I've been out of the crypto game for a while now, but I still hold all my Murraycoin! I'm amazed at how this coin just keeps on keeping on. Thanks to everyone in the community for all the work you do for the coin, and for making this one of the friendliest, drama free threads I've ever seen for a crypto currency.

Bill would certainly approve
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/03/20/article-2296269-18CD2938000005DC-64_634x426.jpg

No worries B, still buying 

Do you understand the concept of flogging a dead horse? Your straw man arguments are running a bit thin.

• Devs have stated that they would like to keep their concept for "hard to trace" features private until it has been implemented. This is to prevent the idea from being stolen by some random crypto punk (every time I hear your argument for transparency in development this is what comes to mind)
• Comparing development of PGP or OpenSSL to a cryptocurrency? GTFO
• Mindfox never has and never will speak of "true anonymity" through the current implementation of the Bitcoin protocol.

I don't always throw all my eggs in one basket, but when I do, it's because Mindfox promises to deliver his best shot at creating an "anonymous" coin. Hell he's so honest he won't even call it that himself because he know's it's not possible.

PB dumbass go spread FUD about coins that outright lie about being anonymous. If you're so concerned with fighting a war against "bad investments" or dishonest development of said feature. This is the first coin that actually had the balls to come out and say that true anonymity is impossible and the best we can hope for is "very hard to trace". If your gripe is with a coin showing no transparency in their development of something they claim to be anonymous, it surely must lie with coins other than Crypt, as Mindfox has never claimed anonymity. Although I seriously doubt that's where your true issue with Crypt lies. Don't bother responding to this either, as you're now on my blocked list.

knightlife999: Keep up the great work poking holes in these ludicrous claims, I had to throw my 2 crypt in

bholzer . . .

http://global3.memecdn.com/bill-murray-says_o_248530.jpg

How much RAM do you have in your system? When I firs purchased my rig I was told by a friend that I needed more system RAM than I had total GPU RAM. I didn't believe him, but for some reason apparently he's correct and having less system RAM than total GPU RAM can effect hash rate negatively. I run 16GB of System RAM, but another difference we have in our setup that is more obvious is that I'm on Win7 running 13.12 CCC drivers.

Just noticed as well that you're using a miner source from "Benmagro", I'm not sure who that is, but try compiling Lasybears sph-sgminer_x11mod_b2_2min_SICK version, as that is the one I'm still using. If you search near the beginning of this thread I believe there are some instructions for compiling the source on BAMT. Good luck!

No x13 on NV yet as far as I know, check the CC/cudaminer thread. They'll probably be adding it soon enough.


I never tried running more threads as I wanted to see how stable this setup is. Here's a 23 hour run:
http://i152.photobucket.com/albums/s196/nicknrd/Crypto/x11-1438mh-23h.png

3 X 290 tri-x 1080/1500
1 X 7870 OC 1300/1500


*Note, I removed TC from my post because it's irrelevant with X11, however I still have it in my .bat file.

not, x13 is lower.

try 1048576

lol I feel stupid, I've been so concerned with tweaking my 290's that I somehow thought my other card (bought used) was a 7850, when in fact it's a 7870 OC lol. So now it's running at 1300/1500 with intensity 20/raw intensity 1048576  and getting 2.3-35mh/s   This Gigabyte is a beast.

configs shouldn't change all that much between ref and aftermarket boards, only the clocks will. I would check what drivers he's on.

Stock? I'm guessing 3.5-3.7mh/s depending on which 290 you have. Interested to see though

1080/1500 +50 power limit in MSI Afterburner.
[Edit: Actually check that, it was at +0% all night. I just turned it up but didn't have an effect. I'm thinking it could be that because I enabled unofficial overclocking to get the mem speed stable, power limit doesn't matter anymore? Either way, clocks remained 1080/1500 flat lined all night.  I'm really new to AMD cards so I'm still trying to pick up the ins and outs, can an AMD guru chime in please? ]

[Edit-1.5: Answering my own question, I believe power limit doesn't have an effect because it I enabled "unofficial overclocking without power play support" in AB so either I have yet to reach a power limit on these clocks or "UO wo/ PPS" in Afterburner disables it.

[Edit-2: I'm wondering if windows 8.1 could be the difference in the speeds we're seeing, I know that my gaming rig with a 780 in it benefited enormously moving from windows 7 to 8.1 in BF4 but I thought that was just because of dx support and didn't think it would affect mining . . .]

Which OS? Try changing drivers, I found I couldn't get anything stable with good speeds on 14.4 or 14.3 with Windows 7. I'm back to 13.12 drivers now, and working great. Use Display Driver Uninstaller from here http://www.wagnardmobile.com/

After getting the drivers back to 13.12 I tried using multiple threads and it did give me about the same speed as I'm seeing now, but much more variance in current hash speed so I switched back to a single thread and here it is now with the constant 1500mhz mem speed after 12 hours.
http://i152.photobucket.com/albums/s196/nicknrd/Crypto/x11-405mh.png

Settings:

Reject rate is well within acceptable limits, but I'm going to try it with 5 threads for 10+ hours to see if it does in fact lower the amount of rejected shares or give an increase in the overall average speed. Thanks to everyone for sharing their tips for these cards.

I'm running with 1 thread atm and getting the same speed, but rock solid stable speed of 4.029-4.031mh/s so you could try that. Here's what I'm running atm.

Wow thanks for that, it's gotten me up to the 4.05-4.1mh/s level with my 290 tri-x's using my previous config but with 5 threads now instead of 1.

I tried other drivers but 12.13 seems to work best for me on Windows 7. Using the B2_sick version.

My card memory speed keeps jumping around as well, but I do not have any gpu settings in my .conf file. I'll have to give those drivers a shot I guess.
[Edit:gonna try the latest build]

After close to a week of tweaking, I've found some pretty decent settings for my Sapphire 290 tri-x's. The first versions of these miners could not run my cards at their normal oc of 1080/1500, but the latest version seems to work (combined with a little voltage bump). I've had my best luck using --Rawintensity, as it's allowed me to bridge the gap between Intensity 20-21 while staying short of the point where the cards go sick. The other card in the rig is a Gigabyte 7850 that I still haven't really tweaked the intensity completely for, but it's running at 1110/1300 1233mv I believe.

Check this guide for configuring your miners, and working on your OC/DC:
http://www.overclock.net/t/1461916/tutorial-ultimate-guide-to-tweaking-amd-cgminer-3-7-2-kalroth-edition-sgminer-instructions-included-aswell-get-the-most-hash-out-of-your-gpu
As well as this one that has some good info for Rawintensity :
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=466867.0


Some Useful Tips for X11

• TC doesn't seem to to matter, so save your self some time and leave it alone . . . for now
• Make sure to try all worksizes, my 7850 performs best with worksize 64
• When working with raw intensity calculate your values based off of (Shaders*n=Rawintensity) Where n= a whole number, once a good value is found you can tweak it from there.
• My 290's give a higher top speed with more threads (right up to 4.2mh/s with 6 threads) but speed variance and reject rates increase as well. Using a single thread has given me my most stable speeds.

http://i152.photobucket.com/albums/s196/nicknrd/Crypto/da8503f7-11d3-4f0d-bb4f-fdab926dfd3a.png

I hope this helps some of you 290 owners, they can be a bit  . . . odd.

Thanks to Lasybear and Remember remember the 5th of November, I've been following this since the Girino release and now that I've found some stable settings I'm happy to send you guys a donation. It's not a lot but it's the least I could do. I'm looking forward to seeing what this new version of sgminer can bring to the table with all these additions being brought in to one source.

Remember folks, if the miners works for you please donate to these guys to say thank you for their work.

[Edit: added second guide]
[Edit: shaders should be 2560 for the 290, Doh!]

Thanks for your work Lasybear(Edit: and thanks RRT5ON as well!), I can't help with compiling to test it atm but I'm sure there will be a few along soon enough. What have you changed in this version? Is it just a change to the intensity limit?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the difference between this miner and the 2% fee one is that this is built on sph-sgminer and the 2%fee version is built on sgminer 4.1 is it not?

Thanks for the tip, which version are you running, the one compiled by RRT5ON? Also what clocks do you have set on your 290 Tri-x? And finally which drivers please