Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 65 results by Thumper650
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
Thumper650
on 24/01/2014, 03:49:15 UTC
No need for that mate.  So when will you be paying back this money then?

Fanny, when will you be stfu then, mate?
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
Thumper650
on 24/01/2014, 01:20:18 UTC
...
You promised that you put me on ignore.  Another lie.
I wouldn't trust Ken if he told me the sun was going to come up tomorrow, but sure, get him to publicly vouch for you, i'm waiting Smiley
I said i was about to start putting a bunch of people on ignore.
But since you want me to put you on ignore then fine I will put you on ignore as soon as i post this msg

I take it Ken won't vouch for you then?  And another lie Smiley

Active Mining supporters are that embarrassing friend that "sticks up for you."  Telling him to fuqoff is cruel, but enduring him is pretty unbearable too.
I know I shouldn't, but at times I feel sorry for Ken.

So much fail in this thread Undecided

Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
Thumper650
on 24/01/2014, 01:02:34 UTC
This will be the final time I ever reply to you crumbs.

You think you are so fucking clever.  Those quotes were far from unintentional slips but quite deliberate.  Reference the specific language intentionally spoon feeding those who like to play Clouseau. Unlike yourself, I have no need or desire to waste my life in the Newbies Section and hide behind proxys and create new email addresses every other day.  That process must be as much a pain in the arse as you are.  What a sad, sad existence you lead.  You even stalk people on IRC and then come running back In here to post random sections of dialogue with no relevance whatsoever and add smileys.  I mean what the fuck is that all about, lol?

It's the reCAPTCHA button your press over and over on webchat.freenode.net and that was the pun you imbecile.  Just get a life and stop being such a loser, you were even trying to correct someone's spelling today and insult them on their grammar.  

There, that's off my chest and I feel much better.  I will immediately place crumbs on ignore now and promise to never unignore him or take his bait ever again.  Smiley





My hats off to you Zum I feel the same way about Thumper A.K.A Crumbs
I am so sick and tired of all the Trolls and naysayers on this thread that i am about to start putting massive amounts of people on ignore here shortly

Egads.  And then it starts agreeing with itself...  And patting itself on its back...  Eewww~!
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
Thumper650
on 24/01/2014, 00:16:50 UTC
...
Kindly address myself as me and not 'you guys' and do not confuse me with anyone else on this thread...

ORLY? Cheesy Cheesy

...
Any chance the reCAPTCHA can be made accessible for humans? What a joke!

#ActiveMining

Don't do what I did though. My God, the reCAPTCHA is unbelievably hard if you are a human!  Good luck buddie.

*The word you were looking for is "captcha," "Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart" Smiley
Fail!

Of course, you're also a bunch of other accounts, but I'll start with the obvious.

BTW, do you prefer fannybaws, zumzero or???
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
Thumper650
on 23/01/2014, 22:51:59 UTC
Utter nonsense, groundless and baseless speculation - ironically more 'Unicorn' in nature  than the facts you decry on this thread.

Give it up, Stewie.  Compare what you were promised just a week ago to what you have been promised yesterday, and have a good cry.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
Thumper650
on 23/01/2014, 22:47:15 UTC
errrr nice try but none of that has been invalidated.

The chip is simply late. Those chip spec details are either correct or will be improved upon with a full custom redesign.

It hasn't? The full-custom chip Ken a couple of guys Ken hired are supposedly developing is going to use those specs?
I'll answer that for you: no.
Edit:  If the full-custom 28nm is indeed going to be no better than the abborted FPGA copy, the two stealth guys Ken hired are worth exactly as much as their 55nm IP: nothing.

Ken will likely give you a "weekly update" at the end of Q2 to the tune of "we decided to buy a stealth startup with highly valuable IP - all vacuum tube hashing cores!
The chassis are taped out with masking tape, and will be ready Q4.  We also wrote Intellihash that runs on Intellihash, so you can get moar while you get moar!"

You have to be pretty deluded to still take Ken's "weekly updates" seriously.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
Thumper650
on 23/01/2014, 22:35:36 UTC
Are they going to be cheap though? You have no idea. You guys make estimates on the most vague Ideas.

OK so here are the vague ideas you mention:

we purchased the IP which we will also use in our custom 28 nm.  UMC is the FAB for the 55 nm.

11mm x 11m package, 1.9 GH/s, 2.5 Watts.

2.5W per chip or 1.315789474W/GH


we have a 10.488 TH/s unit with the 55 nm chips.  We will also have bulk sales of our 55 nm chip soon.

the 55 nm is a full custom chip.

Will Intellihash be an added bonus to the 1.9GH/s chip or is that already factored in?

No, Intellihash will be a bonus.


We now have 2 Engineers in San Jose and a Project Manager working very closely with eASIC to make sure the project is completed the the shortest time possible.

a lot more customers have $1,000 or $2,000 for a machine than $10,000 for a machine.

RE: our energy cost-

How about 0.017 $/kWh  

New Release-
Quote from: kslaughter
Delivery of chips is expected in Q2/2014.  Also, AMC will use the same design team and code which successfully taped out the 55 nm on AMC's eASIC's 28 nm.  EASIC's 28 nm development has been upgraded to a full custom 28 nm.

Active Mining is in one of the best positions to take advantage of the Bitcoin network.  Once we have our chips and boards in production this year we will be one of only two companies in the world which manufactures Bitcoin mining hardware and also mines.  With this combination we have unlimited availability to bitcoin mining hardware only limited by our resources.  

So......are we all reading the same forum??

It seems there are limitless numbers of people on here who don't listen to a single word the CEO says. Is that sensible or reasonable? You all invested in this CEO but now you think everything he says is nonsense??! My earlier workout is firmly based around Kens statements. It's based around an average BTC price of 5k USD over 2014. It's all quite conservative in my view. I appreciate not everyone will agree but I don't understand why you all need to get so worked up about my detailed forecast. Why don't some of you create your own forcasts instead of just stamping all over mine offering no counter argument other than - 'you are a cheerleader'. It's a bit pathetic guys.



That's because the same CEO, in the first post of this thread (edited on January 14 lol) was feeding you a totally different load of crap:
Our chips in development
Generation 1: Fast-Hash. 28nm. Each chip's rated frequency is 800 MHz at 1.15V. It translates to 16,000 MH/s because it does 20 hashes per cycle. Chip requires proper handling of heat and power supply. It is expected the chip can be overclocked to 1000 MHz @ 20,000 MH/s

So Science!
Much Precise!
Wow.
Why should anyone still bother listening to that tripe?
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
Thumper650
on 23/01/2014, 21:43:59 UTC
On another note anyone haveing a problem viewing CT's site

Have U spelted it rite?


since all you do is troll your are on ignore
( in a indian accent ) Please don't come again

d00d, I sincerely Tried to help  you Can't finish a Sentence Without botching It, so check ur spellinks to maek CT Show up in You're Browser
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
Thumper650
on 23/01/2014, 13:26:24 UTC
...
I imagine that Ken only wants the companies BTC back plus possibly legal expenses which would make sense.

The rest of the coin will barely cover the legal expenses.  Slaughter Law Belize charges serious coin.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
Thumper650
on 23/01/2014, 13:09:58 UTC
Interesting how many here defend Ukyo who stole money from the company. I wonder at your motives.

The game mechanics are the same as for the kids defending Ken Slaughter.  Ken promised you the moon, took everyone's coin, and lied to you from that point on.
And yet this thread is chock full of Ken defenders.  What are *your* motives?

It's not surprising that the thread topic has become "Rage at a Bigger Shit Than Ken".  This behavior is a common coping technique among apes.
When a well-adjusted ape is attacked, he attempts to redirect the attackers toward a weaker, more vulnerable ape.
The technique is proving quite successful here.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
Thumper650
on 22/01/2014, 19:22:14 UTC
[14:16] That is the point... ActM is a mining company whose intention is to add hashing power through the production of its own miners. If the CEO of that company says "we will be adding...", then it only makes sense to assume he is talking about the miners the compnay is producing.
[14:16] Of course people speculated that, what else would they speculate it was?
[14:17] I'm not going to argue with you on what shareholders expected
[14:17] I'm simply saying it was never said
[14:17] and was just assumed

Lol
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
Thumper650
on 22/01/2014, 15:08:30 UTC
Is everyone too lazy to look up a cached version of BF to find a shareholder with 232,000 shares in the asset list then?

Who cares?  Ken put up a bunch of shares on Crypto-Trade.  Shares are shares.  Yours are no different from Ukyo's.  If push comes to shove, Ken could claim the shares are his.  Until he explicitly states that the shares are Ukyo's, this is just more diversionary muppetry.

the question is why the sell price is at0.01,why not 0.005?0.004?

Why not?  No one would buy @.004 either, and .01 looks more impressive.  And shows Ukyo that Ken's Serious Bizniz.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Active Mining, An Historical Perspective
by
Thumper650
on 22/01/2014, 13:58:51 UTC
Active Mining, An Historical Perspective

Part The I, or How VMC Came To Be.

A long, long time ago, in a magical land called Missouri, lived a man of God named Ken.
Every evening Ken poured himself a jelly jar of Gordon's Gin and prayed:
"I try and try, God, but my best plans turn to fail and aids.  Thanks for nothing!"

And so he lived, until one night the jelly jar slipped from his hand, rolled, shattered, the air in the room shook, shuddered, shimmered, and *POOF!* - OMG, a magical faery!

"OHAI!" said the faery.  "How's all that drinkin' and prayin' working 4 U?"
"Piss off" mumbled Ken.
"Language!  The name's IPO, and I'm here to help.  Tomorrow night, pour off three fingers of Gordon's, drink the rest, log onto Bitcointalk, and tell the bitpeasants there just what you saw.  Don't forget to mention my name."
"Which is?"
"IPO. IPO IPO IPO IPO!  Remember my magical name, FFS!  If you can spell it, you'll be rich!"
And *POOF!* the faery was gone.

___STAY TUNED FOR PART THE II___
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
Thumper650
on 22/01/2014, 13:55:47 UTC
We are selling Ukyo shares on Crypto-Trade to recover our losses on Bitfunder.

We will start moving Investors shares to Crypto-Trade within the next 7 days.
is it legal to sell the shareholder's asset??

Popcorn shares are skyrocketing.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
Thumper650
on 21/01/2014, 15:32:37 UTC
...
Gut feeling however agrees that you cannot merely say 'products shipped' when everyone is expecting miners to ship. I don't think we even knew about other product types did we?
...

...
Ken never claimed that he shipped miners.  He said that he shipped "products."  This was interpreted as "miners" by zum & Stu, and as "toilet paper" by the rest of us.
Why lie when folks like Stu are around?
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [BitFunder] Moving Forward/Resolution Process
by
Thumper650
on 21/01/2014, 14:38:10 UTC
I like to asking other's opinions about involving legal action to against UKYO?? because I am considering to sue UKYO..... 

... i spoke with persons that know what happened ...


May I ask who these people are?
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
Thumper650
on 21/01/2014, 14:34:02 UTC
You registered 11 days ago. Where are you from?

I ran some text analytics on his posts.  He's Canadian, most likely VE.  I wouldn't trust him.

Oh you, Thumper the gloater is here still. You like nothing better to do than shit on others in a hard place.

Seriously get a life and get lost.

Gloating about spotting Active Miner for a scam?  Absurd.  I'd sooner gloat about not diving into empty pools, or being able to recite the alphabet.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
Thumper650
on 21/01/2014, 14:07:42 UTC
You registered 11 days ago. Where are you from?

I ran some text analytics on his posts.  He's Canadian, most likely VE.  I wouldn't trust him.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
Thumper650
on 21/01/2014, 00:58:35 UTC

The CEO is not allowed to mislead shareholders or buyers. The law is very strict on this.



I agree with the law. However I disagree that he has intentionally misled anyone. The language he used is very clear and concise. He said we had shipped 'products'. He did not say we had shipped miners!
...

ROFL Cheesy

Didn't crumbs say exactly the same thing?  Back then the shrewd financiers of this thread called it FUD, now they're using the same words to save face.
And, to keep the lulz coming, Bargraphics tells everyone that he got good feels from Ken.  Almost as good as he got from the Terrahash kids.

How To Invest Like A Pro, by Bargraphics:

1.  Give all of your money to a guy on the internet.
2.  After half a year goes by, everything turns to shit, and there is no chance left to unload your shrewd investment, find out what you invested in with a personal visit.
3.  ? ? ?
4.  Profit!
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [BitFunder] Moving Forward/Resolution Process
by
Thumper650
on 17/01/2014, 03:39:54 UTC
...This has been working for 2 months now and just continues to roll on.

Got to give credit where credit's due.  The guy knows his crowd and his endgame is awesome to watch.