Weird that you assume that I'm somehow ashamed of my willingness to crowdfund a Jenna Jameson sexbot (but whatever).
No, I didn't assume you were "ashamed" of it. I don't assume you to be that intelligent of an individual for that one. I just said that imo, you don't have very good self-esteem.
Anyone with half a brain has figured out that you are only using the moral low-ground argument because you either don't have a technical argument to invalidate Shelby's criticism or you lost the technical argument already and want to shift the ground to save face.
What's great about a sound technical argument is you can keep posting it without making any adjustments and save yourself a lot of time and hassle. So post one or STFU.
Here' mine:
DecentralizeEconomics can't invalidate Shelby's criticism of Synereo, so he is attempting to attack Shelby's character and by that invalidate Shelby's criticism for those stupid enough to believe technical arguments can be invalidated non-technical arguments.
An example would be: Caravaggio murdered a man, therefore his paintings are worthless or poor quality. Though anyone who knows the slightest thing about art would know that history has proven Caravaggio's art is priceless, and oddly enough, he is considered one of the greatest painters of the gospels to ever live despite his less than gospel life--put that in your morality pipe and smoke it.
What's great about this is that now I can copy/paste the technical argument that shows you and your agenda for what they really are and I don't have to waste time running in pointless circles. I love efficiency.
What's great about a sound technical argument is you can keep posting it without making any adjustments and save yourself a lot of time and hassle. So post one or STFU.
Here' mine:
DecentralizeEconomics can't invalidate Shelby's criticism of Synereo, so he is attempting to attack Shelby's character and by that invalidate Shelby's criticism for those stupid enough to believe technical arguments can be invalidated non-technical arguments.
An example would be: Caravaggio murdered a man, therefore his paintings are worthless or poor quality. Though anyone who knows the slightest thing about art would know that history has proven Caravaggio's art is priceless, and oddly enough, he is considered one of the greatest painters of the gospels to ever live despite his less than gospel life--put that in your morality pipe and smoke it.
What's great about this is that now I can copy/paste the technical argument that shows you and your agenda for what they really are and I don't have to waste time running in pointless circles. I love efficiency.
The only reason you don't like my argument is because you don't have a leg to stand on. You've already lost, and anybody with any common sense knows it. Shelby doesn't have any real, factual technical criticism of anything either, and anybody with "half a brain" knows it.
I'm not directly referring to you, but I will say that how people conduct themselves says everything about them.
What about Nirvana, Jimi Hendrix, Linus Torvalds (<--- click this!), Muhammad Ali, Mike Tyson, etc..
They accomplished nothing.
Well everybody accomplishes something. Whether it's good or bad is another story.
The people on his list were among the best at what they did. You're not even a very accomplished troll, maybe flashing your balls would help....
Wait a second... you think "Nirvana, Jimi Hendrix, and Mike Tyson" were the best at what they did? On what grounds are you making that comment? Drug addiction or thuggery?
I think I've already identified your problem.
[...]
The reason you don't like what I'm saying is because you know that I view you as "not the right type of person", and you'd be correct about that assumption. Imo, anyone who makes comments about "crowdsourcing a Jenna Jameson android"...
In your rigid world, the only art would be Frank Sinatra. We would all use anti-bacterial soap all the time (and be infected with superbugs). And Linus Torvalds doesn't even deserve recognition in your response. Each of those mentioned above were the best at new genre, e.g. Mike Tyson mastered the combination of power, speed, and efficiency at the heavyweight division and his short arms had a lot to do with it (not only due to the power+speed, but also that he only had to bob his head efficiently to slip punches so he cold stay in close). You don't even appreciate the finer details of analysis and diversity. In short, you appear to be a blind simpleton with an oversized Trump ego.
Btw, apparently bipolar people are statistically more creative.
Also I don't know if you noticed but promiscuous sex is necessary for the evolutionary (resilient) reproduction of the human race. And women practice hypergamy and men practice promiscuity, because it is an evolutionary strategy. Religion is apparently another evolutionary strategy, perhaps to countervail the prior instincts, so as to prevent defection from society. This is science. If you don't like it, nature doesn't care. Nature is more complex and diverse than (and ignores/trashes daily) your simpleton rigidness.
Hey, you can call me whatever you want, but I don't degrade myself or others. "Promiscuous sex" has most likely gotten you where you are today. Here you are on this forum posting pictures of the aliments of your privates trying to get a diagnosis from total strangers. My diagnosis is that you've had sex with so many pieces of trash that you've contracted an STD and are losing your mind. You've run away to the Philippines, shacked up with some moron who has agreed to have sex with you in your poor medical condition (what the heck is she thinking), and you've proceeded to have children with her (I assume maybe incorrectly), which you have no means to support them, have exposed them to your disease, and most likely will leave them fatherless. Good job genius. You losers can go be degenerates on someone else's time. I'm finished with you pieces of white trash.