Does the district court in NY have some kind of special powers or something?  I'm not sure where bitcointalk is 'headquartered' or who'd have jurisdiction over any prosecution, but I don't think Theymos operates out of New York.  And I don't think NY courts typically give orders to federal agencies like the FBI--but I could be wrong.

A good VPN with $2.99/mo.

Is that too much for a privacy?

Don't you find interesting that neither my Tor Browser, nor my non-js Firefox had any issues with Cloudflare? I had to force an "all" posts view for Clouflare to kick in.

Sorry, but your conspiracy theories are off topic here.

Tor is now considered to be an infallible tool for blanket anonymity, and to question this dogma means you are “spreading FUD”. This is pathetic.

However, if this is your way of applying for the job, I don't think you'll pass. Work on your anger management first.

Proof it. The forum's addresses are public.

Pick a side: was it spent on toys, or is he HODLing?

I mean seriously OP, did you donate to the forum?  If not, why in the world would you care about the forum's funds?

There's no money coming in, only money going out.

Domain Name: [Suspicious link removed].cloudflare.com
Name Server: brad.ns.cloudflare.com
DNSSEC: unsigned

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted.

Squatters happen everywhere, who cares?  There is nothing stopping websites from being developed on .bit

The closer and more integrated JR and the Namecoin Devs get to integrating .bit into web browsers the more the trolls come out in deep fear!  (The namecoin Core integration has come a LONG way the last 2 years)

Love how much time you just wasted there to not change my descisions whatsoever.

Buy signal - on.

It's clear that with every new development there are coming the envious, even if the latter can do nothing but spread FUD. While they have been banned from all other communities, BitcoinTalk is their last resort where they can keep trolling, that's nothing new at all.

You shouldn't assume I didn't see your FUD a few weeks ago, but everyone embarrasses themselves as best they can! All I can say in response is that you haven't contributed anything to the Namecoin project so far - other than sending merits here and spreading FUD. So on topic, Satoshi is not vinced. Before you keep spreading FUD, you should start reading at the initial post of this thread: Namecoin is a naming system based on bitcoin with a few modifications.  It is inspired by the bitdns discussion. Namecoin wasn't created out of thin air, and undoubtedly Satoshi's contributions were the most important, as cited especially with regard to the proposal of merged mining. Last but not least, just for the readers, it should be noted that Namecoin is a fork of Bitcoin, and the original additional code that made Namecoin from Bitcoin code were just an additional 400 lines of code to define the name operations. "Namecoin", by the way, was just one of the names for the project, and there were other synonyms for the same project in parallel, but I won't go into details here.

I don't care how others are referring to me, but we already had this funny discussion on Twitter/Discord/Telegram. Some contributors joined the Namecoin project in 2015 and you probably wouldn't complain if they were referred to as "OGs", but like I said, I don't care. I joined in July 2018, as you can see on the blockchain. From then until now I have registered many assets as a registrar on behalf of other community members, on May 19, 2019 I opened a huge to-do list on GitHub, and they are still working on the list.

Comments like this have a good reason, and as a side note, unlike some other contributors, I haven't been begging for funds out of the pots of the European Commission, while I would squat silently on a huge Handshake airdrop worth about $ 2 million USD, dedicated to the development of Namecoin, laundered against Bitcoin in the meantime. As declared in the NFT auction notifications, the proceeds from the auctions will be taken to fund the development and maintenance of the new Namecoin DNS apps, which work on the mainstream browsers for desktop and mobile devices in HTTPS mode. Something what the Namecoin community haven't ever seen running until today.

 


I don't believe Uwe Martens' comments on BitcoinTalk meet the bare minimum for inclusion here.  These are completely incorrect nonsense, and he spams his childish Microsoft Word made websites almost every time he makes a comment; the most recent comment alone contained two links.
He not only has no knowledge of the subject, but all of his comments are written specifically to promote his websites, which have nothing to do with Namecoin.

Namecoin is a community-developed open source software.  Uwe Martens, on the other hand, is a con artist who pretends to be a developer by constantly harassing the Namecoin community and spamming his trash websites not only on BitcoinTalk but also on WikiPedia (o_links_are_spam_and_not_relevant]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Namecoin#The_added_namecoi[Suspicious link removed]o_links_are_spam_and_not_relevant).

My opinion is similar to BayAreaCoins', BitcoinEXpress', and biolizard89's, and it will not change in the near future.

This topic should not be about spamming and promoting fraudulent websites.

Edit:
I can't link to the relevant section of the Namecoin talk page on WikiPedia because BitcoinTalk automatically replaces all text that contains the namecoin pro domain with namecoi[Suspicious link removed].  I wish they would also remove all of his comments with a [Suspicious text removed].

By going directly to the Namecoin talk page at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Namecoin, you can see Uwe Martens and his spam that has been removed by WikiPedia admins.

Uwe Martens' failed hostile takeover of the Namecoin project:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Namecoin&diff=1043531325&oldid=1043302032

Nope, without convincing proof that satoshi is vinced, he did not.

He simply chimed in his thoughts in an ongoing discussion about BitDNS, which preceded and is entirely separate from Namecoin. This, along with the most vocal bagholders of re-registered names touting you as an "OG Namecoin dev", are two of the most embarrassing misconceptions in the entire Historical NFT space.

Its great if you want to build on Namecoin but please take your historical revisionism elsewhere.