I'm not sure what you mean by this, but I still stand by my assumption that a fork still empowers the previous devs, assuming of course they still hold any 42.
Better a new coin with little premine and trusted backing.
No. Age and treachery tend to win out over youth and skill. The value of a currency already on exchanges far exceeds the value of a currency founded with the best of intentions.
Market share in the form of mind share is what makes a currency valuable. Is not the fed accused of padding the dollar? If the Zimbabwean authorities still have some huge horde of $100 trillion notes, are they not still a great store of wealth? (and appreciating much better than the 42)
Completely dishonorable intentions including fraud have spawned great industries in the past. Fraudsters get replaced by growers. It is normal. IBM and Microsoft sold products they did not have. Toyota sold sub-par motorbikes for years before improving their quality.
Founders die or move on. The foundation is the inspiration of talent for continuing growth of mind share for Cryptocurrencies. The 42 could excel here if no so badly marketed. I still deeply resent the "miner" focus for this coin. If this does not change, I will not be involved in the future.
Anyway, this ought not be a technical entreaty but an emotional one; someone may have cheated the 42 system for personal gain. So what? Currency does not condemn cheating and personal gain is what it is for.
Would it bother you if the 42 became popular in a few years and the founders regretted selling out?
As I mentioned, I may only visit this forum every week or two.