we both do, at quite a significant monthly cost. not going to get into your little fight with him though.

we have several servers for this project, half of them are mine.

Hi everyone - i worked for Cryptsy in the fall of 2015. Prior to that I was a moderator there. I heard earlier this week that Cryptsy coins were being sold on Bittrex and contacted Paul Vernon about it. And then foolishly decided to post about that on that thread.

You all can believe what you want about me. I have been and will continue to cooperate with authorities about Cryptsy.

As you all know, I've given away some MTR but have never sold any (as is very obvious). If you no longer want me to work on this project I'll turn my servers off and call it a day.

In parting, let me just say this - it doesn't seem to matter around here if you do the right thing. The goal is not to get information - those people could have done that just by asking me questions. The goal instead is to hurt people as much as is possible, and they're experts at that. I won't take that anymore.

You know, I don't blame you at all for feeling the way you do. But as long as Paul is willing to still talk to me, or I can find out information, I am going to share it here. You can put me on ignore if you want.

I'm the holdup on this, been really swamped. This is what's left - we need to move the etna software to the production servers, I'm in the middle of encrypting the payment function, and I'm redoing chat. Then it should be ready. Will try to get this done as soon as possible.

Hey - its been a while for sure. I really dont care what you say about me. I'm not about to defend myself. When records at Cryptsy are examined they will show when people were made mods,  when they were hired,  when they started drawing a salary and when that stopped. It will show who did what, who knew what and when they knew what they knew. Rest assured your little staff analysis has some flaws but they'll figure it all out.  When they take my computer they will see who I communicated with and when.

And they will see what I said last night about what happened at trex.

I go back and forth about what I think. I usually try to find the good in people but when I saw what was going on at trex it just cut me to the core and I had to try to stop it.

I'm not sure what the reason was. I made clear that those coins do not belong to Paul Vernon, they do not belong to Cryptsy and they do not belong to the receiver. But legally the receiver is now the custodian of those funds. I'm happy that he agreed to do the right thing, and will not drop this. I will also speak up if the receiver tries to liquidate the coins to satisfy company debt.

I can't really confirm anything, just relate what he told me, that he has turned over all customer funds to the receiver. I will, however, continue to follow up on this.

As far as I know. If you find out otherwise please let me know, thanks.

I spoke with Paul last night. I believe he has turned all wallets - those on Cryptsy servers, and those at Bittrex- over to the receiver, as well as the servers themselves. I think he sent out a tweet saying this. I would expect that the receiver can confirm that he received this.

call me a scammer and a liar, I really don't care. hopefully y'all are done calling me susan wilson.

yes and its a fake picture too. feel free to ask the coinfront about that, but it was done for "non-nefarious" purposes.

Ooh cool, I'll narrate this one:


Yes - Dana C. Ragazza = DCGirl. I think you'll find a whole thread here on bitcointalk about that. Feel free to contact Brad at the coinfront to confirm why I used that name.

No - Susan Wilson does not = DCGirl

At this point I'm not sure if you're trying to save face or if you really think you're right.

Either way - sigh, whatever.

sigh. whatever.

Dude - the "3LA"s as you call them already have my name, my address and my phone number. I have every intention of testifying if I'm asked to, will turn over my computer and anything else they want. Because, get this, I want to see justice served and I want customers to get their funds.

I seriously don't give a crap if you go after me. People have been doing that forever. I only joined your little troll fantasy party to get you to leave this susan wilson person alone. Unless she worked there and left before I started there I don't think she worked for cryptsy.

In the unique 1+1=11 logic of bitcointalk, someone saw that I created a game called Whack-a-Troll and a lightbulb apparently went off. "OH I remember some scammy lady with a daughter that created a Whack game!" And down the rabbit hole we went.

Whack-a-Troll was a pretty lame game (see pic). I ended up calling it Whack-a-Coin, and in it, a user (UTC) would in a series of levels, try to beat other coins and get to the last level and try to beat BTC (boss). I never released it, but we all played it for a while.



So anyway, this poor Susan lady (although she is much prettier, younger and richer than me, so maybe I shouldn't feel too sorry for her) is now associated with Cryptsy. Hey, maybe she actually is. I really don't know, since I ONLY WORKED THERE FOR A COUPLE OF MONTHS LAST YEAR. Maybe she is actually one of the culprits.

But before we completely blame her, maybe I'm really a guy! Maybe I'm the scammy guy that created this game:



Or this one (this one is particularly appropriate)!



Sigh. You know, if you really want to track down who I am maybe you should start asking the UTC or ToshiDesk people. Or not, your logic leaps are certainly interesting (I couldn't believe you found something with Marshall Long's name associated with Susan Wilson, that boggles the mind).

And before I go, the $10/hour thing - believe me, that's a fraction of what other people were making. I accepted that short-term until things turned around, not knowing the place was already doomed.

So... carry on.

[EDIT] Oh, and why I posted now - not to head off your "investigation" - I posted because I saw some random person's name associated with mine, and thought I'd head that off. 3 pages of posts later I see that didn't work. So, believe what you want. Previously I hadn't ever posted because I WORKED THERE FOR 2 1/2 MONTHS. Geez.

Alright, I knew it was just a matter of time before y'all decided to go after me. So here's my story.

I started at Cryptsy as a contractor in September 2015, brought in to make website improvements. I stopped working there in November 2015. During that time I had no access to either wallets or the production environment. As far as Bitebi9, I was one of several cryptsy employees that was asked to work on the site. My job was to implement translations.

It doesn't surprise me to have my name raised here, although some of the speculation does. It's how btctalk seems to roll - people don't ask questions, instead, they make accusations. When I was with ultracoin I made a website called Ultra-Arb, that showed the difference between coin prices at exchanges, so people could arbitrage. I didn't charge for the site, didn't charge for coins to be listed, but it was still accused of being a scam. I used to do giveaways on twitter and in various trollboxes, and was accused of shilling coins.

As far as Cryptsy goes, I was as shocked as everyone else was to find out about the hack. I also believed the "never been hacked" story. I still have coins stuck there. I made $10/hour, part-time, in the 2 1/2 months I was on the payroll. I was as far from the inner circle at cryptsy as anyone could be, and the other developers actively hated me. That was the main reason I left. But I saw the writing on the wall - no revenues were coming in, no trading was going on, and withdrawals were barely going out.

While I have spoken to Paul Vernon on Skype, I have never met him (have never met any Cryptsy employees) and am not his "paramour". I'm a widowed mom of 2 boys that lives near and works in Washington, DC.

Blaming me for Cryptsy's problems is like blaming the last person hired at Enron for their collapse.

I've been approached by a team of developers that are building a new exchange and want to integrate ToshiDesk (another project I'm involved in) into it. My first word of advice to them was - you probably don't want to do that because people associate me with Cryptsy, even though I had nothing to do with what happened. My second piece of advice was- don't do it unless you can somehow insure customer funds (I think they'll be implementing a recovery fund, and somehow using smart contracts on accounts for that). And my final piece of advice was - be ready to have your life ruined by the people on btctalk, no matter how honest and innocent you are.

So there you go. I won't post here again, but tear me down, drag my name through the mud, say I fuck pigs, all those good things y'all do.

The nicest thing about the world we live in, and especially about btctalk, is we all are given the opportunity to judge things as we see fit. You see catastrophe waiting to happen, I see potential. I guess we'll have to wait and see how it all plays out.

And quite honestly, I'm glad you are sharing your concerns, because that's the best purpose of this forum. It gives people all of the information they need to make decisions about what to invest in. I'll continue to work and share my progress and you can continue to push us to improve our offering. Maybe we'll all win.

Not sure why I'm responding, but anyway...

It's obvious you have a problem with Rich, and a problem with the distribution of MTR, and nothing I say will change that, so I won't even try. But, the rest of your argument - why only MTR, for example. Let's make that a wider example and ask that about every coin. Why would anyone want to use any coin to purchase anything? And if there's no reason anyone would, well, why are we all here?

Is there any value in an "in-house" currency anywhere? Like an in-house currency for platforms like Twitch or Minecraft? That all depends on the size of the audience. Now, I don't ever expect ToshiDesk to have an audience that's more than a tiny fraction of those, as the crypto world is small. But suppose it does gain wider use, by branching into a white-label situation where it is embedded into multiple sites (the first of which we are currently negotiating). And suppose we decide we want to continue to have MTR be the in-house currency for it. All that does is grows the market for the coin. And  I would imagine it has the potential to grow the interest in speculation for the coin as well.

I don't expect that any of this will "convince" you of anything as your agenda is pretty clear, but the rest of the community might be interested in what I say. I didn't join this project because of MTR, I joined it because I saw and still see potential in the application. But I do see potential for MTR to grow along with it, and have "dreams" of where MTR can go - technically - to use more advanced blockchain technologies that will also expand its value. That's a discussion for the future, though.

As far as the "he controls 90%" argument - yes, he does control the keys to that, and yes, he could dump at any time. But I control the source code for the application. I'll pull that in a minute if he doesn't do what he agreed when I first agreed to work on this - to use the premine only for purposes that would grow the value of the coin.  We may never find that necessary to do, and could destroy the premine, or we could just keep it sitting on the sideline. But it's not something I expect to change any time soon.