Pmalek, and bitcoingirlclub I guess, do you bet with real money, not bonuses? Are you up or down overall lifetime?
I don't play casino games and since most bonuses revolve around casino games, I don't use them. I bet on sports from time to time when I see a good offer that I believe can work in my favor. Sometimes it does, other times it doesn't. Betting isn't my profession and I don't look at it as a job so I can't give you any numbers. I don't always bet online and do some betting in my local betting shops. No names, no digital proof, no tracking, and no historical records to check. Even if I had such stats, I see no reason why I would talk about it publicly with unknown internet users.
What I was getting at is, no offence, but you're not good enough to get limited so how can you pass judgement. Though it's not just you. On this forum, limited means must have cheated. In reality, you get limited for consistently winning. Or betting high odds and winning. You can get limited by losing, but beating the closing line. Betnomi even call this cheating. Basically showing any sort of ability or brains can get you limited.
And like bachezy said, the little shitbooks do it quicker, because their risk ceiling is low and their liquidity is limited. A Curacao license is cheap, less than 30k, with no minimum starting bankroll. It's also why most of them end up in this section.
Deposit back only is a freeroll for Coinplay, that ain't right.
Is bachezy really that good and he is winning in all the casinos where he got limited or he is violating the terms of the casinos where he got limited, I don't have the pieces of evidence of all the other casinos but if he is proven to cheat on one then he could be cheating on all and if he can prove that he got limited from winning then he has a case that he is indeed good and these casinos don't want him on their platform, so bachezy can you show that you have a case and prove that these casinos are wrong in limiting you.