Search content
Sort by
Showing 15 of 15 results by Sekhmet_
If some good soul would compile a list of all the fake exch.net domains and list them one per line we could add them to the Domainsure Crypto Defender threat feed:
https://domainsure.com/rpz-threat-feeds/
That gets pushed out to resolver services (like Quad9) which can dampen the reach of known phishing domains before they get taken down.
https://domainsure.com/rpz-threat-feeds/
That gets pushed out to resolver services (like Quad9) which can dampen the reach of known phishing domains before they get taken down.
Code:
https://exch.ac/
https://exch.cd/
https://excz.cx/
https://exclh.cx/
https://excn.cx/
https://excj.cx/
https://exsch.cx/
https://exch.exchange/
Re: eXch - instant exchange BTC / LN / XMR / LTC / ETH / ERC20
⭐ Merited by bitmover (1)
I am trying to understand.
1. You swapped BTC for ETH on eXch yesterday.
2. Then you swapped this ETH for an unknown token/coin using your Uniswap APP wallet, and sent it to Bitget.
How is it related to eXch?
Why are you asking the question here instead of asking those who are blocking your funds? It has nothing to do with eXch: you should contact Bitget support.
If the goal was to get USDT, you could have done it at eXch, which does not segregate funds. You chose to use a shitty exchange (Bitget); that's your problem, sort it out with them.
Yesterday, I exchanged bitcoin for eth through exch and sent it to my own uniswapAPP wallet.
1. You swapped BTC for ETH on eXch yesterday.
Then I exchanged eth and sent it to my own bitget exchange.
2. Then you swapped this ETH for an unknown token/coin using your Uniswap APP wallet, and sent it to Bitget.
What should I do?
How is it related to eXch?
Why are you asking the question here instead of asking those who are blocking your funds? It has nothing to do with eXch: you should contact Bitget support.
If the goal was to get USDT, you could have done it at eXch, which does not segregate funds. You chose to use a shitty exchange (Bitget); that's your problem, sort it out with them.
⭐ Merited by examplens (3)
The pressure on the scammer seems to be paying off somehow
Things are developing further. I got this message, I should probably take it as a threat. Given that Namecheap has the information of the person behind these domains, a possible report to the authorities could be reasonable.
Things are developing further. I got this message, I should probably take it as a threat. Given that Namecheap has the information of the person behind these domains, a possible report to the authorities could be reasonable.
Animesh, why are you threatening our friends?
I don't like it when things get personal; imagine if someone threatened your family, your home, your friends... Not cool, not classy, not worthy of a man. Shame on you.
Perhaps you'll understand better with some real life example..?
Life can be sweet when you are in East India and when you're enjoying BTC stolen to random users of eXch, right? Why do you want to make it complicated when it could just be a long, peaceful river? Tell me.
You know, right, that simple things are the best. For example, when you do your wife's toenails:
Or when you bring her tea:
By the way, you ask our friend if he is sure of his anonymity, but what about you? Are you sure of your safety? And more importantly, what about your wife (by the way, her Instagram account @troubble_makerr shouldn't be public, just a friendly tip. This could be a real trouble-maker for you) and family? Aren't you afraid that by targeting the wrong people, something bad could happen to them one day?
A road accident can happen so quickly, or a boating accident... You know better than we do; Indian infrastructure has its dangers.
This message is a clear show of support for the person and well wishes for his personal safety, after fucking with dangerous criminal organizations who have lots of money to spend on potential retaliation.
There is no threat, direct or implied.
There is no threat, direct or implied.
As you explained so well, my message is not a threat neither, but a friendly message inviting you to be cautious. I know Indians who, for less than half a BTC, would come to explain to your wife, your family, your employer, or even to you directly that one must know how to stay in their place and be careful.
If I were you, honestly, I would continue to enjoy my wife and life; I wouldn't let greed ruin everything.
Got an RFI after receiving funds. Anyway thank you!
Friendly tip, Electrum (or any other non-custodial BTC wallet) will never request any info from you
Well, let's see.
Blender.io = advertised here + had an ANN + active user on the forum
Sinbad.io = advertised here + had an ANN + active user on the forum
ChipMixer = advertised here + had an ANN + active user on the forum
BestMixer = advertised here + had an ANN + active user on the forum
All shutdown by agencies.
eXch also shutting down here because of a potential operation and they were advertised here, had an ANN, were super active, and even donated money to users here.
What happened to the forum and its users? Exactly, nothing.
Blender.io = advertised here + had an ANN + active user on the forum
Sinbad.io = advertised here + had an ANN + active user on the forum
ChipMixer = advertised here + had an ANN + active user on the forum
BestMixer = advertised here + had an ANN + active user on the forum
All shutdown by agencies.
eXch also shutting down here because of a potential operation and they were advertised here, had an ANN, were super active, and even donated money to users here.
What happened to the forum and its users? Exactly, nothing.
You forgot the most important one on your list: Silk Road.
lol, what is this instant exchange? looks scammy. Also, no CEX's please
So, Animesh, it seems you have created this thread knowing most people will recommend eXch just to respond this?
Calling a project that appeared in all world news "scammy" wasn't the wisest of you, boy.
Looks like you're looking for new projects to phish, but be sure, my friend, this community will always watch you now.
Re: eXch - instant exchange BTC / LN / XMR / LTC / ETH / ERC20
I'm a curious person so I wanted to know a little more about this Marian Muller. Another pro-KYC, pro-AML, pro-international-sanctions advocate...
In September 2017 he wrote in a post on Linkedin that he believes “Bitcoin shines in two key use cases: International transfers for the unbanked and financially excluded, and as a store of value.” Financially excluded people, right? He's so interested in their fate that when a non-KYC exchange like eXch just does its job as an exchange, it becomes a mixer (the "M-word" of cryptospace!) - just because it refuses to check whether users are Financially excluded or not (because when they're excluded, they should be refused e.v.e.r.y.w.h.e.r.e!).
In the same Linkedin post he explains how happy he was to have found Reza on his trip to Iran, to exchange BTC for FIAT (his bank card didn't work in Iran).
The thousand-dollar question: Tell us Marian, how would Reza do without services like eXch as an Iranian citizen?
Does he know that people like him, who promote KYC and AML checks at every turn, contribute to isolating people like Reza? How would Reza conduct its business internationally if everyone was following Marian's demands?
Can Reza use Binance, Coinbase, Kraken, or any regulated CEX? Not at all.
Why does he now want those who are “financially excluded” by big banking and globalized groups to be financially excluded by crypto exchanges as well?
Wasn't it practical for these “excluded” people to have existing and doable solutions to give him FIAT for BTC when his bank card didn't work while he was on vacation? I know Bitcoin is P2P by nature, but how would he have found Reza if localbitcoin had imposed KYC at the time?
I'm going to quote his cheesy backpacker post on Linkedin again:
Looks like things have changed a lot in Marian's mind since 2017... Reading his recent blog post about eXch, I conclude eXch should therefore apply all the international sanctions imposed by the US/Western world. On the other hand, when it comes to cheap vacations in Tehran hostels, sanctions shoud no longer exist..
TLDR: For Marian Muller, over-regulation and surveillance are good for earning a living, but when it comes to go on vacation and his privileged Westerner's bank card doesn't work, then he's happy for people to benefit from unregulated services he's paid to defame in everyday life. Making money by rotting the lives of certain peoples, then spending this money in their countries because it's cheap: that says a lot about his integrity.
In September 2017 he wrote in a post on Linkedin that he believes “Bitcoin shines in two key use cases: International transfers for the unbanked and financially excluded, and as a store of value.” Financially excluded people, right? He's so interested in their fate that when a non-KYC exchange like eXch just does its job as an exchange, it becomes a mixer (the "M-word" of cryptospace!) - just because it refuses to check whether users are Financially excluded or not (because when they're excluded, they should be refused e.v.e.r.y.w.h.e.r.e!).
In the same Linkedin post he explains how happy he was to have found Reza on his trip to Iran, to exchange BTC for FIAT (his bank card didn't work in Iran).
Quote
For Reza, Bitcoin is one of very few options that enables him to conduct business internationally
The thousand-dollar question: Tell us Marian, how would Reza do without services like eXch as an Iranian citizen?
Does he know that people like him, who promote KYC and AML checks at every turn, contribute to isolating people like Reza? How would Reza conduct its business internationally if everyone was following Marian's demands?
Can Reza use Binance, Coinbase, Kraken, or any regulated CEX? Not at all.
Why does he now want those who are “financially excluded” by big banking and globalized groups to be financially excluded by crypto exchanges as well?
Wasn't it practical for these “excluded” people to have existing and doable solutions to give him FIAT for BTC when his bank card didn't work while he was on vacation? I know Bitcoin is P2P by nature, but how would he have found Reza if localbitcoin had imposed KYC at the time?
I'm going to quote his cheesy backpacker post on Linkedin again:
Quote
Of course this may not be an option forever — if sanctions are taken seriously, increased regulations might at some point exclude countries like Iran from international cryptocurrency transfers. But for now, Bitcoin is providing many people in Iran with opportunities they would not usually have access to. Not only did I get to experience a real-world use case of how Bitcoin is helping local entrepreneurs grow their businesses, but also how it can help idiotically naïve tourists like me survive in a financially excluded country.
Looks like things have changed a lot in Marian's mind since 2017... Reading his recent blog post about eXch, I conclude eXch should therefore apply all the international sanctions imposed by the US/Western world. On the other hand, when it comes to cheap vacations in Tehran hostels, sanctions shoud no longer exist..
TLDR: For Marian Muller, over-regulation and surveillance are good for earning a living, but when it comes to go on vacation and his privileged Westerner's bank card doesn't work, then he's happy for people to benefit from unregulated services he's paid to defame in everyday life. Making money by rotting the lives of certain peoples, then spending this money in their countries because it's cheap: that says a lot about his integrity.
It seems that Tucows won't do anything unless threatened with legal action.
I'm not sure what the correct instance is to report the ignorance of Tucows as registrar. If it's ICANN or whatever, I'm fine to report to them that Tucows refuses to take action to cut malicious use of the domain name for the fraudster.If many from here report Tucows registrar for their negligence, then that might put enough pressure on them to reconsider their lame stance.
If you send mail to ICANN please share the contact here, I'm also willing to send them mail to highlights that Tucows refuse to take responsibility for their work.
https://icann-nsp.my.site.com/compliance/s/abuse-domain
Found on https://www.icann.org/compliance/complaint
As of now, exch[.]cc is not accessible.
That's good news. That domain name was the worst possible for an attacker to own, since it was officially owned by eXch in the past.
that's not really good news, the domain is not suspended yet (https://www.whois.com/whois/exch.cc) so he could be online again at any time
unnecessary FUD
Let's say you're not just a competitor trying to spread FUD and damage eXch's reputation:
1. I don't see eXch's address mentioned in the FBI alert.
2. I don't see eXch's name there either.
Secondly, don't you think that the ONLY people responsible for this entire situation are Bybit, who were unable to protect their funds? Why not spending your energy blaming those who deserve to be blamed?
At the moment, I'm inclined to believe that eXch has provided some good explanations, as can be found in this article: https://decrypt.co/307430/bybit-funds-on-the-move-could-be-headed-for-bitcoin-mixers-next-elliptic
Quote
In a statement to Decrypt, eXch acknowledged that it had received a request from Bybit to blacklist some addresses, and that, "There were indeed some deposits processed by us, which was vastly a minor part of the total amount of stolen 90000 ETH." The exchange explained that "our AML screening provider, which is a third-party service, had outdated data on the ByBit exploiter addresses for approximately around 12 hours."
eXch went on to argue that this was as a result of Elliptic having refused it as a customer "due to the fact that we are a non-KYC accountless exchange aiming to preserve privacy of our users," accusing the tracking firm of having "elitist policies." The exchange further claimed that it had "implemented comprehensive measures to actively combat money laundering and terrorism financing."
eXch went on to argue that this was as a result of Elliptic having refused it as a customer "due to the fact that we are a non-KYC accountless exchange aiming to preserve privacy of our users," accusing the tracking firm of having "elitist policies." The exchange further claimed that it had "implemented comprehensive measures to actively combat money laundering and terrorism financing."
Quote from: Not ZachXBT
Bybit has created a new website where eXch is the only service listed in the Bad Actors category. According to this website, nearly $100 million from this hack has been laundered through eXch.
https://www.lazarusbounty.com/en/detail?entity=eXch
https://www.lazarusbounty.com/en/detail?entity=eXch
Lmao, this very link tells us that ChangeNOW is a "good actor", it speaks for itself, we can't take this team seriously, they'd do better to use their bounty money to improve their safety and train their team to be at least a little more competent (or less incompetent if you prefer)...
Funny, your name is "Not ZachXBT" but you seem to share the same amateurism as he does, and the same frustration against a non-KYC exchange that respects its users security and privacy.
All those twitter whitehats who supposedly work for the “security” of users are just waging a war of disinformation against the ONLY ones that have never posed a security problem for their users, pretty strange... Isn't it?
Continue to pick up the bounty crumbs, but leave alone those who have never needed to organize a bounty hoping to get back their users funds.
I asked Grok, "What is narcissism?"
Answer:
Answer:
Quote
Narcissism is a personality trait characterized by a grandiose sense of self-importance, a lack of empathy for others, a need for excessive admiration, and often a preoccupation with success and power. It is named after the Greek mythological figure Narcissus, who fell in love with his own reflection.
⭐ Merited by OrangeFren (1)
If I remember correctly, FF covered all the losses incurred during the hack. All their users were paid out. If it was different, someone correct me.
I'm not saying they're ideal, but we've seen many cases where users suffered losses from hacks.
I'm not saying they're ideal, but we've seen many cases where users suffered losses from hacks.
Still, they steal some of their users (hundreds of) using SoF and crazy KYC processes as a way to make people give up their funds.
I can not access the orange fren forum, I get a "403 Forbidden" error. Is it because of some ddos attacks?
Re: 💎 The Change Ltd automatic Cryptocurrency Exchange | ≈$21K Escrow
We have updated the design on the commissions page and also added a new section to the user profile.
🌈 As a reminder, if you make an exchange of any amount and leave a review, you are guaranteed to get paid for pizza or rolls
🖥 thechange.ltd
🌈 As a reminder, if you make an exchange of any amount and leave a review, you are guaranteed to get paid for pizza or rolls
🖥 thechange.ltd
Do you confirm that if I exchange a few dusts on your service and leave a review, you'll buy me a pizza?
It's pretty expensive where I'm currently, so hopefully you won't mind too much. Thank you in advance for your reply.
Foundry and AntPool didn't wait until 2024 to own +- 50% of the network hashrate. Same with dusting attacks, there's nothing really new here.
In my opinion, the biggest current threats are the excesses of legal regulations, and the new KYC shotgun trend, which exploits the anti-Bitcoin idea that there's a difference between "clean" and "dirty" Bitcoin.
In my opinion, the biggest current threats are the excesses of legal regulations, and the new KYC shotgun trend, which exploits the anti-Bitcoin idea that there's a difference between "clean" and "dirty" Bitcoin.