Sure... I suppose that saying that you are patronizing and presumptuous in some aspects of your posted contents could go to your character, too.. but initially, I was only intending to make comments about the way you had posted in ways that seemed to postulate that you were smarter than the rest of us, which seemed to presume aspects of our intelligence and our motivations (lack thereof, mostly).. so I do not need to repeat what I had already posted several times.. and I don't delete any of my posts.. Usually, I do not edit my posts either.. except maybe within minutes of posting them.... .. so to the extent anything that I may have said is relevant, you can go back and look.. I don't go back and look too often either.. not even when some dweeb is trying to make some kind of drama about something that I may have said at one point or another. .blah blah blah.. and yeah.. I am referring to you as a dweeb too.. because you are surely seeming to rise to the definition of such... getting worse (devolving) with each post, so it seems.

 


I was just going based on what you said.



Sure, there are valid ways to use outside links, even to one's own content outside of the forum. I suppose.  I don't claim to be an expert... many of us will link to a variety of outside references, and even though mostly not our own content, there are some guys who link to their own content from time to time..



I doubt that I hold myself out as knowing everything.. but sometimes members do get that impression.. whether they are trolls or not, I am not sure.


I question how you could be able to reasonably assess my goals to be the way that you characterized them to be.  Surely, you are entitled to your opinion, even if seemingly a wee bit out there.


Mostly.. yep.


Well, sure there might be tactics to attempt to cause topics to become less personal, even when others might seem to be striving to make them personal.  So I suppose diversion might be one of them that sometimes might work pretty well.  Seems kind of irrelevant that if you call me a name, then to deny it and call you a name.. does not seem to get us very far, but i am not above calling members names from time to time... especially when they seem to have justified such... just like I called you a dweeb above.. and probably you could be called a cry baby or a whiner, and maybe even take over the title from some other member(s) that have been much more chill in their emotional outbursts recently.. including the deleting of posts does not come off as very emotionally sound behavior and might even deserve a name for that kind of conduct.. it's the taking my marbles and going home approach to the forum.  hahahahaha.. we (royal) have seen that before, too.

It's pretty rare that I get emotional about any of the postings of other members..

but sometimes I get emotional about the price moves of king daddy.



We already covered this... several times, it seems.


I never said that others might not be interested in your content.  It seems that members like some of the various ways that information might be presented.

I was largely bothered when you seemed to be suggesting that your way is superior, and several times, I already covered why I was concerned, no?


You read me as attacking your character and demeaning you... and I suppose that is part of the reason that you are acting out so emotionally.



Is that your goal? to get us to click on your links?  or you want us to respect you because you have supposed outside "real world" status - as demonstrated by us clicking on your links?

I have troubles figuring out where you are going with this and why it might not be problematic in a forum like this for you to seemingly to be wanting to lure people (whether members or not) outside of the forum... or whatever it might be that you seem to be getting so worked up about?

Gotta quote you merely to preserve your stupid-ass posts.. not that they mean much of anything - however, if I don't quote them, then you are going to end up deleting them... You seem to have issues... and sure.. no problem with that.. probably the vast majority of us have variations of issues, no?

Hahahahaha

Wow.. you had already drafted that by the time I posted, and I made a couple edits to the third section of my post

I was not saying that I was necessarily correct.  I was saying that I thought that you were being presumptuous and patronizing with your assertions.... so if you perceive me to be on a pedestal because I expressed my concerns, that seems to be on you..



Oh?  Were you striving to increase your following?


I am not even sure what that means, in respect to what you are about in contrast to what I supposedly am about. 

Anyone in this thread should feel free to express their opinions, provide information and even to question information that has been provided, and surely some people back up their opinions better than others, and sometimes when we share ideas we gain another perspective about the information that we are analyzing... and for sure, we are not always going to understand information that is being presented.

Getting into what I am about and what you are about seems to be going a wee bit astray, no?


That is your characterization.


Oh gawd... I am not even claiming to be that smart about anything.. I was just questioning your telling us that we need to learn your system in order to grow in life.. and maybe I was just too easily triggered and I should apologize.. .. hahahahaha

NOT. 


There is no reason for me to apologize merely because you seem to be getting all worked up because everyone is not sufficiently kissing your feet... You don't want to share your ideas no more because people (this people?) question the seeming overcomplexity of your system?


By the way, I just did a quickie attempt to go  back to look at your posts, and you seem like a real fucking crying and likely delusional baby to delete all of your posts.. take your marbles and go home while accusing other folks (namely yours truly) as if we (Royal in this case) were being disingenuine.. when you seem like the one who cannot even let your posts stand "as is" or "as they were."

You might even reach the level of some other discovered to be disingenuine folks in these parts when you are behaving like you have been while claiming ur lil selfie to be holier than thou.   

I already quoted and described what I considered to be patronizing.. and presumptuous... It's your choice about whether you can "handle" the interaction or if you just want to preach to us and have us all kiss your feet.  You are not the ONLY one who has those kinds of expectations.


Yes.. nothing wrong with your opinion, your methods or even the combination of those - except that you said we need to learn your system... and from my perspective, that is patronizing... and presumptuous.


Good for you for stopping your reading of my post and getting emotional about what I had said up to that point.  

I have no problem with your sharing your ideas, your analysis, your rendition of facts, your description of methods or whatever else you want to share, but if you are going to tell us that you are smarter than the rest of us, then I will likely respond (in similar ways as I already did) to those kinds of assertions.. whether your assertions are true or not...

By the way, I saw that other members had made some responses that were similar to my later response... that involved concerns regarding aspects of the meaning/complexities.. and not necessarily denying your correctness but instead questioning how easy the presentation was understood...  but instead of getting the hint that maybe you could attempt to dumb it down a wee bit, you largely referred to us as lazy dumbies who need to get up to speed regarding your purported brilliance... ...and I am not even denying that you may well be brilliant beyond the capacities of mortals and/or bots.

For sure, you may well have some techniques that work for you and that you are willing to share because you believe that they are replicable.  

Other guys here have techniques that work too... so no need to be patronizing about some kind of supposed superiority about your techniques, even if you believe that they are easily transferable..

For example, I already said that there seem to be too many things going on in your charts for me... hint, hint hint.. ... and sure you attempted to explain why that is to me, and I may well not be your preferred target audience because I am not really receptive to too many things going on in any chart at once.... especially if I do not understand it.. and yeah.. maybe I could understand it a wee bit better if I read more detailedly.. maybe yes and maybe no.. .but who fucking cares, right?   gotta have the right audience, no? 

I am sure that some guys in these here parts are ready, willing and able to sort through some of the aspects of what you are saying and even to attempt to grapple and engage with you on the presentation or the conclusions that you are reaching based on the weight of the various squigglies.. and some squigglies are more important than others, for sure...

Generally in this thread, I would suspect that there are ONLY a handful of the regular guys in these here parts who may well be ready, willing and able to follow the level of your detail and your explanations... whether you may well be correct or not.. and whether you have presented the matters.... relevant facts and conclusions well or not.. in order to achieve shared objectives.. also there are not too many guys in this thread who get into the nitty gritty of TA.. or even hard-ons about trading.. and frequently guys who emphasize TA too much are chided when they place too much emphasis on TA.. and that is when some of us might be able to understand the facts that they are making or the claims about what those supposed fact mean.. but if their TA is overly complex (which seems to be the tendency of yours) .. then you are likely going to have difficulties for guys to either agree or disagree with you because many of us are going to have little to no clues about your presentation and we should not be forced to have to learn detailed analysis in order to understand what you are saying.. which might demonstrate that you might be in the wrong thread.. perhaps?  perhaps?  and it is up to you whether you want to present information that has a lot of ideas presented at once and may well be not so easily digestible for even the most TA oriented of us to follow... in the event that we actually do want to attempt to follow what you are saying..

I have a hard enough time following my own ideas.   

 


Now you are really presumptuous.. and patronizing.



Some of us are already rich as fuck.. so why are we going to presume your squiggly lines are going to improve our psychological or financial condition merely because you proclaim that we will be improved by studying such?


Ok... you are saying that you are a successful trader.  There seems to be little to no reason for any of us to presume that.  Ultimately, each of us needs to figure out his/her own strategy in terms of his/her own particular situation... and there is quite a bit of variance in approaches that members take in this thread.. so instead of presenting ur lil selfie as a supposed expert, maybe it is better if you present your ideas in ways that are understandable.. instead of presuming that your method is going to work for a large number of folks in this thread merely if they sufficiently apply themselves to learning your techniques... blah blah blah.. again.. that is very patronizing and presumptuous.. even if you are the smartest trader since Einstein... hahahahaha  wasn't Einstein a trader, too?


How about:  Fuck gold.

How about if you want to be a gold bug wannabe, then split btc/gold 99/1?  seems reasonable to me for those brave enough to want to hold some gold and believe bitcoin might not be a sufficient enough hedge.

That chart says we are gonna do $250K+ by December!

ok

HODL

got it

you know, for us stupid peeps

check


your chart...busy..whilst i have no doubt it grabs peoples attention..i wonder how long it retains it...sometimes less really is more   ...your time frame...perhaps course?  dunno      ...i do agree that being above the yellow dotted line is preferable to being below it

how does it look on other time frames?  does the narrative match?  how about stretching it out so all those spikes are smoothed...still drive the narrative?   anyway..like the work and daring to be different

+1 WOsMerit

carry on

check


your chart...busy..whilst i have no doubt it grabs peoples attention..i wonder how long it retains it...sometimes less really is more   ...your time frame...perhaps course?  dunno      ...i do agree that being above the yellow dotted line is preferable to being below it

how does it look on other time frames?  does the narrative match?  how about stretching it out so all those spikes are smoothed...still drive the narrative?   anyway..like the work and daring to be different

+1 WOsMerit

carry on

So many colors, lines and so much action seems to be "happening" within the chart that it causes me to get feelings of dizzenings.. In other words, I could well faint if I do not take precautions.  #justsaying. #gottahaveshades

WHERE WERE YOU?

This topic, and your analysis has been very helpful to me in buying DIPs during the bear market cycle. Newbies, read and watch every content from dmwardjr! It will help you, especially during bear markets!

How could you be FOMOing into BTC price dips?  You are just two months short of your one-year anniversary in these here parts.

In my thinking, the more that you grapple with a several BTC price moves over many months while you are attempting to establish and to follow some kind of BTC accumulation system, then the more that you should have some structure to your buys.. even if you are trying to be strategic in terms of buying on dips.

If the BTC price were to go down to $25k, would you have any dry powder left to buy?  How about down to $20k.. yet that would be an extreme that many folks here seem to consider to be quite low currently... but not impossible?