Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 123 results by bluehillfoundation.sup
Re: 🏔🗻 B.H.Mining - Possibly one of the largest copper reserves in Asia
Notice Concerning Blue Hill Mining
From the Blue Hill Foundation, we appreciate the interest of all those who have participated in this thread (which was dedicated so that the project and its progress were known), with opinions both in favor and against from each ones personal point of view.
We have made mistakes and we have had successes, we have learned along the way and we have managed to finance ourselves taking the project to an absolute self-sufficient level, we have acquired 4 more mining licenses in addition to the initial 2 and we are developing our raw materials traceability and exchange platform ahead of schedule, as long as the issuing of our Utility BHF-Token (our first token) which will be issued and distributed in our Blue Hill Platform in August this year, besides the progress into the Security BHM-Token (our second token).
This way, nowadays the project has grown into a Corporation of various brands and companies involved, specific tasks, and high-level interest in our Blue Hill Platform from different industrial companies related to Banking, Assurance, Smelting, Mining, among others.
Always with the intention of communicating in the appropriate channels our objectives and progress, is that we also came within the many communication spaces to BitcoinTalk, whom we also thank for having given us a space for communicating. In any case, we believe that for quite some time, the reason for our thread has been distorted in a meaningless contest and a wave of aggressions that do not reflect the spirit or vision of the Blue Hill Mining Project, for which reason as well as in its moment we stopped responding as advised by our legal department; now we will proceed to terminate the communication through BitcoinTalk, inviting all those who want to give their opinion or consult us, to visit our official channels and our website www.bluehillmining.com/blog
Once again, thank you all for the enthusiasm of your comments and for the humble courage to present your opinions, having or no knowledge of the field. It has been a pleasure to have you at this stage and we hope to keep you updated on our progress in the times to come.
Regards,
Blue Hill Foundation Team
From the Blue Hill Foundation, we appreciate the interest of all those who have participated in this thread (which was dedicated so that the project and its progress were known), with opinions both in favor and against from each ones personal point of view.
We have made mistakes and we have had successes, we have learned along the way and we have managed to finance ourselves taking the project to an absolute self-sufficient level, we have acquired 4 more mining licenses in addition to the initial 2 and we are developing our raw materials traceability and exchange platform ahead of schedule, as long as the issuing of our Utility BHF-Token (our first token) which will be issued and distributed in our Blue Hill Platform in August this year, besides the progress into the Security BHM-Token (our second token).
This way, nowadays the project has grown into a Corporation of various brands and companies involved, specific tasks, and high-level interest in our Blue Hill Platform from different industrial companies related to Banking, Assurance, Smelting, Mining, among others.
Always with the intention of communicating in the appropriate channels our objectives and progress, is that we also came within the many communication spaces to BitcoinTalk, whom we also thank for having given us a space for communicating. In any case, we believe that for quite some time, the reason for our thread has been distorted in a meaningless contest and a wave of aggressions that do not reflect the spirit or vision of the Blue Hill Mining Project, for which reason as well as in its moment we stopped responding as advised by our legal department; now we will proceed to terminate the communication through BitcoinTalk, inviting all those who want to give their opinion or consult us, to visit our official channels and our website www.bluehillmining.com/blog
Once again, thank you all for the enthusiasm of your comments and for the humble courage to present your opinions, having or no knowledge of the field. It has been a pleasure to have you at this stage and we hope to keep you updated on our progress in the times to come.
Regards,
Blue Hill Foundation Team
Re: 🏔🗻 Blue Hill Mining - STO backed by one of the largest copper reserves in Asia
Notice Concerning Blue Hill Mining
From June 09 of 2019 to December 13 of 2019 unfounded and defamatory material has been posted on Bitcoin.org as well as similar platforms, by one individual ("Crypto-info").
BHM has always endeavored to respond diligently and with substance to all allegations made by Crypto-info.
Despite an invitation to meet our team, Crypto-info has elected to hide behind anonymity. In light of the above events, BHM has passed a board resolution to initiate legal proceedings against Crypto-info.
BHM is currently in the process of issuing a court subpoena in order to identify Crypto-info, as the individual behind the defamations.
Pending the legal process, we note BHM has been advised to not publish further responses to Crypto-info. BHM stands behind its token holders and thanks all partners for their support.
We will keep you updated of developments.
The BHM team
From June 09 of 2019 to December 13 of 2019 unfounded and defamatory material has been posted on Bitcoin.org as well as similar platforms, by one individual ("Crypto-info").
BHM has always endeavored to respond diligently and with substance to all allegations made by Crypto-info.
Despite an invitation to meet our team, Crypto-info has elected to hide behind anonymity. In light of the above events, BHM has passed a board resolution to initiate legal proceedings against Crypto-info.
BHM is currently in the process of issuing a court subpoena in order to identify Crypto-info, as the individual behind the defamations.
Pending the legal process, we note BHM has been advised to not publish further responses to Crypto-info. BHM stands behind its token holders and thanks all partners for their support.
We will keep you updated of developments.
The BHM team
Re: 🏔🗻 Blue Hill Mining - STO backed by one of the largest copper reserves in Asia
Mr Crypto-Info:
We are working to get our token regulated under the European criteria. Unfortunately, we can not foresee the time the regulators need for such a procedure! As we clearly said in all our documents: We have the full intention to be regulated in Q4-2019.
Also, we thank you for giving us the contact details of someone who talk to, as your lawyer buffet you have described! As you have never ever given your face or contact details to the community and to us to dialogue with you in a proper way and space.
Hope now it's clear.
Blue Hill Foundation
Legal Department
Your words are only moving in circles. You are not some team trying to explore a project and making a shit show with it, but rather an outright scam with the only intention is to steal peoples money.
Let me talk in a future tense, and I will be black and white. When you fail in being registered/regulated, and also not able to sell anything on any stock market - anywhere at anytime, people will want to take their anger out on the Blue Hill Mining scammers. Let's face it, you won't be regulated nor will you apply for ANYTHING at the end of this Q4. You will make some bullshit news trying to give you time to steal more crypto. When you wrap up this scam, you will simply disappear and stop replying in this thread. However, in the meantime your replies are a desperate grab to steal money.
"As you can read on our roadmap, in the last quarter of the current year 2019 is that we will apply to the regulatory licenses. We are up to date 9 of this month of the Q4 in search of regulation, which is perfectly in the plans we have followed and communicated" - bluehillfoundation.sup
In just a few more weeks bluehillfoundation.sup, I can use the above quote against you and again say you LIED. Just remember it's PUBLIC. When you apply, even if the application isn't fully processed we will know. It may be Europe, Asia, Pacific etc it is a public submission.
So what can people do to take their anger out on Blue Hill Mining? I thought I would help
Looks like there will be lawyers involved after all. The following is the translated statement in english written by LAWMUC Lawyers specifically about this scam - Blue Hill Mining - Fraud or a Good Investment?
Blue Hill Mining - Fraud or a Good Investment?
Blue Hill Mining - In case of warnings from the tax authorities, investors should be cautious in any case. Background of the warnings is very often the suspicion of fraud or unlicensed activity in the financial sector. The cases of prohibited financial transactions are also becoming more numerous in Germany.
Blue Hill Mining information for affected investors
Injured investors can contact LAWMUC lawyers and have their case reviewed. Even with losses by foreign companies, there are various options.
Blue Hill Mining - Why Investors Invest in Unknown Foreign Companies?
In the low-interest phase that has been going on for years, more and more investors in Germany, Austria and Switzerland are looking for attractive profits even in foreign countries. However, companies from exotic countries such as Blue Hill Mining are far more realistic in realizing the total capital loss than a big profit.
Blue Hill Mining - In which countries do you find platforms like Blue Hill Mining?
Blue Hill Mining states on its website to be registered in Switzerland. However, the Swiss FINMA has published a public warning regarding this platform.
Blue Hill Mining - characteristic signs of dangerous investments
Investors should always investigate fully where they invest. In almost all cases, you realize clearly when it comes to boiler rooms scams.
Investors should always be critical of the following characteristics:
- Exceptionally high yields are guaranteed.
- It is urged to an immediate conclusion of the contract, as this is the only way to make special benefits possible.
- Almost only telephone calls are made.
- The alleged brokers are almost without exception in distant countries.
As part of a fraud, the alleged brokers use sophisticated psychological methods to gain financial benefits. As a result, the alleged investment advisors manage to persuade investors to invest in some seven-figure investments.
The companies for which the wrong brokers operate are usually located very far abroad. Almost all of these investment firms have a very trustworthy website and a company name that is very reminiscent of global companies.
The contract drafts used also point to a reputable company. What many investors do not know is that the purported brokers are mostly trading under fictitious names. Investors should contact an experienced solicitor with many years of experience as soon as possible and have their rights enforced in a specific case.
Website (ENGLISH VERSION): https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=https://lawmuc.de/blue-hill-mining-betrug-oder-ein-gutes-investment/&prev=search
Website (GERMAN VERSION) : https://lawmuc.de/blue-hill-mining-betrug-oder-ein-gutes-investment/
Company: LAWMUC
Occupation: Lawyers
Phone: +49 (0)89-588-031-390
E-Mail: info@lawmuc.de
Please see their website for further details.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5152373.0
We are working to get our token regulated under the European criteria. Unfortunately, we can not foresee the time the regulators need for such a procedure! As we clearly said in all our documents: We have the full intention to be regulated in Q4-2019.
Also, we thank you for giving us the contact details of someone who talk to, as your lawyer buffet you have described! As you have never ever given your face or contact details to the community and to us to dialogue with you in a proper way and space.
Hope now it's clear.
Blue Hill Foundation
Legal Department
Mr Crypto-info:
It is starting to get a little hilarious this kind of accusation. It's really hard to talk and explain with seriousness while you are making this kind of nonsense description. We have talked to you for many months already, saying you exactly the reason why of everything that has happened 'till now. We don't pretend everyone to think and understand the way we do, but at least to think and try to understand in any way...
1- You are talking about the BHF-Token and you take a picture of one of the BHM-Whitepaper in one of the many versions (An old one) to back up your accusation to the BHF-Token:
UNDERSTAND IT FOR GOOD! Blue Hill Foundation goes with BHF-Token | Blue Hill Mining goes with BHM-Token. BHF-Token is not regulated and was never regulated. Show WHERE WE SAID THAT THE BHF-TOKEN WAS REGULATED? SHOW IT OR STOP TALKING NONSENSES.
2- "The B.H.Mining-STO is a fully Swiss regulated Security Token Offering...":
We said once again that this was a misuse of the verbal tense. We already apologized for this and we already explained that is OBVIOUS that if we are talking about a project yet to exist, yet to come, yet to be developed; so we are talking in a future present; we are talking about what it will be and what it will have, etc.. and it will be a FULLY REGULATED STO. Because IT WILL BE EXACTLY THAT, and the whitepaper all talks about our objective, the how and the when. Of course the project will change and it has had changes. IT'S A PROJECT... have you ever been part or taken action in a project? It's ironic that we have to explain something so obvious.
3- "the proceeds from the sale of the BHF token will help fund the FINMA license...":
Let's be clear again on this, but with a different approach, as we know this can be hard to understand. We have not applied yet to the FINMA, and they have put us in warning list of their own, which is their job and obligation as regulators; not because it's something bad or something criminal, but because they must warn what is and what isn't regulated under their terms. They decided to put us in the non-regulated list and it's fair an ok as we didn't have regulated tokens! Of course, we are choosing the best regulator to apply to, among all the options in the table. FINMA is one of them but not the only one.
Hope now it's clear.
Blue Hill Foundation
Legal Department
It is starting to get a little hilarious this kind of accusation. It's really hard to talk and explain with seriousness while you are making this kind of nonsense description. We have talked to you for many months already, saying you exactly the reason why of everything that has happened 'till now. We don't pretend everyone to think and understand the way we do, but at least to think and try to understand in any way...
1- You are talking about the BHF-Token and you take a picture of one of the BHM-Whitepaper in one of the many versions (An old one) to back up your accusation to the BHF-Token:
UNDERSTAND IT FOR GOOD! Blue Hill Foundation goes with BHF-Token | Blue Hill Mining goes with BHM-Token. BHF-Token is not regulated and was never regulated. Show WHERE WE SAID THAT THE BHF-TOKEN WAS REGULATED? SHOW IT OR STOP TALKING NONSENSES.
2- "The B.H.Mining-STO is a fully Swiss regulated Security Token Offering...":
We said once again that this was a misuse of the verbal tense. We already apologized for this and we already explained that is OBVIOUS that if we are talking about a project yet to exist, yet to come, yet to be developed; so we are talking in a future present; we are talking about what it will be and what it will have, etc.. and it will be a FULLY REGULATED STO. Because IT WILL BE EXACTLY THAT, and the whitepaper all talks about our objective, the how and the when. Of course the project will change and it has had changes. IT'S A PROJECT... have you ever been part or taken action in a project? It's ironic that we have to explain something so obvious.
3- "the proceeds from the sale of the BHF token will help fund the FINMA license...":
Let's be clear again on this, but with a different approach, as we know this can be hard to understand. We have not applied yet to the FINMA, and they have put us in warning list of their own, which is their job and obligation as regulators; not because it's something bad or something criminal, but because they must warn what is and what isn't regulated under their terms. They decided to put us in the non-regulated list and it's fair an ok as we didn't have regulated tokens! Of course, we are choosing the best regulator to apply to, among all the options in the table. FINMA is one of them but not the only one.
Hope now it's clear.
Blue Hill Foundation
Legal Department
Your words are only moving in circles. You are not some team trying to explore a project and making a shit show with it, but rather an outright scam with the only intention is to steal peoples money.
Let me talk in a future tense, and I will be black and white. When you fail in being registered/regulated, and also not able to sell anything on any stock market - anywhere at anytime, people will want to take their anger out on the Blue Hill Mining scammers. Let's face it, you won't be regulated nor will you apply for ANYTHING at the end of this Q4. You will make some bullshit news trying to give you time to steal more crypto. When you wrap up this scam, you will simply disappear and stop replying in this thread. However, in the meantime your replies are a desperate grab to steal money.
"As you can read on our roadmap, in the last quarter of the current year 2019 is that we will apply to the regulatory licenses. We are up to date 9 of this month of the Q4 in search of regulation, which is perfectly in the plans we have followed and communicated" - bluehillfoundation.sup
In just a few more weeks bluehillfoundation.sup, I can use the above quote against you and again say you LIED. Just remember it's PUBLIC. When you apply, even if the application isn't fully processed we will know. It may be Europe, Asia, Pacific etc it is a public submission.
So what can people do to take their anger out on Blue Hill Mining? I thought I would help
Looks like there will be lawyers involved after all. The following is the translated statement in english written by LAWMUC Lawyers specifically about this scam - Blue Hill Mining - Fraud or a Good Investment? Blue Hill Mining - Fraud or a Good Investment?
Blue Hill Mining - In case of warnings from the tax authorities, investors should be cautious in any case. Background of the warnings is very often the suspicion of fraud or unlicensed activity in the financial sector. The cases of prohibited financial transactions are also becoming more numerous in Germany.
Blue Hill Mining information for affected investors
Injured investors can contact LAWMUC lawyers and have their case reviewed. Even with losses by foreign companies, there are various options.
Blue Hill Mining - Why Investors Invest in Unknown Foreign Companies?
In the low-interest phase that has been going on for years, more and more investors in Germany, Austria and Switzerland are looking for attractive profits even in foreign countries. However, companies from exotic countries such as Blue Hill Mining are far more realistic in realizing the total capital loss than a big profit.
Blue Hill Mining - In which countries do you find platforms like Blue Hill Mining?
Blue Hill Mining states on its website to be registered in Switzerland. However, the Swiss FINMA has published a public warning regarding this platform.
Blue Hill Mining - characteristic signs of dangerous investments
Investors should always investigate fully where they invest. In almost all cases, you realize clearly when it comes to boiler rooms scams.
Investors should always be critical of the following characteristics:
- Exceptionally high yields are guaranteed.
- It is urged to an immediate conclusion of the contract, as this is the only way to make special benefits possible.
- Almost only telephone calls are made.
- The alleged brokers are almost without exception in distant countries.
As part of a fraud, the alleged brokers use sophisticated psychological methods to gain financial benefits. As a result, the alleged investment advisors manage to persuade investors to invest in some seven-figure investments.
The companies for which the wrong brokers operate are usually located very far abroad. Almost all of these investment firms have a very trustworthy website and a company name that is very reminiscent of global companies.
The contract drafts used also point to a reputable company. What many investors do not know is that the purported brokers are mostly trading under fictitious names. Investors should contact an experienced solicitor with many years of experience as soon as possible and have their rights enforced in a specific case.
Website (ENGLISH VERSION): https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=https://lawmuc.de/blue-hill-mining-betrug-oder-ein-gutes-investment/&prev=search
Website (GERMAN VERSION) : https://lawmuc.de/blue-hill-mining-betrug-oder-ein-gutes-investment/
Company: LAWMUC
Occupation: Lawyers
Phone: +49 (0)89-588-031-390
E-Mail: info@lawmuc.de
Please see their website for further details.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5152373.0
Re: 🏔🗻 Blue Hill Mining - STO backed by one of the largest copper reserves in Asia
Mr Crypto-info:
It is starting to get a little hilarious this kind of accusation. It's really hard to talk and explain with seriousness while you are making this kind of nonsense description. We have talked to you for many months already, saying you exactly the reason why of everything that has happened 'till now. We don't pretend everyone to think and understand the way we do, but at least to think and try to understand in any way...
1- You are talking about the BHF-Token and you take a picture of one of the BHM-Whitepaper in one of the many versions (An old one) to back up your accusation to the BHF-Token:
UNDERSTAND IT FOR GOOD! Blue Hill Foundation goes with BHF-Token | Blue Hill Mining goes with BHM-Token. BHF-Token is not regulated and was never regulated. Show WHERE WE SAID THAT THE BHF-TOKEN WAS REGULATED? SHOW IT OR STOP TALKING NONSENSES.
2- "The B.H.Mining-STO is a fully Swiss regulated Security Token Offering...":
We said once again that this was a misuse of the verbal tense. We already apologized for this and we already explained that is OBVIOUS that if we are talking about a project yet to exist, yet to come, yet to be developed; so we are talking in a future present; we are talking about what it will be and what it will have, etc.. and it will be a FULLY REGULATED STO. Because IT WILL BE EXACTLY THAT, and the whitepaper all talks about our objective, the how and the when. Of course the project will change and it has had changes. IT'S A PROJECT... have you ever been part or taken action in a project? It's ironic that we have to explain something so obvious.
3- "the proceeds from the sale of the BHF token will help fund the FINMA license...":
Let's be clear again on this, but with a different approach, as we know this can be hard to understand. We have not applied yet to the FINMA, and they have put us in warning list of their own, which is their job and obligation as regulators; not because it's something bad or something criminal, but because they must warn what is and what isn't regulated under their terms. They decided to put us in the non-regulated list and it's fair an ok as we didn't have regulated tokens! Of course, we are choosing the best regulator to apply to, among all the options in the table. FINMA is one of them but not the only one.
Hope now it's clear.
Blue Hill Foundation
Legal Department
It is starting to get a little hilarious this kind of accusation. It's really hard to talk and explain with seriousness while you are making this kind of nonsense description. We have talked to you for many months already, saying you exactly the reason why of everything that has happened 'till now. We don't pretend everyone to think and understand the way we do, but at least to think and try to understand in any way...
1- You are talking about the BHF-Token and you take a picture of one of the BHM-Whitepaper in one of the many versions (An old one) to back up your accusation to the BHF-Token:
UNDERSTAND IT FOR GOOD! Blue Hill Foundation goes with BHF-Token | Blue Hill Mining goes with BHM-Token. BHF-Token is not regulated and was never regulated. Show WHERE WE SAID THAT THE BHF-TOKEN WAS REGULATED? SHOW IT OR STOP TALKING NONSENSES.
2- "The B.H.Mining-STO is a fully Swiss regulated Security Token Offering...":
We said once again that this was a misuse of the verbal tense. We already apologized for this and we already explained that is OBVIOUS that if we are talking about a project yet to exist, yet to come, yet to be developed; so we are talking in a future present; we are talking about what it will be and what it will have, etc.. and it will be a FULLY REGULATED STO. Because IT WILL BE EXACTLY THAT, and the whitepaper all talks about our objective, the how and the when. Of course the project will change and it has had changes. IT'S A PROJECT... have you ever been part or taken action in a project? It's ironic that we have to explain something so obvious.
3- "the proceeds from the sale of the BHF token will help fund the FINMA license...":
Let's be clear again on this, but with a different approach, as we know this can be hard to understand. We have not applied yet to the FINMA, and they have put us in warning list of their own, which is their job and obligation as regulators; not because it's something bad or something criminal, but because they must warn what is and what isn't regulated under their terms. They decided to put us in the non-regulated list and it's fair an ok as we didn't have regulated tokens! Of course, we are choosing the best regulator to apply to, among all the options in the table. FINMA is one of them but not the only one.
Hope now it's clear.
Blue Hill Foundation
Legal Department
Re: 🏔🗻 Blue Hill Mining - STO backed by one of the largest copper reserves in Asia
Crypto-Info and the whole community:
We can't really understand if you are lazy to look up the messages or you don't have the skills to do it. We already answered about the white paper issue and all your accusations, but we'll give you a resume here so you can look up for the full messages about this:
You understood that we talked about an already regulated token, when we clearly expressed by all ways that the BHF-TOKEN was not regulated and the yet to exist BHM-TOKEN will be regulated. As every project of this characteristics, that obviously you don't know about enough to understand, we talked in future and we presented it as what we intend this to become. And we are doing it as you could and can see in the roadmap.
Moreover, as every project, we have the total right and natural process of adapting the steps and items of the project and communicate them.
Regards and we hope you understand
Blue Hill Foundation
Legal department
We can't really understand if you are lazy to look up the messages or you don't have the skills to do it. We already answered about the white paper issue and all your accusations, but we'll give you a resume here so you can look up for the full messages about this:
You understood that we talked about an already regulated token, when we clearly expressed by all ways that the BHF-TOKEN was not regulated and the yet to exist BHM-TOKEN will be regulated. As every project of this characteristics, that obviously you don't know about enough to understand, we talked in future and we presented it as what we intend this to become. And we are doing it as you could and can see in the roadmap.
Moreover, as every project, we have the total right and natural process of adapting the steps and items of the project and communicate them.
Regards and we hope you understand
Blue Hill Foundation
Legal department
Please don't hide with a nickname behind one forum on the internet. You have nothing to fear to give your name and your face to the community you say you represent, and the company you accuse as a scam and many other things.
Blue Hill Mining chose this forum Bitcointalk.org knowingly, with the understanding that nicknames are used. You seem upset with their choice.
For similar reasons, I too with the full knowledge of being behind an alias chose this site to voice what I like within the boundaries of the rules of course.
So next time Mr bluehillfoundation.sup before being hypocritical try and understand the medium to which you post - anonymous.
We would like to know your name if you are so kind, so we can literally talk to you and not to a nickname, first of all, as we don't know who is the person behind the screen but you can now every person behind this screen. We have invited you to come, we have answered all your questions, we have explained all the details you have asked, we have accepted the ones that were mistaken from us and the ones that are mistakes from your interpretation, and we have settled the formal invitation for you to come to see the interpretation issues from your side with our lawyers that can kindly explain you all the different points that you can't understand at this time.
It is not me for you to convince, it is the community that are also behind nicknames that want answers, thats why you post on here - for the community to see. It makes sense for a public discussion to take place since Blue Hill Mining initiated the first post. I do not need to speak to a lawyer, this is for Blue Hill Mining to prove.
I have no interest in listening about how this scam is run by these fictitious lawyers you talk about. I just pointed out, amongst other Bitcointalk users how this is a scam. In fact I wasn't the first to post about this scam, I however did give credit to them. Remember, you chose to respond to me and picked me as a "community leader", so if you don't like you decision....
For obvious reasons and keeping the professional care of everyone, they won't sit to explain in a forum to a nickname, something that must be explained in-person to a man. And you have rejected that invitation. But for now, we will answer to your different accusations of this post, and to everyone here to see what you can achieve by talking without knowing:
1- We don't ask you to invest, we don't want people who can't understand the project to invest on it as it may be risky for their low understanding level of a high industry business process. You clearly don't have the amount and deepness of knowledge necessary to give this evaluation as you support your accusations in personal appreciations and personal interpretations of the information, even from our answers; what makes you lose total credibility and authority as respect from the well-understood businessmen.
I assume you are saying the Blue Hill lawyers won't explain anything to someone with a nickname and it must be done face to face.
Thats must suck picking a forum full of people with nicknames and not being able to explain anything. It doesn't make any sense does it. You need to hire new lawyers or a new scam artist, or at the very least pick a forum that has peoples real names if thats important to someone there. This is Blue Hill Minings problem, not mine.
2- We don't have one lawyer, we have a full buffet for this, and you are calling it a lie without even knowing about this. You are setting that our lawyers' service is a scam and/or that they are part of one as you are blaming them on being professionally incapable or negligent. Now your accusations have spread to the buffet itself, besides your accusations to us.
I will make a feast from this buffet, all you can eat! LOL In all seriousness though you have no lawyers. It only takes anyone who is fluent with english to realise grammatical/structural errors with the white-papers and the basic incoherent paragraphs that attempt to explain a business structure that is DIFFERENT to the one you are trying to explain. Any professional would rewrite these.
3- The project is not a scam and you are claiming it scam with "authority" self-given and without any proof. You are one person claiming something that dozens of high business people have applauded and become part of. As you may at least understand, this puts you in a very low position, and we are kindly answering your accusations for the people not to get this opportunity out of their hands by unfolded fears from none-named accusations and interpretations.
You are confusing my authority with fact. I have posted what I am happy about saying for the community to read. You don't have to respond to it, and the community will never know your answers. I feel good either way.
4- You don't know about corporate structure, yet you accuse about a scam.
You don't know about legal structures, yet you accuse about a scam.
You don't know about documents and bureaucratic structures, yet you accuse about a scam.
You are accusing so many people involved, so many companies and so many juridic persons that we are pretty sure you are not professional and formed at all neither in business, law or finances. No one with a little knowledge of these areas would be objecting as you are doing, going again and again in the same already answered questions, and complaining to logical and normal actions of every and each business model from top quality in the world.[/color]
Just in case you don't understand what I have been telling you: The business structure in the Blue Hill Mining white papers are different to the structure you are trying to sell people on here. Period.
THIS IS NOT A BUSINESS FOR YOUR LEVEL OF UNDERSTANDING TO INVEST IN, PLEASE WE ADVISE YOU TO THINK ABOUT IT AS IT'S CLEAR THAT EVEN WITH A FULL COMPANY ANSWERING TO YOU AND INVITING YOU TO TALK WITH OUR LEGAL DEPARTMENT, YOU CAN'T DISCERN BETWEEN YOUR REALITY AND THE REALITY, YOUR ACCUSATIONS AND THE REALITY, YOUR INTERPRETATIONS AND THE LEGAL ONES, YOUR IDEA OF SCAM AND A TRUE BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY.
KEEP TALKING, AND KEEP GIVIN YOUR OPINIONS AND ACCUSATIONS BUT CRYPTO-INFO DON'T GET MORE INVOLVED THAN THAT AS YOU DON'T HAVE THE KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING TO TAKE AND KEEP AN INVESTING DESITION TO ANY PROJECT OR NEW BUSINESS OF THIS TYPE.
Why do you invite me to see your lawyers if I have a low level of business understanding? Sounds like you need new lawyers. I would definitely pick someone who knew about business before asking them to this meeting. Looks like there is no-one to report back to this forum, oh the nicknames! LOL
Regarding the other doubts that you again have asked, we kindly ask you to go back to your posts and look for our answers, as we have already answered these questions with all the detail you need, and all the time it takes.
Did you post why you and the white-paper lied about the BHM token being regulated? Still waiting for an answer from you about this.
You claim yourself to be the information giver and the information bringer to the community, and to represent the community. Well, we are sorry and we don't want to break your ideas and dreams, but the community is more than 1, 10 or 100 persons giving their opinions, and before and after yours we have dozens of thousands of people of the community being part of this and also claiming the totally opposite opinion of yours, and they are and they aren't consumers; you are not even an active consumer, you are just giving an opinion from outside, without proper knowledge, without authority, without experience and without even giving your name...
Looks like you know more about what I do and about my experience than I do. Thats amazing and with only my nickname! Crazy world we live in today. LOL
If you don't like what I say or overwhelmed with peoples opinions you don't have to reply. I much prefer it this way.
I bring facts to the public forum so community members can make informed decisions.
Blue Hill Mining is a SCAM
Blue Hill Mining chose this forum Bitcointalk.org knowingly, with the understanding that nicknames are used. You seem upset with their choice.
For similar reasons, I too with the full knowledge of being behind an alias chose this site to voice what I like within the boundaries of the rules of course.
So next time Mr bluehillfoundation.sup before being hypocritical try and understand the medium to which you post - anonymous.
We would like to know your name if you are so kind, so we can literally talk to you and not to a nickname, first of all, as we don't know who is the person behind the screen but you can now every person behind this screen. We have invited you to come, we have answered all your questions, we have explained all the details you have asked, we have accepted the ones that were mistaken from us and the ones that are mistakes from your interpretation, and we have settled the formal invitation for you to come to see the interpretation issues from your side with our lawyers that can kindly explain you all the different points that you can't understand at this time.
It is not me for you to convince, it is the community that are also behind nicknames that want answers, thats why you post on here - for the community to see. It makes sense for a public discussion to take place since Blue Hill Mining initiated the first post. I do not need to speak to a lawyer, this is for Blue Hill Mining to prove.
I have no interest in listening about how this scam is run by these fictitious lawyers you talk about. I just pointed out, amongst other Bitcointalk users how this is a scam. In fact I wasn't the first to post about this scam, I however did give credit to them. Remember, you chose to respond to me and picked me as a "community leader", so if you don't like you decision....
For obvious reasons and keeping the professional care of everyone, they won't sit to explain in a forum to a nickname, something that must be explained in-person to a man. And you have rejected that invitation. But for now, we will answer to your different accusations of this post, and to everyone here to see what you can achieve by talking without knowing:
1- We don't ask you to invest, we don't want people who can't understand the project to invest on it as it may be risky for their low understanding level of a high industry business process. You clearly don't have the amount and deepness of knowledge necessary to give this evaluation as you support your accusations in personal appreciations and personal interpretations of the information, even from our answers; what makes you lose total credibility and authority as respect from the well-understood businessmen.
I assume you are saying the Blue Hill lawyers won't explain anything to someone with a nickname and it must be done face to face.
Thats must suck picking a forum full of people with nicknames and not being able to explain anything. It doesn't make any sense does it. You need to hire new lawyers or a new scam artist, or at the very least pick a forum that has peoples real names if thats important to someone there. This is Blue Hill Minings problem, not mine.
2- We don't have one lawyer, we have a full buffet for this, and you are calling it a lie without even knowing about this. You are setting that our lawyers' service is a scam and/or that they are part of one as you are blaming them on being professionally incapable or negligent. Now your accusations have spread to the buffet itself, besides your accusations to us.
I will make a feast from this buffet, all you can eat! LOL In all seriousness though you have no lawyers. It only takes anyone who is fluent with english to realise grammatical/structural errors with the white-papers and the basic incoherent paragraphs that attempt to explain a business structure that is DIFFERENT to the one you are trying to explain. Any professional would rewrite these.
3- The project is not a scam and you are claiming it scam with "authority" self-given and without any proof. You are one person claiming something that dozens of high business people have applauded and become part of. As you may at least understand, this puts you in a very low position, and we are kindly answering your accusations for the people not to get this opportunity out of their hands by unfolded fears from none-named accusations and interpretations.
You are confusing my authority with fact. I have posted what I am happy about saying for the community to read. You don't have to respond to it, and the community will never know your answers. I feel good either way.
4- You don't know about corporate structure, yet you accuse about a scam.
You don't know about legal structures, yet you accuse about a scam.
You don't know about documents and bureaucratic structures, yet you accuse about a scam.
You are accusing so many people involved, so many companies and so many juridic persons that we are pretty sure you are not professional and formed at all neither in business, law or finances. No one with a little knowledge of these areas would be objecting as you are doing, going again and again in the same already answered questions, and complaining to logical and normal actions of every and each business model from top quality in the world.[/color]
Just in case you don't understand what I have been telling you: The business structure in the Blue Hill Mining white papers are different to the structure you are trying to sell people on here. Period.
THIS IS NOT A BUSINESS FOR YOUR LEVEL OF UNDERSTANDING TO INVEST IN, PLEASE WE ADVISE YOU TO THINK ABOUT IT AS IT'S CLEAR THAT EVEN WITH A FULL COMPANY ANSWERING TO YOU AND INVITING YOU TO TALK WITH OUR LEGAL DEPARTMENT, YOU CAN'T DISCERN BETWEEN YOUR REALITY AND THE REALITY, YOUR ACCUSATIONS AND THE REALITY, YOUR INTERPRETATIONS AND THE LEGAL ONES, YOUR IDEA OF SCAM AND A TRUE BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY.
KEEP TALKING, AND KEEP GIVIN YOUR OPINIONS AND ACCUSATIONS BUT CRYPTO-INFO DON'T GET MORE INVOLVED THAN THAT AS YOU DON'T HAVE THE KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING TO TAKE AND KEEP AN INVESTING DESITION TO ANY PROJECT OR NEW BUSINESS OF THIS TYPE.
Why do you invite me to see your lawyers if I have a low level of business understanding? Sounds like you need new lawyers. I would definitely pick someone who knew about business before asking them to this meeting. Looks like there is no-one to report back to this forum, oh the nicknames! LOL
Regarding the other doubts that you again have asked, we kindly ask you to go back to your posts and look for our answers, as we have already answered these questions with all the detail you need, and all the time it takes.
Did you post why you and the white-paper lied about the BHM token being regulated? Still waiting for an answer from you about this.
You claim yourself to be the information giver and the information bringer to the community, and to represent the community. Well, we are sorry and we don't want to break your ideas and dreams, but the community is more than 1, 10 or 100 persons giving their opinions, and before and after yours we have dozens of thousands of people of the community being part of this and also claiming the totally opposite opinion of yours, and they are and they aren't consumers; you are not even an active consumer, you are just giving an opinion from outside, without proper knowledge, without authority, without experience and without even giving your name...
Looks like you know more about what I do and about my experience than I do. Thats amazing and with only my nickname! Crazy world we live in today. LOL
If you don't like what I say or overwhelmed with peoples opinions you don't have to reply. I much prefer it this way.
I bring facts to the public forum so community members can make informed decisions.
Blue Hill Mining is a SCAM
Re: 🏔🗻 Blue Hill Mining - STO backed by one of the largest copper reserves in Asia
Mr Crypto-Info:
Please don't hide with a nickname behind one forum on the internet. You have nothing to fear to give your name and your face to the community you say you represent, and the company you accuse as a scam and many other things.
We would like to know your name if you are so kind, so we can literally talk to you and not to a nickname, first of all, as we don't know who is the person behind the screen but you can now every person behind this screen. We have invited you to come, we have answered all your questions, we have explained all the details you have asked, we have accepted the ones that were mistaken from us and the ones that are mistakes from your interpretation, and we have settled the formal invitation for you to come to see the interpretation issues from your side with our lawyers that can kindly explain you all the different points that you can't understand at this time.
For obvious reasons and keeping the professional care of everyone, they won't sit to explain in a forum to a nickname, something that must be explained in-person to a man. And you have rejected that invitation. But for now, we will answer to your different accusations of this post, and to everyone here to see what you can achieve by talking without knowing:
1- We don't ask you to invest, we don't want people who can't understand the project to invest on it as it may be risky for their low understanding level of a high industry business process. You clearly don't have the amount and deepness of knowledge necessary to give this evaluation as you support your accusations in personal appreciations and personal interpretations of the information, even from our answers; what makes you lose total credibility and authority as respect from the well-understood businessmen.
2- We don't have one lawyer, we have a full buffet for this, and you are calling it a lie without even knowing about this. You are setting that our lawyers' service is a scam and/or that they are part of one as you are blaming them on being professionally incapable or negligent. Now your accusations have spread to the buffet itself, besides your accusations to us.
3- The project is not a scam and you are claiming it scam with "authority" self-given and without any proof. You are one person claiming something that dozens of high business people have applauded and become part of. As you may at least understand, this puts you in a very low position, and we are kindly answering your accusations for the people not to get this opportunity out of their hands by unfolded fears from none-named accusations and interpretations.
4- You don't know about corporate structure, yet you accuse about a scam.
You don't know about legal structures, yet you accuse about a scam.
You don't know about documents and bureaucratic structures, yet you accuse about a scam.
You are accusing so many people involved, so many companies and so many juridic persons that we are pretty sure you are not professional and formed at all neither in business, law or finances. No one with a little knowledge of these areas would be objecting as you are doing, going again and again in the same already answered questions, and complaining to logical and normal actions of every and each business model from top quality in the world.
THIS IS NOT A BUSINESS FOR YOUR LEVEL OF UNDERSTANDING TO INVEST IN, PLEASE WE ADVISE YOU TO THINK ABOUT IT AS IT'S CLEAR THAT EVEN WITH A FULL COMPANY ANSWERING TO YOU AND INVITING YOU TO TALK WITH OUR LEGAL DEPARTMENT, YOU CAN'T DISCERN BETWEEN YOUR REALITY AND THE REALITY, YOUR ACCUSATIONS AND THE REALITY, YOUR INTERPRETATIONS AND THE LEGAL ONES, YOUR IDEA OF SCAM AND A TRUE BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY.
KEEP TALKING, AND KEEP GIVIN YOUR OPINIONS AND ACCUSATIONS BUT CRYPTO-INFO DON'T GET MORE INVOLVED THAN THAT AS YOU DON'T HAVE THE KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING TO TAKE AND KEEP AN INVESTING DESITION TO ANY PROJECT OR NEW BUSINESS OF THIS TYPE.
WE ALSO KINDLY ADVISE YOU TO STUDY AS YOUR WORDS CLAIM TO BE INTERESTED IN:
BLOCKCHAIN
NEW BUSINESS OR BUSINESS 3.0
INTERNATIONAL LAW
INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE
E-COMMERCE
CRYPTO-ACTIVES
MINNING AND LAND INDUSTRIES
NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS LAW AND PROCESSES
RELATIONAL MARKETING
LINGUISTICS
SEMIOLOGY
ALL OF THIS IS THE KNOWLEDGE OUR WHOLE TEAM HAS BETWEEN MORE THAN 50 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE AND MANY PROFESSIONAL FIELDS COVERED TO GIVE THIS PROJECT A SUSTAINABLE BASE FOR STARTING, CONTINUING AND GROWING IN. YOUR OPINIONS ARE CLEARLY GOING WITH A DEEP MISUNDERSTANDING AND IGNORANCE ABOUT THIS.
Regarding the other doubts that you again have asked, we kindly ask you to go back to your posts and look for our answers, as we have already answered these questions with all the detail you need, and all the time it takes. We are sorry if you expected us to make a copy-paste for you but we trust you are capable of looking and finding in this forum how to go up on the previous posts and answers. In case you don't we advise you to read the instructions of the forum or contact a moderator, as maybe this could be the reason why you don't get to understand or even read our previous answers.
You claim yourself to be the information giver and the information bringer to the community, and to represent the community. Well, we are sorry and we don't want to break your ideas and dreams, but the community is more than 1, 10 or 100 persons giving their opinions, and before and after yours we have dozens of thousands of people of the community being part of this and also claiming the totally opposite opinion of yours, and they are and they aren't consumers; you are not even an active consumer, you are just giving an opinion from outside, without proper knowledge, without authority, without experience and without even giving your name...
Dear community of this forum interested in our project:
IF YOU HAVE THE PROPER KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING TO BE PART OF OUR PROJECT, YOU ARE INVITED AND WE WELCOME YOU. IF YOU DON'T, WE STRICTLY AND STRONGLY ADVISE YOU NOT TO GET INVOLVED IN DESITIONS BEYOND YOUR UNDERSTANDING AND YOUR KNOWLEDGE, AS EVERYONE CAN UNDERSTAND SOMETHING BUT NO ONE CAN UNDERSTAND EVERYTHING, AND AS WITH LIFE, IN BUSINESS NOT EVERY OPPORTUNITY IS FOR EVERYONE. OPPORTUNITIES NEED KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE TO BE APPRECIATED AND TAKEN AS THEY ARE. THE LACK OF THESE WILL MAKE YOU FEAR AND DESTROY WHAT COULD BE THE GREATEST OPPORTUNITY.
Kindly regards
Blue Hill Foundation
Legal Department
Like I say bluehillfoundation, I don't need a lawyer to tell me you lied as did the white-paper. You remain quiet on this front.
Claiming that Bluehill Mining has a lawyer is a ruse to pass this scam off as legit. It is not legit.
Don't get me confused with a potential investor looking for information to solidify my decision to buy into this project - no no no. I am a community member that knows Blue Hill Mining is a SCAM. My intention is to bring this information to the public arena and then potential investors can make their choice - hopefully not to invest.
I will not be paying for flights to see an fictitious lawyer or a paid wanna-be lawyer. If indeed it were important to you to remove any cast doubts "in the professional and serious way that a project of this magnitude implies"... then you would have already done so. If you think having a lawyer talk to a community member would have cleared up any doubts, a project of this magnitude would have action this already before the sale of tokens. In fact a lawyer would have read the white-paper and told them it was rubbish and contradictory to each other, and you need to re-write them.
Let's move on.
Quote from the Blue Hill Mining white-paper:
Quote: Due to legal and regulatory uncertainty in the United States of America, citizens and green card holders of are prohibited from making contributions to Blue Hill Foundation and participating in the Token Sale.
Quote: Canadian citizens and persons resident in and/or domiciled in Canada are specifically excluded from participating, either directly or indirectly, in this Token Sale.
Quote: Dutch citizens and persons resident in and/or domiciled in the Netherlands are specifically excluded from participating, either directly or indirectly, in this Token Sale.
Quote: Persons domiciled in, resident in or purchasing from Japan are excluded from participating, either directly or indirectly, in this Token Sale.
Quote: Persons domiciled in, resident in or purchasing from the Republic of Korea are excluded from participating, either directly or indirectly, in this Token Sale.
https://www.bluehillfoundation.com/docs/terms-conditions.pdf
You claim to ALREADY be regulated in the Netherlands (FINMA), want to be regulated in the US (SEC) and also Toronto (Canada) HOWEVER, no-one in these countries are allowed to purchase tokens, and my major point - it is NOT regulated.
You claim Blue Hill foundation is a Netherlands based company that owns Blue Hill Mining, yet the FINMA issue a warning against Blue Hill Mining and the business structure in the white-paper does not support this. Blue Hill Foundation is not found registered in the Netherlands nor is any other company mentioned in the business model, opposite to what the white-paper(s) state. I wouldn't invest in this.
Let's not forget Blue Hill Mining is part of the SCAM by - Mize Network run by Adrian Jacuzzi (Global World Exchangers SL -GWE). He's been linked with the scams EmGoldEx, prior to its demise and (failed) rebrand as Global InterGold. Infinitum Flame/ Quark scam run by D'Arco and Arcas, via the GCR morph into Pool Miners/SARcoin and Onecoin... the list goes on.
Did I mention the Spanish Financial Regulatory Body also issued a warning against GWE - Adrian Jacuzzi. All of the above has already been discussed throughly.
So why would I invest in Blue Hill Mining when the company behind it is run by a known scammer, and has a warning equivalent in Spain as the FINMA warning in the Netherlands? I wouldn't invest.
Why would I invest in Blue Hill Mining when community members like you lie and the white-paper tells lies? I wouldn't.
Why would I invest when Blue Hill Mining when the white-papers in places contradict each other (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5152373.20). I wouldn't.
It's a bit late for you to back pedal to cover your scam. Simply put....
Please don't hide with a nickname behind one forum on the internet. You have nothing to fear to give your name and your face to the community you say you represent, and the company you accuse as a scam and many other things.
We would like to know your name if you are so kind, so we can literally talk to you and not to a nickname, first of all, as we don't know who is the person behind the screen but you can now every person behind this screen. We have invited you to come, we have answered all your questions, we have explained all the details you have asked, we have accepted the ones that were mistaken from us and the ones that are mistakes from your interpretation, and we have settled the formal invitation for you to come to see the interpretation issues from your side with our lawyers that can kindly explain you all the different points that you can't understand at this time.
For obvious reasons and keeping the professional care of everyone, they won't sit to explain in a forum to a nickname, something that must be explained in-person to a man. And you have rejected that invitation. But for now, we will answer to your different accusations of this post, and to everyone here to see what you can achieve by talking without knowing:
1- We don't ask you to invest, we don't want people who can't understand the project to invest on it as it may be risky for their low understanding level of a high industry business process. You clearly don't have the amount and deepness of knowledge necessary to give this evaluation as you support your accusations in personal appreciations and personal interpretations of the information, even from our answers; what makes you lose total credibility and authority as respect from the well-understood businessmen.
2- We don't have one lawyer, we have a full buffet for this, and you are calling it a lie without even knowing about this. You are setting that our lawyers' service is a scam and/or that they are part of one as you are blaming them on being professionally incapable or negligent. Now your accusations have spread to the buffet itself, besides your accusations to us.
3- The project is not a scam and you are claiming it scam with "authority" self-given and without any proof. You are one person claiming something that dozens of high business people have applauded and become part of. As you may at least understand, this puts you in a very low position, and we are kindly answering your accusations for the people not to get this opportunity out of their hands by unfolded fears from none-named accusations and interpretations.
4- You don't know about corporate structure, yet you accuse about a scam.
You don't know about legal structures, yet you accuse about a scam.
You don't know about documents and bureaucratic structures, yet you accuse about a scam.
You are accusing so many people involved, so many companies and so many juridic persons that we are pretty sure you are not professional and formed at all neither in business, law or finances. No one with a little knowledge of these areas would be objecting as you are doing, going again and again in the same already answered questions, and complaining to logical and normal actions of every and each business model from top quality in the world.
THIS IS NOT A BUSINESS FOR YOUR LEVEL OF UNDERSTANDING TO INVEST IN, PLEASE WE ADVISE YOU TO THINK ABOUT IT AS IT'S CLEAR THAT EVEN WITH A FULL COMPANY ANSWERING TO YOU AND INVITING YOU TO TALK WITH OUR LEGAL DEPARTMENT, YOU CAN'T DISCERN BETWEEN YOUR REALITY AND THE REALITY, YOUR ACCUSATIONS AND THE REALITY, YOUR INTERPRETATIONS AND THE LEGAL ONES, YOUR IDEA OF SCAM AND A TRUE BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY.
KEEP TALKING, AND KEEP GIVIN YOUR OPINIONS AND ACCUSATIONS BUT CRYPTO-INFO DON'T GET MORE INVOLVED THAN THAT AS YOU DON'T HAVE THE KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING TO TAKE AND KEEP AN INVESTING DESITION TO ANY PROJECT OR NEW BUSINESS OF THIS TYPE.
WE ALSO KINDLY ADVISE YOU TO STUDY AS YOUR WORDS CLAIM TO BE INTERESTED IN:
BLOCKCHAIN
NEW BUSINESS OR BUSINESS 3.0
INTERNATIONAL LAW
INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE
E-COMMERCE
CRYPTO-ACTIVES
MINNING AND LAND INDUSTRIES
NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS LAW AND PROCESSES
RELATIONAL MARKETING
LINGUISTICS
SEMIOLOGY
ALL OF THIS IS THE KNOWLEDGE OUR WHOLE TEAM HAS BETWEEN MORE THAN 50 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE AND MANY PROFESSIONAL FIELDS COVERED TO GIVE THIS PROJECT A SUSTAINABLE BASE FOR STARTING, CONTINUING AND GROWING IN. YOUR OPINIONS ARE CLEARLY GOING WITH A DEEP MISUNDERSTANDING AND IGNORANCE ABOUT THIS.
Regarding the other doubts that you again have asked, we kindly ask you to go back to your posts and look for our answers, as we have already answered these questions with all the detail you need, and all the time it takes. We are sorry if you expected us to make a copy-paste for you but we trust you are capable of looking and finding in this forum how to go up on the previous posts and answers. In case you don't we advise you to read the instructions of the forum or contact a moderator, as maybe this could be the reason why you don't get to understand or even read our previous answers.
You claim yourself to be the information giver and the information bringer to the community, and to represent the community. Well, we are sorry and we don't want to break your ideas and dreams, but the community is more than 1, 10 or 100 persons giving their opinions, and before and after yours we have dozens of thousands of people of the community being part of this and also claiming the totally opposite opinion of yours, and they are and they aren't consumers; you are not even an active consumer, you are just giving an opinion from outside, without proper knowledge, without authority, without experience and without even giving your name...
Dear community of this forum interested in our project:
IF YOU HAVE THE PROPER KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING TO BE PART OF OUR PROJECT, YOU ARE INVITED AND WE WELCOME YOU. IF YOU DON'T, WE STRICTLY AND STRONGLY ADVISE YOU NOT TO GET INVOLVED IN DESITIONS BEYOND YOUR UNDERSTANDING AND YOUR KNOWLEDGE, AS EVERYONE CAN UNDERSTAND SOMETHING BUT NO ONE CAN UNDERSTAND EVERYTHING, AND AS WITH LIFE, IN BUSINESS NOT EVERY OPPORTUNITY IS FOR EVERYONE. OPPORTUNITIES NEED KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERIENCE TO BE APPRECIATED AND TAKEN AS THEY ARE. THE LACK OF THESE WILL MAKE YOU FEAR AND DESTROY WHAT COULD BE THE GREATEST OPPORTUNITY.
Kindly regards
Blue Hill Foundation
Legal Department
Dear Forum Member:
We appreciate your participation in this topic, and above all the good intention of building opinions.
Our face-to-face invitation from the Crypto-Info user has not been a random and / or capricious decision; If not the opposite. The reasons are simple but specific:
1- Information and doubts are best treated in person. People are known and communication is more fluid and much richer in understanding
2- Certain information of a private nature and with great strategic value should not be displayed or communicated in digital format, or reproduced in any format other than that of the actual experience in persona
3- Our extraordinary commitment to invite and bring a person with doubts, to solve them in our mother house with our corporate in total confidence and openness; it is a seal of real commitment
For these reasons essentially, we believe that the ideal and the best for the community and for the Crypto-Info user in particular, is to carry out the evacuation of doubts in the professional and serious way that a project of this magnitude implies.
Greet attentively
Blue Hill Foundation
Legal department
Your Whitepaper Road map doesn't mention a FINMA license.
It states
So, FINMA or FMA? But what's a different acronym between friends?
According to FINMA's website, it takes at least six months to process a license.
So even if you apply tomorrow, you won't expect to be "fully Licensed" until Q2 2020. That's not in your road map.
And what happens if they say "NO"? What happens to the BHF tokens you are selling as exchangeable 1-1 for regulated BHM equivalents? To the money you have collected in the pre-sale?
How can Bluehill hold a FINMA approved STO in Q4 2019 if, by the middle of November, they haven't even applied for the license to hold it, which takes six months to process?
And has it crossed anyone's mind that FINMA might just actually say NO, because what you are effectively doing is applying for retroactive approval to sell BHM tokens as you have already sold them, or a straight 1-1 entitlement to them, under the BHF label?
The idea that the supposedly experienced supposed team of financial experts you supposedly have, are assuming that the licensing authorities will approve this sort of abuse of their regulatory process is laughable.
But what's a different acronym between friends?
And no tyvm, I don't want to come to Switzerland either.
this project is going to be shelved soon... so many shady info.
with this kind of project, the profile links of their team members should be available but not, only email addy is published!
we are talking huge amount of investments here, so it is a must that they should show at least their linkedin profiles.
We appreciate your participation in this topic, and above all the good intention of building opinions.
Our face-to-face invitation from the Crypto-Info user has not been a random and / or capricious decision; If not the opposite. The reasons are simple but specific:
1- Information and doubts are best treated in person. People are known and communication is more fluid and much richer in understanding
2- Certain information of a private nature and with great strategic value should not be displayed or communicated in digital format, or reproduced in any format other than that of the actual experience in persona
3- Our extraordinary commitment to invite and bring a person with doubts, to solve them in our mother house with our corporate in total confidence and openness; it is a seal of real commitment
For these reasons essentially, we believe that the ideal and the best for the community and for the Crypto-Info user in particular, is to carry out the evacuation of doubts in the professional and serious way that a project of this magnitude implies.
Greet attentively
Blue Hill Foundation
Legal department
...
As we mentioned before, we have not yet applied for the FINMA License.... Put simply, we were looking to use Finma but we haven't applied yet. As you can read on our roadmap, in the last quarter of the current year 2019 is that we will apply to the regulatory licenses. We are up to date 9 of this month of the Q4 in search of regulation, which is perfectly in the plans we have followed and communicated.
...
Blue Hill Foundation
Legal Department
As we mentioned before, we have not yet applied for the FINMA License.... Put simply, we were looking to use Finma but we haven't applied yet. As you can read on our roadmap, in the last quarter of the current year 2019 is that we will apply to the regulatory licenses. We are up to date 9 of this month of the Q4 in search of regulation, which is perfectly in the plans we have followed and communicated.
...
Blue Hill Foundation
Legal Department
Your Whitepaper Road map doesn't mention a FINMA license.
It states
Quote
Q4-2019
Intention to be fully licensed under the Liechtenstein Financial Market Authority FMA
Has this application not been made either? How long is the expected wait for approval?Intention to be fully licensed under the Liechtenstein Financial Market Authority FMA
Quote
as you can read on our roadmap, in the last quarter of the current year 2019 is that we will apply to the regulatory licenses.
Your roadmap doesn't say "we will apply in the last quarter", it says "intention to be fully licensed."So, FINMA or FMA? But what's a different acronym between friends?
According to FINMA's website, it takes at least six months to process a license.
So even if you apply tomorrow, you won't expect to be "fully Licensed" until Q2 2020. That's not in your road map.
And what happens if they say "NO"? What happens to the BHF tokens you are selling as exchangeable 1-1 for regulated BHM equivalents? To the money you have collected in the pre-sale?
How can Bluehill hold a FINMA approved STO in Q4 2019 if, by the middle of November, they haven't even applied for the license to hold it, which takes six months to process?
And has it crossed anyone's mind that FINMA might just actually say NO, because what you are effectively doing is applying for retroactive approval to sell BHM tokens as you have already sold them, or a straight 1-1 entitlement to them, under the BHF label?
The idea that the supposedly experienced supposed team of financial experts you supposedly have, are assuming that the licensing authorities will approve this sort of abuse of their regulatory process is laughable.
But what's a different acronym between friends?
Quote from: https://cointelegraph.com/press-releases/blue-hill-mine-the-top-blue-collar-cryptoasset-project-of-2019
B.H.Mining has taken a more democratic approach by planning a Swiss-regulated Security Token Offering (STO) for BHM-Tokens....
The Pre-STO is for BHF-Tokens, which will be redeemable 1-for-1 with BHM-Tokens when the official STO takes place in Q4 of 2019.
The Pre-STO is for BHF-Tokens, which will be redeemable 1-for-1 with BHM-Tokens when the official STO takes place in Q4 of 2019.
And no tyvm, I don't want to come to Switzerland either.
this project is going to be shelved soon... so many shady info.
with this kind of project, the profile links of their team members should be available but not, only email addy is published!
we are talking huge amount of investments here, so it is a must that they should show at least their linkedin profiles.
Like I say bluehillfoundation, I don't need a lawyer to tell me you lied as did the white-paper. You remain quiet on this front.
Claiming that Bluehill Mining has a lawyer is a ruse to pass this scam off as legit. It is not legit.
Don't get me confused with a potential investor looking for information to solidify my decision to buy into this project - no no no. I am a community member that knows Blue Hill Mining is a SCAM. My intention is to bring this information to the public arena and then potential investors can make their choice - hopefully not to invest.
I will not be paying for flights to see an fictitious lawyer or a paid wanna-be lawyer. If indeed it were important to you to remove any cast doubts "in the professional and serious way that a project of this magnitude implies"... then you would have already done so. If you think having a lawyer talk to a community member would have cleared up any doubts, a project of this magnitude would have action this already before the sale of tokens. In fact a lawyer would have read the white-paper and told them it was rubbish and contradictory to each other, and you need to re-write them.
Let's move on.
Quote from the Blue Hill Mining white-paper:
Quote: Due to legal and regulatory uncertainty in the United States of America, citizens and green card holders of are prohibited from making contributions to Blue Hill Foundation and participating in the Token Sale.
Quote: Canadian citizens and persons resident in and/or domiciled in Canada are specifically excluded from participating, either directly or indirectly, in this Token Sale.
Quote: Dutch citizens and persons resident in and/or domiciled in the Netherlands are specifically excluded from participating, either directly or indirectly, in this Token Sale.
Quote: Persons domiciled in, resident in or purchasing from Japan are excluded from participating, either directly or indirectly, in this Token Sale.
Quote: Persons domiciled in, resident in or purchasing from the Republic of Korea are excluded from participating, either directly or indirectly, in this Token Sale.
https://www.bluehillfoundation.com/docs/terms-conditions.pdf
You claim to ALREADY be regulated in the Netherlands (FINMA), want to be regulated in the US (SEC) and also Toronto (Canada) HOWEVER, no-one in these countries are allowed to purchase tokens, and my major point - it is NOT regulated.
You claim Blue Hill foundation is a Netherlands based company that owns Blue Hill Mining, yet the FINMA issue a warning against Blue Hill Mining and the business structure in the white-paper does not support this. Blue Hill Foundation is not found registered in the Netherlands nor is any other company mentioned in the business model, opposite to what the white-paper(s) state. I wouldn't invest in this.
Let's not forget Blue Hill Mining is part of the SCAM by - Mize Network run by Adrian Jacuzzi (Global World Exchangers SL -GWE). He's been linked with the scams EmGoldEx, prior to its demise and (failed) rebrand as Global InterGold. Infinitum Flame/ Quark scam run by D'Arco and Arcas, via the GCR morph into Pool Miners/SARcoin and Onecoin... the list goes on.
Did I mention the Spanish Financial Regulatory Body also issued a warning against GWE - Adrian Jacuzzi. All of the above has already been discussed throughly.
So why would I invest in Blue Hill Mining when the company behind it is run by a known scammer, and has a warning equivalent in Spain as the FINMA warning in the Netherlands? I wouldn't invest.
Why would I invest in Blue Hill Mining when community members like you lie and the white-paper tells lies? I wouldn't.
Why would I invest when Blue Hill Mining when the white-papers in places contradict each other (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5152373.20). I wouldn't.
It's a bit late for you to back pedal to cover your scam. Simply put....
Re: 🏔🗻 Blue Hill Mining - STO backed by one of the largest copper reserves in Asia
Dear Forum Member:
We appreciate your participation in this topic, and above all the good intention of building opinions.
Our face-to-face invitation from the Crypto-Info user has not been a random and / or capricious decision; If not the opposite. The reasons are simple but specific:
1- Information and doubts are best treated in person. People are known and communication is more fluid and much richer in understanding
2- Certain information of a private nature and with great strategic value should not be displayed or communicated in digital format, or reproduced in any format other than that of the actual experience in persona
3- Our extraordinary commitment to invite and bring a person with doubts, to solve them in our mother house with our corporate in total confidence and openness; it is a seal of real commitment
For these reasons essentially, we believe that the ideal and the best for the community and for the Crypto-Info user in particular, is to carry out the evacuation of doubts in the professional and serious way that a project of this magnitude implies.
Greet attentively
Blue Hill Foundation
Legal department
Your Whitepaper Road map doesn't mention a FINMA license.
It states
So, FINMA or FMA? But what's a different acronym between friends?
According to FINMA's website, it takes at least six months to process a license.
So even if you apply tomorrow, you won't expect to be "fully Licensed" until Q2 2020. That's not in your road map.
And what happens if they say "NO"? What happens to the BHF tokens you are selling as exchangeable 1-1 for regulated BHM equivalents? To the money you have collected in the pre-sale?
How can Bluehill hold a FINMA approved STO in Q4 2019 if, by the middle of November, they haven't even applied for the license to hold it, which takes six months to process?
And has it crossed anyone's mind that FINMA might just actually say NO, because what you are effectively doing is applying for retroactive approval to sell BHM tokens as you have already sold them, or a straight 1-1 entitlement to them, under the BHF label?
The idea that the supposedly experienced supposed team of financial experts you supposedly have, are assuming that the licensing authorities will approve this sort of abuse of their regulatory process is laughable.
But what's a different acronym between friends?
And no tyvm, I don't want to come to Switzerland either.
this project is going to be shelved soon... so many shady info.
with this kind of project, the profile links of their team members should be available but not, only email addy is published!
we are talking huge amount of investments here, so it is a must that they should show at least their linkedin profiles.
We appreciate your participation in this topic, and above all the good intention of building opinions.
Our face-to-face invitation from the Crypto-Info user has not been a random and / or capricious decision; If not the opposite. The reasons are simple but specific:
1- Information and doubts are best treated in person. People are known and communication is more fluid and much richer in understanding
2- Certain information of a private nature and with great strategic value should not be displayed or communicated in digital format, or reproduced in any format other than that of the actual experience in persona
3- Our extraordinary commitment to invite and bring a person with doubts, to solve them in our mother house with our corporate in total confidence and openness; it is a seal of real commitment
For these reasons essentially, we believe that the ideal and the best for the community and for the Crypto-Info user in particular, is to carry out the evacuation of doubts in the professional and serious way that a project of this magnitude implies.
Greet attentively
Blue Hill Foundation
Legal department
...
As we mentioned before, we have not yet applied for the FINMA License.... Put simply, we were looking to use Finma but we haven't applied yet. As you can read on our roadmap, in the last quarter of the current year 2019 is that we will apply to the regulatory licenses. We are up to date 9 of this month of the Q4 in search of regulation, which is perfectly in the plans we have followed and communicated.
...
Blue Hill Foundation
Legal Department
As we mentioned before, we have not yet applied for the FINMA License.... Put simply, we were looking to use Finma but we haven't applied yet. As you can read on our roadmap, in the last quarter of the current year 2019 is that we will apply to the regulatory licenses. We are up to date 9 of this month of the Q4 in search of regulation, which is perfectly in the plans we have followed and communicated.
...
Blue Hill Foundation
Legal Department
Your Whitepaper Road map doesn't mention a FINMA license.
It states
Quote
Q4-2019
Intention to be fully licensed under the Liechtenstein Financial Market Authority FMA
Has this application not been made either? How long is the expected wait for approval?Intention to be fully licensed under the Liechtenstein Financial Market Authority FMA
Quote
as you can read on our roadmap, in the last quarter of the current year 2019 is that we will apply to the regulatory licenses.
Your roadmap doesn't say "we will apply in the last quarter", it says "intention to be fully licensed."So, FINMA or FMA? But what's a different acronym between friends?
According to FINMA's website, it takes at least six months to process a license.
So even if you apply tomorrow, you won't expect to be "fully Licensed" until Q2 2020. That's not in your road map.
And what happens if they say "NO"? What happens to the BHF tokens you are selling as exchangeable 1-1 for regulated BHM equivalents? To the money you have collected in the pre-sale?
How can Bluehill hold a FINMA approved STO in Q4 2019 if, by the middle of November, they haven't even applied for the license to hold it, which takes six months to process?
And has it crossed anyone's mind that FINMA might just actually say NO, because what you are effectively doing is applying for retroactive approval to sell BHM tokens as you have already sold them, or a straight 1-1 entitlement to them, under the BHF label?
The idea that the supposedly experienced supposed team of financial experts you supposedly have, are assuming that the licensing authorities will approve this sort of abuse of their regulatory process is laughable.
But what's a different acronym between friends?
Quote from: https://cointelegraph.com/press-releases/blue-hill-mine-the-top-blue-collar-cryptoasset-project-of-2019
B.H.Mining has taken a more democratic approach by planning a Swiss-regulated Security Token Offering (STO) for BHM-Tokens....
The Pre-STO is for BHF-Tokens, which will be redeemable 1-for-1 with BHM-Tokens when the official STO takes place in Q4 of 2019.
The Pre-STO is for BHF-Tokens, which will be redeemable 1-for-1 with BHM-Tokens when the official STO takes place in Q4 of 2019.
And no tyvm, I don't want to come to Switzerland either.
this project is going to be shelved soon... so many shady info.
with this kind of project, the profile links of their team members should be available but not, only email addy is published!
we are talking huge amount of investments here, so it is a must that they should show at least their linkedin profiles.
Re: Blue Hill Mining - STO backed by one of the largest copper reserves in Asia
Dear Forum Member:
Thank you very much for conveying your concerns about our project. These types of constructive and objective conversations are those that denote quality of communication and understanding.
As indicated in your message, we declare our intention to be regulated in the last quarter of the current year 2019. Given the bad reviews and deliberate and unfounded opinions that we have received in this forum, and without having applied to the Swiss license yet, We found that we were placed on a warning list for that regulator.
This has logically complicated our regulation plan specifically for the Swiss license, but we have not ruled out it for any reason, and our legal apparatus is in the process of analyzing all the regulation options that are appropriate to the project, in order to apply the one that best suits our needs and objectives.
We apologize again for having had errors of expression regarding the explanatory texts of the project and the plan. We have adapted them to be clearer and we will continue to improve and evolve our project in the hands of our allies and partners as well as the constructive criticisms that are made to us in a polite and respectful way.
Thanking you for your time and input, greet you attentively.
Blue hill Foundation
Legal Department
Your Whitepaper Road map doesn't mention a FINMA license.
It states
So, FINMA or FMA? But what's a different acronym between friends?
According to FINMA's website, it takes at least six months to process a license.
So even if you apply tomorrow, you won't expect to be "fully Licensed" until Q2 2020. That's not in your road map.
And what happens if they say "NO"? What happens to the BHF tokens you are selling as exchangeable 1-1 for regulated BHM equivalents? To the money you have collected in the pre-sale?
How can Bluehill hold a FINMA approved STO in Q4 2019 if, by the middle of November, they haven't even applied for the license to hold it, which takes six months to process?
And has it crossed anyone's mind that FINMA might just actually say NO, because what you are effectively doing is applying for retroactive approval to sell BHM tokens as you have already sold them, or a straight 1-1 entitlement to them, under the BHF label?
The idea that the supposedly experienced supposed team of financial experts you supposedly have, are assuming that the licensing authorities will approve this sort of abuse of their regulatory process is laughable.
But what's a different acronym between friends?
And no tyvm, I don't want to come to Switzerland either.
Thank you very much for conveying your concerns about our project. These types of constructive and objective conversations are those that denote quality of communication and understanding.
As indicated in your message, we declare our intention to be regulated in the last quarter of the current year 2019. Given the bad reviews and deliberate and unfounded opinions that we have received in this forum, and without having applied to the Swiss license yet, We found that we were placed on a warning list for that regulator.
This has logically complicated our regulation plan specifically for the Swiss license, but we have not ruled out it for any reason, and our legal apparatus is in the process of analyzing all the regulation options that are appropriate to the project, in order to apply the one that best suits our needs and objectives.
We apologize again for having had errors of expression regarding the explanatory texts of the project and the plan. We have adapted them to be clearer and we will continue to improve and evolve our project in the hands of our allies and partners as well as the constructive criticisms that are made to us in a polite and respectful way.
Thanking you for your time and input, greet you attentively.
Blue hill Foundation
Legal Department
...
As we mentioned before, we have not yet applied for the FINMA License.... Put simply, we were looking to use Finma but we haven't applied yet. As you can read on our roadmap, in the last quarter of the current year 2019 is that we will apply to the regulatory licenses. We are up to date 9 of this month of the Q4 in search of regulation, which is perfectly in the plans we have followed and communicated.
...
Blue Hill Foundation
Legal Department
As we mentioned before, we have not yet applied for the FINMA License.... Put simply, we were looking to use Finma but we haven't applied yet. As you can read on our roadmap, in the last quarter of the current year 2019 is that we will apply to the regulatory licenses. We are up to date 9 of this month of the Q4 in search of regulation, which is perfectly in the plans we have followed and communicated.
...
Blue Hill Foundation
Legal Department
Your Whitepaper Road map doesn't mention a FINMA license.
It states
Quote
Q4-2019
Intention to be fully licensed under the Liechtenstein Financial Market Authority FMA
Has this application not been made either? How long is the expected wait for approval?Intention to be fully licensed under the Liechtenstein Financial Market Authority FMA
Quote
as you can read on our roadmap, in the last quarter of the current year 2019 is that we will apply to the regulatory licenses.
Your roadmap doesn't say "we will apply in the last quarter", it says "intention to be fully licensed."So, FINMA or FMA? But what's a different acronym between friends?
According to FINMA's website, it takes at least six months to process a license.
So even if you apply tomorrow, you won't expect to be "fully Licensed" until Q2 2020. That's not in your road map.
And what happens if they say "NO"? What happens to the BHF tokens you are selling as exchangeable 1-1 for regulated BHM equivalents? To the money you have collected in the pre-sale?
How can Bluehill hold a FINMA approved STO in Q4 2019 if, by the middle of November, they haven't even applied for the license to hold it, which takes six months to process?
And has it crossed anyone's mind that FINMA might just actually say NO, because what you are effectively doing is applying for retroactive approval to sell BHM tokens as you have already sold them, or a straight 1-1 entitlement to them, under the BHF label?
The idea that the supposedly experienced supposed team of financial experts you supposedly have, are assuming that the licensing authorities will approve this sort of abuse of their regulatory process is laughable.
But what's a different acronym between friends?
Quote from: https://cointelegraph.com/press-releases/blue-hill-mine-the-top-blue-collar-cryptoasset-project-of-2019
B.H.Mining has taken a more democratic approach by planning a Swiss-regulated Security Token Offering (STO) for BHM-Tokens....
The Pre-STO is for BHF-Tokens, which will be redeemable 1-for-1 with BHM-Tokens when the official STO takes place in Q4 of 2019.
The Pre-STO is for BHF-Tokens, which will be redeemable 1-for-1 with BHM-Tokens when the official STO takes place in Q4 of 2019.
And no tyvm, I don't want to come to Switzerland either.
Re: 🏔🗻 Blue Hill Mining - STO backed by one of the largest copper reserves in Asia
Hello Mr (Crypto-Info) as we don't know your name:
First of all, we would like to say again that we have invited you to our offices to discuss all the doubts you have and all the ones you yourself claim to be asking for the community, in order to have all the arguments and explanations you are asking for in several ways, and due to you don't trust in our replies, logically we offer you our legal department to talk with you and solve your doubts.
We don't understand your lack of interest and your lack of will to come and talk with us, seeing the effort and time you lose in posting and replying to our information. We really believe it could be much more useful if you person yourself in our offices, in a professional and committed way, to ask everything you and the community are doubting.
We invite you again to discuss with our legal team all the doubts you have and we can't do more than this for you, for the community, for yourself as a person and as a customer. We are giving you explanations, we are showing you the info, we are informing every doubt you have, we are inviting you to our offices, to talk with our legal team, to ask everything you want and need; we have all the resources available and willing to help you and solve your doubts.
The rest is totally up to you, to see if you really want to know, you want to give true information to the community, or you just want to post and scam projects. Your attitude talks much more than your words, and everyone can see it.
WE HAVE INVITED CRYPTO-INFO, WHOSE NAME WE DON'T KNOW, WHOSE PERSON IS HIDDEN BEHIND A NICKNAME AND A FORUM, WHO CLAIMS TO BE THE COMMUNITY INFORMER AND THE "SCAM-PROJECTS HERO" TO COME TO OUR OFFICES AND ASK EVERYTHING HE NEEDS, AND ALSO TO SHARE IT WITH OUR COMMUNITY, WITH YOU, THE COMMUNITY! AND CRYPTO-INFO HAS REJECTED! WHY? WE INVITE YOU AGAIN
And again, due to the lack of memory, we reply again to the same accusations that periodically you make and we answer:
1. Blue Hill Mining found on FINMA warning list:
As we mentioned before, we have not yet applied for the FINMA License. For logical reasons for their bureaucratic processes, they have the authority and right to expose projects that have used their regulatory compliance as a false statement. Put simply, we were looking to use Finma but we haven't applied yet. As you can read on our roadmap, in the last quarter of the current year 2019 is that we will apply to the regulatory licenses. We are up to date 9 of this month of the Q4 in search of regulation, which is perfectly in the plans we have followed and communicated.
2. Blue Hill Mining found on IOSCO Investor Alerts Portal (International Warning List)
They have every right to warn according to their criteria, and if they have it because of the fact that Blue Hill Mining is not yet regulated as mentioned previously it is correct; since it is part of the company's work plan.
First of all, we would like to say again that we have invited you to our offices to discuss all the doubts you have and all the ones you yourself claim to be asking for the community, in order to have all the arguments and explanations you are asking for in several ways, and due to you don't trust in our replies, logically we offer you our legal department to talk with you and solve your doubts.
We don't understand your lack of interest and your lack of will to come and talk with us, seeing the effort and time you lose in posting and replying to our information. We really believe it could be much more useful if you person yourself in our offices, in a professional and committed way, to ask everything you and the community are doubting.
We invite you again to discuss with our legal team all the doubts you have and we can't do more than this for you, for the community, for yourself as a person and as a customer. We are giving you explanations, we are showing you the info, we are informing every doubt you have, we are inviting you to our offices, to talk with our legal team, to ask everything you want and need; we have all the resources available and willing to help you and solve your doubts.
The rest is totally up to you, to see if you really want to know, you want to give true information to the community, or you just want to post and scam projects. Your attitude talks much more than your words, and everyone can see it.
WE HAVE INVITED CRYPTO-INFO, WHOSE NAME WE DON'T KNOW, WHOSE PERSON IS HIDDEN BEHIND A NICKNAME AND A FORUM, WHO CLAIMS TO BE THE COMMUNITY INFORMER AND THE "SCAM-PROJECTS HERO" TO COME TO OUR OFFICES AND ASK EVERYTHING HE NEEDS, AND ALSO TO SHARE IT WITH OUR COMMUNITY, WITH YOU, THE COMMUNITY! AND CRYPTO-INFO HAS REJECTED! WHY? WE INVITE YOU AGAIN
And again, due to the lack of memory, we reply again to the same accusations that periodically you make and we answer:
1. Blue Hill Mining found on FINMA warning list:
As we mentioned before, we have not yet applied for the FINMA License. For logical reasons for their bureaucratic processes, they have the authority and right to expose projects that have used their regulatory compliance as a false statement. Put simply, we were looking to use Finma but we haven't applied yet. As you can read on our roadmap, in the last quarter of the current year 2019 is that we will apply to the regulatory licenses. We are up to date 9 of this month of the Q4 in search of regulation, which is perfectly in the plans we have followed and communicated.
2. Blue Hill Mining found on IOSCO Investor Alerts Portal (International Warning List)
They have every right to warn according to their criteria, and if they have it because of the fact that Blue Hill Mining is not yet regulated as mentioned previously it is correct; since it is part of the company's work plan.
Blue Hill Mining would like to invite you Crypto-Info to Switzerland to our law office in order to clarify all the doubts you have about Blue Hill Mining. The Blue Hill Mining lawyers are will and able to clarify that all the statements made by Blue Hill Mining are clear and true and that any changes are in the interest of the token holder and the Blue Hill Mining project. Blue Hill Mining team is waiting for your acceptance to clarify any misunderstanding about your statements as this would be in the best interest of the Blue Hill Mining community and the Blue Hill Mining project, thank you.
Blue Hill Foundation
Legal Department
Blue Hill Foundation
Legal Department
Re: Blue Hill Foundation\Mining- Blue Hill Mine - STO - SCAM WARNING
Blue Hill Mining would like to invite you Crypto-Info to Switzerland to our law office in order to clarify all the doubts you have about Blue Hill Mining. The Blue Hill Mining lawyers are will and able to clarify that all the statements made by Blue Hill Mining are clear and true and that any changes are in the interest of the token holder and the Blue Hill Mining project. Blue Hill Mining team is waiting for your acceptance to clarify any misunderstanding about your statements as this would be in the best interest of the Blue Hill Mining community and the Blue Hill Mining project, thank you.
Blue Hill Foundation
Legal Department
Blue Hill Foundation
Legal Department
Re: 🏔🗻 Blue Hill Mining - STO backed by one of the largest copper reserves in Asia
Blue Hill Mining would like to invite you Crypto-Info to Switzerland to our law office in order to clarify all the doubts you have about Blue Hill Mining. The Blue Hill Mining lawyers are will and able to clarify that all the statements made by Blue Hill Mining are clear and true and that any changes are in the interest of the token holder and the Blue Hill Mining project. Blue Hill Mining team is waiting for your acceptance to clarify any misunderstanding about your statements as this would be in the best interest of the Blue Hill Mining community and the Blue Hill Mining project, thank you.
Blue Hill Foundation
Legal Department
Blue Hill Foundation
Legal Department
Re: 🏔🗻 Blue Hill Mining - STO backed by one of the largest copper reserves in Asia
Allow me to give you a reason on why people from the following areas cannot buy into this SCAM. Alarming RED FLAGS in the whitepaper under Terms and Conditions.
https://www.bluehillfoundation.com/docs/terms-conditions.pdf
Quote: Due to legal and regulatory uncertainty in the United States of America, citizens and green card holders of are prohibited from making contributions to Blue Hill Foundation and participating in the Token Sale.
Quote: Canadian citizens and persons resident in and/or domiciled in Canada are specifically excluded from participating, either directly or indirectly, in this Token Sale.
Quote: Dutch citizens and persons resident in and/or domiciled in the Netherlands are specifically excluded from participating, either directly or indirectly, in this Token Sale.
Quote: Persons domiciled in, resident in or purchasing from Japan are excluded from participating, either directly or indirectly, in this Token Sale.
Quote: Persons domiciled in, resident in or purchasing from the Republic of Korea are excluded from participating, either directly or indirectly, in this Token Sale.
Why are these RED FLAGS?
Because you claim to ALREADY be regulated in the Netherlands (FINMA), want to be regulated in the US (SEC) and also Toronto (Canada) HOWEVER, no-one in these countries are allowed to purchase tokens. LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL
You then claimed that you did not state this but WRONG, another LIE.
It is part of the plan to be regulated with the FINMA and the SEC and in Toronto.
Here is your Roadmap.
RED FLAGS!
Blue Hill Mining is a SCAM, Blue Hill Mining is an embarrassment to other SCAMMERS because they cant get their story straight. This is the worse SCAM I have ever seen put together. Amateurs. Scammers.
SCAM
https://www.bluehillfoundation.com/docs/terms-conditions.pdf
Quote: Due to legal and regulatory uncertainty in the United States of America, citizens and green card holders of are prohibited from making contributions to Blue Hill Foundation and participating in the Token Sale.
Quote: Canadian citizens and persons resident in and/or domiciled in Canada are specifically excluded from participating, either directly or indirectly, in this Token Sale.
Quote: Dutch citizens and persons resident in and/or domiciled in the Netherlands are specifically excluded from participating, either directly or indirectly, in this Token Sale.
Quote: Persons domiciled in, resident in or purchasing from Japan are excluded from participating, either directly or indirectly, in this Token Sale.
Quote: Persons domiciled in, resident in or purchasing from the Republic of Korea are excluded from participating, either directly or indirectly, in this Token Sale.
Why are these RED FLAGS?
Because you claim to ALREADY be regulated in the Netherlands (FINMA), want to be regulated in the US (SEC) and also Toronto (Canada) HOWEVER, no-one in these countries are allowed to purchase tokens. LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL
You then claimed that you did not state this but WRONG, another LIE.
It is part of the plan to be regulated with the FINMA and the SEC and in Toronto.
Here is your Roadmap.
RED FLAGS!
Blue Hill Mining is a SCAM, Blue Hill Mining is an embarrassment to other SCAMMERS because they cant get their story straight. This is the worse SCAM I have ever seen put together. Amateurs. Scammers.
SCAM
Dear Sir:
We have been reviewing your profile and finding opinions about you, in which it is clear that your task is to generate great scam strategies for new projects, and then blackmail those responsible for the project for money, as stated in the red flags and complaints to your profile.
It is a coincidence, that at the time that such a scam began towards our project, mainly on this platform and for its posts; They also began to blackmail our communication team asking for money to withdraw posts from this thread.
As the situation is obvious, we take the matter for granted and share a graphic file that demonstrates what we say.
Greet attentively
Blue Hill Foundation team
Communication and marketing
Re: 🏔🗻 Blue Hill Mining - STO backed by one of the largest copper reserves in Asia
Dear Community
As a final answer to this thread (having concluded the Blue Hill Foundation stage for the Blue Hill Mining STO) and thanking you all for your inquires and participation, we leave this previous list made up by a user with some topics to clarify, in order to give more light upon the queries highlited about BHF.
8. Blue Hill Mining relationship with Bayajtatu
Its true that you cannot see see the name Blue Hill Foundation but you can easily read in our Terms and Conditions and also look into our backoffice, where there is a link which shows that Rebus Corporation is 24% co-owner of Bauajtatu LLC. Rebus Corporation is a company belonging to Blue Hill Foundation, the main company behind the Blue Hill Mining Project, so; its logical to say that the brand is 24% co-owner, as there is a huge world known difference between a brand and a company in legal name. You can check this difference in thousands of companies around the world in all the industries.
As a final answer to this thread (having concluded the Blue Hill Foundation stage for the Blue Hill Mining STO) and thanking you all for your inquires and participation, we leave this previous list made up by a user with some topics to clarify, in order to give more light upon the queries highlited about BHF.
8. Blue Hill Mining relationship with Bayajtatu
Its true that you cannot see see the name Blue Hill Foundation but you can easily read in our Terms and Conditions and also look into our backoffice, where there is a link which shows that Rebus Corporation is 24% co-owner of Bauajtatu LLC. Rebus Corporation is a company belonging to Blue Hill Foundation, the main company behind the Blue Hill Mining Project, so; its logical to say that the brand is 24% co-owner, as there is a huge world known difference between a brand and a company in legal name. You can check this difference in thousands of companies around the world in all the industries.
I just need to fully understand from you bluehillfoundation.sup what you are saying above. This is very important bluehillfoundation.sup, the information you provide must be UP-TO-DATE, ie. current. Please be clear for the community with my below question.
You say Rebus Corporation is a company that Blue Hill Foundation own, whom as to date own 24% of Bauajtatu LLC? To-date means as of right now, today.
yes or no? feel free to expand your answer.
Dear Community:
Regarding the question made above, this is our answer.
Yes, Rebus Corporation BV, owns today 24% of Bayatatu LLC, this can be see via the government link to the state registration. Rebus Corporation is a Blue Hill Foundation Company since the beggining of the project.
Feel free to ask whatever else you may doubt.
Cordially greetings
Blue Hill Foundation
Communication and Marketing Department
Re: 🏔🗻 Blue Hill Mining - STO backed by one of the largest copper reserves in Asia
It must be embarrassing for Blue Hill Mining not being legal and therefore not able to sell their scam token to the very countries they are claiming to be regulated in (FINMA) or trying (Toronto, US).
Who would encourage anyone from the Netherlands (FINMA), the US (SEC) and Toronto (Canada) to buy into this SCAM. You may as well include some of Asia and other countries as well, because this project has been put together by amateurs, leaving so many RED FLAGS. Don't pretend to try and be/get regulated in these countries, you will just embarrass yourself.
Give the community a good reason why people from the Netherlands, the US, and Canada, can and should buy into this token.
There isn't a reason. None.
Who would encourage anyone from the Netherlands (FINMA), the US (SEC) and Toronto (Canada) to buy into this SCAM. You may as well include some of Asia and other countries as well, because this project has been put together by amateurs, leaving so many RED FLAGS. Don't pretend to try and be/get regulated in these countries, you will just embarrass yourself.
Give the community a good reason why people from the Netherlands, the US, and Canada, can and should buy into this token.
There isn't a reason. None.
Dear Community:
Regarding the question made above, this is our answer.
Blue Hill Mining is a totally legal project and yet so, it's not a scam. We have never claimed to be regulated neither in Netherlads, Canada or USA. As you should know, each country that you have named has its own regulation. We are beggining the regulation process as you can easily read in our roadmap, and as far we are not intending to be regulated in those countries in this stage.
In order to be able to sell to those countries, we must apply and get each country's regulation; and once this is done we would be able to get into those markets. Right now that's not part of our plan, so that's why we don't have any reason at all of why these people could and should acquire our tokens; as we don't have these countries included neither in our selling plan or our regulation plan for the Q4-2019.
Feel free to ask whatever else you may doubt.
Cordially greetings
Blue Hill Foundation
Communication and Marketing Department
Re: 🏔🗻 Blue Hill Mining - STO backed by one of the largest copper reserves in Asia
It must be embarrassing for Blue Hill Mining not being legal and therefore not able to sell their scam token to the very countries they are claiming to be regulated in (FINMA) or trying (Toronto, US).
Who would encourage anyone from the Netherlands (FINMA), the US (SEC) and Toronto (Canada) to buy into this SCAM. You may as well include some of Asia and other countries as well, because this project has been put together by amateurs, leaving so many RED FLAGS. Don't pretend to try and be/get regulated in these countries, you will just embarrass yourself.
Give the community a good reason why people from the Netherlands, the US, and Canada, can and should buy into this token.
There isn't a reason. None.
Who would encourage anyone from the Netherlands (FINMA), the US (SEC) and Toronto (Canada) to buy into this SCAM. You may as well include some of Asia and other countries as well, because this project has been put together by amateurs, leaving so many RED FLAGS. Don't pretend to try and be/get regulated in these countries, you will just embarrass yourself.
Give the community a good reason why people from the Netherlands, the US, and Canada, can and should buy into this token.
There isn't a reason. None.
Dear Community:
Regarding the question made above, this is our answer.
Blue Hill Mining is a totally legal project and yet so, it's not a scam. We have never claimed to be regulated neither in Netherlads, Canada or USA. As you should know, each country that you have named has its own regulation. We are beggining the regulation process as you can easily read in our roadmap, and as far we are not intending to be regulated in those countries in this stage.
In order to be able to sell to those countries, we must apply and get each country's regulation; and once this is done we would be able to get into those markets. Right now that's not part of our plan, so that's why we don't have any reason at all of why these people could and should acquire our tokens; as we don't have these countries included neither in our selling plan or our regulation plan for the Q4-2019.
Feel free to ask whatever else you may doubt.
Cordially greetings
Blue Hill Foundation
Communication and Marketing Department
Re: 🏔🗻 Blue Hill Mining - STO backed by one of the largest copper reserves in Asia
It must be embarrassing for Blue Hill Mining not being legal and therefore not able to sell their scam token to the very countries they are claiming to be regulated in (FINMA) or trying (Toronto, US).
Who would encourage anyone from the Netherlands (FINMA), the US (SEC) and Toronto (Canada) to buy into this SCAM. You may as well include some of Asia and other countries as well, because this project has been put together by amateurs, leaving so many RED FLAGS. Don't pretend to try and be/get regulated in these countries, you will just embarrass yourself.
Give the community a good reason why people from the Netherlands, the US, and Canada, can and should buy into this token.
There isn't a reason. None.
Who would encourage anyone from the Netherlands (FINMA), the US (SEC) and Toronto (Canada) to buy into this SCAM. You may as well include some of Asia and other countries as well, because this project has been put together by amateurs, leaving so many RED FLAGS. Don't pretend to try and be/get regulated in these countries, you will just embarrass yourself.
Give the community a good reason why people from the Netherlands, the US, and Canada, can and should buy into this token.
There isn't a reason. None.
Dear Community:
Regarding the question made above, this is our answer.
Blue Hill Mining is a totally legal project and yet so, it's not a scam. We have never claimed to be regulated neither in Netherlads, Canada or USA. As you should know, each country that you have named has its own regulation. We are beggining the regulation process as you can easily read in our roadmap, and as far we are not intending to be regulated in those countries in this stage.
In order to be able to sell to those countries, we must apply and get each country's regulation; and once this is done we would be able to get into those markets. Right now that's not part of our plan, so that's why we don't have any reason at all of why these people could and should acquire our tokens; as we don't have these countries included neither in our selling plan or our regulation plan for the Q4-2019.
Feel free to ask whatever else you may doubt.
Cordially greetings
Blue Hill Foundation
Communication and Marketing Department
Re: 🏔🗻 Blue Hill Mining - STO backed by one of the largest copper reserves in Asia
Dear Community
As a final answer to this thread (having concluded the Blue Hill Foundation stage for the Blue Hill Mining STO) and thanking you all for your inquires and participation, we leave this previous list made up by a user with some topics to clarify, in order to give more light upon the queries highlited about BHF.
1. Blue Hill Mining found on FINMA warning list:
As we mentioned before, we have not yet applied for the FINMA License. For logical reasons of their bureaucratic processes, they have the authority and right to expose projects that have used their regulatory compliance as a false statement. Put simply, we were looking to use Finma but have decided to use a quicker regulatory compliance. As you can read on our roadmap, in the last quarter of the current year 2019 is that we will apply to the regulatory licenses that best suit the project and the corporate strategy. We are up to date 7 of this quarter in search of regulation, which is perfectly in the plans we have followed and communicated.
2. Blue Hill Mining found on IOSCO Investor Alerts Portal (International Warning List)
They have every right to warn according to their criteria, and if they have it because of the fact that Blue Hill Mining is not yet regulated as mentioned previously it is correct; since it is part of the company's work plan.
3. Blue Hill Mining is NOT found in the Swiss Commercial Register
It's true, because we have not yet concluded where and when the company is regulated. We will be regulated according to the country in which it happens. If it happens in Switzerland we would apply to the Swiss regulation for example. Until that moment the record you indicate will not be found.
4. Articles written against Blue Hill Mining.
People are free to give their opinion and that is good both for and against.A healthy debate is encouraged and an activity that we will always try to defend for the benefit of our investors. Opinions are always necessary and welcome.
5. No KYC was required when purchasing Blue Hill Mining BHF-Token
Unregulated tokens, such as the BHF-Token case, do not need KYC. The BHM-Token will need it. In the exchange of the BHF-Token for the BHM-Token a KYC will also be requested.
5. Contradictions from bluehillfoundation.sup and the whitepapers.
It is a project that will begin on a specific date, is a problem of understanding the document. We are Blue Hill Foundation and the roadmap is clarified and communicated in order to understand the steps of the project. We speak in the present tense literally to imply the concretion of the project, but at the beginning we talk about a future project. We have used the PRESENT time in writing to refer to the future in a situational way; but it is clearly a FUTURE PROJECT and you can verify it with the official documents. We apologize if such a situation has been misunderstood, but for that we communicate what the roadmap of the project is.
6. Blue Hill Mining team members swapping headshots and names.
The confusion of the photographs between two members of our team was due to the simple fact that when changing the project programming and communication team, a misunderstanding was generated between the two.Photographs corresponded to the wrong member; a common detail and simple mistake that was resolved on the spot. The integrity of the team is something were proud of.
7. Blue Hill Mining buying promotional photos and video's - none of this media is actually the real Mine.
Our Blue Hill Mine is an exploration mining project, in which 8 years of geological research have been invested. There has been no exploitation work in the field. As well as a thousand other industries and diverse markets in countless brands, it is logical that in a multimedia presentation legal footage is used portray a visualisation and concept of our project. At no time have we lacked the honesty and / or legality of our activity since the importance of the message lies in the text and the data described, not in the images.
8. Blue Hill Mining relationship with Bayajtatu
Its true that you cannot see see the name Blue Hill Foundation but you can easily read in our Terms and Conditions and also look into our backoffice, where there is a link which shows that Rebus Corporation is 24% co-owner of Bauajtatu LLC. Rebus Corporation is a company belonging to Blue Hill Foundation, the main company behind the Blue Hill Mining Project, so; its logical to say that the brand is 24% co-owner, as there is a huge world known difference between a brand and a company in legal name. You can check this difference in thousands of companies around the world in all the industries.
We are deeply grateful for your interest and participation in this project, we thank you all and invite you to continue learning about Blue Hill Mining in view of our STO. You can follow us on our official channels as well as on our websites. For any questions that may arise, we urge you to write to our support team.
Cordially greetings
Blue Hill Foundation
Communication and Marketing Department
As a final answer to this thread (having concluded the Blue Hill Foundation stage for the Blue Hill Mining STO) and thanking you all for your inquires and participation, we leave this previous list made up by a user with some topics to clarify, in order to give more light upon the queries highlited about BHF.
1. Blue Hill Mining found on FINMA warning list:
As we mentioned before, we have not yet applied for the FINMA License. For logical reasons of their bureaucratic processes, they have the authority and right to expose projects that have used their regulatory compliance as a false statement. Put simply, we were looking to use Finma but have decided to use a quicker regulatory compliance. As you can read on our roadmap, in the last quarter of the current year 2019 is that we will apply to the regulatory licenses that best suit the project and the corporate strategy. We are up to date 7 of this quarter in search of regulation, which is perfectly in the plans we have followed and communicated.
2. Blue Hill Mining found on IOSCO Investor Alerts Portal (International Warning List)
They have every right to warn according to their criteria, and if they have it because of the fact that Blue Hill Mining is not yet regulated as mentioned previously it is correct; since it is part of the company's work plan.
3. Blue Hill Mining is NOT found in the Swiss Commercial Register
It's true, because we have not yet concluded where and when the company is regulated. We will be regulated according to the country in which it happens. If it happens in Switzerland we would apply to the Swiss regulation for example. Until that moment the record you indicate will not be found.
4. Articles written against Blue Hill Mining.
People are free to give their opinion and that is good both for and against.A healthy debate is encouraged and an activity that we will always try to defend for the benefit of our investors. Opinions are always necessary and welcome.
5. No KYC was required when purchasing Blue Hill Mining BHF-Token
Unregulated tokens, such as the BHF-Token case, do not need KYC. The BHM-Token will need it. In the exchange of the BHF-Token for the BHM-Token a KYC will also be requested.
5. Contradictions from bluehillfoundation.sup and the whitepapers.
It is a project that will begin on a specific date, is a problem of understanding the document. We are Blue Hill Foundation and the roadmap is clarified and communicated in order to understand the steps of the project. We speak in the present tense literally to imply the concretion of the project, but at the beginning we talk about a future project. We have used the PRESENT time in writing to refer to the future in a situational way; but it is clearly a FUTURE PROJECT and you can verify it with the official documents. We apologize if such a situation has been misunderstood, but for that we communicate what the roadmap of the project is.
6. Blue Hill Mining team members swapping headshots and names.
The confusion of the photographs between two members of our team was due to the simple fact that when changing the project programming and communication team, a misunderstanding was generated between the two.Photographs corresponded to the wrong member; a common detail and simple mistake that was resolved on the spot. The integrity of the team is something were proud of.
7. Blue Hill Mining buying promotional photos and video's - none of this media is actually the real Mine.
Our Blue Hill Mine is an exploration mining project, in which 8 years of geological research have been invested. There has been no exploitation work in the field. As well as a thousand other industries and diverse markets in countless brands, it is logical that in a multimedia presentation legal footage is used portray a visualisation and concept of our project. At no time have we lacked the honesty and / or legality of our activity since the importance of the message lies in the text and the data described, not in the images.
8. Blue Hill Mining relationship with Bayajtatu
Its true that you cannot see see the name Blue Hill Foundation but you can easily read in our Terms and Conditions and also look into our backoffice, where there is a link which shows that Rebus Corporation is 24% co-owner of Bauajtatu LLC. Rebus Corporation is a company belonging to Blue Hill Foundation, the main company behind the Blue Hill Mining Project, so; its logical to say that the brand is 24% co-owner, as there is a huge world known difference between a brand and a company in legal name. You can check this difference in thousands of companies around the world in all the industries.
We are deeply grateful for your interest and participation in this project, we thank you all and invite you to continue learning about Blue Hill Mining in view of our STO. You can follow us on our official channels as well as on our websites. For any questions that may arise, we urge you to write to our support team.
Cordially greetings
Blue Hill Foundation
Communication and Marketing Department
Re: 🏔🗻 Blue Hill Mining - STO backed by one of the largest copper reserves in Asia
Dear community:
As we have been falsely accused in this thread with misintended and misinterpreted data in favor of the perpetrator, below is the answer that we give regarding the ROI and the government link for the Blue Hill Mine license confirming that the license is paid and active, as well as other topics.
We will answer everything that you may doubt about, as this information can be found in several places around our communication assets. Its up to you and your common sense to give credit or not to the accusations, as we understand there can be doubts but not accusations. Simply because we haven't gotten any question to our support or communication team, even doe you can accesso to their mails by yourselfs. So, with respect and clear messages, we will inform your doubts in this thread thill they are all answered.
Explanation of the potential of increase in value of the BHM-Token.
The 8 year geological works performed on Blue Hill Mine, show an estimated resources of Copper: 1,400,000 tons - 5,900,000 tons; Nickel 2,005,560 tons 4,550,000 tons: Cobalt 165,888 tons - 638,280 tons; Gold 391 tons 1,651 tons) in less than 10% of the surface area. The remaining 90% of the surface area still remaining to be discovered, which covers a vast area of almost 70 times the size of the principality of Monaco. According to an acceptable valuation formula in the mining industry, Blue Hill Mine should be worth 20% to 30% of the total resources at current market value, whereas the final stock market value has historically proven to further enhance this ratio. Taking this formula into account the estimated resources of Blue Hill Mine is estimated at $23 per token. Blue Hill Foundation strategy is to sell a small percentage of the mine via a security token offering (more than 300 times undervalued). This in order to prove up the estimated resources of Blue Hill Mine to the Canadian National Instrument 43-101 standards (The Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects within Canada), so that the majority ownership of Blue Hill Mine will increase in value on the Canadian Stock Exchange. This is made possible due to the blockchain technology as for the very first time retail investors can have access to the previously highly restricted mining industry via a security token giving you a co-ownership into Blue Hill Mine. It is know that the mining industry carries a high risk and on the upside it is common that one can multiply its investment in this sector.
Many other mines and hence mine owners have similar ROI and much higher ROI then proposed by Blue Hill Mining
For example, Rob McEwen that turned US$1 million into US$3 billion and the larger players in the mining industry most of which make their billions from the mining industries including Vladimir Sergeyevich Lisin US$21 billion, Alisher Usmanov 18 billion, Lakshmi Mittal 16 billion, German Larrea Mota Velasco 16 billion, Viktor Vekselberg 16 billion, Vladimir Potanin 14 billion, Iris Fontbona 14 billion, Alberto Bailleres Gonzalez 12 billion, Rinat Akhmetov 12 billion as well as the neighboring mine called Turquoise Hill (now one of the largest copper mines in Asia), within the same metallic belt as Blue Hill Mine, making Robert Martin Friedland a billionaire (upon the discovery of the minerals to international standards).
For the Blue Hill Mine licenses
See government link that these license are paid and with status active License 14307 & License 14308.
Regarding Whitepaper
As expected in certain markets and especially in certain legal and bureaucratic areas, there are generic data and writing models already accepted and approved for use. It is no plagiarism to place these blocks of general information in our documents, since they correspond to correct and fundamental data of general themes of free use.
Being the accusation of plagiarism a bad intention based on falsehood and misrepresentation of the facts, we again give rise to the common sense that everything related to the Blue Hill Foundation project is of authorship and self-explanation as it is obvious to do; and we have taken certain meanings of concepts difficult to explain from other sources validated and active in communication.
It could be considered plagiarism if the majority of the document were an exact copy of a source, where the information dumped directly affected the proposed business model, economic data, expectation of return, roadmap, financial strategy, sponsors and partners , the advisors and / or the team. Since this is not the case, we regret having to explain something so logical and fundamental..
Regarding graphic footage from stock
Our Blue Hill Mine is an exploration mining project, in which 8 years of geological research have been invested. There has been no exploitation work in the field. As well as a thousand other industries and diverse markets in countless brands, it is logical that in a multimedia presentation legal footage is used to connotation and conceptualize the texts. At no time have we lacked the honesty and / or legality of our activity since the importance of the message lies in the text and the data described, not in the images.
Blue Hill Foundation
Communication & Marketing Department
As we have been falsely accused in this thread with misintended and misinterpreted data in favor of the perpetrator, below is the answer that we give regarding the ROI and the government link for the Blue Hill Mine license confirming that the license is paid and active, as well as other topics.
We will answer everything that you may doubt about, as this information can be found in several places around our communication assets. Its up to you and your common sense to give credit or not to the accusations, as we understand there can be doubts but not accusations. Simply because we haven't gotten any question to our support or communication team, even doe you can accesso to their mails by yourselfs. So, with respect and clear messages, we will inform your doubts in this thread thill they are all answered.
Explanation of the potential of increase in value of the BHM-Token.
The 8 year geological works performed on Blue Hill Mine, show an estimated resources of Copper: 1,400,000 tons - 5,900,000 tons; Nickel 2,005,560 tons 4,550,000 tons: Cobalt 165,888 tons - 638,280 tons; Gold 391 tons 1,651 tons) in less than 10% of the surface area. The remaining 90% of the surface area still remaining to be discovered, which covers a vast area of almost 70 times the size of the principality of Monaco. According to an acceptable valuation formula in the mining industry, Blue Hill Mine should be worth 20% to 30% of the total resources at current market value, whereas the final stock market value has historically proven to further enhance this ratio. Taking this formula into account the estimated resources of Blue Hill Mine is estimated at $23 per token. Blue Hill Foundation strategy is to sell a small percentage of the mine via a security token offering (more than 300 times undervalued). This in order to prove up the estimated resources of Blue Hill Mine to the Canadian National Instrument 43-101 standards (The Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects within Canada), so that the majority ownership of Blue Hill Mine will increase in value on the Canadian Stock Exchange. This is made possible due to the blockchain technology as for the very first time retail investors can have access to the previously highly restricted mining industry via a security token giving you a co-ownership into Blue Hill Mine. It is know that the mining industry carries a high risk and on the upside it is common that one can multiply its investment in this sector.
Many other mines and hence mine owners have similar ROI and much higher ROI then proposed by Blue Hill Mining
For example, Rob McEwen that turned US$1 million into US$3 billion and the larger players in the mining industry most of which make their billions from the mining industries including Vladimir Sergeyevich Lisin US$21 billion, Alisher Usmanov 18 billion, Lakshmi Mittal 16 billion, German Larrea Mota Velasco 16 billion, Viktor Vekselberg 16 billion, Vladimir Potanin 14 billion, Iris Fontbona 14 billion, Alberto Bailleres Gonzalez 12 billion, Rinat Akhmetov 12 billion as well as the neighboring mine called Turquoise Hill (now one of the largest copper mines in Asia), within the same metallic belt as Blue Hill Mine, making Robert Martin Friedland a billionaire (upon the discovery of the minerals to international standards).
For the Blue Hill Mine licenses
See government link that these license are paid and with status active License 14307 & License 14308.
Regarding Whitepaper
As expected in certain markets and especially in certain legal and bureaucratic areas, there are generic data and writing models already accepted and approved for use. It is no plagiarism to place these blocks of general information in our documents, since they correspond to correct and fundamental data of general themes of free use.
Being the accusation of plagiarism a bad intention based on falsehood and misrepresentation of the facts, we again give rise to the common sense that everything related to the Blue Hill Foundation project is of authorship and self-explanation as it is obvious to do; and we have taken certain meanings of concepts difficult to explain from other sources validated and active in communication.
It could be considered plagiarism if the majority of the document were an exact copy of a source, where the information dumped directly affected the proposed business model, economic data, expectation of return, roadmap, financial strategy, sponsors and partners , the advisors and / or the team. Since this is not the case, we regret having to explain something so logical and fundamental..
Regarding graphic footage from stock
Our Blue Hill Mine is an exploration mining project, in which 8 years of geological research have been invested. There has been no exploitation work in the field. As well as a thousand other industries and diverse markets in countless brands, it is logical that in a multimedia presentation legal footage is used to connotation and conceptualize the texts. At no time have we lacked the honesty and / or legality of our activity since the importance of the message lies in the text and the data described, not in the images.
Blue Hill Foundation
Communication & Marketing Department
Re: 🏔🗻 Blue Hill Mining - STO backed by one of the largest copper reserves in Asia
Important information❗️
We decided to clarify the situation with FINMA regulator. We see that this issue is of concern to many of our subscribers and supporters.
Blue Hill Mining as well as Blue Hill Foundation have always been honest and clear about the non-regulatory situation. It can be verified both in the official documents and on the official websites, as well as in each publication we have made on the subject.
It is not new that FINMA communicates that we do not have regulation yet, and as we have well established in our road map, the procedures to obtain the necessary and appropriate regulations to the business plan of the company will be carried out in the fourth quarter of 2019, which has still arrived.
We appeal to their common sense to discern between a news or novelty and a previously established data such as regulation.
✨Best regards
Blue Hill foundation
We decided to clarify the situation with FINMA regulator. We see that this issue is of concern to many of our subscribers and supporters.
Blue Hill Mining as well as Blue Hill Foundation have always been honest and clear about the non-regulatory situation. It can be verified both in the official documents and on the official websites, as well as in each publication we have made on the subject.
It is not new that FINMA communicates that we do not have regulation yet, and as we have well established in our road map, the procedures to obtain the necessary and appropriate regulations to the business plan of the company will be carried out in the fourth quarter of 2019, which has still arrived.
We appeal to their common sense to discern between a news or novelty and a previously established data such as regulation.
✨Best regards
Blue Hill foundation
Re: 🏔🗻 Blue Hill Mining - STO backed by one of the largest copper reserves in Asia
FINMA issued a WARNING for Blue Hill Mining!
Blue Hill Mining is NOT registered with the FINMA.
https://www.finma.ch/en/finma-public/warning-list/blue-hill-mining/
The Swiss FINMA has put Blue Hill Mining on their warning list on 20 September 2019. Blue Hill Mining is based in Haupstrasse 71 in Degersheim, Switzerland, and in Loewen-Koester Strasse 6 in Lünen, Germany.
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=https://verbraucherschutzforum.berlin/2019-09-23/blue-hill-mining-achtung-nicht-finma-authorisiert-202229&prev=search
We also find INVESTOR ALERTS for Blue Hill Mining are now starting to take place.
https://www.iosco.org/investor_protection/?subsection=investor_alerts_portal
We said we would pursue getting Finma registered we never said we 'were' Finma registered. We will look to get Finma registered after being regulated as a security token by the European Regulation.Blue Hill Mining is NOT registered with the FINMA.
https://www.finma.ch/en/finma-public/warning-list/blue-hill-mining/
The Swiss FINMA has put Blue Hill Mining on their warning list on 20 September 2019. Blue Hill Mining is based in Haupstrasse 71 in Degersheim, Switzerland, and in Loewen-Koester Strasse 6 in Lünen, Germany.
https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=https://verbraucherschutzforum.berlin/2019-09-23/blue-hill-mining-achtung-nicht-finma-authorisiert-202229&prev=search
We also find INVESTOR ALERTS for Blue Hill Mining are now starting to take place.
https://www.iosco.org/investor_protection/?subsection=investor_alerts_portal