If I had a sponsor, the project would already be working and you wouldn't have to persuade everyone to follow you to move the price, the project would do it for you. Your efforts to convince everyone of the correctness of your idea are in vain, since not everyone believes in God, most believe in the golden calf, and not in the mission.

Unfortunately, I'm not a programmer, I'm looking for programmers who can bring this complex project to life. If you understand how to implement this idea, you are welcome, I accept any help in cooperation. I was offered a team of programmers to implement this project, but the first question they were interested in was not how it works and what to do it for, but what my budget is. I understand that any work must be paid for and if someone paid me for my development, which I have been doing for many years, I would be able to pay the cost of the programmers' work. I also offered programmers joint participation in the development of the project, as a result of which, after its implementation, they would earn much more than their costs, but everyone is interested in income here and now.

Something we have gone in the direction of a decentralized network, although your previous question was

At first glance, it seems logical, but if you drop deeper, it turns out that the bulk of all bitcoins are in the hands of a very narrow circle of people who manage volatility and increase their share even more with the help of manipulation. To counter this, there is currently no insurance, so banks do not lend for fear of losing their assets. In my project, this insurance is available for banks.

[/b]

A crypto bank is a network of individual smart contracts, united by a common control over the emission of bond tokens, managed jointly by all owners of the ETH deposit and by no one in particular. Anyone who has placed financial assets in a deposit at their address in a smart contract can become a co-owner of a crypto bank.

I don't understand you at all, can a system be decentralized if its control is carried out by anonymous people, who, according to you, are regularly randomized? In my opinion, this is pseudo decentralization.
The project completely lacks any regulator. The main advantage of the project is that the owners of ETH manage their financial assets without transferring them on their own to anything other than their addresses connected to the smart contract, or only for the necessary initial connection, and also if they only need bond tokens.

Placed ETH in the depository cannot be stolen from the addresses of the owners connected to the smart contract, as it is blocked, which provides additional insurance for invested funds.

A crypto bank is a network of individual smart contracts, united by a common control over the emission of bond tokens, managed jointly by all owners of the ETH deposit and by no one in particular. Anyone who has placed financial assets in a deposit at their address in a smart contract can become a co-owner of a crypto bank.

[/quote]
If you explain why it is necessary to centralize a decentralized bank, then I will try to answer. If you think that your anonymity is at risk in this bank, then it seems to me that everyone is responsible for the anonymity of their wallet address, there is no verification in this bank.
[/quote]

I mean those who control a decentralized system should be anonymous, or their privacy should be well protected otherwise a bad actor who wants to centralize the system could easily hunt them down and get them to surrender control & do whatever he wants them to do. I developed a project that not only anonymize participants but regularly randomize them to make such takeover almost impossible, yet the participants can be punished when they try to hurt the system while being anonymous.
Anonymity needs to be guaranteed to participants to prevent a takeover and centralization a decentralized system.

[/quote]
I don't understand you at all, can a system be decentralized if its control is carried out by anonymous people, who, according to you, are regularly randomized? In my opinion, this is pseudo decentralization.
The project completely lacks any regulator. The main advantage of the project is that the owners of ETH manage their financial assets without transferring them on their own to anything other than their addresses connected to the smart contract, or only for the necessary initial connection, and also if they only need bond tokens.

Placed ETH in the depository cannot be stolen from the addresses of the owners connected to the smart contract, as it is blocked, which provides additional insurance for invested funds.

A crypto bank is a network of individual smart contracts, united by a common control over the emission of bond tokens, managed jointly by all owners of the ETH deposit and by no one in particular. Anyone who has placed financial assets in a deposit at their address in a smart contract can become a co-owner of a crypto bank.

If you explain why it is necessary to centralize a decentralized bank, then I will try to answer. If you think that your anonymity is at risk in this bank, then it seems to me that everyone is responsible for the anonymity of their wallet address, there is no verification in this bank.

This project just meets your desire. This bank allows you not only to accumulate your assets, but also gives you the opportunity to earn by helping others open their accounts (cells) and do the same, which leads to an increase in the total deposit, which affects your income percentages.

You are right about the keyword (littered), and the difference is that none of them meets the requirements for the liquidity of the security of your investments. This project solves these problems.

Название не принципиально это рабочее придумайте что ни будь другое подходящее и увековечите свою принадлежность к будущим финансам. Я даже особо отмечу ваш вклад в создании децентрализованных стабилкойнов.

You obviously associate your software with a safe deposit box. But here's the trouble: you, like a bank cell, have a master who can open or close your data as easily and simply as in life, so my advice to you is to go into decentralization.

The situation is as follows -
There is a smart contract with parameters
if ether is sent to his address in contact, he blocks it at the address in the smart contract, and in response to the address from which the ether came, he sends tokens that he generated. The ether will become available when the tokens return to the contract.
Question? Can the address in the smart contract be duplicated with the wallet address.

You are absolutely right, all financial developments in the field of cryptocurrency are focused on the Fiat system. Everyone is trying to repeat it in a decentralized version, not realizing that it is simply impossible for them to have a different nature of existence. Fiat cannot exist without management, and decentralized finance is inherently unmanaged by anyone in particular and no public consensus will solve this problem. If you cross a hedgehog and a hedgehog, you understand what happens in the end.
I have proposed an alternative solution for the development of decentralized finance, which does not rely on the Fiat exchange rate, but transforms it into a cryptocurrency without fear of losses. No one has refuted it yet.

^{A timeline for the development of decentralized finance.}

To become the owner of your cell in the world bank, where everyone is independent and independent, free to conduct their own business independently, benefiting not only themselves, but all owners of their cells, I think this business deserves attention.
 This bank cannot be bankrupted, so your financial assets are protected and liquid.

Алгоритмические стейблкоины терпят неудачу именно потому, что они пытаются привязаться к доллару США. Они всегда будут терпеть неудачу именно потому, что их алгоритмы несовершенны, нельзя измерять децентрализованные финансы физической величиной, Попробуйте измерить сколько весит 1 биткоин в килограммах.
Децентрализованные финансы это параллельные централизованным, у них нет ни одной общей точки соприкосновения. Они могут только пересекаться в разных местах, трансформироваться друг в друга.
Внедрять Фиатную монетарную систему в децентрализованную экономику с помощью искусственных стабилкойнов это абсурд. Сам принцип децентрализованной экономики основан на её открытости и стабильности. Криптовалюта с открытым исходным кодом прозрачна и предсказуема, она сама может себя стабилизировать и даже управлять Фиатной экономикой.

Algorithmic stablecoins fail precisely because they try to bind to the US dollar. They will always fail, not because their algorithms are imperfect, but because decentralized finance cannot be measured.
Using a centralized method, try to measure how much 1 bitcoin weighs in kilograms.
Decentralized finance is parallel to centralized, they do not have a common point of contact. They can only intersect, transform into each other.
To introduce a Fiat monetary system into a decentralized economy with the help of artificial stablecoins is absurd. The very principle of a decentralized economy is based on its openness and stability. An open source cryptocurrency is transparent and predictable, it can stabilize itself and even manage the Fiat economy.

I repeat, monopoly is the main control of any market and bitcoin is no exception. A monopolist controls bitcoin through Fiat, emptying your wallets, stuffing his own and try to get out of this control, it is unlikely that you will succeed. The crypto market in this sense completely repeats the currency market. The principle of the market is to make money on the mistakes of other market participants.
Any monopoly inflates bubbles and collects its fragments in time, this is the main tool for enrichment. If there was an opportunity to insure your risks from such losses, life would be more fun.