Search content
Sort by
Showing 13 of 13 results by superza
Re: PhoenixMiner 5.6d: fastest Ethereum/Ethash miner with lowest devfee (Win/Linux)
Hello Guys,
I get a Rtx 2060 6GB.
Until yesterday 11 GMT my hashrate was 31/32 mh while today I see 28/29 mh with the same overclock parameters (cpu -500 undervolted with curve, mem +1030, power 80%)
The hashrate was with 5.5c, I switched to 5.6d but the result is pretty the same.
Is anyone see an hasrate drop with Rtx Nvidia Cards
(I knew the issue of the progressive hashrate drops exist for gtx 10x0, is the same for rtx?)
Best Regards
I get a Rtx 2060 6GB.
Until yesterday 11 GMT my hashrate was 31/32 mh while today I see 28/29 mh with the same overclock parameters (cpu -500 undervolted with curve, mem +1030, power 80%)
The hashrate was with 5.5c, I switched to 5.6d but the result is pretty the same.
Is anyone see an hasrate drop with Rtx Nvidia Cards
(I knew the issue of the progressive hashrate drops exist for gtx 10x0, is the same for rtx?)
Best Regards
Re: [ANN] [1080 | 1080TI] ETHlargement - The Hashrate Hardener
Tried this pill for 1hr and insteresting thing - hash rate pool reported, it slowes down to some 40MH/s from 1080ti. After 1hr I shut down pill window and pool reported has hrate immediately starts to grow to some 55MH/s and stays ))) Very interesting.
BTW this mod makes cards power supply and memory very hot. Tried it on EVGA FTW3 and it has sensors to monitor it. Literally from 65C to 80-82C with 100% fan on Power.
BTW this mod makes cards power supply and memory very hot. Tried it on EVGA FTW3 and it has sensors to monitor it. Literally from 65C to 80-82C with 100% fan on Power.
I Had The same Issue;
It worked @52mh +150cpu +720 mem PL 70 65° Temp, randomly after few hours hashrate dropped @46mh and mem clock went automatically down to 5000mhz (never see that before!!) temp goes up to 83°
Even restarted it did the same after few hours, three times; I reduce pov lim even also to 60% but behaviour was the same.
I would like to try with a liquid cooled Gpu, anyway this pills looks like pretty unstable.
Tried with.
W10 Pro 64Bit
Claymore 11.6 and 11.7
Nvidia Driver 397.31
Afterburner 4.4.2
Update with photo; see memory clock temp and unstable hashrate if i apply once again afterburner settings situation normalize. May be an afterburner bug in the interaction with pills
https://ibb.co/fA7BEH
Re: [ANN] [1080 | 1080TI] ETHlargement - The Hashrate Hardener
Tried this pill for 1hr and insteresting thing - hash rate pool reported, it slowes down to some 40MH/s from 1080ti. After 1hr I shut down pill window and pool reported has hrate immediately starts to grow to some 55MH/s and stays ))) Very interesting.
BTW this mod makes cards power supply and memory very hot. Tried it on EVGA FTW3 and it has sensors to monitor it. Literally from 65C to 80-82C with 100% fan on Power.
BTW this mod makes cards power supply and memory very hot. Tried it on EVGA FTW3 and it has sensors to monitor it. Literally from 65C to 80-82C with 100% fan on Power.
I Had The same Issue;
It worked @52mh +150cpu +720 mem PL 70 65° Temp, randomly after few hours hashrate dropped @46mh and mem clock went automatically down to 5000mhz (never see that before!!) temp goes up to 83°
Even restarted it did the same after few hours, three times; I reduce pov lim even also to 60% but behaviour was the same.
I would like to try with a liquid cooled Gpu, anyway this pills looks like pretty unstable.
Tried with.
W10 Pro 64Bit
Claymore 11.6 and 11.7
Nvidia Driver 397.31
Afterburner 4.4.2
Re: [Awesome Miner] - Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 10000 miners
Hello Awesome, did someone encounter the following windows message on win10 64 bit?
"Application has been blocked from accessing Graphics hardware. Application ccminer-x64.exe has been blocked from accessing Graphics Hardware"
It looks like a minor issue that sometimes block miner.
The efffect looks like the miner restart
(I was running Awesome 4.7.4 with profit mining, the client issuing the error ran the awesome remote agent)
Best Regards
Massimiliano
"Application has been blocked from accessing Graphics hardware. Application ccminer-x64.exe has been blocked from accessing Graphics Hardware"
It looks like a minor issue that sometimes block miner.
The efffect looks like the miner restart
(I was running Awesome 4.7.4 with profit mining, the client issuing the error ran the awesome remote agent)
Best Regards
Massimiliano
Re: [Awesome Miner]- Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 5000 miners
Hello Patrike, I Got 4.6.6 Version with some remote miners (agent updated to 4.6.6 too) configured in profit miner.
Sometimes, when one of my miners (still the same) switch to Ethrereum with Claymore, the Awesome Gui shows me the "interface offline" message.
I configured "claymores dual ethereum miner" section in the profit switching profile with command line options -platform 2 -mport -4028 (to get read only management)
Looking at the agent log I noticed some errors; i would like to know if it could be related with interface offline error i get.
05/04/2018 11:20:25.120 [008][ManagedMiner#8 - Test Profit Miner -Rigo2] Configured command line:
-platform 2 -mport -4028
05/04/2018 11:20:25.448 [008]Saving configuration to: C:\Users\Rigo2\AppData\Roaming\AwesomeMinerService\ServiceData.xml.tmp
05/04/2018 11:20:25.464 [008]--> C:\Users\Rigo2\AppData\Roaming\AwesomeMinerService\ServiceData.xml
05/04/2018 11:20:25.464 [008][ManagedMiner#8 - Test Profit Miner -Rigo2] Mining Engine Process started, PID: 8000
05/04/2018 11:20:30.058 [014] [E]Failed to process API request (time: 1016 ms): {"id":0,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"miner_getstat2"}
Impossibile stabilire la connessione. Rifiuto persistente del computer di destinazione 127.0.0.1:4028 ( Traslation: Impossible to establish connection. Persistent Deny Destination Host 127.0.0.1:4028)
P.S 127.0.0.1:4028 was correctly reacheable via browser
Thank you in Advance
Massimiliano
Sometimes, when one of my miners (still the same) switch to Ethrereum with Claymore, the Awesome Gui shows me the "interface offline" message.
I configured "claymores dual ethereum miner" section in the profit switching profile with command line options -platform 2 -mport -4028 (to get read only management)
Looking at the agent log I noticed some errors; i would like to know if it could be related with interface offline error i get.
05/04/2018 11:20:25.120 [008]
-platform 2 -mport -4028
05/04/2018 11:20:25.448 [008]
05/04/2018 11:20:25.464 [008]
05/04/2018 11:20:25.464 [008]
05/04/2018 11:20:30.058 [014] [E]Failed to process API request (time: 1016 ms): {"id":0,"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"miner_getstat2"}
Impossibile stabilire la connessione. Rifiuto persistente del computer di destinazione 127.0.0.1:4028 ( Traslation: Impossible to establish connection. Persistent Deny Destination Host 127.0.0.1:4028)
P.S 127.0.0.1:4028 was correctly reacheable via browser
Thank you in Advance
Massimiliano
Re: [Awesome Miner]- Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 5000 miners
EDIT: SOLVED! : I Run the Latest Installer in repair mode, and it started! Also after a Reboot it's ok...
Best Regards
Massimiliano
Hello Awesome Miners, after the latest upgrade to 4.3.1 all works fine until a reboot;
After the reboot I discover that awesome didnt start anymore both at the startup than manually
Windows Version is 10 Pro 64bit Ver 1709 Build 16299.125.
Event viewer gave me this error:
Name of the application that generated the error: AwesomeMiner.exe, version: 4.3.1.0, timestamp: 0x5a4b6441
Name of the form that generated the error: KERNELBASE.dll, version: 10.0.16299.15, timestamp: 0x2cd1ce3d
Exception code: 0xe0434352
Error offset 0x001008b2
Process ID that generated the error: 0x2c8c
Start time of the application that generated the error: 0x01d384d6d0119ab1
Path to the application that generated the error: C: \ Program Files (x86) \ Awesome Miner \ AwesomeMiner.exe
Path to the form that generated the error: C: \ WINDOWS \ System32 \ KERNELBASE.dll
Reporting ID: 7398967a-c061-4921-a617-0a45a9bb40d3
Any tips for me?
Best Regards
Massimiliano
Best Regards
Massimiliano
Hello Awesome Miners, after the latest upgrade to 4.3.1 all works fine until a reboot;
After the reboot I discover that awesome didnt start anymore both at the startup than manually
Windows Version is 10 Pro 64bit Ver 1709 Build 16299.125.
Event viewer gave me this error:
Name of the application that generated the error: AwesomeMiner.exe, version: 4.3.1.0, timestamp: 0x5a4b6441
Name of the form that generated the error: KERNELBASE.dll, version: 10.0.16299.15, timestamp: 0x2cd1ce3d
Exception code: 0xe0434352
Error offset 0x001008b2
Process ID that generated the error: 0x2c8c
Start time of the application that generated the error: 0x01d384d6d0119ab1
Path to the application that generated the error: C: \ Program Files (x86) \ Awesome Miner \ AwesomeMiner.exe
Path to the form that generated the error: C: \ WINDOWS \ System32 \ KERNELBASE.dll
Reporting ID: 7398967a-c061-4921-a617-0a45a9bb40d3
Any tips for me?
Best Regards
Massimiliano
Ciao anche io presenterò interpello per una posizione di gain tra acquisto e vendita di circa 10K per il 2017 ;
Domanda stupida ma l'interpello va mandato via raccomandata e/o pec alla direzione regionale dell'agenzia delle entrate di residenza corretto?
Saluti
Domanda stupida ma l'interpello va mandato via raccomandata e/o pec alla direzione regionale dell'agenzia delle entrate di residenza corretto?
Saluti
Re: [Awesome Miner]- Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 5000 miners
Hello, I noticed that Bitcoin Gold equihash mining will officially start on November 12 07:00 UTC.
Is there a Plan to support it in Awesome Miner for the near future?
Best Regards
Massimiliano
Is there a Plan to support it in Awesome Miner for the near future?
Best Regards
Massimiliano
Re: [Awesome Miner]- Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 5000 miners
Hello Awesome Guys, I would like to share a question with you;
I Am on Awesome Miner 4.0.9 and I was testing profit mining on MiningpoolHub on two miners:
1x1060 (i'm expanding it !)
8X1070
.....
Best Regards
Massimiliano from IT
Thanks for the detailed description. If you look in the miner console, is for example the difficulty different? There are probably others here with more experience of MiningPoolHub, but based on hash power, your miners may end up with different difficulties which may result in similar number of accepted shares, but more profit for your more powerful rig.I Am on Awesome Miner 4.0.9 and I was testing profit mining on MiningpoolHub on two miners:
1x1060 (i'm expanding it !)
8X1070
.....
Best Regards
Massimiliano from IT
Yes it is! I checked and noticed it the share of the 8X1070 rig have average higher difficulty, but it happens only on certain protocols; for example i noticed that in ethash i see the 10X factor in the share founded.
I didnt understand that the difficult could impact the share values for certain protocols!!!
Many Thanks for your reply!
Re: [Awesome Miner]- Powerful Windows GUI to manage and monitor up to 5000 miners
Hello Awesome Guys, I would like to share a question with you;
I Am on Awesome Miner 4.0.9 and I was testing profit mining on MiningpoolHub on two miners:
1x1060 (i'm expanding it !)
8X1070
I noticed that for most algorithms, number of captured shares, was quite the same for both rigs, while I would like to expect at least a 10X share numbers for the 8X1070Rig.
(and the 10X factor is shown correctly when I mine with standard managed miners on flypool or ethermine)
For example right now with lyra2rev2 i got both miners mining lyra by 19 minutes up and they captured quite the same shares; 72 Vs 67:
https://ibb.co/cZ1vaw
I checked the console for both miners and yes the share numbers are correct.
Looking at Miningpool hub he see me with two different miners because I added in mining properties different name extension for each miner;
Anyway Balance earned in miningpoolhub looks like adeguate for a 8X1070 mining rigs so I dont understand in what assumptions I am wrong...
It Looks like illogic
It's that normal or weird?
P.S. the two rigs goes on internet with the same public Ip
Best Regards
Massimiliano from IT
I Am on Awesome Miner 4.0.9 and I was testing profit mining on MiningpoolHub on two miners:
1x1060 (i'm expanding it !)
8X1070
I noticed that for most algorithms, number of captured shares, was quite the same for both rigs, while I would like to expect at least a 10X share numbers for the 8X1070Rig.
(and the 10X factor is shown correctly when I mine with standard managed miners on flypool or ethermine)
For example right now with lyra2rev2 i got both miners mining lyra by 19 minutes up and they captured quite the same shares; 72 Vs 67:
https://ibb.co/cZ1vaw
I checked the console for both miners and yes the share numbers are correct.
Looking at Miningpool hub he see me with two different miners because I added in mining properties different name extension for each miner;
Anyway Balance earned in miningpoolhub looks like adeguate for a 8X1070 mining rigs so I dont understand in what assumptions I am wrong...
It Looks like illogic
It's that normal or weird?
P.S. the two rigs goes on internet with the same public Ip
Best Regards
Massimiliano from IT
ieri sulla pagina fb di bitcoin italia hanno passato questo link; Asserisce che sotto i 51k non si paga niente tranne credo un campo del 730 da poche decine di euro...
Mah sempre più confuso...
https://www.adviseonly.com/blog/brandcorner/goodwill-asset-management/investire-in-bitcoin-e-criptovalute-un-chiaro-vantaggio-fiscale/
Mah sempre più confuso...
https://www.adviseonly.com/blog/brandcorner/goodwill-asset-management/investire-in-bitcoin-e-criptovalute-un-chiaro-vantaggio-fiscale/
Riesumo un po' il post per una domanda che non mi sembra abbia ricevuto risposta nel (lunghissimo) thread (ho cercato di leggere, ma non la trovo).
Si è parlato molto di exchange, ma meno di mining.
Esempio: se io oggi mino, nell'arco di 3 o 4 mesi , 4000 Altcoin( diciamo ad esempio Dogecoin). che quest'anno valgono 0.01 l'uno. Me li tengo nel wallet e nel 2019 i Dogecoin salgono ad 1l'uno e io ho 4000 in dogecoin, li vendo, e incasso 4000.
Questa operazione va individuata come trading con plusvalenza 4000? Oppure il mining viene assoggettato a lavoro autonomo e quindi ho generato 4000 da lavoratore? Ma in questo caso il valore generato dal lavoro del mining era di 40 in quanto il dogecoin valeva 0.01quando l'ho minato. Che confusione. Avete esperienze in merito? Magari conviene dichiarare tutto come exchange e pagare le tasse al 26% e basta, ma è possibile dichiare come plusvalenza i guadagni ottenuti dal mining dei coins, che non sono stati quindi acquistati?
Si è parlato molto di exchange, ma meno di mining.
Esempio: se io oggi mino, nell'arco di 3 o 4 mesi , 4000 Altcoin( diciamo ad esempio Dogecoin). che quest'anno valgono 0.01 l'uno. Me li tengo nel wallet e nel 2019 i Dogecoin salgono ad 1l'uno e io ho 4000 in dogecoin, li vendo, e incasso 4000.
Questa operazione va individuata come trading con plusvalenza 4000? Oppure il mining viene assoggettato a lavoro autonomo e quindi ho generato 4000 da lavoratore? Ma in questo caso il valore generato dal lavoro del mining era di 40 in quanto il dogecoin valeva 0.01quando l'ho minato. Che confusione. Avete esperienze in merito? Magari conviene dichiarare tutto come exchange e pagare le tasse al 26% e basta, ma è possibile dichiare come plusvalenza i guadagni ottenuti dal mining dei coins, che non sono stati quindi acquistati?
Anche io ho i tuoi stessi dubbi perchè le ordinanze lette sembra facciano riferimento al mining in maniera impropria;
In generale come fai notare tu è complicato calcolare il reale plusvalore ottenuto con il mining, come molti miner infatti lo scopo è andare long nella speranza che la quota minata assuma maggior valore nel tempo.
Mi sento comunque di aggiungere che il mining potrebbe anche essere assimilato all'acquisizione di cryptovalute, usando computer ed energia elettrica e quindi rientrare nella tassazione per valuta estera sovente letta in questo thread.
Saluti