Bitcointalk username: kasabus
Bitcointalk profile URL:
Bech32 BTC Addy:

Bitcointalk Username: Kasabus
BSC Wallet Address: 0x07f87Ea376D46c455f1AbcB49f141bD7bAc263aA

Bitcointalk Username:
Profile link
Post Count: ..... (including this one)
btc addy
Forum Rank
Current Merit

Seriously, dude? Are you even a sports bettor?

What you said is an insult to sports bettors who genuinely believe their skills can lead to long-term success and consistency.

I’m guessing those who claim “sports betting is mainly a luck game” are the ones who haven’t really explored or pushed themselves to understand and challenge the complexities of sports betting.

---

Anyway, @ EVO.io and yahoo, Merry Christmas to you!

This is a major player, and I’m pretty sure they’re compliant with the law.

I often see this company because of their partnership with the LA Lakers and Clippers, they even named their arena Crypto.com Arena.
They can try to compete with Polymarket, but the market is huge, so I think their impact on Polymarket will be minimal.

Rank- hero member
Segwit BTC address- bc1q3c4z8mf4cn369w94aspd2xpp3gxtmg2ckfqvkl

I will try again LM

Rank- hero member
Segwit BTC address- bc1q3c4z8mf4cn369w94aspd2xpp3gxtmg2ckfqvkl

Bitcointalk username: Kasabus
Bitcointalk profile URL: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=849498;
Bech32 BTC Addy: bc1q3c4z8mf4cn369w94aspd2xpp3gxtmg2ckfqvkl

Rank- Hero Member
Segwit BTC address- bc1q3c4z8mf4cn369w94aspd2xpp3gxtmg2ckfqvkl

I hope of getting a chance to work with you LM.

Rank- Hero
Segwit BTC address- bc1q3c4z8mf4cn369w94aspd2xpp3gxtmg2ckfqvkl

We're stucked at $100k.. what's next?..

By the way, what can you say about the IMF pressuring El salvador on bitcoin policy change?

ps ; just convert it to english

He had paid his previous loans, but those were small amounts, typically less than $100. That was enough to build a reputation as a paying customer. I think what DaveF approved for him was reasonable, as it was within his usual range. However, the oversight was not knowing he already had another loan. This became an issue, especially when he was granted a large loan of $500 from Shasan -- an amount far beyond anything he had borrowed before.

The main concern here is that all these are unsecured loans. Even if the borrower initially had no intention to scam, life circumstances or unexpected events could make it impossible for him to repay. Based on the signs, this loan might end up being unpaid. I’m not an expert, but I suggest lenders limit their loan exposure, even to trusted borrowers, because these are still unsecured loans. If the borrower dies or disappears, the loan remains unpaid, making it high-risk.

Since most of us don’t know each other personally here, I’d like to suggest introducing something like a co-maker system, a group loan arrangement. In this setup, if one member fails to pay, the others in the group share responsibility for repaying the loan. This concept already exists in real-world microfinance, which often deals with unsecured loans. The risk is minimized because there are co-makers who can be held accountable if a borrower defaults.

I guess you can't blame them because it’s normal for some people who lack knowledge to criticize Bitcoin, but over time, it has been proven that Bitcoin isn’t a Ponzi scheme, as some initially believed. what they lack is proper education, but if they take the time to educate themselves for the right reasons, they’ll eventually appreciate Bitcoin’s value and its potential to replace gold in the future.

you're familiar with Michael Saylor of microstrategy, right? You know that he urged the US government to sell their gold reserves and invest in Bitcoin? interestingly, this is the same guy who used to criticize Bitcoin but has since become one of its biggest advocates. Now, he’s confident in Bitcoin and no longer sees it as a risky investment.

LOL

Bitcointalk username: Kasabus
Bitcointalk profile URL: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=849498;
Bech32 BTC Addy: bc1q3c4z8mf4cn369w94aspd2xpp3gxtmg2ckfqvkl

Right, the best thing you can do is to forget what he had promised and act like nothing happens. After all, it’s his money, whether he’ll stick to his promise or not, that’s his decision already.

I’m not really used opening up a topic and recommend something to my friends, especially that gambling quite denotes a negative outcome. We’re more into business and investment ideas. However, if they will ask me about crypto gambling, I can give them significant ideas as long as they’re willing to listen. Maybe in the future when crypto becomes more a common topic in our society, I will be glad opening up about it.

Casinos have reached no limits nowadays because even the best actresses and actors that are used to be role models in their show are now advertising casinos which I think is quite unethical for them. However, that's also their life so they are free to chose on what they will advertise, but yeah intrusive as it is, I think thats how really business works these days.

Even if this isn’t a scam, reality tells us that there are no betting tips that will guarantee stable profits. All are just wild or even educational guesses, but they will never create an assurance that those will certainly hit the target. Just a suggestion OP, if you want to gain our trust, don’t be so confident without providing us a proof. Because for us, it only looks like a clear scam attempt, and only greedy and inexperienced newbies will fall for it. The rest have been used to this kind of strategy.

I don’t think the bank should be accountable with what the gambler currently experienced now. The fact that the employee is no longer productive in his own job, regardless of its reason, then the employer have all the right to warn or worse fire the employee. But of course, this doesn’t happen in an instant for sure. Most probably prior investigations or interviews from other employees have been made first. Until proven that the employee is no longer effective in his position, then the bank should call out his attention or fire from his job.