the answer to all these shenigans, is to bet with smart contract only, it is coming but slowly.

for sure goodway to get in her panties

can someone correct the address for exbet api token?

from their docs it seems to be this below

("https://api.macau.exbet.io/post/v2/login", {"password", "username"})

but it does not work

what a complete and utter load of bllx this thread is.

This is how it works in real life. For instance a tennis tournament.



AS each point is played it is broadcast over satellite with what is called a uplink feed.(0.525 seconds) because the signal is going 35000 kilometres into space),this is then sent back to earth,probably encrypted(0.525 seconds)
Television company's around the world will receive this signal .

They will then add their own commentary and graphics, and send the signal back to space ( another c 2.5 seconds).
Other tv will use THIS signal and repeat the process with their own graphics( another 1.5 seconds).

Meanwhile betting syndicates, will have at the venue stewards using mobile phone technology with a delay of 0.01 second
Meanwhile bookies, sportsbook , will have at the venue stewards , or pay for he same from dedicated data providers( the biggest is sportsradar).
And then will impose a delay of 3 to 5 second on live bets.

No way can the OP supply faster updates than what is the norm.
That is why serious betters are at the venue themselves, or paying for the 0.1 phone delay.

I think you would get many users with horse racing, with sports betting you have 100's of sites and much competition in the bitcoin world.

There are very few bitcoin with horse racing, and the few there are, are  all flimpers.

I know you said in earlier post more difficult to set up horses, but sometimes a more difficult task renders greater success.

you are not understanding the dispute.

It is not about the odds changing.

Try and read again the original complaint.

Now I am not siding with the player against betcoin.ag, for the simple reason in all of the firms I  have bet with and I have 20 years experience of inplay with hundreds of firms, none have ever done this.

Having said that the answer above is rubbish and the lack of clarity as to what should happen is pitiful.

What is the norm(and should have been explained) is that when a bet is submitted the delay kicks in, if no event occurs in this delay time(advantaging EITHER TEAM) then the bet is good and valid.

If the Op has his facts right then it is fraud, but for me I  do not think a firm would do this.
 A lot easier to just not pay winners, as many firms do(no aspirations on (Betcoin.ag)

just a suggestion, why have differing rules for each cashback, it is just nonsense.

when did youget accessto api?

I emailed yesterday, like the website suggests, for access.

Still no access, after 28 hours, or are you on about the test api?

see above, never had understood the layout.

There is no need for both options in a two way market, betfair do it as well, Jackson Jags option is redundant it is not needed.

Why do I think that answer is best ever on the forum?

if someone generated 1000 transactions every minute at zero fee.
Would it mean that anyone lse who tried bitcoin would have very little chance of getting confirmed?

Well probably reason is, because it is, people from allover the world want to go to America.
People from all the world, send the American company's billions of dollars each week

[/quote]

hi Intrepidity, the issue you encountered is an edge case - it only occurs where a new bet's stake/liability exceeds the funds left in the user's account. We do not believe this feature will significantly affect liquidity in any way (although we do not underestimate the general challenge of building liquidity on Exbet). But we appreciate you bringing this up and will take it back to our dev team for review. Thanks!



[/quote]

i see what you are saying, but have you thought of this scenario?

A punter pre match has a backof 1 @ odds of 4, this is his total account balnce so his balance now is 0

with 5 mins to go his team is winning and he wants to trade his bet so he wins whatever the result.

On what you are saying he will not be able too. when the equaliser arrives you will have a disgruntled punter.

Not knocking your site, think you have done a great job, but this is serious flaw.

 I can see no reason why someone would intentionally programme this way.
All It will result in is 10x less liquidity.

Without liquidity the exchange as no chance of success.

the one about 6 posts above this

@exbet.io

what about the liabilty issue?

I have 1.4 in account

i offer bet (lay england) & 1.76 stake1 =liab .76
I now cannot lay the draw @ 3.6 stake 0.5 =liab 1.3

hiccups?

this should be easy to resolve
1 punter can post list of deposits
2 cloudbet can post list of withdrawals

either can then dispute any transaction

When all transactions are agreed, then if punter as lost then under cloudbet terms punter is reimbursed
if punter has won then accusation against cloudbet is dismissed. No more going round in circles