Hi, How do i know if wallet is mining ive followed instructions to activate and turned on automine on start
but haven't received anything all day. i understand it could take longer but i cant actually see anything that indicate the process is happening at all?
sorry question is a bit basic, however any help or support would be very much appreciated.
Thanks
What CPU are you mining with? It actually can take several days to hit as block solo mining. But as mrankin already posted, use getmininginfo command to see your hashrate.
At current price 1 block is less than 0.3$. For several days! 100 watts per day is about 0.3$ I mined with 270-280 Watts per Server (including cooling) with hashrate about 40 000. 1-2 blocks per server per day. CryptoBridge still shows some movements. Most probably direct selling to buy orders. Of course buyer and seller can be the same person with different registrations. Over 90% of my servers are turned off due to no profitable CPU mineable currency at the moment. For me profitable means any currency with > 1.5xCosts.
If your servers are off and not doing anything else you should sell them and consolidate the money for a more powerful server that is more energy efficient. Even with the price dip my rig is still profitable. Though I'm not mining CPU coins for quick turn around.
That's why the rebrand would be good option for preventing such confusion.
Well, let's say we've made a rebrand. A week later (conditionally) a coin with the same (already new) name appeared. What then? Rebrand again? I believe that we only need a good marketing campaign.
It just seems like a problem when no one even has control over the original post to change the bounty link which points to old websites. Stuff like that is just crazy. If you don't want to re-brand at least try to re-announce the thing when your new wallet is up and toss in some marketing. Give the coin a good strong push.
Thanks for the heads up, we have obviously missed that. I'll get Loremipsum to update that thread to get all links etc. corrected.
I apologize about that. I stated this issue in an earlier post and since there was no response or action I figured it was ignored due to lack of control of the post.
That's why the rebrand would be good option for preventing such confusion.
Well, let's say we've made a rebrand. A week later (conditionally) a coin with the same (already new) name appeared. What then? Rebrand again? I believe that we only need a good marketing campaign.
It just seems like a problem when no one even has control over the original post to change the bounty link which points to old websites. Stuff like that is just crazy. If you don't want to re-brand at least try to re-announce the thing when your new wallet is up and toss in some marketing. Give the coin a good strong push.
Post
Topic
BoardMeta
Account Issues
by
NetZero
on 13/03/2018, 01:37:05 UTC
Where do I go to get support on account issues? Had to create a new username to try to find out how to do this.
The registration says the e-mail is in use however I cannot recover the password for it saying the account was never activated. I'm not sure what caused it to happen but I haven't used the account in a few years.
We are up to 11 votes now with a very small lead for the rebrand.
I'd even dispute the lead for the rebrand. Yes is always the first option, so there is positional bias.
right now 13 votes ,7 vote yes ,6 vote no , the numbers most are equal ,so keep doing nothing is the best option
in my opinion no need to rebrand, because this is to early for crds,, maybe need a better promotions and marketing strategy on it also being listed on another exchange will be a good idea for crds
Agreed. CRDS needs to get out there. Can we get some updated signatures? I'd love to use one.
We are up to 11 votes now with a very small lead for the rebrand.
I'd even dispute the lead for the rebrand. Yes is always the first option, so there is positional bias.
right now 13 votes ,7 vote yes ,6 vote no , the numbers most are equal ,so keep doing nothing is the best option
in my opinion no need to rebrand, because this is to early for crds,, maybe need a better promotions and marketing strategy on it also being listed on another exchange will be a good idea for crds
Agreed. CRDS needs to get out there. Can we get some updated signatures? I'd love to use one.
Coin has a good name, algo, simple feature set and roadmap. Wallet interface is nice and clean.
I'd like to see more updates on how the roadmap and marketing are progressing. Do these conversations take place outside of the ANN thread?
Name is good, but those new Credits (CS) stole it and hyped their ICO. So I'm wondering if rebranding would be a good idea. For discussion join discord channel, people are very active there.
Rebrand would be good for CRDS. Look Nano and Neo. Both had names which was not very attractive. I think the name credits is not enough, in addition its been hijacked . It would be nice to rebrand in accordance with new wallet release.
I would agree, I think a rebranding would be the way to go, I think there should be a new poll to find out if the majority of the community support it
Rebranding could also reduce the confusion between the old and the new website and also confusion between old and new github.
This is crucial. Now there are confusion between old and new credits fork as well as confusion between credits coin and credits token. The purpose of marketing is make people remember the brand clearly. The name 'credits' is just not enough than the potential credits has.l
I agree with this as well however I believe some publicity on this could balance things out. Ah heck maybe changing the name and re-announcing might be for the best. I was looking at the signatures on the bounties thread and saw the incorrect websites linked. Just seems like quite a bit of confusion with CRDS. Maybe just change the name and keep the logo and designs?