Its funny, the imbeciles and assorted trolls whining at Lauda and now at Vod forgot that I have a whole thread for this:
UNSOLICITED HOSTILE COMMUNICATION SEEKING TO INFLUENCE MY TRUST-RELATED DECISIONS
Yes, I can; but I do not wish to.
Please be advised that this PM discussion may be published at my discretion.
Please be advised i NOT PERMIT this discussion be published
but i know
you from lauda gand and she's assliker
good luck
Nothing is new with me. I have always published hostile unsolicited communications as well as (at my discretion) communications begging for merits, trust, and/or money. And I have always left feedback consistently with my publicly stated trust feedback policy, q.v., which I should soon update with a policy on inclusions and exclusions.
Also, this is not newcompare 2018 and 2020:
OP on this thread:
[...]
(...etc...)
UNSOLICITED HOSTILE COMMUNICATION SEEKING TO INFLUENCE MY TRUST-RELATED DECISIONS
hi
can you explane why you excluded me?
can you explane why you excluded me?
Yes, I can; but I do not wish to.
Please be advised that this PM discussion may be published at my discretion.
Please be advised i NOT PERMIT this discussion be published
but i know
you from lauda gand and she's assliker
good luck
Nothing is new with me. I have always published hostile unsolicited communications as well as (at my discretion) communications begging for merits, trust, and/or money. And I have always left feedback consistently with my publicly stated trust feedback policy, q.v., which I should soon update with a policy on inclusions and exclusions.
Also, this is not newcompare 2018 and 2020:
OP on this thread:
Whines > /dev/null. Otherwise, shall be published here.
I will duly oppress your opinion by filing it in taken under advisement. 🗑️
...as part of your life advice to me, which I duly filed in taken under advisement. 🗑️
Your lesson as such is duly filed in taken under advisement. 🗑️
I will not waste my time arguing with a troll on endless forum threads about this. He is beneath reply. Case closed. Direct complaints to /dev/null, and DNFTT.
* nullius dons moderation hat.
[...]
Complaints > /dev/null
That is a conclusion, not an argumentand certainly not an invitation to debate. I will only debate Faketoshi or his shills if they can produce the most basic piece of evidence: A verifiable signed statement by one of Satoshis known keys, identifying Craig Wright as Satoshi. They do not do so, because they are liars or dupesperiod. That is the truth, the objective truth, based on facts and not debates. Complaints >/dev/null
This is how its done, folks!
So having said, I will not argue the point. Complaints 2>/dev/null (Thanks, Anonymous, for the upgraded shell script!)
P.S.,
Complaints > /dev/null
Complaints > /dev/null
Whines > /dev/null.
Edit, P.S.: In case that last line be ignored, I reserve the right to publicly post PMs, e-mails, etc. from spammers and/or spam supporters and/or spammer supporters.
Edit, P.S.: In case that last line be ignored, I reserve the right to publicly post PMs, e-mails, etc. from spammers and/or spam supporters and/or spammer supporters.
At my exclusive discretion, I reserve the right to publicly post any PMs received by me (0) on the subject of negative trust feedback left by me, and/or (1) in relation to such a public discussion as this one.
Whines > /dev/null.
Whines > /dev/null.
(...etc...)
