RIP

and thanks for all the entertainment and good memories you provided in wrestling.

You will be badly missed.

I did not want to send you an smerit to ruin your merit record, then I just said to lil selfie:  "Fuck it... .. who gives a shit about numerology?"

Yeah but used the word digital assets, Bitcoin is part anyways:
Sec. 4c ii
I have a little problem understanding fully the part I bold with the way it’s being used in the statement [/b]

Had similar  post here

I guess it depends on the definition: I'd say owning Bitcoin means owning owning your keys. Considering there are only 53,218,057 funded Bitcoin addresses (based on yesterday's data), and considering many Bitcoin owners have more than one funded address, there are far less than 50 million Bitcoin owners worldwide.
On the other hand, if I use a broker to buy shares of a certain company, I can say I own shares of that company. So I guess (by now) it's okay to say you own Bitcoin when you "have" some on an exchange or ETF. By that definition, 1 in 6 or 7 sounds plausible.

Our whole existence sometimes appears "magical".
Disregarding the fact that our realm is just one of 10^500 theoretically possible and focusing on Earth.

The more we look at it, it appears more and more special and not average.
Facts:
1. Earth maintained it's surface temperature in a narrow range over 4 billion years despite Sun's luminosity increasing 20-30% over this time frame.
2. There is no other known planet that has tectonic plate movements. Well, we could not study it yet anywhere else, but in our solar system it is the case.
3. Earth was formed by a rare (or very rare) collision of two bodies with a similar mass, causing evaporation of all initial water and ejection of a lot of material into space where it formed an unusually large and close-by satellite, causing tides (which were tremendous initially). Whatever water is on Earth right now was brought in by comets and asteroids, apparently. Therefore, it is entirely possible that almost all earth size and larger planets are covered with water-they could all be waterworlds. It is also entirely possible that tectonic plates movement was initiated by that initial collision. Some scientists suggest that evolution "needs' tectonic plate movements to produce variations in the climate, which possibly speeds up evolution.
4. Earth is on a roughly circular orbit around the galaxy, minimizing disturbances. Earth is also on a stable orbit around a relatively stable star.
5. Among more than 5000 studied star systems, they did not find a single planet that was within 10% of the Earth mass in a "goldilocks zone" around the G or K type star. Kepler 186F is 10% larger, but belongs to a red dwarf and, therefore, is tidally locked to that star making it less hospital to life (one side is likely burning while another is frozen) plus it receives just 1/3 or the energy in comparison to Earth. Planets larger than earth might be waterworlds or mini-Neptunes. Kepler 1649c is also a larger planet and also tidally linked to its red dwarf star. Trappist-1e-is probably our best "shot", despite it being tidally locked. Alas, no atmosphere there has been detected.
https://www.space.com/30172-six-most-earth-like-alien-planets.html

It's a 'survivor' bias, of course, but if civilizations were common, we would have been colonized long time ago and would probably never developed into our current state.
Either that or prior civilizations "evaporated" into other realms (of pure thought or virtual reality?) and don't bother with the current state of matters in the Universe.

From the conclusions:

that headline definitely caught me too and the quote is gold. It's oddly reassuring to hear someone as credible as Gutmann cut through the hype with such bluntness. Quantum computing still feels like a buzzword minefield, so it’s nice to see a grounded take. Makes me wonder how much of the PQC rush is real urgency, just future proofing theater.

From $0 to $100,000 was the hardest part, futeremore from $100,000 to $1,000,000 BTC will be achieved faster that you think.

Well, expensive relative to worthless fiat? Or expensive relative to the entertainment value you derive from them? I have expensive chores... relative to the joy I gain from them (almost negative!).

Each bush splits in twos
Many trees, all paths hidden. 
The smoker is lost.

You're probably aware that there was a recent, what they call, "colossal eruption" on the Sun - I wonder if you have any footage of that? One picture from the article shows a "canyon of fire" as long as 250,000 miles - it looks unreal...

Welcome to the Jungle....



GO BITCOIN

You're probably aware that there was a recent, what they call, "colossal eruption" on the Sun - I wonder if you have any footage of that? One picture from the article shows a "canyon of fire" as long as 250,000 miles - it looks unreal...

By the way, I can confirm that a very aggressive email campaign is underway for all those whose data was leaked in the Ledger leak.

This can come from anywhere. Why tag a country? Why tagging Nigerian? Scams are everywhere, and the most sophisticated ones are from more advanced countries.

Didn't  get any source for China other than they've been secretly selling jaut as you've mentioned, they don't announce like US either https://www.theblock.co/post/350955
At the end, we just have to assume they do truly  have the 190kBtc  and for US to beat that they will be needing atleast 170k+ btc , doesn’t matter if their rivals already sold yet, if they did trully did sold  then China on the other hand,needs 190k+ to catchup ( just that it might not bee annouced once again ). Another speculation  could be that  they have more than that figure ....

Found a sauce :
https://www.theblock.co/post/363034/

I can’t say that I like this development, but if the United States is indeed sitting on way less Bitcoin than we thought, isn’t that somewhat bullish? The President has been saying over and over again in speeches that he wants the United States to lead. Right now we definitely aren’t leading China. Only one thing to do…