You received lots of merits for posting this shit?

Lots people here are so hypocrits on making merits use strictly yet using it on ass licking purposes.

---

Why not consider rechecking your campaign participants?

Why should I try. I’m not even aspiring to become one. I’m pointing out to you a concern since it’s your job not mine.

You keep accepting participants as “new bloods” that obviously a product of merit farming. They are just jerking around merit from merit thread then post the same generic sports post on football once accepted.

How sure you are that account is already stopped? This merit requirements just make the account farming exclusive for those who have the merit source.

Try to look on local board and see for yourself the reality. A newbie posting few months of merit begging on local board and merit source thread then go straight on signature campaign application once they gain enough merit is very common on local board like Nigeria, Indonesia, Turkey and more.

Account farming only becomes exclusive but not stopped. The clear result is it removes the casual forum user that doesn’t do a wall post just to beg for merit. Currently, discussion in the forum is less organic probably because only less people organically controlling each account.

I’m sure most of this alt farms is controlled by some established member here due to the nature of their constructive post immediately as newbie just to gain merit quickly since they knew the sweet spot of merit source.

---

This user is an example for potential merit farming: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=3357535

This user failed to join on multiple campaign before March 8 until he received of multiple merit on his generic post.

Amazing right? This is one of the example of alt farming becomes exclusive only to user with connection to merit source.

I like the idea of giving smerit to all user on random count. I mean what the heck is your problem with that?

Campaign manager should do their job to check the post quality instead of relying on merit count for fuck sake if signature campaign is the reason for this gate keeping Lord @LoyceV.

1xbit is probably the best example here. Many hacked account suddenly woke just to join signature campaign then later on stop posting after the campaign ends.

Funny thing is they are always become active whenever 1xbit campaign is live again and keep getting the spot.

No one will purchased high rank account just to suicide on a signature campaign that pay less to the account worth itself.

This is the result of campaign manager ignoring the DD on each participants and relying solely on tag or merit counts.

I think post quality and relevance of the board which user frequently posting should be the main criteria on choosing campaign members for specific project.

Example:
Why should campaign manager keep picking a member to promote a services that he doesn’t like or he keeps posting on board which the service is not relevant.

This merit counts that obviously from merit circle and positive trust from a backscratcher sugar coat with simple penny amount trade is being use as front to be easily accepted on signature campaign while the post quality itself is below average especially on gambling boards.

This is the product of campaign manager less DD because they are busy on multiple management project at the same time.

This drama will never be extended if only the 2 party involved will reconcile and talk seriously without the butting in. Yet both you just seeking for support to prove the other party is wrong that’s why this will never end.

Those extra side comments that stir the issue to make it a big deal make the forum drama worst. And guess what, Because of the +1 post on signature campaign.

Only @Vod is legitimately posting on this board without the hypocrisy of signature campaign. Smh!

This method is actually working! Check Rollbit signature campaign and other campaigns handle by manager. All the user is doing same shit merit fishing on different thread that merit is generous while the user post is generic AF.

We should admit that merit count matters now over post quality. Even Duelbits campaign now only consider minimum 50 merit regardless on how you get it.

Every merit jerker knew this secret sauce.

Keep doing that to prove I’m right with my suggestion. This kind of nonsense comment is the reason for this thread.

The goal of this thread is to make those serious becomes less spam post to easily arrived to conclusions without the butting in post.

Other boards are not considered serious because it doesn’t contain risk.


How come do you arrive on this conclusion. I even requested to you for investigation on accounts that obviously abusing merit to farm their accounts. This is happening on many local boards.

I only don’t want injustice by bullying small time cheater while there’s a blatant cheating happening in the form of merit jerker which is legally working on campaigns that handled by campaign manager that consider only merit count rather than where the merit get.

You can tag as many as you want. I never said what you said. My goal is not to stop fighting cheaters rather focus on what is blatantly merit jerking.

---

I don’t buy that other account ranking fast because they are a good poster. They ranking fast because they are an alt account of established member that knew already how to farm merit.

I’m generalizing but those local boards regular poster peeps is highly suspicious.

---

Someone with same intellect with @LoyceV can do multiple account and farm merit easily with those boards.

Again, I’m only using @LoyceV as example because he is the most established user here and the best example for high intellect user.

He is trying to imposed that his behavior should be the standard here.

If he is enjoying posting then why the heck he needs to apply on signature campaign?


Seriously, what’s the sense of having post quota on campaign.

And who define this shit?

It’s the most hypocritical take. You are being paid per post therefore it’s a job no matter how you twist it. Wtf privilege is this. You are applying to get a spot to do the job of posting while signature is attached on your sig space.

I’m only using you as an example on how incentivizing post motivates user to become a regular poster because some user is already trying to removed the freedom here in the forum by imposing their personal ideal forum while the forum itself doesn’t imposed that kind of rules all because of signature campaign.

And here you are defying all the rules and shit posting here because you’re goddamn @LoyceV. 

You’re the only one assuming that I’m an alt, This signature campaign makes the discussion inorganic just like this one.

You’re already done receiving your another +1 instead of just moving on if you don’t like the topic. Instead you post that is not relevant to the subject and attack my account.

What’s the big deal on removing incentive on this board. If scam topic happened everyone is still free to participate. This will remove unnecessary post from signature motivated member and only those doing genuine job on investigation will participate.

Reputation and scam accusation already become a drama board while it should be use to tackle serious topic. For example why serious discussion doesn’t display signature? Why Bitcoin wall observer still very active despite no signature display?

If this proposal is accepted, we will see more neat thread that focus on dealing the problem instead of prolonging it with unnecessary replies from ez +1 poster.

This board should be use to tackle scam and reputation without the influence of the signature campaign.

Scam accusation board is full of complaints to casino that has active signature campaign while most the user defending it are wearing casino signature campaign that gives a bias impression to the OP.

Same with the reputation board. Investigators, volunteer scam buster and other drama are being paid with an easy +1 on their signature campaign post quota that typically prolongs the thread due to unnecessary butt in reply for the payment.

Those who will disagree on this petition can’t do post without payment.

Screw campaign manager that doesn’t accept you because you can post more?

Your logic is an ass licker employee because post quota is set to determine each post rate. Above post quota is already considered as overtime without pay. Why campaign manager needs to determine post quota if that’s not the ideal basis for the post count?

So if you are working 8hrs at job, you will extend up to 12hrs without pay because you are not lazy? Following the work guidelines is not a sign of laziness. You’re just a hypocrite.

It comes back on why did campaign manager pay the post if the post quality is way below the standard.

Are you implying that campaign manager doesn’t check post quality before they initiate payout to participants?

What’s the difference for user having 2 accounts to user with 1 account that post equivalent post per day. For example LoyceV average post per day is 10 post, will his IQ will be lower if he distributes that post count to 2 account?

I’m only saying that if such low post is the main issue on multiple account, why does it receive payment.

---

I want to go back to my main battle cry about merit jerker that keeps successfully milking campaign on legal way just because they don’t have evidence of connection aside from blatant merit sharing.

I received butthurt neutral tag for pointing this out but why campaign manager consider merit count that received on topic that is not related on the brand they are promoting. I think post quality on the relevant board is should be the top priority instead of this merit count to deny this merit jerking farming.

My point is there’s no scam happened. I defined scam as someone committed fraud that cause losses to others. The user only broke the rules of account limit but in terms of work done he did a fair work on his side to get the payment therefore he didn’t scam the project rather just broke some rules.

I consider it as scam if the user in question use AI tool or other dishonest work that is not worth it for a payment. If this user doesn’t caught alt account his work is considered as fine.

---

I still don’t understand until now why the 1 account per campaign is still a thing now while there’s a lot of local board that obviously committing merit jerking to each other as an easy ticket to join campaigns.

They are not caught because of lack of wallet connections but in terms of merit jerking it’s very obvious. High rank member is involved on this farming that results to more cautious newbie account on wallet connection but good on merit farming.

I see this as hey investigator pls caught cheater so that we can let in fresh blood of farmed merit jerker that create zero sense post on gambling board after farming merit on local merits jerker board and wo. We need more merit sauceee.

 *walter junior voice*

At what part of this issue scam happened? Even if they are alt account, They both finish post quota that equivalent to work done. There’s nothing lose here because all payment done was matched by required post.

Alt account is allowed to join on different campaigns. Even well known member has alt account that joins on different campaigns. If we are being honest here what’s the difference in terms of work done there?

There’s a bigger problem on this that is still not being addressed. Merit farmer on local boards!

Some campaign manager already stop doing their job on checking post quality as top priority instead they are focusing on merit counts now despite it’s acquired on board that is not relevant to the campaign that they are promoting.

I will not be surprised if the high reputable member itself and some of this detective are the owners of those new account that easily rise on the rank due to merit circle jerking on local.

In the future, Forum users will be dominated by these alt accounts of merit jerker. Yeah keep ignoring this facts.

This is a bit racist. I saw many users from different board like Turkey, Indonesia and Nigeria that jerking merit to each other blatantly while they join together on campaign just because campaign manager choose participants based on merit count except when the account reputation is already reputable.

Why not focus all your detective instincts on user like this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5491383.0 that obviously farming hard signature campaign.

I don’t understand why the gang above are so defensive. I didn’t mention any name to avoid drama yet you guys keep changing topic on attacking my account instead of focusing the discussion on topic.

Is there anything wrong to what I say here? Or am I just feeding spammers to have +1 post for quota by attacking my account which is the easiest course.

Recently, I just saw a participants selection on signature campaign. I notice that the user got accepted out of many participants doesn’t seem so good when it comes to gambling board.

He just has a good amount of merit received on different board. With this case, is the total amount of merit received is the right choice? I knew the guy is not the one who has the highest amount of merit among all applicants but I’m sure his merit is one of the factor considered on his application since his post is not that good on gambling board.


_{I didn’t mention any name to avoid drama of throwing unnecessary feedback when my opinion gets under his/her skin. The discussion is purely for clarification on what’s happening in the forum.}

There’s a lot of instances and you are one of this user that benefited on this merit circle jerking. You only sighted an exception but most of the time those high merits got accepted. You are one of those user that has a post on middle page yet you receive merit out of nowhere from your gang.

Also the posting pattern of “want something” on bitcoin discussion or beginners & help is your gang favorite post because merit source preferred this dramatic post.


Not distributed by merit source yet most of the smerit sender merit came from merit source by doing same post pattern. Most of this jerker is on Duelbits and Rollbit.