Washington Capitals 1 @ 0 Anaheim Ducks

New England Patriots 28 @ 35 Atlanta Falcons

How would you know they are worlds ahead in support if you never used my site? Or is that just another preconceived notion you don't feel the need to back up?

You guys are really something. Real intellectuals posting around here, thanks for your insightful inputs that can help my improve my open source code which seeks to support the longterm community.

Didn't you already and copy and paste this in two other places? So you are literally criticizing me for responding to you in each location you copy and paste your insults? That is utterly absurd.

Here is your response again:


I did not program the deposit/withdraw functionality on my site. My code is built on the betcoin poker room source code. So your accusation that I am somehow trying to be underhanded is not only racist but unfounded. If this becomes a large concern for the community I would happily invest the time to change this.

It is clear to me you are not above throwing around accusations before actually investigating the truth.


If you feel there is a way to improve it you are a free to share it, you seem to make the claim you support open source software. For open source software to improve it needs feedback from the community. I have tough skin, I don't mind criticism but vague insults isn't helpful for improving the site.


This isn't true, but that hasn't stopped you from making unfounded statements before so why start now? You can look at the source code yourself, I only manually process moderator withdrawals. It would be much too time consuming to process each withdrawal. I monitor it every so often to make sure nothing fishy is happening but all user withdraws are automatic. If it was slow that was not the fault of my code.


I do not collect withdrawal fees, I don't take a cut from your withdrawal. There are sites that take a portion for the transaction fee and an additional fee on top of that. That is what I mean by no transaction fee, if the community really feels this is unfair wording I will happily change it - I don't really think it would affect new membership rate significantly.


So are you a real lawyer or do you just play one one the internet? I'll take advice from my actual lawyer who I pay money too, because he will be the one in court defending me if it ever comes to that.


They are my smtp server too for full disclosure. There are benefits to this including added security, but you clearly aren't really interested in having a civil discussion you just want to find any shallow thing to support your preconceived notions. You should take note from the philosopher Thoreau, "It's never to late to give up your prejudices."


My code is open is open source, if I was actually doing this you could provide example source code instead of make silly accusations with no support. Also yes I do take small amounts from each transaction, they are the fees which I openly say I take to maintain the code and provide hosting.


Which ones? Care to provide examples? Or do you not really support open source software? Because I'm sure betco.in would be interested in knowing too if this was the case.


This is the only legitimate concern I see, but the reason is I want to separate my personal life from this. And trolls like you and drama like this last weekend only makes me feel confident in that decision.
 


You just appear to be a hateful person trying desperately, grasping at straws, to put any shallow argument together to support your preconceived notions. I really don't have time to waste with this. If you ever actually put together substantial criticism or suggestions which could improve the code for the community please share them but otherwise I'm just going to ignore you from now on. Feel free to email me when you actually want to have a civil and productive discussion.

It was probably made like that to be more intuitive, Ill add something to the help text to make it less confusing when I can.

Was I bragging? I thought my exact words were "To be fair my exchange is currently at 85k volume."

That doesn't read to me as bragging but rather just stating a fact. I thought my writing was pretty clearly neutral in tone. Perhaps you are just mad because I called your reading comprehension skills into question, but this only seems to validate my point.

That argument is extremely shallow. It is the equivalent to judging a site purely on the layout/style rather then the underlying code - it is in general a bad idea.

I do agree that this decision to move away from open source does threaten the future of solid coin. My site though is not tied to the success of SC, our primary currency has been bitcoin and will continue to be. However to be fair my exchange is now up to 85k volume for today so there is still a way to trade.

If you ever come up with some legitimate criticism of my exchange feel free to email me and I will try to resolve it as fast as possible.

I really don't mean to be rude but I believe your comprehension of that statement is faulty. In your first post you seemed to interpret my statement as meaning as absolutely that I believe it was wrong for doublec to have his exchange closed, which is not what I said at all. So when you defended the statement that I didn't make by saying

"doublec had every right to make a closed-source application for his business."

You were in fact arguing a point I never made, which is by definition a strawman argument. I invite you to read this article on the subject if you are interested in the specifics: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man

Now this most recent post seems to argue something completely different, and it still seems to fail to understand my statement. So please let me clarify: Clearly he believes that it possible for closed source software to be functional and successful. To me it reads that he shows no preference long as the software is good. Even though what realsolid is doing is clearly a bad move its not breaking any laws so long as he continues to maintain it I don't understand why someone with that position would care what the licensing of the software is.

Regardless I have no interest in being involved in this discussion unless it is either civil or at the very least results in substantial feedback which I can use to improve the open source project which work on.

I don't think I made the claim that you couldn't I just thought it just appeared to me that the logic didn't pan out. I could have misunderstood.  Not that I believe Realsolid did the right thing (I certainly support open source), it should be noted that under the MIT license he is capable of doing what he did legally, so if it is successful (which I personally believe it won't be) I don't see why it matters if you don't have a preference. Which appears to me to be your new claim, but I may be misunderstanding again.


I do use it, even when I'm traveling and it appears to work without flaw for me. Do you have any substantial criticism that would actually help me improve the project? Because I would appreciate it.


Do you really think having a different tld then what is currently (and it won't be once the DNS servers open up every possible combination) makes my site any less secure? If this is your only real legitimate criticism I feel like I'm doing well.
 

That is what typically happens in civil discussions but I have this suspicion you are not interested in a civil discussion.

I don't see anywhere in my post where  make the claim he did not have this right. So this appears to me to be a strawman argument.


I never made any claim to defend what happen, if anything I explicity said I believe the project should remain open source.

Care to explain why my exchange is pathetic? Feedback is appreciated as our project is open source and always looking to improve.

The exchanges you mentioned are closed source, so you in one breath are praising close sourced applications and demanding he remain open source. I believe the project should be open source (and if the community wishes to keep it around they will maintain it under open source) but it appears to me you have conflicting opinions.

250 SC sent. Not much but hopefully it helps draw enough interest to return this project back to the community who found it interesting and gave it life.

Our volume jumped 8x today to 80K SC.

Our solidcoin exchange will still remain open long as there is interest in trading solidcoins, moonco.in has nor wants involvement in the drama surrounding solidcoin. I simply want to maintain the code for an open source exchange to be used for cryptocurrencies  and provide a reliable and quality service.

If you have any questions or concerns feel free to email me at mrmooncoin@gmail.com

 

I have no desire to get involved in the drama surrounding this (so please leave me out of it), this image is free to use there are no copyright restrictions.

We don't add any additional withdrawal fees as some exchanges do.

The user is making the transaction so it is their fee to pay - I don't feel like I'm being disingenuous in saying no withdrawal fees considering. I don't collect that fee, the network does.

You have no SSL. I are currently sending users passwords via plain-text.  You should take your site down until you can sort that out because you are putting your users security at risk.

Hello,

  I host and maintain an open source solidcoin<->bitcoin exchange ( https://moonco.in/exchange/solidcoin ) and a namecoin <-> bitcoin exchange ( https://moonco.in/exchange/namecoin ).

 We charge a 0.2% fee, have no withdrawal fees (beyond the transaction fee which goes to the network), have an API, a chart, and a live calculator on the trading page.

Edit:

Our solidcoin exchange will still remain open long as there is interest in trading solidcoins, moonco.in has nor wants involvement in the drama surrounding solidcoin. I simply want to maintain the code for an open source exchange to be used for cryptocurrencies  and provide a reliable and quality service.

tl/dr We choose this remain open because the community uses it, not because we have a position one side or the other.

 Any feedback is appreciated, we are an open source project and we require input from the community in order to be successful.

I wasn't talking to you and have no idea why you are spamming this thread and acting like the OP.

His fake japanese name isn't really that appealing, I don't think this coin is going anywhere. Maybe you should consider renaming your character.

Do you think you could add my sc exchange? I noticed you added the other one

http://moonco.in/exchange/api/solidcoin

Great work.