Solution to the VM's "loadable library and perl binaries are mismatched" bug when you run "./collider/LBC -x" is to run "cpan -r" and let it update everything.

No downloads available on site?

3,014 California Attorney Leads (Name, Phone #, Website, Years in Practice, Practice Area & Skills)
Price: .009 BTC BTC

https://satoshibox.com/a2e5cki2cvy5m37wnt6egc57

286 New Hampshire Attorney Leads (Name, Phone #, Website, Years in Practice, Practice Area & Skills)
Price: .003 BTC BTC

https://satoshibox.com/fibfyo2eekg4xnyc7dn7hxyz

4,185 Virginia Attorney Leads (Name, Phone #, Website, Years in Practice, Practice Area & Skills)
Price: .012 BTC BTC

https://satoshibox.com/r5syauiy522vgbaod8gpofkj

280,000 Older (50+) Texans Demographic List - Phone, Address, Age, DOB, Ethnic Background, Gender and Religion
Price: .84 BTC BTC

https://satoshibox.com/k4nmnfbgw8crxvoirkqttm3v

I also accept requests for industries and demographics for custom lists, and offers for the list sales to be exclusive.


Please note:

All files are in excel format (XLS) unless otherwise specified.

Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, Bitcoin Cash, Monero, Dash and Dogecoin Accepted on Satoshibox

More to come.

Vouch copies available for Trusted, Long-Term BCT users.

Affiliate sales set to 70% Me / 30% Affiliate.

.014

Sorry, this is what I get for browsing bitcointalk right before bed. Oh well, hopefully someone gets a laugh out of it, or at least a chuckle.

Unrelated to the functions as in not used, yes, but equal in strength is equal in strength. Again, I'm not talking decryption of public->private keys being a be-all solution to cracking wallets, but the level of strength is near or at the same levels, regardless of the protocols used. If you want to talk about ECDSA and cracking chains, let's talk hardwallets, going back to the original topic at hand. It's just as hard as SHA-256 and SHA-512 respectively in ECDSA. If SHA-XX2 were broken, the equality in entropy when using BIP 39 12x and 24x word wallet is therefore breakable as they're the same level of hardness, and would generate the master key and all subkeys for the hardware wallet, and mnemonic wallets. Deterministic wallets are a failure.

As for brute force and similar cracking methods, reducing the amount of space needed to be searched to find a viable wallet is the aim of either attacks. It needn't be an attack against an individual wallet. If security precautions are taken to upgrade bitcoin further in the future, only legacy wallets will have this issue. So long as you're relying on low bit-length codes, in either SHA-XX2 or ECDSA they'll be broken. Next Generation Encryption methods aren't extended at the moment because people see no need. Collisions against cracked private keys shorten the space yet again, yielding a limited space to search for chaincodes. Analysis of transactions narrows this further. People like to quote the "heat death of the universe" as in "hell will freeze over before that" but the reality is that shortening spaces in each case will lead to successful attacks unless the chaincode, too, is extended. And even then, human fallacy comes into play.

If someone breaks SHA-256 they'll be able to break SHA-512 in short order, relatively speaking. The orders of magnitude beyond what's being done right now say it's so. All avenues for modern cracking point to quantum state side channel attacks being the most likely candidates. Deriving a means of bypassing locks isn't what I'm referring to. And since hardware wallets rely on ECDSA for the most part (512 bits in some cases, re: BIP39), breaking SHA-256 definitely does have bearing. Standard cryptographic models aren't going allow it to be broken, but novel ones will. The fact that entropic quantum entanglement and the entanglement measure is an NP-Complete measurement means that no one's been able to look at it, except in novel effects-related efforts. I'm currently looking at electromigration as a candidate for bearing said data as it's related directly to quantum discord. Call it irrelevant if you like, but the security-level for bitcoin is based upon standard models, not taking into account measures that are outside of the boundaries. We've seen that bitcoin blocks can be falsely generated with the initial genesis block, and derive from there. Yes, that's a straw man for now, but that fact doesn't negate the weak foundations. Again, call that irrelevant or also un-prove-able. If I had a working model I'd be sitting in Maui. So, "pics or it didn't happen" all you want, I'll just leave this here so someday when it occurs I can refer back to it.

While I tentatively agree with what you've said, I'll add that if someone breaks SHA-256 or SHA-512 anytime soon, all three. Supposedly we'll see attacks against hardware wallets this year at Defcon or Blackhat. I'd buy a Nano S anyway, but I would keep it in my safety deposit box or safe, or in a highly secure location because it's going to be physical attacks. Someone might've come up with ways to crack mnemonics faster but that's always been an issue for brainwallets and always will be, whether 3, 6, 12, or 24 words. I do like the plausible deniability feature of the Nano S, but it may be pointless if a great attack method comes out at one of the hacking conventions this year.

To flesh it out for him, nothing is stored on your hardware wallet that isn't corresponded with in the blockchain. Your wallet isn't holding your money, it's more like a key to your safety deposit box. You personally can be held hostage for it, and it may be that this year proves that it's physically vulnerable itself. I like the Ledger Nano S over the current alternatives, but if you're looking for long-term cold storage I'd buy more than one and have some very secret hiding place that only the Executor of your Last Will and Testament will have access to.

bump, $550 OBO

Like the title says, selling an Oculus Rift in good condition (light screen scratching, not noticeable during use), well cared for.
With it will be Touch Controllers, the XBox One controller it came with, plus two sensors and their wall / ceiling mounts.

$450 in BTC or LTC, shipped.

Photos to come.

Escrow required.

Sold.

Let's start with the majority of the Parkers, including many vintage, some still in clear case, box or cardboard-backer package
Some of then pens are a more expensive type, some are collectibles for novelty and untouched in boxes, while still others are loose. Gotta love their tape measures, too.



Parker

http://imgur.com/a/QUkm6

Other

http://imgur.com/a/iNj4c


Please excuse the mess if any showed in the photos, I'd been working 70 hours per week until this week, and took the photos on an aged whiteboard covered in printer paper.

No, I am Batman.

thanks!

My advice is that if you're going to use a ramdisk, rent some hardware like a bi-quad Xeon with dual SSD, then make the ramdisk on that. I've done it under proxmox and while it's not as fast as straight-up OS -> ramdisk, VM OS -> ramdisk gives you a lot more versatility than just a normal setup. OVH is good for hardware like that.

nice!

Hi folks, just wanted to say hello and that I'll be around for awhile. I've been a lurker up until this point and I've been following bitcoin for quite awhile.

Cheers!