These games are solely a function of the Player's luck at the moment , It's clear that Strategies can be applied In fact, there are many on the web and in many publications But what Really makes sense is that these games require great restraint There's no need to invent anything or use a martingale or anything similar, because that would be the end of your money.

You should play with carefully calculated money, and with that, you can achieve better results.

I think it's possible for a casino to have 100% original content that attracts and keeps its players engaged.

Business is really hard though, there is 100% chance that your resources might never yield something you desire. Business is very hard, most oftien you don't win when you start, you may feel discouraged and all that and also you might also run into some losses, these things are can't be avoided but if you are dedicated and ready to compromise somethings to improve the business, you will succeed in it but like I said, alot of people failed in business.

I don't mind if I have investment and not really business type, it's easy to manage invest at your comfort while you focus on other means of making money, it's easy to control as you can see some loss coming unlike business that you will never see coming, once you are in it that's it, you have to sell everything you are have down before you can be able to know if your business strategy comply with your cost of production,  cost of income and revenue.

I have made this kind of reference earlier before now, The thing is that so many persons who make predictions of bitcoin and published it to the public doesn't make research, some of them make their analysis without research or findings and that's why bitcoin price alway end up on disappointing them.

Bitcoin price is not that's rational, and before you makes a public predictions of bitcoin ensure you have study the pia chart of bitcoin and make your findings of how the candle sticks movement will be in next move, but people predict without having results.

Gold is scarce but it has no limited supply. Bitcoin has limited supply.
Gold is not easy to save. Bitcoin is easy to save if you read and understand about it.

Because BTC is digital - and people of this age tend to go for this rather than gold and assets that cannot be used on the get-go, so to speak.

There is no fixed amount for child raising because even if someone has 10 million on there account there is a high probability of not having any single one left before the child will even get to higher institutions in schooling so actually instead of someone to ask of the money that should be needed they should instead get a stable source whether working or self employed because that is what can guarantee and last till they saw there children from all levels in education, some persons do not see what is ahead of them but instead they only see what the material things can buy for them at the time.

Half of us are profitable? Where are you even getting that idea from?

I don't see how any of those tokens you mentioned would have any potential, and i am not sure what kind of potential you are looking for your trading tactics. Because that sounds like you are interested on holding to me.

And to any of the coins you mentioned holding wouldn't either make much gains or had potential to lose it all. And that's why i am guessing DYOR wouldn't help for newcomers. You might as well use dice and buy anything.

When the Bitcoin price closed red for the month of August, most of the people did not expected this because in the first 10 to 15 days the Bitcoin made in another all time high and everyone was thinking that this month will be closed green but we had some bearish sentiments in the latter part of the August.

People need a good mentality, financial and knowledge before they want to have kids.

These thing three are bare minimum before someone want to have a kids, I would want to add one more: make sure you've finished your single life. What I mean, if you still want to have fun, fuck many women, get drunk, and other "bad lifestyle", stay single until you're ready to be a husband and a dad.

I've always told people that they should have plenty of other things to enjoy in the real world, because that way they'll allocate less time to each entertainment activity so they can enjoy many activities. This reduces the risk of addiction to alcohol, drugs, gambling, and even depression.

But unfortunately, when people have problems at work or financial problems at home, they choose to seek out alcohol, drugs, and even gambling and isolate themselves from the rest of the world as a way to forget their problems. The effect is the opposite: they get another problem: addiction, which is a very difficult disease to cure.

It's said about brain that, "use it or lose it" — now, question being, do you think if person plays brainless gambling games such as slots, dice for major part of his/her daily routine, will it make him/her dull?

Edit: "brainless" as in playing gambling games that does not require using brain, I thought it was clear especially given examples.

It's incredible that even after 15 years since the existence of Bitcoin, a lot of those who own Bitcoin have not learned anything, so they still think that CEXs are some kind of bank where you can store (in a safe way) your cryptocurrencies and nothing bad can happen. Will people ever understand that no government in the world will accept Bitcoin for what it actually is, but rather they accept it by changing its purpose?

It will probably never happen, but as the old saying goes, "While I breathe, I hope"

People are actually aware of this but actually lots of people are lazy to transfer to those wallets which they have control. Since what they think its waste of time to do transfer when they want to trade their asset. They are so confident that nothing will happen on the CEX's they are using.

I do not actually understand the perceptive you are coming from. You mean losing money is a sign of being a wealthy man or a sign of having a big money.
I thought that being very judicious and not lose money is a good way to be rich but I am just hearing a different thing altogether this night.
So, it will be fine to say that we should learn how to lose money in order to be rich.

Who do you think has control over TSMC factories if not the US?

China would wish it could take over Taiwan. In terms of local politics they could do it as they did with Hong Kong because the local population is pro China even more than Hong Kong.

But the US has so much armory stationed in the area that it looks as if they wouldn't let Taiwan go without a fight.
To this day TSMC ships most of its production directly to US controlled companies so in spite of being closer to china geographically the US is putting a big political war to keep it under control.

Nothing wrong with state ownership of corporations?
Alright, sure why not even go full blast with it and take control of all corporations? Not just subsidies. Eliminate competition, centralize planning. Why not?
If it works at 10% why not take full advantage of it?

The US is seeing that capitalism is caving within and is now utilizing very antithetical solutions to save its economy. This is what's bonkers about it. Because the US has historically been a very strong proponent of the so called "free market capitalism".

Now what's going to happen if US' partners also start subsidizing the industry? The EU has for forbidden state subsidies to industry and vowed to keep its markets competitive throughout its existence. But if Trump takes the charge at changing this who's to say that other countries that are historical US allies won't follow?

In his first Admin Trump accused China a lot saying they had a strategic advantage due to central planning. So is the US trying to become a socialist economy now also?
Will be funny to witness.

No one loves to lose money.  Don't tell me to invest what I can afford to lose; tell me things I should do to avoid losing that money or even minimise the risks of losing that money.

This is some of the most bonker news I've heard.

The US gov paying billions to get shares in a company, and no board seat in return. Intel hasn't issued any dividends this year, in spite of a long standing tradition to issue quarterly dividends. The company is arguably on a downtrend with dwindling market share and losing the competing battle with AMD in terms of technology.

So the US gov under Trump is now continuing to take stakes in private business... Do you think this will put the US ahead in the world arena or will they continue to be laggards in technology?