Search content
Sort by

Showing 12 of 12 results by voltsifer
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][PASL]-[PASCAL Lite]-[PascalLite just hit $1 million market cap milestone!]
by
voltsifer
on 09/01/2018, 23:26:43 UTC
FYI, after almost a week I've finally received an update on one of my support tickets on Cryptopia regarding to the PASL wallet maintenance. Nothing new or useful unfortunately, here's it is in case you're curious.

"PASL is currently in maintenance due to investigating deposit issues. You will be able to generate a wallet address once the maintenance is complete. Deposit and withdrawals will be enabled and process when the maintenance has been completed and if the wallet is back online again.  Unfortunately there is no ETA on when the PASL wallet will be back online again.  You can keep an eye on the wallet here : https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/CoinInfo/?coin=PASL  Sorry for the inconvenience this has caused."

It has been few weeks in the maintenance already, AFAIK it's been like that since mid-December and they don't even have an ETA on when it will be completed.

+1

I also wrote several times to cryptopia's technical support .
They respond within 3-5 days.

Usually the answer is:
Unfortunately there is no ETA on when the PASL wallet will be back online again.
You can keep an eye on the wallet here :
https://www.cryptopia.co.nz/CoinInfo/?coin=PASL
Sorry for the inconvenience this has caused.
Please feel free to contact us if you have any further questions.
)))

Deposit is impossible from November.
The developer said that this is not their problem and he can not affect it.

It's strange that this coin is still quoted on the stock exchange.
And Whattomine also.
Due to the fact that there is no inflow of currencies to the exchange - so exchange rates is overvalued.
When the exchange opens the possibility of deposits - the rate will drop.

Post
Topic
Board Pools (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][POOL] Mining Pool Hub - Multipool. Multialgo, Auto Exchange to any coin.
by
voltsifer
on 07/01/2018, 07:30:19 UTC
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][PASL]-[PASCAL Lite]-[PascalLite version 1.4.8 just released - Aug 30]
by
voltsifer
on 05/12/2017, 08:57:34 UTC
Cryptopia does not accept deposits since the end of last month.
Xiphon pool does not work correctly - it rejects the 10% of shares.
What are the expectations for miners in this project?
What to expect next?
Post
Topic
Board Pools (Altcoins)
Re: [ETC ETP DBIX SUMO PASL] FairPool: Realtime stats, Profit calc, Instant payout
by
voltsifer
on 03/12/2017, 13:37:01 UTC
Hello, xiphon

Last days I see  shares rejects on pasl.fairpool.xyz pool.
Pool rejects 5-10% shares.
I mine with Claymore Dual miner 10.1 and 10.2.
Why?..
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Claymore's Ethereum Mining with NoDevFee v7.5 for Linux
by
voltsifer
on 10/09/2017, 23:31:18 UTC
Hello!
Nice tool!
Is it possible to redirect the devfee to a particular wallet or workername? To see the difference?
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN][PASL]-[PASCAL Lite]-[PascalLite.com NOW LIVE]
by
voltsifer
on 01/07/2017, 18:50:41 UTC
Hello!
Can anyone explain it to me ..
When I run mining on account's public key - I receiving accounts with 12.5 PASL.
When I run mining on the account (40022-30) - I receiving only PASL, but not accounts.
Why is that?
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [OS] nvOC easy-to-use Linux Nvidia Mining
by
voltsifer
on 21/06/2017, 15:38:22 UTC
using:

ETH_WORKER="miner7"
ETH_ADDRESS="ijduncan"
ETH_POOL="eth.suprnova.cc:5000"

anyone have a thought on that?

cheers
Wrong ETH_ADDRESS
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [OS] nvOC easy-to-use Linux Nvidia Mining
by
voltsifer
on 17/06/2017, 20:06:09 UTC
ASUS PRIME Z270-P has 6xPCIe slots. So I use 2 x PCIe -> 2 PCIe splitters.

SuperMicro X10SRL-F has 7xPCIe slots. So I use 3 x PCIe -> 2 PCIe splitters.

I thought so; what ports are the splitters attached to; both on the mobos and on the splitter boards themselves.

I want to try to predict all possible indexes when a splitter is used in any port.
I've already tried to change PCIe indexes in /etc/X11/xorg.conf (Section "Device") in accordance with to lspci, but did not see any changes.
Maybe I did something not right...  Huh

Not sure, things get a little weird after 7 GPUs.  I want to support up to 14 GPUs to be ready for the new asrock mobo; so I will work on this for next version.
I found resolutions of this problem:
nvidia-xconfig --enable-all-gpus --allow-empty-initial-configuration --cool-bits=31
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [OS] nvOC easy-to-use Linux Nvidia Mining
by
voltsifer
on 15/06/2017, 20:38:39 UTC
ASUS PRIME Z270-P has 6xPCIe slots. So I use 2 x PCIe -> 2 PCIe splitters.

SuperMicro X10SRL-F has 7xPCIe slots. So I use 3 x PCIe -> 2 PCIe splitters.

I thought so; what ports are the splitters attached to; both on the mobos and on the splitter boards themselves.

I want to try to predict all possible indexes when a splitter is used in any port.
I've already tried to change PCIe indexes in /etc/X11/xorg.conf (Section "Device") in accordance with to lspci, but did not see any changes.
Maybe I did something not right...  Huh
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [OS] nvOC easy-to-use Linux Nvidia Mining
by
voltsifer
on 15/06/2017, 20:25:28 UTC
Noted the indexing, first time ive seen 14:00.0.

Are you using a pcie splitter with the ASUS PRIME Z270-P ?

ASUS PRIME Z270-P has 6xPCIe slots. So I use 2 x PCIe -> 2 PCIe splitters.

SuperMicro X10SRL-F has 7xPCIe slots. So I use 3 x PCIe -> 2 PCIe splitters.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [OS] nvOC easy-to-use Linux Nvidia Mining
by
voltsifer
on 15/06/2017, 19:25:09 UTC
fullzero, thank you for attention for my case.

lspci | grep VGA for SuperMicro
Code:
root@m1-desktop:/home/m1# lspci | grep VGA
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation Device 1c03 (rev a1)
02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation Device 1c03 (rev a1)
05:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation Device 1c03 (rev a1)
06:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation Device 1c03 (rev a1)
09:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation Device 1c03 (rev a1)
0a:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation Device 1c03 (rev a1)
0b:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation Device 1c03 (rev a1)
0c:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation Device 1c03 (rev a1)
0f:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation Device 1c03 (rev a1)
10:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation Device 1c03 (rev a1)
14:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ASPEED Technology, Inc. ASPEED Graphics Family (rev 30)

As I understand,
14:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ASPEED Technology, Inc. ASPEED Graphics Family (rev 30)
is an CPU-based VGA.

lspci | grep VGA for ASUS PRIME Z270-P (the same problem - 2 out of 8 GPU is not overclocking)
Code:
m1@N-005:~$ lspci | grep VGA
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation Device 1c03 (rev a1)
03:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation Device 1c03 (rev a1)
07:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation Device 1c03 (rev a1)
08:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation Device 1c03 (rev a1)
0b:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation Device 1c03 (rev a1)
0c:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation Device 1c03 (rev a1)
0d:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation Device 1c03 (rev a1)
0e:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation Device 1c03 (rev a1)
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: [OS] nvOC easy-to-use Linux Nvidia Mining
by
voltsifer
on 15/06/2017, 18:34:32 UTC
Hello, fullzero!
Thank you for yours work, it's great.
But couldn't you explan me this case.
This is the log of running oneBush on my rig with 10 Nvidia GTX 1060 cards.

Quote
spawn sudo dos2unix /media/m1/1263-A96E/oneBash
[sudo] password for m1: spawn sudo ldconfig /usr/local/cuda/lib64
[sudo] password for m1: spawn sudo nvidia-smi -pl 125
[sudo] password for m1: spawn sudo nvidia-xconfig --cool-bits=24
[sudo] password for m1:
  Attribute 'GPUGraphicsClockOffset' (N-003:0[gpu:0]) assigned value 100.
  Attribute 'GPUMemoryTransferRateOffset' (N-003:0[gpu:0]) assigned value 1400.

  Attribute 'GPUGraphicsClockOffset' (N-003:0[gpu:1]) assigned value 100.
  Attribute 'GPUMemoryTransferRateOffset' (N-003:0[gpu:1]) assigned value 1400.

  Attribute 'GPUGraphicsClockOffset' (N-003:0[gpu:2]) assigned value 100.
  Attribute 'GPUMemoryTransferRateOffset' (N-003:0[gpu:2]) assigned value 1400.

  Attribute 'GPUGraphicsClockOffset' (N-003:0[gpu:3]) assigned value 100.
  Attribute 'GPUMemoryTransferRateOffset' (N-003:0[gpu:3]) assigned value 1400.

  Attribute 'GPUGraphicsClockOffset' (N-003:0[gpu:4]) assigned value 100.
  Attribute 'GPUMemoryTransferRateOffset' (N-003:0[gpu:4]) assigned value 1400.

  Attribute 'GPUGraphicsClockOffset' (N-003:0[gpu:5]) assigned value 100.
  Attribute 'GPUMemoryTransferRateOffset' (N-003:0[gpu:5]) assigned value 1400.

  Attribute 'GPUGraphicsClockOffset' (N-003:0[gpu:6]) assigned value 100.
  Attribute 'GPUMemoryTransferRateOffset' (N-003:0[gpu:6]) assigned value 1400.

  Attribute 'GPUGraphicsClockOffset' (N-003:0[gpu:7]) assigned value 100.
  Attribute 'GPUMemoryTransferRateOffset' (N-003:0[gpu:7]) assigned value 1400.










  Attribute 'GPUFanControlState' (N-003:0[gpu:0]) assigned value 0.
  Attribute 'GPUFanControlState' (N-003:0[gpu:1]) assigned value 0.
  Attribute 'GPUFanControlState' (N-003:0[gpu:2]) assigned value 0.
  Attribute 'GPUFanControlState' (N-003:0[gpu:3]) assigned value 0.
  Attribute 'GPUFanControlState' (N-003:0[gpu:4]) assigned value 0.
  Attribute 'GPUFanControlState' (N-003:0[gpu:5]) assigned value 0.
  Attribute 'GPUFanControlState' (N-003:0[gpu:6]) assigned value 0.
  Attribute 'GPUFanControlState' (N-003:0[gpu:7]) assigned value 0.


/home/m1/9.0/ethdcrminer64: /usr/local/cuda/lib64/libOpenCL.so.1: no version information available (required by /home/m1/9.0/ethdcrminer64)

пїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSH»
пїS      Claymore's Dual ETH + DCR/SC/LBC/PASC GPU Miner v9.0      пїS
пїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSпїSHj

ETH: 1 pool is specified
Main Ethereum pool is eth-eu2.nanopool.org:9999
PASC: 1 pool is specified
Main Pascal pool is pasc-eu2.nanopool.org:15555
AMD OpenCL platform not found

Driver 368.81 is recommended for best performance and compatibility
Be careful with overclocking, use default clocks for first tests
Press "s" for current statistics, "0".."9" to turn on/off cards, "r" to reload pools
CUDA initializing...

NVIDIA Cards available: 10
CUDA Driver Version/Runtime Version: 8.0/8.0
GPU #0: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 6071 MB available, 10 compute units, capability: 6.1

GPU #1: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 6072 MB available, 10 compute units, capability: 6.1
GPU #2: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 6072 MB available, 10 compute units, capability: 6.1
GPU #3: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 6072 MB available, 10 compute units, capability: 6.1
GPU #4: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 6072 MB available, 10 compute units, capability: 6.1
GPU #5: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 6072 MB available, 10 compute units, capability: 6.1
GPU #6: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 6072 MB available, 10 compute units, capability: 6.1
GPU #7: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 6072 MB available, 10 compute units, capability: 6.1
GPU #8: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 6072 MB available, 10 compute units, capability: 6.1
GPU #9: GeForce GTX 1060 6GB, 6072 MB available, 10 compute units, capability: 6.1

Total cards: 10
ETH: Stratum - connecting to 'eth-eu2.nanopool.org' <198.251.88.21> port 9999
ETH: Stratum - Connected (eth-eu2.nanopool.org:9999)
DUAL MINING MODE ENABLED: ETHEREUM+PASCAL
ETH: eth-proxy stratum mode
Watchdog enabled
Remote management (READ-ONLY MODE) is enabled on port 3333

 PASC: Stratum - connecting to 'pasc-eu2.nanopool.org' <185.71.66.39> port 15555
 PASC: Stratum - Connected (pasc-eu2.nanopool.org:15555)
ETH: Authorized
Setting DAG epoch #129...
 PASC: Authorized
 PASC: 06/15/17-13:54:05 - New job from pasc-eu2.nanopool.org:15555
Setting DAG epoch #129 for GPU #1
Create GPU buffer for GPU #1
Setting DAG epoch #129 for GPU #8
Create GPU buffer for GPU #8
Setting DAG epoch #129 for GPU #2
Create GPU buffer for GPU #2
Setting DAG epoch #129 for GPU #4
Create GPU buffer for GPU #4
Setting DAG epoch #129 for GPU #3
Create GPU buffer for GPU #3
Setting DAG epoch #129 for GPU #5
Create GPU buffer for GPU #5
Setting DAG epoch #129 for GPU #7
Create GPU buffer for GPU #7
Setting DAG epoch #129 for GPU #9
Create GPU buffer for GPU #9
Setting DAG epoch #129 for GPU #6
Create GPU buffer for GPU #6
Setting DAG epoch #129 for GPU #0
Create GPU buffer for GPU #0
 PASC: 06/15/17-13:54:09 - New job from pasc-eu2.nanopool.org:15555
 PASC: 06/15/17-13:54:13 - New job from pasc-eu2.nanopool.org:15555
GPU 6 DAG creation time - 7137 ms
Setting DAG epoch #129 for GPU #6 done
GPU 7 DAG creation time - 7180 ms
Setting DAG epoch #129 for GPU #7 done
GPU 1 DAG creation time - 7184 ms
Setting DAG epoch #129 for GPU #1 done
GPU 0 DAG creation time - 7208 ms
Setting DAG epoch #129 for GPU #0 done
GPU 5 DAG creation time - 7149 ms
Setting DAG epoch #129 for GPU #5 done
GPU 2 DAG creation time - 7172 ms
Setting DAG epoch #129 for GPU #2 done
GPU 3 DAG creation time - 7160 ms
Setting DAG epoch #129 for GPU #3 done
GPU 4 DAG creation time - 7176 ms
Setting DAG epoch #129 for GPU #4 done
GPU 9 DAG creation time - 8440 ms
Setting DAG epoch #129 for GPU #9 done
GPU 8 DAG creation time - 8473 ms
Setting DAG epoch #129 for GPU #8 done

As you can see - there is not info about applying OC settings for gpu:8 and gpu:9.
In really work GPUs from #0 to #7 show about 21mh/s (eth) but GPUs from #8 to #9 show about 18mh/s.

It's looks like cool-bits is not settings for GPUs from #8 to #9.

In NVIDIA console I see section "Editable performance levels" for GPUs from #0 to #7, but don't for GPUs from #8 to #9.
I trying Supermicro X10SRL-F and ASUS PRIME Z270-P motherboards. But is't the same problem. OC settings not applying for 2 cards of 10.

Why?..