When people hear the word "ToS," they often think of a long PDF file that would take a lot of time to read. In reality, we don't need to read the entire ToS; we just need to read a few important points, such as deposit terms, withdrawal terms, and the welcome bonus. The minimum deposit amount for each network and coin type varies. The minimum withdrawal requirements and fees apply. Finally, there are the rules regarding the welcome bonus. Personally, if you don't care about your money and withdrawals, you can use the welcome bonus. However, if you want to withdraw after winning several times, I don't think you should activate the welcome bonus.

If Bitcoin can gain momentum this year, then the $150,000 target is very possible. As far as I can remember, Bitcoin consistently hits all-time highs from August to the end of the year. If that pattern continues, I think this month is the last opportunity to buy Bitcoin below $120,000. However, Bitcoin's price is currently influenced by many factors, as it has become a sought-after asset by global crowdfunding companies. Bitcoin needs significant momentum to break through $130,000 and reach $150,000. If Trump, major institutions like Blackrock or MicroStrategy, and several countries make Bitcoin one of their foreign exchange reserves, it's not impossible that Bitcoin could reach $200,000 by the end of this year.

My mentor also said the first thing you should do when you have limited investment funds is to increase your income. This is similar to what you said. Investing with a small amount of money becomes difficult because you barely see any benefits from your investment. For example, with a 10% annual return, your $100 investment will yield $10, which isn't even enough for a day's food. But with $10,000, you can earn up to $1,000 in returns, which would probably cover your monthly expenses for up to four months in my country. This is a reality everyone should know. It's more realistic than dreaming of turning $100 into $10,000 from altcoins or meme coins.

People on the internet criticize those who sold Bitcoin in 2017 and 2020. But in the future, I'm sure people living in 2030 or 2035 will criticize those who sold Bitcoin in 2025. This is a never-ending cycle, as it will be every year. I'm sure those who acquired Bitcoin in the early days have all sold their Bitcoin. And we can criticize them only because we're already living in 2025 and seeing Bitcoin prices that can buy a house instead of butter. Some Satoshi-era wallets that never move are likely dead wallets abandoned by their users. Or they're too rich and have plenty of other income to hold Bitcoin for 10 or 20 years.

I also think taking a small profit on an investment is a good step so we can enjoy the benefits of our investment. Realistically, it's very rare for anyone to hold Bitcoin for more than ten years without selling anything.

Personally, I've had Telegram hacked more often than WhatsApp or MiChat. Many of my phone contacts have suddenly contacted me via Telegram, claiming they need money. They often ask for small amounts, like $5 or $10, which makes people more likely to give them.
Luckily, Telegram isn't very popular in my country, so most people don't pay much attention to Telegram messages. I wonder if it's because you can create a Telegram account with just a username, which allows scammers to impersonate others to make money?

Bitcoin is already popular now, but I believe more and more people will learn about it and invest in it in the future. This will give Bitcoin the potential for significant price increases. Considering inflation and average growth, I even believe Bitcoin will reach one million dollars in the next five or ten years. Given its current valuation, it would surpass gold's market capitalization, but I also believe gold will remain the world's largest asset by market capitalization in the future. Since Bitcoin reached its new all-time high this year, I've become even more confident in its future potential. I used to be skeptical that Bitcoin would ever reach one hundred thousand dollars.

Yes, you don't need to be rich to invest. You can even invest with just a few dollars. But believe me, there's a big difference between investing a few dollars and hundreds or thousands of dollars. I'm not saying investing a few dollars is bad. But the reality is, investing should only be done by people whose income is sufficient for their daily needs. We can't force someone who barely even makes enough to live on to invest. Furthermore, we must have an emergency fund before trying to invest. I have a friend who regularly invests around $30-$50 per month in Bitcoin and stocks. But he can't hold it long-term due to unexpected expenses like hospital bills and car repairs. He has to sell his Bitcoin or stocks when he needs money. This means he doesn't have an emergency fund or non-investment savings.

R

I still don't own a single Bitcoin. I'm accumulating Bitcoins bit by bit. I agree that even if the price of Bitcoin continues to rise, Bitcoin still has a Satoshi unit, meaning one Bitcoin is equal to 100,000,000 Satoshi units. If Bitcoin reaches $1 million, perhaps in the future we will use Satoshi units more frequently in transactions.

What differentiates Bitcoin from altcoins is that Bitcoin is pseudonymous and decentralized, which increases public trust in it. While some altcoins may have a lower total supply than Bitcoin, they don't command the same level of trust. Even Bitcoin hard forks like Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin Gold (CMIIW), which both have 21 million coins, don't have 10% of Bitcoin's current value.

As far as I know, almost no individual has accumulated a significant amount of Bitcoin, and it seems impossible for anyone to hold more Bitcoin than Satoshi. Blackrock and MicroStrategy currently hold vast Bitcoin reserves, even approaching Satoshi's, but they are companies, not individuals. It's unlikely Elon Musk himself would try to hold as much Bitcoin as Satoshi. He would have to sell a significant portion of his holdings, which is nearly impossible. If he did, it would make headlines, and if his wallet became public, people would start looking for other wallets that have transacted with Elon Musk's wallet. The most plausible possibility is that Musk may have become one of the current whales.

At that time, Bitcoin was worth less than $1. If you weren't a Bitcoin believer, 5 BTC was just like any other giveaway contest on the internet that gave you $1 or $2. And even if you received 5 BTC at the time, at around $4, I think we would have sold it if it reached $100 or $200 per coin. Everyone must have regretted seeing that site because they didn't have the chance to participate. But believe me, if you had been one of those who participated, I don't believe you would have kept your Bitcoin until now. Because I would have sold it too, unless you forgot you ever entered the contest. If you feel sad, you need to know that in that era, someone could spend several thousand BTC just to buy small items like game vouchers or pizza, as Lazslo did - CMIIW

Gambling exploits human emotions, including greed and the desire to win. Environmental factors play a major role in leading someone to fall into gambling. When you see people around you gambling, as a beginner, you'll be curious and try it. It's like a smoker who starts out in the community and then tries it. The danger of gambling is that you keep coming back after losing. I think that's normal, because most people are curious and try again because they can't accept losing. You can also experience this feeling when playing games like Mobile Legends or E-Football on your phone. But what makes gambling dangerous is that it's a game where winning and losing are determined by luck, not skill. And that's what causes most gambling addicts to destroy their careers and families by continuing to gamble even after losing everything.

Given the current state of Real Madrid's forward line, I think Rodrygo wants to be a first-choice player, not just a supersub. He's still 24 years old, and if he chooses to leave, there will be plenty of clubs willing to sign him. I'm sure it won't be long before Rodrygo plays for one of Europe's top clubs. However, I'm sure Saudi Arabia is prepared to spend a large sum of money to sign Rodrygo. At his age, he could probably play in the SPL and earn a lot of money for his future. This is similar to what Oscar did when he played in the Chinese Super League a few years ago. Whatever option he chooses, Rodrygo is clear.

When we win, we can't sleep for two reasons: we get a good multiplier but bet so small that we miss out on a lucky break, or we're overjoyed at winning a large amount. And when we lose, we can't sleep if we bet so large that we can't afford to lose. The only time we can sleep soundly is when we lose but bet so small that we don't feel like we've lost anything. Everyone can find themselves in one or two states that keep them awake. And I think that can be a problem because it can lead to a state where you can't...

Res

Given his impressive record with Atalanta, I think 50 million euros is commensurate with Lookman's age and capacity. I don't think it's too expensive, nor too cheap. At 27, it's no longer young for a footballer, but it can be a prime age for most. If Lookman can consistently maintain his fitness, Inter Milan may have made one of the best transfers they've ever made. I don't doubt Lookman's performance because he plays for Atalanta. Not so much.

This reminds me of the time when Real Madrid was coached by Zidane and won the UCL three times in a row.

I also think placing many small bets in the hope of winning gradually risks becoming a gambling addiction. I personally dislike the first method because I think it wastes a lot of time and makes it difficult to break free from gambling. As for the second method, since I'm not a gambling addict, I don't know if I agree or not. Everyone has different opinions. Betting less frequently but with large amounts can cause you to lose your money more quickly. But it's still better than the first method, which wastes more of your time. Ultimately, no matter how good a gambling method is, it's meaningless if you can't manage your emotions and finances.

I like your way of thinking. Yes, in this context, I don't think any religion condones gambling. Humans have free will and are free to determine their own lives. However, within each religion, there are rules that must not be violated. As far as I recall, gambling is prohibited in every religion, so I would never condone gambling. If a country's government adopts the rules of the majority religion as new law, I believe that is a democratic decision. Of course, everyone will have different opinions. But I believe that rules made based on the majority are wise. I mean, it's impossible for the government to base a law on the wishes of a small minority. I believe we need to respect a country's laws. However, if a proposed law hasn't been passed, I believe those who disagree can still appeal to find another solution.