Search content
Sort by
Showing 6 of 6 results by cynical_observer
It's astonishing that any lawyer would consider walking into court with nothing more than a computer-generated arbitration award bearing a /s/ before a printed name. Judges aren't stupid. Mr. Dhami's advice borders on malpractice.Would appreciate being updated Kanati. Paid my last payable so I have another month to make up my mind.
Considering the Dhami awards are worthless, there's no need for anyone to pay anymore. Who's going to come after you? Tulkas? roflmao Maybe the New York City bar association can track down the invisible Mr. Dhami to find out what's going on. The more people who complain, the better our chances of getting some attention.
http://www.nycourts.gov/courts/ad1/committees&programs/DDC/Complaint%20Form.pdf
http://www.nycourts.gov/courts/ad1/committees&programs/DDC/Complaint%20Form.pdf
Like I said, this is in the end going to have to be a class action format suit against Jam and no lawyer will take a case like this on without multiple examples of fraud...lets start assembling and documenting all of the individual examples of fraud perpetrated by Jam and build a case to present to the authorities first...we will probably have better luck with the authorities initially; civil action for damages can follow after an official fraud investigation is conducted.
I don't know if they still do, but I know in the past that several btcjam employees (including senior management people) were investing in numerous btcjam loans while working for btcjam. I wonder if they also lined their pockets with unpaid loans which is why btcjam is fighting so hard not to give us anything enforceable, first cutting ties with a legitimate arbitration firm and now bad-mouthing enforcemyarbitrationaward.com.
Kanati,
Regarding enforcemyarbitration we advise you not to work with them, they are using our user database without authorization (they got it from NET-ARB from when we used their service) and working with net-arb to enforce the loans, this is a violation of arbitration laws (the arbitror cannot work with the lawyer that is enforcing the award).
I'm verifying with Dhami what this authentication means. They are a separate arbitration firm and we are not allowed to interfere with the process since the loans are made inside our platform (arbitration needs come from an uninvolved third party).
Best,
Regarding enforcemyarbitration we advise you not to work with them, they are using our user database without authorization (they got it from NET-ARB from when we used their service) and working with net-arb to enforce the loans, this is a violation of arbitration laws (the arbitror cannot work with the lawyer that is enforcing the award).
I'm verifying with Dhami what this authentication means. They are a separate arbitration firm and we are not allowed to interfere with the process since the loans are made inside our platform (arbitration needs come from an uninvolved third party).
Best,
Tulkas is talking out of his a** again. I have researched this. There is no connection between enforcemyarbitration and net-arb. However net-arb "cooperates" with enforcemyarbitration to validate awards while btcjam, tulkas, and the invisible mr. dhami all turn a blind eye to trying to help us get our money back. There is nothing illegal about net-arb's cooperation - in fact, it would be illegal for a legitimate arbitration firm not to cooperate.
Face facts - btcjam does not want to help you because it hurts their bottom line.
Tulkas,
I am one of those who received the "spam" you keep saying NET-ARB sent to your user database. Besides the arbitration awards, the only emails I ever got from NET-ARB were about enforcing my awards at Mr. Palley's website. This seems like something you should support if you care at all about borrowers not repaying loans. Both NET-ARB and Mr. Palley are trying to help us. So would you please explain why you are against this and why you call it spam?
I am one of those who received the "spam" you keep saying NET-ARB sent to your user database. Besides the arbitration awards, the only emails I ever got from NET-ARB were about enforcing my awards at Mr. Palley's website. This seems like something you should support if you care at all about borrowers not repaying loans. Both NET-ARB and Mr. Palley are trying to help us. So would you please explain why you are against this and why you call it spam?