Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 254 results by tsvekric
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][KMD][dPoW] Komodo - Zcash Zero Knowledge Privacy Secured by Bitcoin
by
tsvekric
on 03/02/2018, 22:19:29 UTC
Been searching and I cannot find an answer - I've sent 7 transactions of Hush of different sizes to Barterdex and no matter what I cannot make a trade and my inventory (not balance) says 0 - cannot split anything further. What am I doing wrong?

I sent one single transaction of BTCH and I'm able to see that on my inventory.
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Current economy aside, which altcoins fit this description?
by
tsvekric
on 13/11/2017, 16:05:42 UTC
With the current state of bitcoin because basically unusable as a real currency, which altcoins (could) fit these criteria?

-scalable, continued usability and experience if the economy becomes massive (billions in market cap/transactions) - unlikely to have pending transaction backlog
-low friction transactions: continued low transaction fees regardless of price
-micro-transactions feasible regardless of price
-little to no useless coins due to complexity of transaction causing transaction fees to be greater than the value held, regardless of price
-environmentally/economically friendly for whatever mechanism generates coins (low energy usage) - maybe no 'proof of work' currencies.

Basically, if I want to tell customers to use a currency to buy a $1 cup of coffee that they can continue to use for that purpose in perpetuity, what currency should they use? Because it certainly isn't Bitcoin, and potentially wouldn't be any forks of it either

This is all regardless of current popularity/development of a coin - just which ones could fit that criteria should they become as popular as Bitcoin is now.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Losing faith in BTC...
by
tsvekric
on 12/11/2017, 21:27:49 UTC
I see a lot of people saying this will correct and the currency will return to 'normal'

What is the 'normal' it will return to? Will transaction wait times go back to one block? Will fees shrink or ever go back to being able to transact feeless?

Will this currency ever be used like a currency again? Will I ever be able to make microtransactions? Will I ever be able to send transactions with many small inputs? Will I ever be able to buy a cup of coffee with bitcoin? What's the point of this "currency" any more?

People are seriously comparing btc transactions to Western Union now saying that $10 fees aren't that bad. This is not the bitcoin world I came to circa 2012.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Technical Support
Re: Old wallet.dat file loaded with old unconfirmed transaction
by
tsvekric
on 12/10/2017, 16:42:25 UTC
Transactions are kept in a wallet file along with the private keys for addresses. Your wallet.dat simply stored it for a very long time. As I assume you want the coins and want that transaction to go through, you could rebroadcast it and if the fee isn't high enough, use the CPFP method to get it confirmed.

You should go to Help->Debug Window->Console and type
Code:
gettransaction ""
, that should give you the hex that you can push to any online service like this one https://blockexplorer.com/tx/send.

So I tried blockexplorer and it returned an error: "Missing inputs. Code:-25
blockchain.info gives me "missing parents for while inserting:

Could it be that this was spent from another unconfirmed transaction and since that one didn't confirm this one wouldn't show up? Or for some other reason was pruned by the network?

Any chance you can post the address here? Altough it probably won't be in a block explorer if it has been unconfirmed for thislong as they're normally cleared fairly quickly.

I think that the transaction you got probably got a double spend rom it also as that wasn't a bad time for transaction confimations even without a fee (as far as others say anyway).

Receiving address is 1BAGeeR428SMRqGyXrsXzAYiFWC7SuK21Y txid is 623c4c933a0a0f93567bfaa60181f9df4e2e995a505bea9891d9e012edbce7c5
amount sent was exactly 1BTC

Can you right click it and get the input scripts/sending address.
If you specify the sending address and the date then I'll see if that has been spent or not. If you could get the input scripts as well, they would be even more helpful.



It doesn't seem to see the inputs unless I'm missing something.
I think this is probably right, unfortunately:

This means that at least one (possibly all) of the inputs to your "unconfirmed transaction" have already been spent in another transaction, so they are no longer in the UTXO set... they effectively don't exist anymore. This is not surprising given that 4 years has passed since that transaction was originally broadcast.

So basically, there is no way for you to rebroadcast this transaction to the network. Those coins are gone.

Which would make sense since I have no idea where this transaction came from.

Is there a chance though that this is just an 'orphaned transaction'? (Not a transaction in an orphaned block)
I can't seem to find a lot of info about those since it's hard to filter out the posts about blocks.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Technical Support
Re: Old wallet.dat file loaded with old unconfirmed transaction
by
tsvekric
on 12/10/2017, 00:09:52 UTC
Either way as this (probably?) doesn't have any fees with it and since it is old and no other nodes I've checked see it, should I run as my own full node and rebroadcast and attempt to CPFP? I'm not quite familiar with this stuff, but if this was a valid transaction and the funds are still sitting there this seems like the only option, yes?
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Technical Support
Re: Old wallet.dat file loaded with old unconfirmed transaction
by
tsvekric
on 11/10/2017, 22:09:45 UTC
Transactions are kept in a wallet file along with the private keys for addresses. Your wallet.dat simply stored it for a very long time. As I assume you want the coins and want that transaction to go through, you could rebroadcast it and if the fee isn't high enough, use the CPFP method to get it confirmed.

You should go to Help->Debug Window->Console and type
Code:
gettransaction ""
, that should give you the hex that you can push to any online service like this one https://blockexplorer.com/tx/send.

So I tried blockexplorer and it returned an error: "Missing inputs. Code:-25
blockchain.info gives me "missing parents for while inserting:

Could it be that this was spent from another unconfirmed transaction and since that one didn't confirm this one wouldn't show up? Or for some other reason was pruned by the network?

Any chance you can post the address here? Altough it probably won't be in a block explorer if it has been unconfirmed for thislong as they're normally cleared fairly quickly.

I think that the transaction you got probably got a double spend rom it also as that wasn't a bad time for transaction confimations even without a fee (as far as others say anyway).

Receiving address is 1BAGeeR428SMRqGyXrsXzAYiFWC7SuK21Y txid is 623c4c933a0a0f93567bfaa60181f9df4e2e995a505bea9891d9e012edbce7c5
amount sent was exactly 1BTC
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Technical Support
Re: Old wallet.dat file loaded with old unconfirmed transaction
by
tsvekric
on 11/10/2017, 21:45:07 UTC
Transactions are kept in a wallet file along with the private keys for addresses. Your wallet.dat simply stored it for a very long time. As I assume you want the coins and want that transaction to go through, you could rebroadcast it and if the fee isn't high enough, use the CPFP method to get it confirmed.

You should go to Help->Debug Window->Console and type
Code:
gettransaction ""
, that should give you the hex that you can push to any online service like this one https://blockexplorer.com/tx/send.

So I tried blockexplorer and it returned an error: "Missing inputs. Code:-25
blockchain.info gives me "missing parents for while inserting:

Could it be that this was spent from another unconfirmed transaction and since that one didn't confirm this one wouldn't show up? Or for some other reason was pruned by the network?
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Technical Support
Re: Old wallet.dat file loaded with old unconfirmed transaction
by
tsvekric
on 11/10/2017, 19:05:13 UTC
You can just dump your wallet to get the private keys and don't have to wait for the sync to complete. Then import the private key into an online type wallet or another wallet where the blockchain is online. If there is a balance it will show up.

I did that and it showed 0 balance. I already know that the network doesn't seem to see this transaction. So where did this unconfirmed transaction come from on my client's end?
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Technical Support
Old wallet.dat file loaded with old unconfirmed transaction
by
tsvekric
on 11/10/2017, 18:38:44 UTC
In going through some old backups I found an old bitcoin wallet.dat file and decided to download Bitcoin Core to load it and see if anything was in it, or to just see if there were old transactions listed that I could daydream about having now

Opened the file, and oddly there was a pending received transaction from December 2013 that is sitting unconfirmed. This transaction showed up immediately before I downloaded any of the blockchain yet (waiting on that to finish, estimated time ~week...)
If I search the received address or the transaction ID I find nothing.
Also, I have no recollection of where this transaction could have come from and have not used that receiving address for anything else.

Couple questions:

-If this isn't showing up anywhere (blockchain.info, for example) where did it come from? Could it be an intentional double-spend just to mess with me?
-can this transaction be rebroadcasted if the network has no record of it?
-do I need to have the entire blockchain downloaded to get my client to rebroadcast this transaction?
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: What is happening again? The market is looking all red!
by
tsvekric
on 13/09/2017, 16:26:20 UTC
Hello there!
Every one is talking about bad news from China but have they taking any real action to implement such policies?

It seems like every few years when BTC is going up in price consistently China makes some sort of vague threat and the price crashes. Screams of attempts at price manipulation. I'm sure there's some insiders in the Chinese government making a lot of money off this.
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: If he dumps ETC will go up strongly
by
tsvekric
on 01/08/2016, 14:15:53 UTC
If the DAO attacker dumps the ETC then the price of ETC will most likely skyrocket. The ETC will be freed. The threat of dumping is more powerful than the execution

lol @ the anti-logic of ETC holders. Yes, a massive sell-off will cause the price to skyrocket, because that has happened ever in a market before...
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: WHo will win - ETH or ETC?
by
tsvekric
on 26/07/2016, 13:51:57 UTC
So much FUD. Roll Eyes

Very much, yes.

Some people are really trying to make a killing with ETC before it dies. I definitely will not be falling for that trap.
For most of us, it doesn't really matter if it is ETH or ETC. Moving on in the chain the only real difference is that there is a huge threat of a dump of ETC by whoever siphoned the DAO. As a speculator only, it would be incredibly stupid to push for the smaller guy with a big whale waiting to sell.
Now, if you're only goal is some kind of Ethereum purity and standard, then yeah, ETC is your guy. But don't expect to make any money holding onto it now.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Why bitcoin isn't currency.
by
tsvekric
on 07/11/2013, 18:51:13 UTC
also conflating units of physical measurement with currency, units as placeholders for valuation as a medium of exchange, is completely irrational. The comparison just doesn't work.
you can say a gram is a certain number of atoms. That is objectively true. There is no such thing as objective value, so you can't measure a constantly defined unit of value. You're just confused.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Why bitcoin isn't currency.
by
tsvekric
on 07/11/2013, 18:46:36 UTC
To the value is subjective so it is okay that the unit of value is subjective crowd.

Value is subjective to the individual but objective to mankind.. I can say I dont value water because I am not thirsty, I can never say that mankind doesnt value water.

Further the measure of the subjective nature of value is called price!!!!   

And price is measured by currency.  And Bitcoin is currency.  So what's the problem?

You can't have an objective measure of value that is disconnected from price.  It's just not possible.  Gold is a joke.  Fiat currencies are inherently flawed.  The "accounting" profession is a total fraud.  What else is there?  Nothing.  That's why we have Bitcoin.

Like I said, in fifty years, price and value will likely converge in Bitcoin anyways.  If you can come up with an "objective" measure of value between now and then, more power to you.  Odds are you won't.  It's a hard problem.  So just accept that Bitcoin is a currency in the short term, and (hopefully) an objective measure of value in the long term.

You will never get me to believe that you can have a system of measurement without a UNIT of measurement.

Bitcoin IS the unit of measurement.  It seems so unmoored only beause it's trying to measure something that is subjective, the value of products and services.  The measurement system still requires the pricing mechanisim that a live trade market provides, and even that is only valid momentarily.

No it isn't. The reason it is so unmoored is because it is not a unit. Units are a constant that are definable. It is unstable in the same way that measurement of length was before an inch was defined.

Price is the representation of the change in subjective value, the currency is supposed to be the constant that it measured against.
   

So under your definition pretty much every major economy is operating on something that is not a currency. The US dollar doesn't fit your definition. It is a completely silly argument.
'Unit' defined for currencies IS an abstract. You're conflating the constant of the abstract unit with a constant of physical unit. 1 Dollar is 100 cents. Dollar is the unit, cents are fractions of that unit. 1 Bitcoin, it is a unit that can fractionally be used down to .00000001. It is defined.
The value of the unit is not constant under ANY currency system.
In fact, I would argue that bitcoin fits the definition of currency better than the US dollar because it has greater definition. The monetary base in the US is indeterminate in the future, yet the path of bitcoins being introduced to the economy is definite.

I'm pretty sure you're just trolling, but I thought I'd say something just in case someone was taking you seriously.
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: 1 hour trading lag - MtGox.. Good Job
by
tsvekric
on 10/04/2013, 18:26:48 UTC
This doesn't make any sense..
It's being DDoS'd. And everyone is stupidly panic selling.

I'm stupidly panic buying  Smiley
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Response
by
tsvekric
on 10/09/2012, 14:51:33 UTC
Matthew had already posted his payment address if he won the bet, and I'm sure many would have just paid what they owed to that address if pirate did start paying back - this right here makes Matthew the biggest piece of shit on the forums. No way in hell would I believe for a second that he would turn down 10,000BTC if he had won the bet.

His parsing of his own initial bet agreement to turn it into a 'joke' doesn't make any sense. It is perfectly clear that the '20BTC bet' was a reference to the bet format, not to the 'bet' as defined before the example. There is no reason to believe otherwise and no reading of it makes any other sense. If this were a legally binding document there's no way he'd get away with not paying as a plain reading of the agreement is very clear. This was a retroactive 'joke' for sure. He may have played it off as a 'joke' to some people beforehand to cover his bases.

I don't even have any investment in this bullshit as I didn't participate. I don't feel so bad for the people who lost money with pirate as the whole idea of his 'investment' was laughably unrealistic and obviously a scam from the beginning. But an established member posting a legit bet in the 'gambling' forum (not off-topic or other place, but a forum strictly for placing bets and gambling, which Matthew now claims was NOT the case from the beginning) and reneging on his part of the deal makes this one of the shittiest things to happen around these parts since this community started.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: BitInstant - Providing instant transfer services for the bitcoin economy
by
tsvekric
on 27/06/2012, 04:56:41 UTC
so, I used this service for the first time to transfer Dwolla>bitcoin address. It is an extremely useful service, however, it was a bit confusing. Maybe I was totally missing it, but I was not quoted how much bitcoin I was going to get - only the dollar amount after fees.

The BTC I received amounted to $6.546 after fees. Where did this number come from? MtGox hasn't been that high in a while - 24hr average is $6.4, 2 day is $6.35, 7 day is $6.5. I don't have much of an issue with it being more expensive - but the rate should be stated *somewhere* rather than just buying blind. If I had received $7 coins, what recourse do I have to say I was cheated?

Anyways, I will be looking forward to trying out more of this service including the cash service, which seems super convenient. The bitcoins arrived within a couple minutes, which is awesome considering the delays lately from dwolla>mtgox.

Thanks for your kind words.

The commissions are displayed on our homepage, and on the Quote page as well. We purchase the coins automatically as soon as you pay the Dwolla.

The fee for Dwolla is roughly 3% all inclusive depending on the amount

Thanks

Charlie

No - I understand that, but I'm wondering where the bitcoin price is. How do I know how much BTC I'm getting before I complete the transaction? Because effectively I got a ~4.4% less in BTC than I put in based on mtgox's prices. So for Dwolla>BTC, where does the BTC price come from?
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: BitInstant - Providing instant transfer services for the bitcoin economy
by
tsvekric
on 27/06/2012, 02:58:21 UTC
so, I used this service for the first time to transfer Dwolla>bitcoin address. It is an extremely useful service, however, it was a bit confusing. Maybe I was totally missing it, but I was not quoted how much bitcoin I was going to get - only the dollar amount after fees.

The BTC I received amounted to $6.546 after fees. Where did this number come from? MtGox hasn't been that high in a while - 24hr average is $6.4, 2 day is $6.35, 7 day is $6.5. I don't have much of an issue with it being more expensive - but the rate should be stated *somewhere* rather than just buying blind. If I had received $7 coins, what recourse do I have to say I was cheated?

Anyways, I will be looking forward to trying out more of this service including the cash service, which seems super convenient. The bitcoins arrived within a couple minutes, which is awesome considering the delays lately from dwolla>mtgox.
Post
Topic
Board Goods
Re: BitVinyl ---Analog Music in Exchange for Digital Currency
by
tsvekric
on 17/06/2012, 19:45:42 UTC
dang, there's actually a lot of good stuff on there...
Post
Topic
Board Trading Discussion
Re: How to protect yourself from Amazon to bitcoin conversions?
by
tsvekric
on 06/06/2012, 19:39:59 UTC
for first time sellers, use escrow. That should be the default for pretty much anything on the forums, really. Check reputation if they're relatively new and just getting established. Be wary of 'too good to be true' deals.

I sell Amazon gift codes/will buy off Amazon wishlists at a bit below bitcoin market price. I usually do 3% off because I get 3% back on Amazon purchases through my credit card. I've had the card and Amazon account for many years, been selling gift codes on here for around a year maybe...

That said there are some seemingly legit sellers on here who sell for ~10-20% off regularly - no idea if they're just willing to pay that much more for BTC or if they really have some nice deal worked out somehow, or if they are doing something illegal someone along the way... Anything more than 20% off I'd assume is a scam/stolen credit card buy.