Would it be possible to have a scale template for the dog tags?
If possible, I'd like a custom design. I can create a vector file for use without issue.

Hit me up in PM if this is possible.

Thanks

Wow.... just wow.


So the 1000 BTC ends up going to 'TheTwistedTwo' who also uses the handle 'TheHellboundHarlot' who very funnily posted https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1558232.0


New user who never posts in /r/Bitcoin except once and 'wins' 1000btc and the same person posts to BTCTalk and straight away offers loans (because everyone thinks 'Hey, I've got a huge budget of $700 dollars, what can I do with it? Oh I know, lets visit a forum I've never been to before and give random people who I don't know loans!"

Call me skeptical and all, but if it looks like horseshit and smells like horseshit, you know I don't need to taste it to know it's horseshit.


However, I wish Dayah the best of luck... she's definitely going to need it.

I'll give it a shot though I've never won anything based on chance in my life.

1ALgEHeJ3fCtBfLpcsxfqjLqa61HrmPBYP

I thought he was the VP of Development after Sonny was no longer after his disposition?

Can't say it hadn't crossed my mind, however a return trip from the UK to Kansas City just to kick some arse would be expensive. Not saying it's not worth it..... just a bit of an unjustifiable expense.

To put that in perspective: If you deposit $100 you will get back $88.38 after all the conversions (so it works out as 11.62% total).

I was highly skeptical when I saw that the person who responded was so new.

The device was given to HSE after I asked repeatedly for the CE certificate but they refused to comply (which is also illegal).

Jody originally stated

This was later changed when I repeatedly stated I wanted the CE certificate and would not be sending the device back until I had received it. I asked a total of 9 times for the CE/FCC certificate (CE is legally mandated, unsure about FCC) and each request was either stalled or outright ignored (but other points were addressed by Jody). The address given to BFL for a refund was 16BFfdKE7PxyeVA2V7Pi3U3nHygE5QRpJ8 and was for $301.75 (+ $111.60 for return of the device for investigation). As the address shows, no BTC was ever refunded.

Jody's last response was somewhat humourous though...

Actually Scott Harding does not go by Scott Davie or any of the other aliases listed above.

Sorry but this is why you're getting no interest. This is called 'Spec' work, and no self respecting designer will do it. As the industry says... 'No ReSPECt'
You're asking for specialised skills and knowledge (renderings) yet not offering to pay them.... but 'they might win' something. The most you can hope for is a designer starting out who will do it for exposure.

I have an interview with Agency C later this week. Anyone have anything specific they want mentioned?

Well that would be more for my esteemed american counterparts to pursue.

Sorry, messed up my acronyms;

CAB: Citizens Advice Bureau
HSE: Health & Safety Executive
FTC: Federal Trade Commission
EC: European Commission
TSI: Trading Standards Institute

Yes, BFL did respond.

They rescinded their previous statement in which they offered a refund (when I sent them photos of the damage). They then stated that I could have a refund if I shipped device back and it had been tested to 'eliminate user error'. As per my (very clear) instructions to BFL, I did go ahead and contact the various 3 letter agencies that I said I would.

Agency A: Advised to not send the Monarch back as they are very interested in testing it themselves.
Agency B: Very interested and has now referred the case to another agency who's the equivalent of the FTC in the UK.
Agency C: Responded within 6 minutes(!) that they want to talk to me via telephone (from the USA) this week. Agency C is the agency that BFL really do not want involved.
Agency D: Referred me back to Agency B.

Now the agencies involved are; the CAB, the HSE, the FTC, the EC & the TSA. Can you guess which agency is which?

Okay as this seems to be going around and around....

Wardrick: Did you use the cards?

The evidence is pointing to yes, as displayed in the screenshots as well as your own statements ("I could care less either way because the items I ordered").
Using your own terms you should pay the guy if you did.

You're now using the excuse "The cards turned out to be fraudulent, and I don't deal with fraudulent gift cards" to avoid any backlash, but what the hell did you expect? $500 of gift cards for $110? How could these not be carded? You knew the deal, but you had no intention of paying. Basically you scammed a scammer/carder and you expect people to pat you on the back and go "Oh you're in the right here..."

Let's be realistic. You're both scammers and thieves.

Like I said, it's possible.

I, as someone who owns both tools, would use a CNC machine for the wider stuff and a laser engrave for the finer details (like serifs).
The hardest part then would be ensuring everything matches up in orientation (which can be easily done by cutting the outside last on the CNC machine as squares are nice and easy to align).

But I'm crap with wood, which is why I have a CNC machine

Just saw this, and thought I would input as I use these devices all the time (and own a 3d printer & CNC machine with solid state laser attachment etc).

3D laser cutter: Whilst this is technically possible, it would cost an obscene amount of money as the focal length of the laser would constantly change. In order to accurately cut something the laser needs to be accurately focused (within 10 microns for most), and constantly changing topography would make that hard, but possible. I say possible, but the length of time would be extremely long as the device would have to poll the focus at every point...

... which leads onto my next point. CNC. You can get 2, 3,4,5, & 6 axis CNC machines which do exactly as you describe, at a somewhat faster rate as well as it's not bothered by a focus length. I own a CNC machine so I can make topological site models with accurate contour representation which then have architectural models placed in the appropriate place (we call this 'context').

I assume that the picture doesn't illustrate the contents as I can see an axe and an entrenching tool?

Am I the only one worried by this?

User posts thread for 1.4BTC and states his collatoral is held by Monbux and can be confirmed by PM'ing Monbux...... and the same user has access to the Monbux account?

Quality > Quantity

You can buy blended pasteurised honey, that often mixed with chinese honey crap (some of it even fake honey!) for very little money.
Real raw (un-heat treated) honey is significantly better then shop bought.... and the best part of raw honey? You can make mead!

And this is why I keep bees....

.... and yes, there is such a thing as fake honey.


Sorry to hear about your grandfather dude.

I'm pretty sure I could dox him.
Like he said 'im not some 11 year old amateur...'. Hell I even tracked the infamous 'FF' scammer on -otc and he uses TOR for everything.

Remember there are always people better at CompSec then you...

On another note, I might just make it a principle to dox anyway as it's Xmas time and I suspect it was a quick 'loan' in order to get some funds for Christmas time and pay back later.
And in the short term, OP gets fucked over at Xmas time for what seemingly was some extra funds for Xmas.