Is this even related to this project or is this a totally different one?

The fact that i see some legendary members actively commenting and possibly still invested in this, is sickening to say the least. Rather than band together and collectively denounce this scam for what it is. Same individuals will probably chase after Rhett's next hype, and use their forum status to  lure in newbies for a quick buck with no regards to the impact it might have on the investors. I truly hate the greed in human.

Sorry but that statement is really weird. Since when does a lot of money mean to succeed? There are tons of examples of crypto projects or startups that have taken a lot of money and ultimately failed. I'm not saying that's what EOS needs to be, but EOS isn't the holy cow as you represent. EOS is still struggling with security problems and flaws. Besides, I can't see that EOS has solved a major problem, unlike Komodo. And Komodo has much less money available, but talented and dedicated developers.

I was also active in the crypto universe at James' NXT times.

I also own these assets.

These assets were migrated to the KMD chain.

Projects like JumblR, Dex and other assets have been functional for a long time now -
 
Dex is even the world leader with over 116000 Atomic Swaps!
 
So I can't understand the statement that many projects were not finished here.

The Komodo article has been listed on Krown (https://krown.io/story/cryptographic-hash-functions-explained-a-beginners-guide) Make sure to upvote your link!

Creator there's a lot promised and advertised, buyers were many when EOS was not make until but Komodo created silently and efficiently

ETH also made quietly and also cost $ 1 for a long time, fame began as soon as it bought by the first billionaire

EOS is worse than Komodo in all parameters except block time:

1. No proof of work
2. less bandwidth, 3000 transactions per second against 20000
3. a short address of 12 characters, which can be used to calculate the private key, the recent theft of the cold key from the exchange is proof of that
4. was freezing of the funds of the user with the requirement to explain the origin
5. there is no sense in the coin, Visa is better and Windows is better

BTCD or BCD ?


Basically it was a stupid combination of failures. I use Windows 10 and tried to claim BTCP and BCD. Both with the Electrum version for their blockchains.
I used the same long password for different things - especially my password safe had the same pw as the DASH QT wallet. So after I started the Electrum clients (which I tested before with Defender, SuperAntiSpyware and www.virustotal.com) I had to do a little thing in DASHQT - that was it - the one of the wallets, most likely BCD, spied my password through a keylogger and the hacker had access to everything.
(there is no need to discuss the stupidity of using Win10, same passwords many times, storing 2FA codes in password safes or testing new software on a vulnerable system)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5080741.msg48476147#msg48476147

You claim that Jl777 hasn't finished even the smallest projects in the last 6 years, I'd like to know which ones.
Thank you

It's about EOS not bringing the TPS they promise.  
Central systems have, blacklists, almost all block producers in China are located, a 4 TB database after not even 1.5 years and on top of it still such bugs.

Which projects have not been finished that you are talking about here ?

this requires trust in delegates, the exchanges is rarely trusted to them, so increased deposit time to 2 hours, only on the Hitbtc deposit in 6 minutes so.  A high hashrate is preferable to trust.  But many coins do not have a hashrate, but they are credited quickly, I do not understand the logic of exchanges. Why do bad coins without hashrate has a good grow but a good Komodo has bad grow?  Why Komodo block in 1 minute, it is fit for neither Dex nor for shopping in the stores, why not do a hulf second like the EOS? Even 15 seconds of ETH is a lot for Dex, I think that's the only reason EOS is a leader. People otherwise understand the high speed of transactions, give them what they like

OMG what is happening with this coin now we have to take part on low volume exchange to make it list there. Now that time has been arrived we must accept the facts and move to other coins who already have good support.

If you get the coins for free because you hold Bitcoin it doesn't matter, but I think investing in these forks is very risky.

Rhett Creighton contributed to many projects including Bitcoin.. I'm not standing in defence, should we call BTC scam?

ZEN started chainspliting from ZCL as base for constructing completely new project, this is not secret. And we dont have anything with ZCL developers for a long time now..

So please if you have more questions please join Horizen thread. Thanks!