Search content
Sort by
Showing 12 of 12 results by spyr0
Each person and each group should and do have the right to form their own system of interactions, whether that is religious, political (or lack of) or anything else, providing they do it at will.
When a child gets brainwashed by their parents, it is against their will.
Indeed, one's own thinking system is one's own right too. Brainwashing is essentially the imposing (injecting) one's thinking inside another's without his will. (Like when you're put by force to memorize a book and then repeat it.) Or the prohibiting one from thinking his own thoughts.
My little theory about rights:
Each person and each group should and do have the right to form their own system of interactions, whether that is religious, political (or lack of) or anything else, providing they do it at will.
They lose that right when they try to take away other persons, groups right to do the same; and that is authority. I only see restrains in doing so, and no benefit unless one tries to restrain oneself.
But if it is you who grants control, power unto some God or gods or some leader well it is your own right to do so, and then it doesnt count as authority.
In case it is not clear, I'm implying anything from complete anarchy, atheism, christianity, communism, national socialism, blockchain, fiat currencies, scientology, free market --literally anything is one's right to adhere to, as long as he doesn't try to impose that to others. If he does so, he get's restrained himself.
If we can't agree with each other, can't have one big system for all, but we can allow each other to have whichever system(s) we wish to, and that way we can have peace. (And that's a good reason for blockchain to exist too.)
Each person and each group should and do have the right to form their own system of interactions, whether that is religious, political (or lack of) or anything else, providing they do it at will.
They lose that right when they try to take away other persons, groups right to do the same; and that is authority. I only see restrains in doing so, and no benefit unless one tries to restrain oneself.
But if it is you who grants control, power unto some God or gods or some leader well it is your own right to do so, and then it doesnt count as authority.
In case it is not clear, I'm implying anything from complete anarchy, atheism, christianity, communism, national socialism, blockchain, fiat currencies, scientology, free market --literally anything is one's right to adhere to, as long as he doesn't try to impose that to others. If he does so, he get's restrained himself.
If we can't agree with each other, can't have one big system for all, but we can allow each other to have whichever system(s) we wish to, and that way we can have peace. (And that's a good reason for blockchain to exist too.)
To make something clearer, the idea is not to create a new, more advanced coin that will operate more or less within the usual system; but to create a new system with a new coin that will be compatible with the rest. My own task is the system, not the coin. A new system includes new ways one can acquire and use it.
In contrast to the 'versus' conditions that can exist in an economy, my aim is an economy that is -as much as possible- win-win for investors, collaborating business and consumers, and that gives good reasons for one to own and to use the coin without fearing he might loose it.
For reasons you can understand I can only talk specifics with somebody who could be willing to collaborate towards that direction.
In contrast to the 'versus' conditions that can exist in an economy, my aim is an economy that is -as much as possible- win-win for investors, collaborating business and consumers, and that gives good reasons for one to own and to use the coin without fearing he might loose it.
For reasons you can understand I can only talk specifics with somebody who could be willing to collaborate towards that direction.
There are 2 altcoin I know which implemented non volatile by equalizing the price with $1. USDT and USNBT.
Like @sweetdesirez said, you need more innovative ideas, I'm sure if you show good credibility, the people will trust and used in trading, no matter with the price, like bitcoin.
Like @sweetdesirez said, you need more innovative ideas, I'm sure if you show good credibility, the people will trust and used in trading, no matter with the price, like bitcoin.
I haven't talked any specifics concerning my plan yet, just a general direction.
Yes, I am aware of Tether and I'm glad it exist. Perhaps I gave a wrong picture in my initial post (?) but I don't intend to create anything parallel to fiat currencies, but a new system.
Hi guys, I am looking to help resolve a small problem related to cryptocurrencies and profit by doing so too.
What problem? In my opinion a currency is not a currency at all if you cannot trade (products, services) with it. And although bitcoin has some relatively consistent growth and it has been very profitable for those who have invested in it, not everyone is an bitcoin/altcoin trader, and not everyone will understand why if he deposits 500$ he will have 520$ the next day and possibly 470$ the other day, in which case he might as well get broken-hearted.
I'd like to help create a more mainstream altcoin, addressed to business and to consumers by 1. Reducing volatility 2. Promoting more consistent growth. So it can then more easily be trusted and used in trading.
For that reason a new coin, a new system of investing and ways to give value to that currency (other than by just asking from investors to buy it) can be created.
So if anybody's looking to start a project of his own and is not quite certain what to do with it, I could discuss my system with him/her and collaborate.
What problem? In my opinion a currency is not a currency at all if you cannot trade (products, services) with it. And although bitcoin has some relatively consistent growth and it has been very profitable for those who have invested in it, not everyone is an bitcoin/altcoin trader, and not everyone will understand why if he deposits 500$ he will have 520$ the next day and possibly 470$ the other day, in which case he might as well get broken-hearted.
I'd like to help create a more mainstream altcoin, addressed to business and to consumers by 1. Reducing volatility 2. Promoting more consistent growth. So it can then more easily be trusted and used in trading.
For that reason a new coin, a new system of investing and ways to give value to that currency (other than by just asking from investors to buy it) can be created.
So if anybody's looking to start a project of his own and is not quite certain what to do with it, I could discuss my system with him/her and collaborate.
Mainstream altcoin, addressed to consumers n business, reducing volatility, promoting consistent growth - none of these are innovative in the sense all altcoins target these things, the biggest question is, do yo have any proper plan and vision to implement it in a way others have not done before?
A small correction: Not a more mainstream altcoin (that would mean more popular than the rest) but an altcoin addressed to the mainstream, as opposed to an altcoin addressed to altcoin traders. I'm not implying anything against altcoin traders, by the way. I'm just saying most people are not involved with that.
I have a very solid plan that is partially composed of what I see others do that I wouldn't want to do. But I don't mind so much what others do. Instead of criticizing other's coins I want to go about it how I see it being more workable, myself. And if I agree with others, even better. I do lack in the technical expertise needed to start a coin from zero, though; not to mention all the work that will be needed later on.
Hi guys, I am looking to help resolve a small problem related to cryptocurrencies and profit by doing so too.
What problem? In my opinion a currency is not a currency at all if you cannot trade (products, services) with it. And although bitcoin has some relatively consistent growth and it has been very profitable for those who have invested in it, not everyone is an bitcoin/altcoin trader, and not everyone will understand why if he deposits 500$ he will have 520$ the next day and possibly 470$ the other day, in which case he might as well get broken-hearted.
I'd like to help create a more mainstream altcoin, addressed to business and to consumers by 1. Reducing volatility 2. Promoting more consistent growth. So it can then more easily be trusted and used in trading.
For that reason a new coin, a new system of investing and ways to give value to that currency (other than by just asking from investors to buy it) can be created.
So if anybody's looking to start a project of his own and is not quite certain what to do with it, I could discuss my system with him/her and collaborate.
What problem? In my opinion a currency is not a currency at all if you cannot trade (products, services) with it. And although bitcoin has some relatively consistent growth and it has been very profitable for those who have invested in it, not everyone is an bitcoin/altcoin trader, and not everyone will understand why if he deposits 500$ he will have 520$ the next day and possibly 470$ the other day, in which case he might as well get broken-hearted.
I'd like to help create a more mainstream altcoin, addressed to business and to consumers by 1. Reducing volatility 2. Promoting more consistent growth. So it can then more easily be trusted and used in trading.
For that reason a new coin, a new system of investing and ways to give value to that currency (other than by just asking from investors to buy it) can be created.
So if anybody's looking to start a project of his own and is not quite certain what to do with it, I could discuss my system with him/her and collaborate.
This post will be deleted in 25 minutes.
(Now I have to say something irrelevant to MCO.)
Yes, the dishonesty of few makes all eventually become suspected and regulated, including the honest ones. But that's no solution. At least the way it is now nobody gets forced to participate, and if we were, it would certainly all be dishonest as a whole.
Lol the pic
Yes, initially I said I'd support what has potential and is legit. Then I got impatient to play shorter term (I really enjoyed it), and the buying low and selling high was also my aim. Most of my trades were successful that way. And I lost my profit (+ more) in a couple of quickie pump and dump schemes. Well...free market
Very good post.
Also do consider automatic stop loss trades that activate when large sell comes in.. One stop loss activates another stop loss and so on. That generates an automatic dump in market value.
Also do consider automatic stop loss trades that activate when large sell comes in.. One stop loss activates another stop loss and so on. That generates an automatic dump in market value.
Right; that's possibly what some try to trigger. Plus, it seems fresh coins/tokens with potential and with attention are very good for such a thing (draw buyers then dump them).
Thanks
I see VISA as a good, temporary (for the years to come) solution. It's isn't just for it's shopping potential; it connects fiat cash with cryptos through 'normal', non bitcoin ATMs too. If such cards become more popular, cryptos become more popular.
If you look at the MCO price graph it is obvious the pump that started at around 8/25 has now been dumped, possibly taking some panic sells along with it. And by my brief experience in exchanges I can tell many or most short-term traders don't care which coin they trade, they just go for it if it appears profitable to them in the short term, based on hype and similar things. Whether MCO will succeed or not in the long run is not based on pre-launch graphs. It is based on how legit it is and how well it will go as business.
Please take nothing that I say as advice (to buy or not), just my opinion. I don't want to be responsible for others. If it drops more I might as well buy some more myself.
If you look at the MCO price graph it is obvious the pump that started at around 8/25 has now been dumped, possibly taking some panic sells along with it. And by my brief experience in exchanges I can tell many or most short-term traders don't care which coin they trade, they just go for it if it appears profitable to them in the short term, based on hype and similar things. Whether MCO will succeed or not in the long run is not based on pre-launch graphs. It is based on how legit it is and how well it will go as business.
Please take nothing that I say as advice (to buy or not), just my opinion. I don't want to be responsible for others. If it drops more I might as well buy some more myself.
The only thing I don't understand is what's the difference between Monaco/Tenx and some other debit cards I've seen online like Uquid? Why is Monaco said to be the first?
Monaco is aiming to establish itself higher up the "credit food chain" than TenX has initially done. It is possible that in a few years TenX could switch from WaveCrest to Monaco as its actual card issuer.
Thanks for the info.
Generally speaking, I think debit cards are good for cryptos --specially for smaller ones that could be supported by them. Because as far as I understand (I'm not 100% certain) the main exchange method between fiat cash and cryptos has been bitcoin ATMs untill now.
This is the first time I follow a coin/token in the long term, aside from BTC. I bought rather high and I would preffer to had bought with this lower price but I still think it is going to go much much higher, because it is not an 'empty' project --meaning it can have usability, plus token holders with be getting a comission from transactions ad infinitum. The only thing I don't understand is what's the difference between Monaco/Tenx and some other debit cards I've seen online like Uquid? Why is Monaco said to be the first?