Oh no 
My posts are specific, well-argued, coherent, and substantial.
They are based on my knowledge of how terrorism was spread and supported around the world by the Soviet Union and its successor — Russia.
My posts are specific, well-argued, coherent, and substantial.
They are based on my knowledge of how terrorism was spread and supported around the world by the Soviet Union and its successor — Russia.
You’re copy & pasting directly from ChatGPT. It’s hard to tell whether it is your own knowledge or AI hallucinations based on your prompting for pro-imperialist talking points.
But the essence of your manipulation is clear to me.
As OP has not removed their (bogus) trust rating on pooya87, it is hard to take them seriously. This kind of de-escalation done in good faith would be the first and most obvious step in rectifying the situation.
pooya87 should know better than to leave these types of ratings and should also remove theirs, but there's not really much to be done except for considering excluding them on personal trust lists, if considered necessary (which is always at least somewhat subjective).
my trust rating is not "fake", it is reasoned.pooya87 should know better than to leave these types of ratings and should also remove theirs, but there's not really much to be done except for considering excluding them on personal trust lists, if considered necessary (which is always at least somewhat subjective).
I will write you a quote
Quote
pooya87 actively spreads disinformation, echoing narratives of authoritarian regimes (Iran, Russia). His rhetoric is anti-Western, relying on lies and manipulation to undermine Western society. His posts are not mere opinions, but part of an ideological campaign to justify terrorism and discredit free societies.
then you can follow the link and make sure that my argumentation is correct.https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5551741.0
Obviously this issue is very close to OP's heart, and he's on fire.
Hmm, how exactly did you come to the conclusion that I’m “in a rage”?I’m old enough to understand that my account means nothing to me. At first, I merely smirked at pooya87’s retaliatory feedback — but then I decided to pursue the matter formally, simply because pooya87 lied about me.
He exposed himself as a liar — which is not unusual, but still quite rare for a Legendary-level account.
When confronted by me, pooya87 not only failed to counter my arguments, but also buried himself with a false review
Oh no, I’m not in a rage — quite the opposite: I’m doing this confidently, with a self-satisfied smile.
Iranian propaganda has been shattered by the facts presented by someone from the former USSR, and pooya87 had no choice left but to slander me.
However, I wouldn’t object to any fair and justified negative feedback from pooya87 about me.