I think I'll need to exclude Arionum from our list, as from here it seems like the announcement was made at 4:17 PM and at 5:25 PM of the same day their developed wrote that "mining was possible only with CPU under linux" so it's not clear whether the coin was already mined at that moment. I suppose it was. If anybody can prove the opposite please let me know.

Datacoin seems to fit into our criteria. They have a very low volume though, so I'll put them in our Small Coins list.

From here it seems like they announced at 1:01 AM and at 1:06 AM of the same day someone had already gotten the first 8 blocks.

From here it seems like Veil's organizational structure is semi-decentralized.

Thank you very much for your suggestion!

Cryptonite is in my list of coins to analyze, Datacoin as well, so I'll be able to tell you in the next days whether they fit or not.
Consider that the volumes of Datacoin are so low at the moment that, I'm afraid I won't be able to put it in the main list.

We are glad to announce that Vertcoin has been added to our lighted list of truly decentralized coins.
Warm welcome to you guys!

Thank you! :-)

Thank you! :-)

I'm glad to announce another find: Primecoin.

I've decided to extend this list to the following categories:
24h volume 1 - 0.5 BTC
24h volume 0.5-0.3 BTC
24h volume 0.3-0.1 BTC
24h volume 0.1 - 0.05 BTC
24h volume 0.05-0.01 BTC

I think that in the long term the truly decentralized currencies will win. By other hand all those private coins that are the majority out there are just another kind of thing and even if they advertise a lot sooner or later people will begin to understand the difference. As I said above maybe a community of decentralized coins should be created in order to solve the issues you mentioned together.  

I agree that volumes are often being faked but of course one can't fake a lower volume.

Maybe it may make sense working on a kind of Community of decentralized currencies. In such case going outside of this thread would make even more sense. Another thing I'd like to create is a fully decentralized site for this project.

Thank you for your suggestion of course I have to consider larger timeframe, but I don't know where to find it. There is no such data on coinmarketcap as well.

Maybe it can be interesting for TRC Community.
I've found this post of crazy_rabbit that states that TRC was created on October 28th, 2012.

I'm seeing the poll you've done so I'd like to add my 2 cents. I feel like GPU miners are the fuel of crypto-popularity because there are many, they've made investments so they spread the word about the coin they are mining. Mergemining doesn't lead the coin to popularity because only a small group of very big investors are mining BTC and they don't have time and interest to discuss or promote small coins. PoS is an ecological choice of course, but it makes big holders even bigger so it's not a good choice and also I feel that PoS doesn't make people promoting the coin they are stacking, because they haven't invested into equipment. Another interesting option could be PoC, which is ecological, but requires equipment. The downside is that the community that has PoC equipment is much smaller than GPU miners. So I'd consider to opt for some GPU, possibly ASICs resistant, mining algorithm, X16R for instance.

I've finished analyzing the full list of coins I was working on (all those listed on coinpaprika).
As you can see we have only 11 coins, that has at least some volume, fitting in our criteria.

I think I'll work now on the list of 300 small coins I haven't taken into consideration because their trading volume is under 1 BTC/day. Of course it's not that easy to understand whether a small coin is alive or not or whether it has some heavy issue, so please help me if you know anything about the coins I'll be mentioning.

That proves that centralized model is superior to the decentralized one. :-p

Thank you for your suggestion. Pandacoin has had a fair launch as far as I understand. It doesn't fit into 1 BTC/day trading volume criteria but I'll put it in the list of the small coins I'm about to create.

I like the idea of bitcointalk thread because it's being bumped each time someone comments so the idea is being advertised. I'm not that familiar with Github, is there this kind of mechanism there? Of course the cooperation of many people would be preferable.

I don't really know how much this idea is required. I have only 15 coins to analyze left, so maybe another coin will pop up, maybe a couple of coins.
I can also reconsider the small 1-0.5BTC/day coins for a minor coins list, but there are risks to mention coins that has heavy issues that are difficult to understand without a deep study.
So if we create a site just to mention the list of coins we have it may be too much effort for not such a long list.
What do you think?

Seems like Arionum fits into our criteria as well.
Would please somebody check them and tell me whether I'm wrong?

Wow you've got the same idea of another member of this discussion.
Maybe we can work on the site together: you, me and him?

When Dogecoin was first announced I knew right away that I was not interested at all in it. And I still don't like its stile, the fact it's not being developed any more and so on.
But I have to admit that Doge has found its important niche in the cryptoworld. Without it many small coins would be dead by now. Being Doge one of the base currencies for many exchanges it's possible to trade small coins in the range of prices that are not possible for BTC.

Guys thank you very much for encouragement.
I felt your support and yesterday I was able to analyze 152 coins!
I have more or less the same quantity remaining so now I'm sure I'll be able to get to the end of this research.

The new entry for today is: Vertcoin (they have 150 coins of test premine announced since the beginning).
 

Ofc I don't just believe the OP of the ANN, I analyze what people say during the launch, so Burst seems to have had a really fair launch.
So you are suggesting me to go on with this public research?