Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 1,587 results by death69
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: Be careful with nostalgia
by
death69
on 25/07/2025, 17:17:06 UTC
Nostalgia plays with the odds. Any gambler who says he is immune is already a step behind. One foot in the past, the other in a puddle of self-deception. I have seen it all over: old fighter has got the name, the legend, the tape. Then people hold on to highlights as though they are purchasing time itself. The cash flows in the direction of the mob. And sure, memory hijacks logic, sentimentality blinds even the sharpest bettor. And sentiment is punished by the market. It has no tolerance of what-ifs, no affection of history. All it sees is today. Today's data, today's knees, today's sleep schedule.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin still number 1
by
death69
on 25/07/2025, 16:50:08 UTC
Bitcoin doesn't flinch. Never has and never will. The same non-interfering maker, the same un-molested store, the same transparent account. You bring up XRP and a $50M transfer. That is just the symptom of the same old human disease: permissioned power, backroom keys, one admin flip away from chaos.

Bitcoin does not just resist interference. It defines non-interference. Satoshi locked the vault, threw away the key, and walked offstage. That is the architecture: 21 million, never more. Nobody calls a board meeting to decide the supply. Nobody takes profit at the top and leaves bagholders on the ground. The code, the network, the consensus, every part built to make manipulation impossible, not just unlikely.

Every time another centralized coin's owner signals with a fat transaction, it is another billboard for Bitcoin. Bitcoin does not signal. It screams in math and the world is lagging behind. Trust is not on a server in Singapore, it is written in stone.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Should I depend solely on Bitcoin?
by
death69
on 24/07/2025, 19:42:12 UTC
Depending solely on Bitcoin is like living in a world where the only color is orange. It is brilliant, but you will miss the blue, the red, the silent greys. e protocol has poetry in it, the scarcity has elegance, the freedom it gives has fire. Bitcoin is resistance.  It is the rejection of the world where your work is bled out by inflation and manipulation. I would trust it more than any fiat hallucination on offer.

But, take a deep breath, risk is not evil, it is oxygen. Bitcoin was born as an act of rebellion, not as a safety blanket. Every block mined, every transaction, every node, these are acts of defiance, but also acts of exposure.  When you are all-in you are all-exposed. A crash can come at midnight; a pump, at sunrise. No central bank is coming to smooth the ride.

When your friend invests all his soul, sweat, memory and survival in this single revolution, he is no longer immune, he is vulnerable. Bitcoin is the king as it is the only one, but the humans who use it must have more than one pillar to stand on. These are the basics of art, craft, skills, which make sovereignty worth anything.

Digital freedom should never enslave you to one result. Stack stats, make art, run a node, plant a garden, tell a story. Do not trust, verify, then diversify. The revolution is here, but even revolutions need backup plans.

Ask yourself: How many ways can you win? That is where the real freedom lives.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: What is been professional like to you?
by
death69
on 24/07/2025, 18:51:49 UTC
Been around gamblers. Watched them blow paychecks, win miracles, lie about both. Professional? You will not see it on a neon sign, and you sure as hell cannot measure it by the times someone got lucky and posted a screenshot. "Responsible" gets thrown around by people who want to sound in control. Nobody is responsible all the time, not even the algorithm.

If you really want to know, a professional gambler is not some statistical anomaly. It is the person who treats risk like a craft. Grind through odds, edges, endless research. The line between thrill and disaster gets thinner. Winning? Sure, it matters, but only over thousands of repetitions, after you have developed a sixth sense for when you are the mark. The house edge is also psychology. Most "pros" do not look like winners. They look like data analysts with slightly haunted eyes. Sometimes, they look bored.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Is Buying Shares of a BTC ETF a good way to invest in Bitcoin?
by
death69
on 24/07/2025, 18:30:55 UTC
Buying a BTC ETF like FBTC is an easy way to get price exposure. Yes, it works when you do not mind technicalities or direct ownership. But you are not actually buying Bitcoin. You are buying a financial product that tracks Bitcoin's price. You do not get real custody, cannot send BTC, cannot move it off the exchange. It is convenient, regulated, but your Bitcoin lives in someone else's vault, and you trust them to let you cash out.

It is fine for traditional investors, and for people who want zero hassle. Just remember, you are getting Wall Street's version of Bitcoin, not the real thing. If you want actual control and self-sovereignty, learn to use a wallet and buy real BTC. Otherwise, the ETF suffices to simple exposure and to the majority of late adopters.. Simply know what you are owning. It is not the initial vision of Bitcoin, yet it is the way of least resistance.
Post
Topic
Board Services
Re: [OPEN] Rainbet.com | Crypto Casino & Sportsbook | Signature Campaign ~ Sr. +
by
death69
on 22/07/2025, 04:52:14 UTC
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=447543
Current amount of Posts: 1449
EARNED merit in the last 120 days: 28
bech32 BTC Address: bc1qfqt9ptradu7eduz989h073f66qa5prwqrpxzqf
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: FIFA World Cup 2026 :Canada/Mexico/United States: Discussion Thread
by
death69
on 19/07/2025, 20:38:54 UTC
The trend is like that, because to play at the European level they need to compete fiercely with other players and the exposure they get may be less, whereas when they choose to represent their ancestral nations, it can give them a better position and it can also directly help the country they defend to improve the quality of play and give them the opportunity to serve their country. Especially now that African countries such as Senegal, Morocco, Algeria, Nigeria, and several other countries are trying to improve the quality of their national teams.. the presence of players of African descent might be able to reshape African national teams and make them even more qualified.

Indeed, choosing a country of descent can give a player the opportunity to help their chosen country compete in the World Cup. This also helps maximize their potential. However, this can also be a mistake, such as several naturalized Indonesian national team players who lack playing time in the main squad. They have sacrificed their citizenship for Indonesia, but cannot make the starting eleven. How do these players feel? There will be disappointment for sure. This means it's not just about trends, but also the player's readiness to choose their country as their new citizenship; they must accept the risks too.

All of that must have been carefully considered before they decided to defend a national team - because not all players who decide to defend a national team will have the opportunity to get into the core squad - their skills also need to be considered to be able to get the position. And in the case of the Indonesian national team, there have been many names of naturalized players who were removed from the core team because their performance did not meet the requirements, the most recent example is Rafael Struick who was removed from the core squad by Patrick Kluivert because his performance was inconsistent. So these risks are definitely there, and they have to be ready to accept those risks.
Everyone sees the news about bloodlines or European experience, but people forget: football is ruthless. Indonesia brought in almost a full XI of European-trained lads, but fast-forward to this year, half of them are out of contract, including Struick. Guy scored one in ten at Brisbane, struggled for minutes, and suddenly, your national hero is club-less and dropped by Kluivert. Nobody is giving out international careers for sentimental value. You do not perform, you are out, no matter how fancy your CV or how loud the fans are. You see, Indonesia's model is all about eligibility, but what happens when your European imports cannot find a club? You end up with a core that is unstable and a coach in crisis mode, just like now. Harsh, but that is football.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: Had my gambling history on track recently.
by
death69
on 19/07/2025, 20:00:58 UTC
You has logged your own patterns. A lot of people, most, never do. There is something about seeing the log of losses and gains (no matter how brutal, pixel by pixel, day by day) that does a number on the 'am I in control?' loop in your head. That log, scrolling, numbers going red, balance dropping, suddenly, you are watching yourself play, narrating to your friend, and somewhere that feedback loop becomes its own thrill.

People who do not gamble always say 'it is the losing that hurts', but it is almost never the losing. It is the losing control that burns. You catch that, check your emotional dashboard. Pause, like, real pause. Actually shutting down the casino, noticing what comes up in the silence. Boredom, peace, nothing, whatever. Some people never find out. You did, and that is a real win, a grown-up achievement.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin on a company balance sheet. Bad idea?
by
death69
on 19/07/2025, 19:22:13 UTC
No one tells you what compliance really means. They dress it up as civic duty, social contract, fair share. Underneath, it is just a one-way mirror: you see the state, but the state sees through you. They do not just want your capital, they want your digital reflection. They do not just want tax, they want submission, repeated, documented, signed in blood or ledger.

Registering with the IRS, the tax authority, the alphabet-soup overseers? You are gifting them a switch. A lever. Data is pre-crime in the modern era. Today's info is tomorrow's justification for a retroactive penalty, a future fee, an invented offense. Unrealized gains. Exit tax. Where do these end? They do not. They just mutate. The walls grow taller every year, and the barbed wire is your own paperwork.

Stablecoins in cold storage? Maybe it buys you time. Maybe it just delays the knock at the door. KYC everywhere, AML everywhere, a new net every year.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: 1 Million Enough?
by
death69
on 19/07/2025, 18:54:26 UTC
Depends who is asking, and how deep you want to swim. Not enough for dreams of overnight riches. Enough to start building sovereignty, if you accept slow victories and hard reality.

You drop one million naira in, you might win, might lose, might just pay for the tuition of your own mistakes. The bots are faster, whales swim circles, emotions are the sharpest enemy. In physical business, you buy the rules with inventory, relationships, risk you can see. In trading, the rules change without warning.

BTC rewards patience, not panic. Freedom comes from ownership, cold wallet, private keys, hard lessons. One million is enough to get burned, or enough to start learning how not to burn.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Did we get it wrong?
by
death69
on 17/07/2025, 17:38:58 UTC
Nobody got it wrong. Everyone just keeps acting like macro is a coin flip. Tariffs go up, stocks go down, bitcoin follows. Yeah, that is neat, until reality eats the script. Tariffs are a distraction. The manipulation is behind the curtain - central banks, deficit spending, the quiet draining of trust. Trump pushes for low rates, claims it is good for Main Street. Nobody asks why the dollar, the supposed world reserve, needs emergency life support in the best economy ever. You feel the contradiction right there.

Bitcoin does not care about your rate hikes or your QE or your trade war theatre. It runs block after block, zero manipulation, zero boardroom drama.

The US will not pivot to bitcoin reserves. Power hates competition. They will try to cage it, tax it, spin it in the name of reserve, but not embrace it. They will call it a risk, a criminal's tool (as they seize crime funds for their so called reserved), a climate threat, everything but a solution. It is too pure, too transparent. Not the kind of tool you can use for shadow budgets and invisible wars.

Bitcoin beating the dollar? By the time the damage shows, it is already done. People keep asking if the dollar is dying. They never ask if they are already living in the ruins.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: New account and old account, which one is luckier?
by
death69
on 17/07/2025, 17:04:19 UTC
New accounts are the casino's favorite. They want you hyped. So maybe, odds feel better at first. You win, you get hooked, you think it is your day. It is pure game design. The backend knows you are fresh, they want your loyalty, so they feed you a few wins. Old accounts? You are data now. You are less profitable. The machine dials it down. Your "luck" was the onboarding bait, not a cosmic blessing. Casinos ban multiple accounts because they know people figure this out fast. They want you to chase, but only if you play by their rules. If you feel your odds dropping after the first week or two, you are not crazy. That is just business, nothing personal. Anyone who has been around sees the pattern. The only thing random is how long it takes people to catch on.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: Drinking vs Gambling
by
death69
on 17/07/2025, 16:34:54 UTC
It is oddly easy for a culture to decide which kinds of self-destruction are acceptable, which ones must be hidden behind red tape and shame. Alcohol is everywhere because we learned to decorate with it. We call it tradition, celebration, the good life. The ads get a warning in a font so tiny you need a magnifying glass. So it all feels sanitized, prepackaged, safe-enough-to-ignore. Nobody checks the statistics behind the campaign slogans. Hospitals know, families know, kids growing up with broken promises know, but billboards do not disappear.

Gambling, though, perhaps it is too obvious. It is not hidden. A drink enables you to tell yourself a tale about socialising, relaxation, just being human. Gambling is a reflection of your brain’s desires, the primordial craving for dopamine, and nobody is comfortable with that level of exposure in public. We regulate, restrict, wrap it in law. Not for well being, mainly for comfort, our, not their.
It is not about what is safe or risky. It is about which parts of the truth we can dress up and put out in daylight. So we let the liquor ads shine, paint Drink Responsibly, and we hope nobody reads the fine print, or remembers what they have lost.

There is no real symmetry here, just ritual. We get used to these rituals, repeat them, shrug when they do not work. We forget, or pretend, that harm is not democratic. It just follows the script we write for it. And nobody rewrites the script.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: The Dangers of Becoming a Professional Gambler
by
death69
on 16/07/2025, 18:43:45 UTC
No one is giving out health insurance to pursue a +1% advantage at the blackjack table. The majority of the so-called pros are just one cold streak away. Adrenaline does not make you mentally healthy. It only covers up the damage, it puts it under the grind. You go numb. Money ceases to be real. Time ceases to be real. You lose the idea of enough - that word disappears.

In this system, even the urge to gamble is a rational reaction to limited agency. When you are cornered, when you are fed up with being pressed by wage work or precarity, the casino floor seems the only fair playing field. It is not, of course, but the illusion is strong.

People talk about preoccupation as if you can just step back, breathe, and reset. Not really. It is immersion. It rewires you. The worst part: no one celebrates you when you walk away. There is no ticker-tape parade for the guy who realizes, quietly, that he would rather build something else, somewhere else.

Most pros? They do not last. They burn out, cash out, fade out. The system is designed that way.

You want real agency? Create something, anything, that rewards you with your mind and your attention, not just your tolerance to risk. The table is open, and the payoff is seldom freedom.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Can Bitcoin kill other crypto?
by
death69
on 16/07/2025, 17:53:19 UTC
Bitcoin does not “kill”. It exposes. Altcoins disappear not because Bitcoin attacks, but because time and entropy reveal what’s built on sand. Most projects never had substance, just marketing, just noise. Bitcoin is the first and maybe the only digital asset that is not anyone’s liability. Proof-of-work: the strongest wall money has ever built. Try counterfeiting that. You cannot.

Weak fundamentals do not survive long when they are not protecte. Meme coins? They’re just reflections of a distracted attention economy - built for exit scams, built for spectacle. So the question becomes: “can any crypto justify surviving in Bitcoin’s shadow?” Bitcoin is protocol, not product.
Altcoins have CEOs; Bitcoin has nodes.
Altcoins shift narratives; Bitcoin is narrative.

The ones who survive will have to either find a purpose Bitcoin cannott fulfill, or dissolve into irrelevance. There is no mercy, no drama, no hit-list. Just network effects. Just protocol gravity.

Money is never just about code. It is about who is willing to defend it socially, economically, energetically. Bitcoin's immune system is everywhere and nowhere, voluntary, organic. If anything survives alongside it, that is not because Bitcoin let it. It is because that thing proved its own worth in a world where the bar has been raised. Not many will.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: what is next for bitcoin?
by
death69
on 16/07/2025, 17:04:04 UTC
Price targets are superficial. They grab, they mislead, they almost never teach. Bitcoin at new highs is a spectacle, but it is never the real story. It is the story of sovereignty seeping back into the lives of people, one transaction, one node at a time.

Governments never intend to make it legal. They react, late and awkward. There will be countries that will all ain, not because they are visionary but because they are desperate. Think Turkey, Argentina where currencies are bleeding, and people are now wondering: what is money, anyway? Each large rally creates more scams. Very human nature, just in a new suit. Watch the cycles: innovation, speculation, manipulation, then (if we are lucky) education.  It is always the same thing, but louder every time. If you are here for freedom, you build, you self-custody, you teach. If you are here for profit, you get caught, sooner or later, in someone else's profit scheme.

The next chapter should be about the hard work: building antifragile tools, normalizing privacy, outsmarting the grifters, and making being careful a communal habit. This tech's just a skeleton while  the culture, the mindset, the shared stories are what will flesh it out.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: keep Your Money in Bitcoin Not in Fiat. You Loss More In Fiat with Levies.
by
death69
on 15/07/2025, 10:55:05 UTC
⭐ Merited by irhact (1)
The modern banking “ecosystem” (call it that, laugh if you want) is a bureaucratic assembly line for bleeding people dry, one micro-fee at a time. It is engineered for extraction. Cybersecurity levy, stamp duties, maintenance, this, that, next week there will be a “climate resilience charge” or some new way to tax existence. And still, the trust is gone. Nobody reads the fine print. Nobody wins. All upside to the suits.

Banks eat your time. They eat your future.  Even the so-called safe savings melt away. Fiat is a melting ice cube, it has been for ever and will be forever. You can save ten years, and see it melt away, month by month, charge by charge, crisis by crisis, like background noise, like it is supposed to be normal.

Bitcoin changes that. There is no middleman skimming off your inertia. No silent leak. Nobody asking, “Have you considered our platinum account upgrade?” Just code, consensus, a record that doesn’t apologize. If you are lucky, you notice it early. If not, you notice it when it is almost too late.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: ESports betting -CS:GO, DOTA 2, LOL, Valorant - Sportsbet.io discussion thread
by
death69
on 15/07/2025, 09:42:18 UTC
How did T1 fair against GenG yesterday?

Those were the finals or a bracket match to see who advances? Because the site I was looking to for the results of the match yesterday showed some more matches being played throughout next week:
T1 fell short again to Gen.G, but this time they had the upper hand and had two series points after winning the third map.



They couldn't close it out on those last two maps, and Gen.G played it out perfectly, capitalizing on every bit of mistake T1 made during each skirmish.

In the next few days, we'll have more league action since EWC is up next after the MSI.
That's a close fight ngl, even T1 stomped them on G3 (?), well it is what it is. MSI is fun! I'm looking forward to the upcoming EWC which is T1 is the defending champion. This month is full of league and I'm happy since this is my childhood game and this recent year is full of very fulfilling tournaments that's very intense.

GGs to T1 and wellplayed to GEN.G, if the narrative is the same as 2023 JDG (ruler) won MSI and T1 in worlds, 2024 GENG (chovy) won MSI and T1 in worlds, let's see! Still incredible for T1 to at least dominate 90% of the major teams! (90% since it's always 3-2 with GEN.G)

That series had everything, including the record-breaking viewership. It does feel like a golden era for League fans, especially with the storylines so tightly wound. Both teams keep pushing each other to new mental levels. Chovy finally shook off the finals choker thing by reframing the pressure (just playing for fun, which is god-tier at that level), and you could see the Gen.G coaching staff taking real risks with the draft. Those are not safe calls in a Game 5.

On the T1 side, you have to respect how even after all these heartbreaks, they are never really out of it. Every time they lose, they are back in the lab. And with MSI giving a Worlds ticket now, Gen.G has all the breathing room, but T1's path just got way harder. So, Ruler's MSI -> T1's Worlds, then Chovy's MSI -> T1's Worlds? Maybe! But it's never that simple, and that is why we keep watching. These two keep finding new ways to surprise us. EWC, LCK, Worlds… next few months are fun and I am here for it.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: Tennis League All Thread
by
death69
on 15/07/2025, 08:58:37 UTC
Swiatek made history with her 2-0 victory in the final. She became the first tennis player in Wimbledon history to win a final match 6-0 without giving up a single game.
Previously, Steffi Graf had won the final match 2-0 at the Rolland Garos, and she also didn't give up a single game.
While it was a happiest day for Swiatek, it was also a saddest day for Anisimova. She had made it to the final well, but she can't easily forget this devastating loss. She, too, became a part of this history.

Yea it was such a whirlwind match for Anisimova, it was all done and dusted in around an hour.
She will definitely be looking back at that and wrecking her brain over and back on why she didnt
perform better but it just comes down to experience really and/or how you deal with it on the day.

Compare that to Emma Raducanu and Leyla Fernandez, two newbies contesting the US open final
in 2021, it was two sets but each player was able to score against each other, they both dealt with
the occasion better then than Anisimove did at the weekend.

I would say a lot of bets got burned with her loss to Swiatek.
I believe that people do not realize how much the schedule and the mental aspect kill you in these big finals. Anisimova's problem was not just experience. She was literally playing on fumes after all those three-setters and she even said it was a red flag during her warm-up. It is about your legs and brain not working together and no coach can do it in a night.

Swiatek had her own demons - came off a doping ban, dealt with harsh press in Poland, dropped down the rankings, changed her whole camp. But instead of collapsing, she went full process mode, reworked her grass game, and found freedom by not obsessing about the result. But can you block out the circus and stick to the plan?

Most of the money was still on Swiatek, but the sheer volume of small bets chasing the underdog dream just shows how narratives override logic. For Anisimova, she can either let this become a Zvereva situation, haunted by the double-bagel, or use the pain to level up. The most painful loss is the one that prepares you to become a true success.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: The solution to gambling…
by
death69
on 14/07/2025, 19:11:21 UTC
~snip~
Winning is like a pill when taken you will want more and more and you begin to gradually do beyond the usual as you now see that it has become rewarding and so you can get something really nice from it, this is exactly what happens to some gamblers,  they then begin to want more that they no longer gamble just for the fun or entertainment alone because they have seen they can get more than just entertainment from gambling so they begin to intensify and increase their stake, habit and they get in to problems sooner because they lacked self control and all their funds will be lost in the end.

People have excessive greed, due to which people can easily get deeply involved in gambling, it happens to most gamblers that they initially come to gamble only for entertainment, but later when they get some wins they become excessively greedy, then it is no longer just entertainment but they want to continuously win through it, and through it they keep moving towards disaster. Here self-control, limitations, and discipline must be maintained, without these, gambling can definitely bring huge losses.
Winning is like a pill when taken you will want more and more and you begin to gradually do beyond the usual as you now see that it has become rewarding and so you can get something really nice from it, this is exactly what happens to some gamblers,  they then begin to want more that they no longer gamble just for the fun or entertainment alone because they have seen they can get more than just entertainment from gambling so they begin to intensify and increase their stake, habit and they get in to problems sooner because they lacked self control and all their funds will be lost in the end.
It begins as a time killer.  And that is what everybody says. You win a bit and everything goes out of balance - sharper, hungrier, louder. The air changes. The sense that you have discovered the back door out of the normal life, and you want to get back in. All gamblers are familiar with this taste, include the ones who say they are not. The majority are unable to explain why a twenty-dollar win on a slot is more real than a day salary.

Nobody teaches you about thresholds, only to “be careful”. But the threshold is not visible, and it changes. Each time you win, you are convinced you can repeat it, like you are training a muscle. The phone pings--a new bonus. You say to yourself it is only fun. Everyone does. This is the reason why it works.

It's easy to preach discipline. Harder to accept how slippery the ground gets when luck is in your favor. There is a moment (call it the shimmer) where you forget why you started, and the game becomes about not letting go. Most won't talk about it. Fewer will admit how much they lost chasing that shimmer.