Please judge this matter Please！it is very important to me！
Starting from January 14, I started to be exposed to cryptocurrencies.
Starting from June 09, I have been obsessed with bitcointalk.
Starting from June 19, I started to post every day .
Starting from August 09,I started to reduce the number of posts and shifted my focus to reading
Here are all my topics：
市场交易心得
Where should i start？
Craig Wright is real Satoshi？ No way！
Craig Wright is real Satoshi？ No way！
Why does the signature look a bit weird？
As a newbie, explore and ask about the text editing function of bitcointalk
Is Bitcoin decentralized?
Is it necessary to set up a separate TOKEN sub-section
Asymmetric encryption--RSA（A novice explanation）
How long do you spend on bitcointalk every day？
Asymmetric encryption（signature）--DSA（A novice explanation）
I'm very curious if there is a similar Fraternities in this community
Does bounty really make money?/Who are participating in the bounty?
How to quote a locked post？
What nft functions can you think of?
What are the difficulties with Amazon accepting Bitcoin payments？
Check out RainbowKun's article to see if forums really need depth knowledge.
[Metamask teaching]Add different chains on metamask
Reading is more important than replying
My first bitcoin shopping
What do you think of the Bitcoin Discussion section? Does he need to change?
Now I have changed from a novice who knows nothing about forums to a Member who knows some about the rules of forums.
I want to state one thing I am going through now, I want to ask everyone to judge together.
From about July 08, 2021, I have a great interest in encryption. So began to search for relevant information on the Internet. I am lucky I found some information, I learned a lot from it.Since then I started to have a simple understanding of DSA and RSA.
Since I don’t have a friend who majors in encryption, I don’t know if the knowledge I have learned is correct, so I decided to edit some of the things I learned and post it to bitcointalk, a forum that I read every day.
Thanks to all the teachers who corrected me @jackg、@pooya87、icopressetc.
On July 22, I received LoyceV’s PM and told me that someone reported me plagiarism in this post.Thank you sir
- User: kxwhakexk
- Post link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5349332.0 (archive)
- Link to source: https://www.programmersought.com/article/7824960278/
Introductory part for comparison
I will say in the words of pooya87 "It is not your English, there are fundamental flaws in what you explain. Maybe you should avoid trying to explain to others things you don't fully understand yourself", especially when the user is trying to explain something to someone without specifying a link to the source. I want to add that I probably would not have paid attention to this post if I had not seen the link to it in the thread [self-moderated / Report unmerited good posts to Merit Source].
I immediately replied to the post when I saw this PM
The DSA content I posted was not copied directly from the link he pointed out.As I said in the article, I am not a native English speaker. It is still difficult for me to read articles in pure English.
My purpose in posting this post is to hope that others can point me out mistakes so that I can learn better. But unfortunately this is suspected of plagiarism.I won't make the same mistake again in the future. About technical posts, I will read more and less reply.
I found the previous manuscript. I do have a step-by-step verification.Not plagiarism for merit！
I am also trying to learn programming knowledge to better understand everything about Bitcoin.
Thanks again to everyone who helped me correct my mistakes！
and added the source to the article according to loyceV's suggestion.
At the same time, this matter also caused discussion under another post.
- User: kxwhakexk
- Post link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5349332.0 (archive)
- Link to source: https://www.programmersought.com/article/7824960278/
I also apologized and explained.
- Post link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5349332.0 (archive)
- Link to source: https://www.programmersought.com/article/7824960278/
Damn, too bad. That was a pretty good post and I would have merited it without checking for plagiarism....so I'm glad you found out that it was plagiarized before I got suckered.
Gotta be careful with lower-ranked members making very detailed, very well-written posts on this forum. It's unfortunate that such skepticism is needed when evaluating their posts, but the fact is--and has been for years--that most people who are new to bitcointalk are in it for the money and don't take the time to write out such technical posts as the one by kxwhakexk, and that's assuming they had the ability to write that well in English to begin with.
Sir, I didn't copy and paste it directly from that link.
I read a series of articles in my native language. Then I wrote this post.These are some articles related to DSA：
DSA-数据签名算法（理论）English interpretation-DSA-data signature algorithm (theory)
RSA、DSA算法原理与举例 English interpretation-DSA algorithm principle and examples
加解密篇 - 非对称加密算法 (RSA、DSA、ECC、DH) English interpretation-Encryption and decryption-asymmetric encryption algorithm (RSA, DSA, ECC, DH)
And in the process of reading, I made a series of notes and calculations.Here are some of my explanations
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1926895.msg57523235#msg57523235
I hope you remember my name and the explanation，The Pharmacist sir. Today I was controversial because of an article written in the same period.Since that post is no longer the first few pages, I did not add the post source to it. No one has read the post recent weeks. Adding or not adding sources has no effect on others, nor does it attract more merits.
But to my surprise, due to another incident, some people talked about me again：Exposing RainbowKun and His Large Alts Army. Big farm 60+ Accs !!!
Ratimov suspects that I and Rainbowkun are the same person. And suspected of abusing merit
Of course I don't care about their allegations, they can check my posts at will.There is no doubt that someone has reviewed all my posts one by one and accused me of plagiarism.
But these posts have been explained very clearly in the posts I mentioned above. And after that, I never published a similar topic.The accusation against me this time is totally unreasonable.
Also I would like to ask The Pharmacist sir，You PM me a few days ago, you hope that I will not send merit to you, let me give more novices who need merit.Thank you for your generosity.
Do you remember the explanation I mentioned above?I don’t understand why your attitude this time is completely different from before.
Is it just because you suspect that I am the alt account of rainbowkun? But I really am not! !
Starting from June 09, I have been obsessed with bitcointalk.
Starting from June 19, I started to post every day .
Starting from August 09,I started to reduce the number of posts and shifted my focus to reading
Here are all my topics：
市场交易心得
Where should i start？
Craig Wright is real Satoshi？ No way！
Craig Wright is real Satoshi？ No way！
Why does the signature look a bit weird？
As a newbie, explore and ask about the text editing function of bitcointalk
Is Bitcoin decentralized?
Is it necessary to set up a separate TOKEN sub-section
Asymmetric encryption--RSA（A novice explanation）
How long do you spend on bitcointalk every day？
Asymmetric encryption（signature）--DSA（A novice explanation）
I'm very curious if there is a similar Fraternities in this community
Does bounty really make money?/Who are participating in the bounty?
How to quote a locked post？
What nft functions can you think of?
What are the difficulties with Amazon accepting Bitcoin payments？
Check out RainbowKun's article to see if forums really need depth knowledge.
[Metamask teaching]Add different chains on metamask
Reading is more important than replying
My first bitcoin shopping
What do you think of the Bitcoin Discussion section? Does he need to change?
Now I have changed from a novice who knows nothing about forums to a Member who knows some about the rules of forums.
I want to state one thing I am going through now, I want to ask everyone to judge together.
From about July 08, 2021, I have a great interest in encryption. So began to search for relevant information on the Internet. I am lucky I found some information, I learned a lot from it.Since then I started to have a simple understanding of DSA and RSA.
Since I don’t have a friend who majors in encryption, I don’t know if the knowledge I have learned is correct, so I decided to edit some of the things I learned and post it to bitcointalk, a forum that I read every day.
Thanks to all the teachers who corrected me @jackg、@pooya87、icopressetc.
On July 22, I received LoyceV’s PM and told me that someone reported me plagiarism in this post.Thank you sir
- Plagiarism.
- User: kxwhakexk
- Post link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5349332.0 (archive)
- Link to source: https://www.programmersought.com/article/7824960278/
Introductory part for comparison
In August 1991, NIST (Nation Institute of Standards and Technology) proposed a digital signature algorithm (DSA) for use in their digital signature standard (DSS). DSA is an algorithm, and DSS is a standard. The standard uses algorithms, algorithms are part of the standard.
But NIST’s announcement has caused a lot of condemnation, and these condemnations are more political than academic. Many large software companies that have obtained the RSA algorithm patent license have also against DSS. They have invested a lot of money to implement the RSA algorithm. Of course, they do not want these funds to be lost in vain.
[...]
I am not a native English speaker. If I have logic errors, grammar and vocabulary errors, please help me to correct them. Thank you.
The sourceBut NIST’s announcement has caused a lot of condemnation, and these condemnations are more political than academic. Many large software companies that have obtained the RSA algorithm patent license have also against DSS. They have invested a lot of money to implement the RSA algorithm. Of course, they do not want these funds to be lost in vain.
[...]
I am not a native English speaker. If I have logic errors, grammar and vocabulary errors, please help me to correct them. Thank you.
In August 1991, NIST (Nation Institute of Standards and Technology) proposed the Digital Signature Algorithm (DSA) for their Digital Signature Standard (DSS).
DSA is an algorithm and DSS is a standard. The standard uses algorithms, and the algorithm is part of the standard.
But the NIST announcement has caused a lot of condemnation, and these condemnations are more political than academic. Many large software companies that have obtained patent licenses for the RSA algorithm have also stood up against DSS. They have invested a lot of money to implement the RSA algorithm, and they certainly don't want these funds to be lost.
DSA is an algorithm and DSS is a standard. The standard uses algorithms, and the algorithm is part of the standard.
But the NIST announcement has caused a lot of condemnation, and these condemnations are more political than academic. Many large software companies that have obtained patent licenses for the RSA algorithm have also stood up against DSS. They have invested a lot of money to implement the RSA algorithm, and they certainly don't want these funds to be lost.
I will say in the words of pooya87 "It is not your English, there are fundamental flaws in what you explain. Maybe you should avoid trying to explain to others things you don't fully understand yourself", especially when the user is trying to explain something to someone without specifying a link to the source. I want to add that I probably would not have paid attention to this post if I had not seen the link to it in the thread [self-moderated / Report unmerited good posts to Merit Source].
I immediately replied to the post when I saw this PM
It looks like he's been trying to get Merit from the day he joined, and he did earn 75 Merit in a short time.
When I first registered for an account, my goal was to become a legendary member，I also try my best to do this, replying to 7-8 posts on average every day.But now for me, merit is a secondary aspect，The more important thing is to learn knowledge and make good friends in the forum！But I don't regret that I have suffered those words before. Maybe after many years, it will be interesting to see my naive reply in my newbie period again. Quote
It could also be he doesn't know plagiarism isn't allowed on Bitcointalk, he doesn't look like the standard signature spammer. I'll send him a message.
Thank you very much for trusting me, I am definitely not active in bitcointalk for bounty. I reviewed my previous post. It does have similarities with the post pointed out by icopress.The DSA content I posted was not copied directly from the link he pointed out.As I said in the article, I am not a native English speaker. It is still difficult for me to read articles in pure English.
My purpose in posting this post is to hope that others can point me out mistakes so that I can learn better. But unfortunately this is suspected of plagiarism.I won't make the same mistake again in the future. About technical posts, I will read more and less reply.
I found the previous manuscript. I do have a step-by-step verification.Not plagiarism for merit！
I am also trying to learn programming knowledge to better understand everything about Bitcoin.
Thanks again to everyone who helped me correct my mistakes！
and added the source to the article according to loyceV's suggestion.
At the same time, this matter also caused discussion under another post.
I think this Threads are need tobe notice
Posted by Ratimov,kxwhakexk including mine
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5350002.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5349332.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5350455.0
I'll just leave it here [May LoyceV forgive me]Posted by Ratimov,kxwhakexk including mine
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5350002.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5349332.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5350455.0
- Plagiarism.
- User: kxwhakexk
- Post link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5349332.0 (archive)
- Link to source: https://www.programmersought.com/article/7824960278/
[...]
I drew attention to this post only because it ended up in this thread .... Not that it bothered me much, I just felt sad to watch Pooya87 explain to this user details that he does not even approximately understand [in the context of wasted time]. Since in this section I periodically come across good posts, even from beginners.I also apologized and explained.
- Plagiarism.
- Post link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5349332.0 (archive)
- Link to source: https://www.programmersought.com/article/7824960278/
Gotta be careful with lower-ranked members making very detailed, very well-written posts on this forum. It's unfortunate that such skepticism is needed when evaluating their posts, but the fact is--and has been for years--that most people who are new to bitcointalk are in it for the money and don't take the time to write out such technical posts as the one by kxwhakexk, and that's assuming they had the ability to write that well in English to begin with.
I read a series of articles in my native language. Then I wrote this post.These are some articles related to DSA：
DSA-数据签名算法（理论）English interpretation-DSA-data signature algorithm (theory)
RSA、DSA算法原理与举例 English interpretation-DSA algorithm principle and examples
加解密篇 - 非对称加密算法 (RSA、DSA、ECC、DH) English interpretation-Encryption and decryption-asymmetric encryption algorithm (RSA, DSA, ECC, DH)
And in the process of reading, I made a series of notes and calculations.Here are some of my explanations
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1926895.msg57523235#msg57523235
I hope you remember my name and the explanation，The Pharmacist sir. Today I was controversial because of an article written in the same period.Since that post is no longer the first few pages, I did not add the post source to it. No one has read the post recent weeks. Adding or not adding sources has no effect on others, nor does it attract more merits.
But to my surprise, due to another incident, some people talked about me again：Exposing RainbowKun and His Large Alts Army. Big farm 60+ Accs !!!
Ratimov suspects that I and Rainbowkun are the same person. And suspected of abusing merit
Of course I don't care about their allegations, they can check my posts at will.There is no doubt that someone has reviewed all my posts one by one and accused me of plagiarism.
But these posts have been explained very clearly in the posts I mentioned above. And after that, I never published a similar topic.The accusation against me this time is totally unreasonable.
Also I would like to ask The Pharmacist sir，You PM me a few days ago, you hope that I will not send merit to you, let me give more novices who need merit.Thank you for your generosity.
Do you remember the explanation I mentioned above?I don’t understand why your attitude this time is completely different from before.
Is it just because you suspect that I am the alt account of rainbowkun? But I really am not! !