Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 47 results by ccinet
Re: Preocupaciones sobre la Seguridad del Protocolo de Bitcoin
⭐ Merited by Don Pedro Dinero (1)
Lamento tu pérdida.
Según cuentas, hay algunos pasos que quizás obviaste
1- Cuando creaste la wallet en bitaddress.org estabas desconectado de internet?
2- Cuando generaste la wallet lo hiciste desde un dispositivo de uso frecuente?
3- El gestor de contraseñas esta en un dispositivo que accede a internet?
Lo que yo haría en caso de generar una wallet fria es primero NO usar el generador bitaddress.org estando conectado a internet, en todo caso puedes descargar el fuente en javascript y ejecutarlo en un dispositivo offline limpio, o sea que nunca haya accedido a internet o al menos que no lo vuelva a hacer.
NO usar un gestor de contraseñas, lo mejor es imprimir las direcciones con una impresora NO conectada por wifi o copiarlo a un pendrive, siempre desde dispositivos no conectados a internet y en lo posible que nunca se hayan conectado o al menos que nunca se vayan a conectar.
De todas maneras HOY es mas seguro tener una cuenta en un buen exchange de criptos como puede ser Binance, las billeteras de papel son muy peligrosas por varios motivos, entre ellos lo expuesto que se está al momento de la generación de las direcciones, vamos que NO HAY manera TODAVIA de vulnerar bitcoin, el peligro está al momento de manipular la clave privada ya que esta puede ser robada en esos momentos por programas espias que tengas en tus dispositivos.
Según cuentas, hay algunos pasos que quizás obviaste
1- Cuando creaste la wallet en bitaddress.org estabas desconectado de internet?
2- Cuando generaste la wallet lo hiciste desde un dispositivo de uso frecuente?
3- El gestor de contraseñas esta en un dispositivo que accede a internet?
Lo que yo haría en caso de generar una wallet fria es primero NO usar el generador bitaddress.org estando conectado a internet, en todo caso puedes descargar el fuente en javascript y ejecutarlo en un dispositivo offline limpio, o sea que nunca haya accedido a internet o al menos que no lo vuelva a hacer.
NO usar un gestor de contraseñas, lo mejor es imprimir las direcciones con una impresora NO conectada por wifi o copiarlo a un pendrive, siempre desde dispositivos no conectados a internet y en lo posible que nunca se hayan conectado o al menos que nunca se vayan a conectar.
De todas maneras HOY es mas seguro tener una cuenta en un buen exchange de criptos como puede ser Binance, las billeteras de papel son muy peligrosas por varios motivos, entre ellos lo expuesto que se está al momento de la generación de las direcciones, vamos que NO HAY manera TODAVIA de vulnerar bitcoin, el peligro está al momento de manipular la clave privada ya que esta puede ser robada en esos momentos por programas espias que tengas en tus dispositivos.
wish me luck, current speed is 100K keys per sec.
It must be a joke! You're joking, aren't you?
Astrology for btc...
Some make good money from BTC astrology. But that doesn't work here .
You'll need to wait until the end of the galaxy we live in (times many billions) until you stumble upon a key with wallet balance.
https://i.ibb.co/qxYQz0R/2024-05-02-08-20.png
Can you imagine idiots who buying Python scripts to solve this puzzle for billions of years?
Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity.
The Human mind is incapable of understanding such enormous magnitudes, which is why in these cases it is useful to use analogies.
The number space of puzzle 66 is equal to (2^65) -(2^66-1) or 36893488147419103231.
Now suppose that each digit of that number is a millimeter.
The light travels in a year 9460730472580000000 millimeters, so to travel through the space of the 66 puzzle you would need 3.9 ≈ 4 LIGHT YEARS
If we take into account that the closest star is Alpha Centauri, which is 4.2 light years away, the number space in the 66 puzzle would be the equivalent of a ruler in millimeters
SO LONG THAT IT WOULD REACH FROM THE EARTH TO ALPHA CENTURUS.
Randomly Satoshi has hidden 6.6 BTC in that rule... FIND IT!
Here's the challenge!
but idk, i had an idea
is there anyways to extend https://privatekeyfinder.io/bitcoin-puzzle/random-keys/66 instead of 50 keys per time, to like idk maybe 500, will reduce by 10.
ik ik, it will maybe takes more time than a normal vanity addresss search
my idea is not only find the 66# puzzle, but maybe if you cross with other wallets with balance if more random wallets can be see at once. Its simple and lite for any pc
You'll need to wait until the end of the galaxy we live in (times many billions) until you stumble upon a key with wallet balance.is there anyways to extend https://privatekeyfinder.io/bitcoin-puzzle/random-keys/66 instead of 50 keys per time, to like idk maybe 500, will reduce by 10.
ik ik, it will maybe takes more time than a normal vanity addresss search
my idea is not only find the 66# puzzle, but maybe if you cross with other wallets with balance if more random wallets can be see at once. Its simple and lite for any pc
You have billions more chances attacking brain wallets
Let's look at it another way! 
https://www.talkimg.com/images/2024/04/26/rwvdf.gif
The video and the source of all these works are in the Telegram channel and you can download them.
https://t.me/bitcoinsolvers
https://www.talkimg.com/images/2024/04/26/rwvdf.gif
The video and the source of all these works are in the Telegram channel and you can download them.
https://t.me/bitcoinsolvers
I still don't see anything special. In such a large set of numbers it is not unusual for groups of two, three, four or five to repeat themselves.
It would be interesting if they were repeated following a rule, or forming a pattern of some kind, but I don't see that.
I am not digaran.
If my posts are bothering you and it is not worth it at all, I will stop posting. But know that there are many things that definitely helped to solve the keys.
My problem is my lack of knowledge in mathematics and I thought that there are people here who understand correctly.
This circle is not a simple thing, you only see a part of it.
I have been watching the thread since today like many others.
I do not post anything
Those of you who know, write and comment...
Of course, those who want to follow me or even have an opinion or idea can join this Telegram group:
https://t.me/bitcoinsolvers
It is definitely not mandatory to enter this channel and everyone can talk without restrictions without being ridiculed and the only thing that is not acceptable is insulting and mocking others.
We know that once upon a time there were people who had ideas and were even attacked and ridiculed for expressing their ideas, but with the passage of time, everyone came to that idea and theory. One of those people is Galileo... you all heard his story
If my posts are bothering you and it is not worth it at all, I will stop posting. But know that there are many things that definitely helped to solve the keys.
My problem is my lack of knowledge in mathematics and I thought that there are people here who understand correctly.
This circle is not a simple thing, you only see a part of it.
I have been watching the thread since today like many others.
I do not post anything
Those of you who know, write and comment...
Of course, those who want to follow me or even have an opinion or idea can join this Telegram group:
https://t.me/bitcoinsolvers
It is definitely not mandatory to enter this channel and everyone can talk without restrictions without being ridiculed and the only thing that is not acceptable is insulting and mocking others.
We know that once upon a time there were people who had ideas and were even attacked and ridiculed for expressing their ideas, but with the passage of time, everyone came to that idea and theory. One of those people is Galileo... you all heard his story
What is your hypothesis? that the creator has used the circle to generate the private keys?
The truth is I don't know how it could because except for the case of puzzle 65, for the rest it doesn't comply with those rules. For example, in the case of puzzle 64, the first digits of its private key are not formed with the radius of the circle and the angle, and this does not occur for the rest of the known puzzles either.
Imagine a Bitcoin giveaway with 1 BTC up for grabs. The host exposes the address and private key (a big no-no!). This creates a race condition:
• Many people try to send a transaction at once (the race starts!).
• Transactions need miner confirmation, not instantaneous processing. It's like waiting in line at a bank.
• Miners prioritize transactions with higher fees, like a fast lane with a toll.
• Person A starts first, but sets a low fee. Their transaction waits in the regular line.
• Person B sends a smaller amount with a high fee. They pay extra to jump the line.
• The block gets filled, and only transactions including Person B's smaller amount fit. It's confirmed first.
• Person A's transaction might still be valid, but there's not enough remaining to cover their intended amount + fees. They get a partial payout or nothing.
Conclusion:
Timing and fees, not starting order, determine the winner.
Source : Google Gemini
• Many people try to send a transaction at once (the race starts!).
• Transactions need miner confirmation, not instantaneous processing. It's like waiting in line at a bank.
• Miners prioritize transactions with higher fees, like a fast lane with a toll.
• Person A starts first, but sets a low fee. Their transaction waits in the regular line.
• Person B sends a smaller amount with a high fee. They pay extra to jump the line.
• The block gets filled, and only transactions including Person B's smaller amount fit. It's confirmed first.
• Person A's transaction might still be valid, but there's not enough remaining to cover their intended amount + fees. They get a partial payout or nothing.
Conclusion:
Timing and fees, not starting order, determine the winner.
Source : Google Gemini
Someone is going to be angry with this...
Everything is useless, I have tried many predictions like this, none of them worked 
I also tried to predict #66 in a similar way but the ranges I got are still too big to do anything useful. I don't have high end hardware to test the predictions either, and the ranges I got are around 40% of the total range.
Factoring in that most likely the beginning and end of the ranges have been searched already, and doing other basic assumptions, you can reduce the range down but it's still too big.
Furthermore, now I am trying my luck on #130 because why not. It is very unlikely that #66 will get in my hands (or yours) so I just gave up on that.
Factoring in that most likely the beginning and end of the ranges have been searched already, and doing other basic assumptions, you can reduce the range down but it's still too big.
Furthermore, now I am trying my luck on #130 because why not. It is very unlikely that #66 will get in my hands (or yours) so I just gave up on that.
Exactly. I'm also long done with #66.
I'm currently trying my luck with #130 too cause even brute forcing it could be done in less time than #66.
I shared this not with the intent of actually predicting the correct key, but to maybe narrow down the range.
Still, my rig would take one year to search from 290860e0f31602000:291fff00000000000.
Way more if 290860e0f31602000 is used as mid point instead of starting point.
Anyways, sorry if the idea is dumb, and thanks for your answers.
One year would be wonderful, whoever could solve 66 in one year!
e54acb08cf7e7d9be0102e2914d1a4eb643f5df386e67bb4be1bad5a05a53879
A simple empty private address
1EVURWZJW38MzbqHQULons1jWDR34p96hE
There's simply no feasible way to withdraw the funds on lower end puzzles like #66. It will be snatched up by bots. Not maybe, but it's 100% guaranteed. There will be hundreds of withdrawal transactions with varying fees all battling each other. You will simply be left in the dust.
It's a fundamental flaw in this puzzle that was originally aimed to bring the community together and try to solve the puzzle. The puzzle creator did not think much about the puzzle, and this is proof of it.
The only way the original solver will get the funds of puzzle #66 is if they can prove to be in possession of the private keys directly to the puzzle creator. The puzzle creator then withdraws the funds at a 6BTC fee (they can afford it) to your address.
It's a fundamental flaw in this puzzle that was originally aimed to bring the community together and try to solve the puzzle. The puzzle creator did not think much about the puzzle, and this is proof of it.
The only way the original solver will get the funds of puzzle #66 is if they can prove to be in possession of the private keys directly to the puzzle creator. The puzzle creator then withdraws the funds at a 6BTC fee (they can afford it) to your address.
The goal of the puzzles is to demonstrate the strength of bitcoin and so far it has more than proven that.
I don't think the creator cares about the method by which the private key is obtained, whether it's years of brute force, whether it's discovering a pattern or through social engineering, the owner of the private key is the owner of the coins. If there is more than one transaction with the same private key, the protocol designed to resolve double spending will be applied.
End of story
If you dont trust it, just dont use it. NEVER use any exe you didnt compile
Better yet:
- review the source code line by line, if anything seems suspicious or don't understand it, it's likely a threat on so many levels;
- review the compiler, check all SHA signatures for all downloaded and installed packages (use https to get sigs from authors, verify certificates, compare against results on another computer which you never touched)
- dump Windows. You may have viruses already which you never knew about, or ever will.
- clear CMOS / flash UEFI or BIOS and make sure secure boot is on and that you never signed insecure kernel modules to load at boot time
Lastly:
- make sure you protect against RF attacks (keystrokes and such can travel a long way in the EM field). Use a mechanical keyboard and a CRT monitor (not a digital display, pixels can be trapped with a correctly tuned analog-to-digital converter and some decoding software)
- for maximal anti-virus protection you need to also disconnect from the internet, run all software on VMs.
Compile everything from scratch.
Better yet:
- review the source code line by line, if anything seems suspicious or don't understand it, it's likely a threat on so many levels;
- review the compiler, check all SHA signatures for all downloaded and installed packages (use https to get sigs from authors, verify certificates, compare against results on another computer which you never touched)
- dump Windows. You may have viruses already which you never knew about, or ever will.
- clear CMOS / flash UEFI or BIOS and make sure secure boot is on and that you never signed insecure kernel modules to load at boot time
Lastly:
- make sure you protect against RF attacks (keystrokes and such can travel a long way in the EM field). Use a mechanical keyboard and a CRT monitor (not a digital display, pixels can be trapped with a correctly tuned analog-to-digital converter and some decoding software)
- for maximal anti-virus protection you need to also disconnect from the internet, run all software on VMs.
Compile everything from scratch.
Oh! This boy will never do it without a condom!
What if I can open all of them at once? Would that not overwhelm the miners? They can't be watching all of them.
What if I just sweep all of them at the same time? What if I know how to generate all of them, the same way he did? Where I have all of them, all at once? What then? It's like being frozen and unable to walk from the casino to the parking lot just to get back to your car after everyone around you heard you won... How do you get back to your car safely?
I need help and I don't know where to find it...
It's been 3 days now and I still can't come up with a safe way to get back to the mother fucking car...
~K¹
(Does anyone live in Southeast Missouri? I will meet you, pay you, to get this over with. We all know how much is here, you can have 40%.)
What if I just sweep all of them at the same time? What if I know how to generate all of them, the same way he did? Where I have all of them, all at once? What then? It's like being frozen and unable to walk from the casino to the parking lot just to get back to your car after everyone around you heard you won... How do you get back to your car safely?
I need help and I don't know where to find it...
It's been 3 days now and I still can't come up with a safe way to get back to the mother fucking car...
~K¹
(Does anyone live in Southeast Missouri? I will meet you, pay you, to get this over with. We all know how much is here, you can have 40%.)
I think you don't understand what the "problem" is here. What happens here is what the bitcoin protocol is expected to do. What is not expected is that someone can obtain a private key that "does not" belong to them, and that can only happen with the certainty of a certain proximity as occurs in the case of low bit puzzles.
how to find public key of an address which has transactions (in and out)?
and how to find public key of my BTC address which i have private key.
https://github.com/Dedaloo/PublicKeyHuntand how to find public key of my BTC address which i have private key.
Let's assume the mempool is low when you do the transaction for the puzzle. If I send the coins with a fee of .1BTC and someone else finds the private key 30 seconds later and sends the transaction with a 1BTC fee, would they both be in the same block and the first transaction would win because it has an earlier timestamp, or would that not matter?
Double spending in Bitcoin is an inevitable feature of the network, regardless of whether it is legitimate or not. So how do you solve the problem of a conflicting transaction? well, through the confirmations of the miners. And how can we "win" a conflicting transaction? increasing the rate...
In fact, exchanges usually carry out these transactions to reverse a transaction in which the transaction fee was low and they need to make the transaction faster or even unblock a stuck transaction generating a double spend this time with a higher fee.
So this is part of the bitcoin protocol and there is nothing to do. If someone obtains your private address and makes a transaction before it is confirmed, both transactions will "fight" to form a block first, regardless of which was issued first.
It turns out you need to win the lottery 2 times)) first win the private key and then also so that your transaction is included in the block. But what if you choose a moment when the network is overloaded and make a transaction with a commission of 100 million sat? Will this increase the chances or does it not matter?
Why win the lottery twice? This is precisely the problem we are dealing with, this is ONLY for low bit puzzles like 66.
A bot that is sniffing mempool transactions (transactions that have not yet been placed on the blockchain and are stored in volatile memory) gets the public key and in minutes the private key with kangaroo, then initiates a transaction with a commission larger, which has a better chance of obtaining confirmations than the "original" transaction
Let's assume the mempool is low when you do the transaction for the puzzle. If I send the coins with a fee of .1BTC and someone else finds the private key 30 seconds later and sends the transaction with a 1BTC fee, would they both be in the same block and the first transaction would win because it has an earlier timestamp, or would that not matter?
Double spending in Bitcoin is an inevitable feature of the network, regardless of whether it is legitimate or not. So how do you solve the problem of a conflicting transaction? well, through the confirmations of the miners. And how can we "win" a conflicting transaction? increasing the rate...
In fact, exchanges usually carry out these transactions to reverse a transaction in which the transaction fee was low and they need to make the transaction faster or even unblock a stuck transaction generating a double spend this time with a higher fee.
So this is part of the bitcoin protocol and there is nothing to do. If someone obtains your private address and makes a transaction before it is confirmed, both transactions will "fight" to form a block first, regardless of which was issued first.
Friendly reminder that to solve #130 in 2**65.5 average steps you need to store 2**65 kangaroo jumps (e.g. thousands of exabytes with constant time random access).
If we go with distinguished points space goes down, expected time goes up. There's no free lunch.
Currently testing ~ 500 billion tame kangaroos footprints against wilds, I don't really expect a collision but who knows. I'd need like millions of times more storage.
I don't think #120 or #125 were solved by existing (public) software, it just seems unrealistic from a resources / cost perspective. There's something else going on there.
If we go with distinguished points space goes down, expected time goes up. There's no free lunch.
Currently testing ~ 500 billion tame kangaroos footprints against wilds, I don't really expect a collision but who knows. I'd need like millions of times more storage.
I don't think #120 or #125 were solved by existing (public) software, it just seems unrealistic from a resources / cost perspective. There's something else going on there.
Lol, why?
Current speed for a sample of cards using Kangaroo:
RTX 2080Ti = 3,790 MKey/s
RTX 3070 = 3,085 MKey/s
RTX 4070 = 3,900 MKey/s
RTX 4080 = 5,260 MKey/s
RTX 4090 = 7,500 MKey/s
H100 SXM = 13,600 MKey/s
For #120, that is roughly 58 days with 64 RTX 4090s, to solve
For #125, with 128 RTX 4090s, that would be around 163 days, to solve.
The software and hardware is out there.
So you basically stored 500 billion DP 0, tames, basically just printing pubs and privs to a file, and now are offsetting 130s pub by random amounts, and looking for a collision?
For the traditional Kangaroo algo, for 130, with DP 32, I need to find only 9 billion tames and 9 billion wilds to solve. So it sounds like you just stored random pubs and privs, because 500 billion tames, with a decent DP, would take a loooooong time.
Also, you need to perform roughly 2^66.05 "steps" for #130, that would be the average.
But then it's easy! A pair of RTX 4090 and in six months I solve 120 and 125 and become a millionaire???
Unfortunately, I don't think that's the case, for some reason thousands of people have been trying for years...
It is enough to mark the tx as without RBF and the winner gets it all!
Stop spreading bs.
Stop spreading bs.
This is not bullshit, as some others users already mentioning, Doesn't matter if you mark it with or without RBF, the transaction always can be repleaced and that only depends of Node configuracions to accept it or reject it.
The only safest way to move the founds is ask to a miner if they mined your transaction without broadcast it (previously to the block begin mined), also it is even better if you are a miner and you include the transaction without broadcast it before it is mined.
Anyone could do that with current any address with balance and known pubkey.
Not for any address, that is only for low puzzles like 66, 67... maybe up to 80 bit can be solved in some seconds or minutes depending of the program used.
This is only for the next specific addreses:
Code:
66 13zb1hQbWVsc2S7ZTZnP2G4undNNpdh5so
67 1BY8GQbnueYofwSuFAT3USAhGjPrkxDdW9
68 1MVDYgVaSN6iKKEsbzRUAYFrYJadLYZvvZ
69 19vkiEajfhuZ8bs8Zu2jgmC6oqZbWqhxhG
71 1PWo3JeB9jrGwfHDNpdGK54CRas7fsVzXU
72 1JTK7s9YVYywfm5XUH7RNhHJH1LshCaRFR
73 12VVRNPi4SJqUTsp6FmqDqY5sGosDtysn4
74 1FWGcVDK3JGzCC3WtkYetULPszMaK2Jksv
76 1DJh2eHFYQfACPmrvpyWc8MSTYKh7w9eRF
77 1Bxk4CQdqL9p22JEtDfdXMsng1XacifUtE
78 15qF6X51huDjqTmF9BJgxXdt1xcj46Jmhb
79 1ARk8HWJMn8js8tQmGUJeQHjSE7KRkn2t8
67 1BY8GQbnueYofwSuFAT3USAhGjPrkxDdW9
68 1MVDYgVaSN6iKKEsbzRUAYFrYJadLYZvvZ
69 19vkiEajfhuZ8bs8Zu2jgmC6oqZbWqhxhG
71 1PWo3JeB9jrGwfHDNpdGK54CRas7fsVzXU
72 1JTK7s9YVYywfm5XUH7RNhHJH1LshCaRFR
73 12VVRNPi4SJqUTsp6FmqDqY5sGosDtysn4
74 1FWGcVDK3JGzCC3WtkYetULPszMaK2Jksv
76 1DJh2eHFYQfACPmrvpyWc8MSTYKh7w9eRF
77 1Bxk4CQdqL9p22JEtDfdXMsng1XacifUtE
78 15qF6X51huDjqTmF9BJgxXdt1xcj46Jmhb
79 1ARk8HWJMn8js8tQmGUJeQHjSE7KRkn2t8
Other Regular wallets are safe
We will go from being hunters to leeches!!!
...
Stop spreading bs.
Stop spreading bs.
better you stop spreading bullshit. You may mark the TX with RBF or not, it doesn't change anything. The transaction can always be replaced independently if the TX has been signaled RBF or not. Believe it or not, saatoshi_falling is right about what he said.
Anyone could do that with current any address with balance and known pubkey.
No it can’t be done to any address. #66 will be solved within seconds of public key being broadcast, because its range is known. That’s why this is different versus just any old address.
What do you think, brother? Is such a thing possible? Do you agree with what is said?
If so, there will be no point in searching for low-end puzzles.
If two transactions from the same private address simultaneously without confirmations bid, the one with the most confirmations wins... then there is a possibility that the thief will keep your coins, and this is due to the bitcoin protocol itself.