different

grin needs a 42 cycle , swap a 32 cycle.

there is a 1/x propability for a solution in a random graph.

every 32th graph will have a 32 cycle
every 42th graph will have a 42 cycle

when you estimate gps by solution rate and use the formula for grin, the result will be 24% off.

to the Gminer devs:

- I know why you chose that name, but it's no longer neccessary and those pools who have not fixed that will work with "Swap" in any part of the agent string "Gminer/Swap" will work too in that case.

- are you sure you calculating hashrate correctly? because at swap it's a 32 cycle not a 42 cycle.

- also the miner seems to disconnect on this pool response :

"{"id":"Stratum","jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"submit","result":null,"error":{code: -32503, message: "duplicate"}}"


have a nice day!

maybe have a look at this solo pool https://github.com/swap-dev/swap-micropool

it's called repackacking.

I don't expect you to listen as you demonstrated, so I don't bother to explain my viewpoint any further. buy BEAM and ETH!

ETH is a scam scheme.

isn't that self evident? it creates a destructive incentive.

the fund will not contribute to beams success but to it's downfall.

' I understand Haven has an ultimate goal of "offshoring" being its primary attractive feature'

complete hoax


'set itself apart from being another Monero clone.'

there isn't a single monero clone which is not a total scam or not broken otherwise.


' or the average person who doesn't particularly care about pre-mine'

the people who don't care about premine please move on as quickly as you can, nothing to see here. I don't even want to talk to you.

it's no longer related to haven.

history in a nutshell

- haven forked to freehaven: https://github.com/swap-dev/freehaven_historical
  same but fee removed
  (zawy dropped and cn superfast added)
  haven broke commit history with monero, so freehaven also had no commit-integrity with monero

- freehaven rebased to monero-0.13.0.4 codebase: https://github.com/swap-dev/swap
  with freehaven blockchain configuration (ringct from block 0, cn-superfast, etc.)

freehaven and swap daemons and wallets worked in parallel up until block 150k

at 150k swap activated bulletproofs (which haven still doesn't have) and forked to block version 8 (and to 9 at 151k). the freehaven daemon stopped working at 150k

commit integrity with monero is restored (a set of clean and easy to review commits) and now we have a solid foundation so we can focus on cuckaroo28 mining for swap-2.0

the haven folks can use swap to upgrade to bulletproof, they only need to add their developer-fee code (and zawy). cn heavy already included.


https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/515039248915628032/522356458692804629/WFw6LQg.png

Yes.


Freehaven is a fork of haven. Swap 1.0 restores commit integrity with monero. Same blockchain.



https://swap.coinscope.cc/

https://gitlab.com/swapdev/swap.git

https://gitlab.com/swapdev/swap-gui/tags/release-1.0

Windows GUI
https://mega.nz/#!7xQEiIKC!BUznQOrkpPWTQTU8sajNvr1ITCGf1guI5u0OhGqShIE

Windows CLI
https://mega.nz/#!jkQmhaoQ!3Wzp9B3cSiXtS9iisqlHyXyBehfluaIlyFmPRmp4VmM


https://i.imgur.com/WFw6LQg.png

No it's a knock off monero, because haven IS monero. there is no difference except a broken daa we removed again.

the source is monero, haven is scam.

forcing them to closed source would be ok also. It's basically proven the system can be hacked soon you have seen the code.

also you can't call it "cryptocoin" when it's closed source. because the most important feature of a cryptocoin is the "consensus". There is zero consensous when it's closed source.

the testnet is fake and closed source. nobody can test anything.

"took a shortcut by co-tailing a successful product "

we troll a scam project. whats wrong with that?


"Well, how about you switch your name sooner than later"

no longer in my hands. It's a community project. Join the community to help on the rebrand.

"one of the hardest exchanges to get into"

you can list every shitcoin at bittrex. They don't do any technical due diligence.


" long after their listing criteria has tighten up"

nonsense, they announced that they lessened their criteria.


"why did you attach the name to your project"

as I said, that was a joke.


"but can't even get your story straight"

for the record: we will not emulate haven or copy any or their features and we will change the name also.


"Free Haven promises to implement every feature Haven publishes"

We have every feature haven published and they won't publish anything more.

"claims that haven is a scam"

it's proven.



freehaven was the joke it was started on. there is zero "plans to emulate haven's protocol"



https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/512386345231056921/516490090478829578/swap_logo_overview.png

thats only a few hours because block time is 15s. you can scroll up the discord and witness the birth of the coin. it was very transparent from the very beginning.

The idea was born less then 48 hours ago.

5