When I read an article about a gambler with addiction, I noticed that he often mentioned that when he started to accumulate debts among friends, and loans from banks, he began to eat worse, stopped buying new clothes. He began to live in the Syndrome of Deferred Life. What kind of syndrome is this?

Do you think problem gamblers can save themselves to start living in the "bright future" they hope for after a big win at the casino?
The same goes for problem bettors and sports betting.

The answer is affirmative, signature campaigns paid to casinos actually make you to gamble.  There are some instances in which the payment for signature campaign is less than the minimum withdrawal, in that case one will be required to bet with it to aim for the minimum withdrawal to be able to make withdrawal.  Apart from this, the temptation to gamble when you have some balance is very high which is why payment of signature campaign into the casino actually make one to gamble more.

I recently read about an MIT and IBM model trained on millions of Bitcoin transactions, already being used to quickly identify suspicious patterns. It got me wondering if we’re adequately prepared for what’s coming.

Has anyone else here been thinking about this? Are there discussions happening about potential safeguards—or is this just something we'll have to live with?

I'd really like to hear your thoughts on this.

Mourinho leaving Fenerbahce for me is not something that just happened, I think it was a planned work, maybe the Fenerbahce board are not ok with how the Turkish disciplinary board will start taking harsh decisions on the club even when is not necessary that's why they allowed him go, I think. Fine he has his own way of replying to matters that affects him without hiding how he feels but after that group chat that was revealed some months ago I think this is the result.

This UEFA Champions League play-off match should have been a little more exciting but in this match we witnessed that Benfica won but the first match between them was a draw. The Portuguese team may have already qualified for the Champions League group stage because they defeated Jose Mourinho's club. You are right that everyone believes in what Jose Mourinho can do which is why many may have been in favor of this Fenerbahce team but on the field Benfica was the better team in the UCL playoff match. It is largely true that Fenerbahce could not make the most of their majority superiority, they should have been considerably stronger before this decisive clash perhaps everyone noticed that Fenerbahce was not dominant.

As what the question is, Do you think governments should set limits on how much one can gamble daily?

Should this is be good deterrent to at least minimized gambling in a certain country? Or does it force gamblers to uses illegal means or even travel outside of the country that has this strict law to continue with their gambling?

Investing is when you buy something and hope that its price will rise after several years. This was not the case with Bitcoin in the early days, as the probability of failure was high and Bitcoin had no long term value.

One country's decline is a benefit to another one. It might sound cold and selfish but the truth is that if one economy is declining, you can use this to your advantage. If one country has a failing economy and they can no longer produce high quality products and their trade is losing significance then another country can sweep in and give better offers. This is simply the reality and so economy should not have emotions in because it will not do you good. If you want to improve your financial state, you have to compete. This is true even with smaller scale marketplace. Not a country's but let's say in one city. If one seller fails to deliver good products, you can sell better ones and take their customers. There is no space in the economy for soft hearted because everything is a competition. You have to compete for resources. You have to compete for demand. You have to compete for customers.

Any well informed newbie will only be quick to learning and slow in actions, this has a lot of meaning in determining for what we choose to go for, having the opportunity of discovering this forum is an added advantage, whereby some have taken it serious to learn and develop some knowledge from the opportunity they had, to an extent, we all have started being a newbie, this forum is welcoming enough in giving information to everyone that seek to have it, because you will know more about cryptocurrency and be able to stand independent.

With the Indian government tightening regulations around online gaming and betting, many local platforms face stricter rules. However, offshore betting sites and crypto casinos are becoming popular among Indian players. Do you think these platforms are filling a gap, or are they adding more legal and financial risks for users?

Due to the stigma attached to gambling, most persons by default wants to hide their gambling habit from their partner especially when they know their partner is a very hyper active and repulsive person, and such partner cannot handle such information about  their other partner in most cases, that alone gets them to want to keep hiding their gambling activities so as not to cause any form of uproar in the family or pit their relationship on the line.

But all of this is not excuse enough because if you hold onto those excuse to hide your gambling behavior, eventually you will get exposed and loose out in your relationship in some cases so it is best to come clean amd inform your partner soyou don't have to battle it in the nears future and cause issues you would have prevented much earlier

El Salvador made the mistake of thinking that bitcoin could save their economy and they got too dependent on it, but I don't think they made any mistakes with their bitcoin investment strategy.

If I remember correctly they are holding over 6k2BTC worth over $700 million and the capital they have spent is $300 million. That means the profit they made was around $400 million and that's not a bad profit.

In my opinion, for countries, organizations and companies, those with large capital and can invest long term. They can and should invest whenever they are ready, they don't have to wait for a bear season or a bitcoin price crash to buy, and El Salvador and MSTR are doing quite well with that strategy. The bear season waiting strategy is more suitable for small investors.

Rumor has it that Galatasaray are very much interested in signing Donnarumma this summer, but I believe since Manchester City have also shown interest in Donnarumma this season, Donnarumma will prefer a move to Manchester City over Galatasary. Ederson will not accept to be a second choice goalkeeper if Manchester City signs Donnarumma, so it is expected Manchester City will sell Ederson to another club.

It may be a source of money, mostly from financially bouyant tourists, yet it isn't enough to awake a whole economy by itself. Gambling may boost tourism, hotels, restaurants, as well as local jobs, though it equally has it risks associated with it such as social problems and dependent on a sector. Sri Lanka may need larger reforms and firm policies for better recovery. Personally, I might not choose to travel for gambling purposes alone, yet I might love to check it out when I visiting such area.

I think tax income from the casinos is very big that's why this idea appears because basically SriLangka want to makes this income to develop their economic conditions and i feel like if their government is really serious potentially this project will be success especially if high roller gamblers are starting to interested to visit this country to gamble probably it can help the people economy a lot

You are absolutely correct in saying that access is just ridiculously easy. Children are conditioned by loot-box systems and hammered by social marketing. Look at these 27% of 11-17-year-olds gambled with their own funds last year. KYC is not an impenetrable shield as age checks are clumsy and avoidable. A combination of bank or application level gambling blocks, tough parental controls and stricter ad/algorithm limits with actual enforcement on the platforms are some prominent solution that should be implemented rather than just vibing along.That reduces exposure and minimizes friction even when a child attempts to sneak in.

I have seen many people saying they'll love the two, I think i won't be left behind on this but if I have only one option among the two I will choose skills and I have my reasons for that, am from a country where your educational certificate doesn't guarantee you automatic employment but if I have skill I might even be safe employed and there are many companies that prefer skilled worker persons so I might also get employed and maybe sponsor my education later, it only requires me to work hard and always remain focused, although i must be sincere If I must accept skills, I must have gone through the basic education which is primary to atleast secondary level then i can train myself in the university if I start getting money from the skill I learnt.

How about you? How did you start, and how’s it going so far?

There will probably be a significant reduction in the hashrate, at least in the early phase. That's expected because Bitcoin mining right now is heavily dependent on other sources. Miners can't just shift to solar power overnight. But I believe it will catch up eventually and a new hashrate record will be hit. 

I think the issue with solar power when used in Bitcoin mining is it's unstable nature. Bitcoin mining is energy-demanding and operates 24/7 while solar power isn't around the clock and is also dependent on the weather.

I don't see the need for the government to impose such rules to miners. It would be at their own loss since they make money as well from the electricity consumed by those mining farms. I would reply directly to the title of this topic, solar energy has long been a back up option for miners.

Donnarumma might be PSG backup option if Chevalier experiences an unexpected injury or the goalkeeper, as PSG already has a new goalkeeper this season. However, we haven't seen his full potential at PSG, so I can't yet judge whether Chevalier is better than Donnarumma. Let's see how he performs before PSG actually uses him as their first-choice goalkeeper.
Against Angers, they didn't do much, so PSG need to play a tougher team first to see how strong he is in guarding PSG defense.