The ethos you live by.

---

---

do you want to explicitly deny you are alts or are you willing to admit that you are a fraud?



Surely this should be very easy for Quickseller to dispel this by simply denying that they are alts. However he has failed to do this. Why do you think Quickseller would not quickly deny that they are alts?


I am interested for Quickseller to more specifically address this. Are you going to explicitly deny? Or is there truth to you being alts?


I would like to see Quickseller deny the connection before I comment on this


Do you explicitly deny the allegations?


If he is online and he isn't actually an alt then the least he can do is deny the charges against him.


I just want to see if you admit it (which I know you won't), or deny it, which you probably won't either because you are going to "exercise your right to remain silent"


since the OP is refusing to deny the fact PrimeNumber7 is not controlled/owned by him.

HAHAhahahahahaha. Whaaaaatt?

You were banned for plagiarizing! You defend Ratimov the proven plagiarizer because he leaves you positive trust! You question other users morals when your morals are bought with a positive trust rating? HAHAhahaha scumbag.

Admits to using trust 30 times just for pathetic insults. What a stupid child. Remove from DT now.


Then you do not trust the judgements of yourself who spreads false information on trust walls about people being raped. Remove from DT now.


You made money by plagiarizing. Proofs - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5297144. Very corrupt thing to do. Leaving fake red trust for being called out about it is even more corrupt. Remove from DT now.


It is not 2012, no one cares what you think any more. You are old has been.

By plagiarizing.


30 hours to put a topic written by a different person in to Google translate? HAHAHAHahaha.


Keep going abusing trust, idiot. Writing about rape and pissing on people on trust. Nothing to do with trade risk. You sound like a brat child. You lost signature payment for your trust abuse and plagiarize. Next you lose DT position.

Bumping to show more trust abuse

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5297144.msg56465521#msg56465521
fxpc made post with direct quote from Ratimov bragging about making money from being a plagiarizer. Ratimov then leaves this trust feedback


Trust abuse. Ratimov earns money from forum from being a plagiarizer. That is a fact. Even if you think plagiarizing is not corrupt, this feedback has nothing to do with trading risk. It is more trust abuse.

I will update list in first post that you can copy and paste to exclude Ratimov and everyone who includes this abuser.

lovesmayfamilis defends his abusing friend.

STILL WAITING. Maybe lovesmayfamilis can show that Ratimov it not useless pile of shit plagiarizer.

Also look my thread about Ratimov and trust abusing
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5303363.0

Proves my point he has not made single good post which he wrote. All his merit are from stolen work. Scum.


So exclude this trust abuser.


I have updated first post to remove the names of the people who have removed Ratimov. All the others should still be excluded until they stop supporting trust abusers.

Leaving ratings like whiner, dumb hysterical bitch, stupid idiot, fuckhead, raped, bash your head in, piss on your head, is abuse. If you think that is not trust abuse, then you are stupid. Death threats are also against forum rules.

Trust is for trading risk, not for name calling and death threats. If Ratimov can't control his anger, then he shouldn't be DT1. Simple.

Even more reason to ~Ratimov. Shit way to use trust.


Left in trust ratings. See my first post where he leaves feedback about "bashing your head in".


Did you even read the thread in Meta board? That is what he does -- he takes article in Russian, puts it in Google translate, and then posts in English as if it is his own work.

Profile of this abuser -- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2627711

The only people who defend and say it is not plagiarizing are people he includes on his trust list/has left positive trust to/regularly showers with merits. Everyone objective says it is plagiarizing. Still don't know why mods don't ban.

Retaliatory feedback is wrong, doesn't matter if feedback you have been left is correct or not. Calling people names in feedback with no reference is worse. Death threats in feedback is against rules and he should be banned.

Negative trust for plagiarizing is different topic, but if you are happy to steal intellectual property then you are also happy to steal physical property.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5297144

Every post he makes which is longer than 2 lines is plagiarized, except the ones where he defends his plagiarizing or calls other people names like a kid.


So you trust him when you do not even read his trust ratings? Bad bad bad.

Because of this --


Even if we pretend he isn't a huge plagiarizer, using the trust system as weapon to punish someone who disagrees with you (with no references!) is not correct. Using the trust system to issue death threats is not correct.

Thank you for standing up and not wanting the trust system to turn in to kindergarten name calling. My newbie accounts means I can only send 2 PMs a day, so topic is most useful. Will also remind others not to add this plagiarizing name calling child who should be banned to their trust list.

Everyone knows Ratimov is a huge plagiarizer and shit poster, but the staff don't ban him (not sure why). We all know he has not made a single good post that isn't plagiarized.

Still waiting...

But he is also a massive trust abuser. Why is he on DT? Just look some of his feedback. These are all just from the last two months only! (Russian ones transalted to English using automatic translation. Ratimov knows how this works well! Hahahaha.)

Pathetic insults. No reference for any of these. He is using negative trust as a weapon, to punish someone he does not like. Totally wrong use of trust system. Very childish.

But here is the best! Look.

Talking about rape, about his mother, death threats (head bashed in), being pissed on, and more. This use of trust system would be absolutely wrong from a newbie. But from a DT1 on ChipMixer campaign!!!???

If you trust Ratimov, then you are helping to turn trust system in to a stupid joke where we just insult people. Here are uses who add Ratimov to trust network. Everyone should ~Ratimov and everyone should ~all these users until they remove this plagiarizing abuser. Here is easy to paste list.


Does DarkStar know he is paying for plagiarism and death threats?

Just use Google translate and you can join ChipMixer LOL!

Ratimov is DT1 and merit source.
Ratimov adds witcher_sense to trust list, leaves positive rating.
Ratimov adds lovesmayfamilis to trust list, leaves positive rating.
These users used to report plagiarism. Now they defend it for selfish reasons.

Shameful.

---

---

Hahaha, what bullshit. You save them the time of copying and pasting an article in to Google translate, because you already did it for them? And then added a sentence lying about how you wrote it? Shameful excuse.


What tips? Stop fucking plagiarizing? Hahaha.

---

---

Still waiting for links to knowledgeable posts Ratimov has made which aren't copy paste. Why does no one reply?

It has been pointed out before that he is plagiarizing, and he has continued to plagiarize, so I am not holding my breath that he has "learned" anything.

---

---

Knowledgeable? Ha! Can you link to a single knowledgeable post he has made which is original and not a copy paste of someone else's work?

Feel annoying? You mean like creating dozens of useless spam threads filled with useless statistics no one cares about? You and Ratimov aren't that different; not a single original thought between you.

---

---

You both say that you are "impressed" by him? Impressed by what exactly? His ability to copy and paste? His posts could be made by a bot, and a very simple one at that.

---

---

This is a good summary. Add posting endless lists of stats to your list of things that require zero knowledge but for some reason keep getting awarded with merits.

So your argument is "This is not plagiarism because I used a comma". This is utterly deplorable. This is worse than newbies who claim ignorance of the rules. They are simply calling themselves stupid for not reading the rules; here you are implying the entire forum is stupid for thinking we will all believe such a pitiful excuse.

This is plagiarism, period.

I have assembled a few quotes from theymos. Bold added by me throughout. Italics present in originals.



I cannot think of how one could show the "intent of passing work off as one's own" any more than an opening sentence like this.

---

---

The path forward is decided then. Submitting a Google translated article in its entirety, even with a link at the bottom would get you expelled from a university, no questions asked.

---

---

---

---

This is eye opening. Thinking that 90% of content here is plagiarized speaks volumes to his character, is at odds with the purpose of the forum, and is a truly pathetic excuse.

>Ratimov takes article in Russian
>Uses Google translate on whole article
>Posts in English
>Passes off as own work ("In this article I would like to touch upon")
>??
>Profit from Chipmixer payment

Question 1. Why not banned?
Question 2. How selected by Chipmixer when he just CTRL C / CTRL V?

>Vispilio
>Thoughts on ChipMixer


>Also Vispilio
>Paaayyyy mmmmeeeeeeeeee - I promise I will be a good boy!