Solutions to above possibilities,
1. No solution
2. Sign a message from BTC address 1DAXoynA9hMQ1fY6nPeBCA2YnmLjptaaev or DOGE address DM6XDBtWNrDHmywfHfuJ6XYn9eoPwcfvSf to prove ownership of account
3. 20,500 will be sent to desired address

Solutions to above possibilities,
1. No solution
2. Sign a message from BTC address 1DAXoynA9hMQ1fY6nPeBCA2YnmLjptaaev or DOGE address DM6XDBtWNrDHmywfHfuJ6XYn9eoPwcfvSf to prove ownership of account
3. 20,500 will be sent to desired address

The transaction time I posted earlier is incorrect, I was looking at the wrong one.

The time the transaction was posted to the blockchain was at 2017-04-20 00:43:17 and the form was submitted at 2017-04-20 00:46:05.

Your private message to the board came at 2 AM. Bitcointalk time is set to my local time so times represented on the forum are equal to my own.

A side note, why did you wait hours to contact us after noticing something off immediately?

So, what lessons have we learnt from that "issue"?

I made several swaps, some were mine, most belonged to other users. Never had any problems. Of course that happened at the very beginning when everyone still had been waiting for others to step in.

But at some time i got a feeling, while doing swaps, that this might be an issue if you wait to long to submit a claim, after sending old coins to swap address, but at the same time some should be lurking for swap address for any change..but still...as CryptoDatabase said this is most unlikely to happen.

Again, most unlikely. But plausible, yes. Probability of those two events occurring together is really small. But....

In general, after you made a swap, your wallet creates tx id which is announced only after several minutes in blockchain, because of the block generation time.

In the meantime before announcement of tx id in blockchain, you should or have to or even must to submit your swap.

Don't wait for, like a day...for submitting your request and thats it.

And there will always be someone waiting for you around the corner to take advantage of you.

What is true and what is not, knows only you, yomamanodros, and you, yes you, the "potential thief", a rat among us.

SO LESSON IS, AFTER SENDING YOUR COINS TO SWAP ADDRESS, MAKE YOUR CLAIM AS FAST AS YOU GET YOUR TX ID.

Hey, calm down and don't panic. The world is not gonna end for this, let's say little issue.
Once the problem has been identified, maybe CryptoDatabase can fix it adding other security measures as for example request a signed message for the original address made with the very wallet.
Dev fund could also be used to reimburse this transaction. I don't know, but always there are more than one solution.

The first step has been made. Now we know that maybe there is a little gap.

@HYPER Community, I received the following private message from a user here on the forum who is claiming to have sent a transaction to the swap address that was snatched by someone else. This is highly unlikely due to the circumstances and time frame of that transaction being sent and the swap form being submitted with the transaction. It was submitted in less than 3 minutes from the time of the transaction.

Below is the PM I received and my response,


Hello,

The swap transaction was inserted in less than 3 minutes of the coins being sent. The odds of someone watching the blockchain and just happening to see that transaction and submit it that fast is very slim. It often takes 1-2 minutes for a transaction to even confirm, some have taken hours, and show up so this narrows the time frame down even more making it less likely than it is already.

We're considering a burn or giving away the coins as a promotion which would help to promote PlantiumBAR.  We'll let everyone know what we decide to do. 

Check your miner settings again. Today was bad luck on multiport, which is actually reported on the main page. Try multiportN when multiport is not performing well. With 2Mh (1m on scryptn) you should have much more. I Had for 13 hours ~0,005 with 600khs.

Here are my 270s:
MSI R9 270 GAMING 2G
ASUS R9270-DC2OC-2GD5

+1 for the 270s.  The 7950s are good performance / watt, but the 270s are even better..

They work very well with the 13.11 Beta / 13.12 drivers. Had virtually no issues setting up 2 5 card boxes.

One box has all MSI 270s, the other box has Asus 270s and all 10 cards are doing 475-480ks on SGMiner 4.0.0 in Win8.1 x64.

you need to add nodes see first post