i think killing of a democratically elected leader is not acceptable in any civilized society no matter how cruel or corrupt he/she is  while there are other constitutional options available to remove him from office. . The history of democracy vindicates that it is not the best system to run the government but having said that what is other better alternative. The world has already witnessed  terrible disasters created by  authoritarian and communist regimes in many parts of the world.

So if you feel the need to kill your leader, chances are you're either mentally ill or not in a democracy.

Probably the former.

That can never be a Democracy. Or any such act cannot be denoted as a democratic act. Killing anyone (despite being at fault) is not allowed to be done by any individuals. It is illegal to law into hands. Legal processes can be adopted to assure the enforcement of justice. The leaders are elected by the common citizens, so they must vote for some better option. But killing someone still cannot be allowed at any case.

I see that but everything good wear its price.

3. Since it's more like a flash drive, I guess, what happens if it got corrupted by viruses? Or any malware?

I'm surprised that so many people write that if you haven't read Frank Herbert's novel you won't understand the movie. Well, why can't we abstract ourselves from the book and just enjoy a beautifully made film? Dynamic, entertaining, vivid and clever. Personally I haven't read any of Herbert's books and I really liked the movie. I watched it on 123movies. It's so classically filmed that from the very first minutes you literally dissolve into it. It's like you're transported into that fabulous fantasy desert of Arrakis. You really feel the heat of the sand and the wind. The sand grains swirling around you. Yes, the movie is over 2.5 hours long and I got a little tired towards the end. But to say that I was bored I can not.

But thinkpads have very good properties for cheap.

What should i avoid?

I cheked them but they are very expensive.

My long time fav are Thinkpads.
I'm one of the proverbial Road Warriors (Field service engineer) and can attest that they work for decades despite constant heavy and not often kind usage. I still have a couple from 1993-1997 when they were still under the IBM brand - but actually made for IBM by Lenovo - aside from being slow (1 is 486M, another is Pentium-M cpu) and the backlights getting dim, they still work perfectly. All ThinkPads are highly dust and water resistant with built-in gutters to drain away spills out the bottom. Never had any issues with hinges going bad nor cracked cases both of which are something very common with other makes.

Very nice thing is that Thinkpads can be easily repaired if ever needed. Lenovo carried on the IBM traditions of assembling them with screws vs 'snap & crack' housing latches, providing actual repair manuals and of course parts lists. Currently using a ThinkPad P15 workstation w/gen 10 i7, 16gb memory & NVIDIA® Quadro RTX graphics. That replaced my T410 circa 2010 which still works perfectly, is just slow because of the i3 CPU and only 4gb of memory.

FYI: When IBM exited the small PC market starting in 2004 there was a massive outcry from users regarding the fate of the near-bulletproof ThinkPads. Lenovo paid attention to that and on May 1, 2005 paid IBM a very tidy sum of money to buy all rights to the ThinkPad brand name along with all other IBM PC's and continue production of this top-end gear. Ja ThinkPads are pricey but well worth it.

As for the other Lenovo laptops - meh. Still very well built for being 'Consumer grade' but they ain't ThinkPads...

I installed it but it can't read the OS. in Short I can't use windows. I have old laptop which I can open I tried it there but it can't read the OS

I have seen that some of the services that offer data rescue in my country offer just such a service - means that the client is present when rescuing data (which of course means a higher price). Yet even in such a situation, is it possible to be 100% sure that the data is being copied to only one location, and that this person is not doing another secret backup simultaneously?

I want to buy the better option because in future when i need performance i will have it.

Remember 'What goes around, comes around' it's not just a phrase but a harsh reality of life. A betrayal relationship doesn't ever last long.
We can't expect happiness by cheating someone. You cannot ever reach a level of mental satisfaction by cheating someone.
Remember if you ever do something bad or betray someone you would have to face the same in the future.

It's not entirely individual, no. I think I started by saying there is a 'default' right and wrong which is whatever is defined that way by the conventions of the society. A personal right and wrong may differ from the default. There is huge pressure to conform, so in many instances the personal ideas of right and wrong may be suppressed in favour of going along with the crowd view in order to fit in.
We could consider homosexuality as an example. Over the course of the last fifty years, in many societies, the default (and legal) definition has migrated from being 'wrong' to 'right'. And obviously many people have suppressed their homosexuality, which they believe to be 'right', because society in general, or their peer group specifically, believed (or still believe) it to be 'wrong'.

psychology is simple
its the thought of if the friend is banging her ex now. then her friend might/must have wanted to before the divorce and so thoughts of betrayal that the friend might/must have cheated with him whilst first marriage was going on. or that the female friend may have been less loyal to alice in the first place and just wanted some frank meat between her legs all along. pretending to be friend with alice just to get reasons to be near frank

yes it might not be the case. but thats not the point its what alice might be thinking could have happened

the other aspect is things like. alice the now ex wife cant have open conversations with mary about the divorce and complications of the first marriage because mary is now getting pounded by the very guy alice has negative thoughts about. so from a therapy stand point. alice cant openly vent her frustrations about frank to the woman now yearning for franks genitals. so its a loss of trust and companionship

its just basic psychology. no one wants to talk to a person knowing what they may say might get back to the other party they are talking about. no one likes to open up about someone where the person you are talking to might be biased towards the person your talking about.

its a trust and loyalty thing.

People do it all the time; you only have to look at some of the anti-vaxxer threads on here to see people starting from an emotion-derived conclusion and then attempting to prop it up with logic. But it's not just them, of course, I'm sure we all do this sometimes, to some extent.

There's no single answer, because the root cause will differ from person to person. You'd have to unpack someone's whole identity to understand why they feel a certain way about something.

I think the underlying cause is that wherever you have a group of people interacting with each other (even when this is only two people), you have a situation where each participant in the interaction wants different things. The outcomes that you as an individual want are 'right', and those you don't want are 'wrong'. Your own 'right' and 'wrong' will differ from other people's 'right' and 'wrong'.

In this situation, for Alice, the idea of Frank being with Marry is 'wrong'. It doesn't really matter what in her mind the 'right' outcome is, whether she would like to be with Peter but also stay with Frank at the same time, or whether she doesn't want anyone to be with Frank, or whether she just doesn't want her friend to be with him. It's enough for Alice that Frank being with Marry is 'wrong'. She has not reached this definition of 'wrong' through any logical reasoning, it's simply an emotional position. What she then does is to try to seek any reason she can find that might support this conclusion. She then decides that Marry's action is not compatible with the rules of friendship... because this is a reason that supports her desired conclusion, that Marry+Frank=wrong. Alice's reasoning is superficial and inauthentic. Her 'reason' for Marry's action being bad is not a reason at all, it's simply a mental prop to support a pre-established conclusion. It happens all the time. Consider for example the painful logical contortions that creationists will go through in order to deny the truth of evolution through natural selection.