before anyone knew the killers name or description. some spotted this guy in blue shirt and noticed something in his hand and just alleged he might be a suitable suspect/man of interest. and even now people still are wondering about this guy and what was in his hand

i simply expelled some notions by just bringing attention to the fact of which side of the barrier he was on, to say he is not part of the random crowd. he seems to be one of the vetted/checked entourage allowed to be on the inside of the barrier. so im sure he was exonerated as not a suspect
obviously video footage would also show the direction and type of killshot was not of one from a close proximity of a small weapon

its not exactly just a assumtion/normalisation of life for life..

for instance if it was a car accident, no motive, no malice, no bad intent. just a bad result due to bad luck, which lead to someones death.. the driver does not deserve 'life for life justice'
if someone chokes on food or has food poisoning due to a restaurant where customer dies. the chef does not deserve 'life for life justice'

many deaths at the result of another person do not deserve life for life justice..

however when dealing with radicalised, malicious, violent people whom have made a intentional decision to kill. thats a different story where the circumstances then lead to the deeper judgement of higher required penalties

but to answer the question about the guy in blue
he was not some random student, faculty, visitor watching the debate. you can clearly see he is on the inside of the area, thus part of the entourage so would have been vetted and checked by security

hamas themselves admit to executing palestininans 'looting' from hamas aid storage
hamas themselves admit to 'taking control' of aid trucks

as for the children
do better research.. the wiki tries to use a haaretz media as source, which uses a "le monde" media story(propaganda) to suggest there were no dead babies.. but le monde admit to this though:

and then later

so even le monde initially began the denial propaganda but then got confirmation that there were dead kids..
then more rumours pushed the unable to identify if dismemberments were due to assailants hands or explosives to pretend yet again there were no decapitated kids(facepalm)

actually he gave a schedule of dates of different phases of negotiations but the week prior to the beginning of the next phase, iran declined to join talks and wanted to push the deadline, and shown signs they disagreed with the terms

this was not some car accident gone wrong leading to death. this was a planned organised sniper assassination, ontop of this it was on a busy university campus, thus causing excess fears and trauma of students unable to have avoided witnessing it first hand, affecting their ongoing studies with worry should any other well known speaker comes to campus or any maintenance guy on a rooftop, etc (people will be watching over shoulder from now on)

so top penalty possible. life means life no parole. and from americas system of having FBI involved is obviously going to be federal level, so death penalty is possible

differing viewpoints is natural, as is learning.

just allowing some uninformed people to continue with some beliefs is where some people go radicalised and want to incite violence because they believe their uninformed belief is so strong that they will get angry with anyone who defies their opinion.
(the type of people that have never been taught the word no, until its too late)
we shouldnt let some people just continue with that viewpoint, we should educate them using data and facts to try to de-radicalise them and make them see sense and a place of open-mindedness, consideration, and teach them to research, understand and process information better, to make better decisions. instead of insisting on their closed mindedness and pretending no one should debate or oppose them

well murder and news should take precedence in news media compared to pictures of puppies and commercial adverts. but yes certain murders get highlighted more whereby others get hidden behind stories of reporters visiting puppies that do tricks

the reason this particular murder is getting attention is because its not a murder that happened on the street. it happened on a train so gets uprated automatically to federal law. which i still feel is weird for 2 murders of same violent method to be treated differently simply because of the transport used.
if the guy followed her and then stabbed her as she was about to get a taxi, he would have only been handled at state level.

the other thing is this violent action is also a springboard for lobbyists to want to push other agenda's

im all for introducing more laws that protect people, without limiting freedoms.. so lets see how the ulterior agenda lobby decide to use this violent incident for their own motives. lets hope the loss of Iryna life brings positive results. and not turned into political game play to harm/limit more people

aww poor guy again taking hamas's atrocities and trying to apply them to israel
hamas want genocide.
hamas execute palestinians for trying to take hamas stored food(stolen by hamas initialy from aid trucks destined for the palestinians)
hamas cut of hands, legs and decapitate. they also rape and kill babies.
look how many hamas killed raped and slaughtered in just one day oct 7th 2023.. then look deeper into how they treat palestinians and hostages since

he cant even do math or use fact. he just runs on the fuel of emotion.. emotion triggered by misleading clickbait media.
poor guy when he wakes up to fact, data and statistic, he too will realise that he will need to cry about moderators of social media cutting away the facts to only leave the lies, deceit and propaganda.

when he realises that the hamas health ministry's own data about the amount of deaths do not reveal thousands of kids dying of starvation but instead at this moment under 130 since 2023(~130 out of hundreds of thousands).. where even the under 130 child deaths related to nutrition deficits are not majority due to lack of aid for months, but instead other co-comorbidities that required special attention, EG kids that just cant eat normal food even if piled up on the table because they have other medical issues of concern(birth defects and such like cystic fibrosis)
lets use a comparison of stats
UK births are 1.2m over 2 years... uk infant mortality rate is 4 per 1k birth meaning 4800
UK has 70m pop.. gaza has 2.. so lets divide all UK numbers by 35 to get like for like over view 4800 /35=137
so not much different compared to the uk health/food supply system
and as said the numbers of children in gaza was numbers supplied by hamas's own health minister

as for general population "starvation".. again israel are main country sending supplies in. you dont see jordon, lebanon or iran sending huge amounts to support their fellow arabs
but the population of gaza still remains over 2m.. if it were genocide via starvation. knowing soneone can die in months without food, they would all be dead by now. but their population remains above 2m..

when he realises its actually israel sending in the aid inside the gaza border, destined to be distributed for free to palestinians.. but hamas ambushing it on route, to feed the good stuff to troops/affiliates as salary/brines. and then sells the rest at inflated markets.. but then he finds out also that hamas are using lawfare themselves to not class it as theft under UN's reports.. even though the aid 'transfered to recognised government' in many cases reaches the destination food aid distribution sites due to ambushes(oops i mean transfers). he will rightfully call out their "lawfare" abuses

when he realises the ~70k war related death over last couple years are not of women and children of innocent palestinians.. but a mass co-mingling of hamas troops, hamas leaders, affiliates, co-conspirers, their families and others coerced, bribed, held hostage to stay around hamas strongholds to be used as martyrs, pawns and human shields in majority of that number.. he might realise the crappy tactics of hamas to cause unneeded death 'of women and children'..

then when he runs said numbers and realise the proportionality of intended vs collateral, is actually seen in the numbers that israel done all it can to minimise collateral casualties compared to other urban warfare wars. he might wake up. and yep again the war related deaths of 70k currently are again hamas's health ministry stats.. even hamas admit the numbers they produce are co-mingled with troops and operational personnel and their families, so the number of true, uninvolved innocents is a low number mixed in with those wrapped up as intended targets
when you work out how many troops and affiliates of military significance kill you will see the left over amount of 'others'(innocents) being a low proportional number

israel send warnings when hamas take over a new residential area for their military operations, israel warn the innocent population to disperse and evacuate, israel create safe zones and declare the area now occupied by hamas as a target zone. after giving time for innocents to evacuate.. but do hamas tell population to evacuate when hamas decide they lik

aww poor lil guy above has no clue..

he cant even do math or use fact. he just runs on the fuel of emotion.. emotion triggered by misleading clickbait media.
poor guy when he wakes up to fact, data and statistic, he too will realise that he will need to cry about moderators of social media cutting away the facts to only leave the lies, deceit and propaganda.

when he realises that the hamas health ministry's own data about the amount of deaths do not reveal thousands of kids dying of starvation but instead at this moment under 130 since 2023(out of hundreds of thousands).. where even the under 130 child deaths related to nutrition deficits are not majority due to lack of aid for months, but instead other co-comorbidities that required special attention, EG kids that just cant eat normal food even if piled up on the table because they have other medical issues of concern
lets use a comparison
UK births are 1.2m over 2 years... uk infant mortality rate is 4 per 1k birth meaning 4800
UK has 70m pop.. gaza has 2.. so lets divide all UK numbers by 35 to get like for like over view 4800 /35=137
so not much different compared to the uk health/food supply system
and as said the numbers of children in gaza was numbers supplied by hamas's own health minister

as for general population "starvation" again israel are main country sending supplies in. you dont see jordon, lebanon or iran sending huge amounts
but the population of gaza still remains over 2m

when he realises its actually israel sending in the aid inside the gaza border, destined to be distributed for free to palestinians.. but hamas ambushing it on route, to feed the good stuff to troops/affiliates as salary/brines. and then sells the rest at inflated markets.. but then he finds out also that hamas are using lawfare themselves to not class it as theft under UN's reports.. even though the aid 'transfered to recognised government' in many cases reaches the destination food aid distribution sites due to ambushes(oops i mean transfers). he will rightfully call out their "lawfare" abuses

when he realises the ~70k war related death over last couple years are not of women and children of innocent palestinians.. but a mass co-mingling of hamas troops, hamas leaders, affiliates, co-conspirers, their families and others coerced, bribed, held hostage to stay around hamas strongholds to be used as martyrs, pawns and human shields in majority of that number.. he might realise the crappy tactics of hamas to cause unneeded death 'of women and children'..

then when he runs said numbers and realise the proportionality of intended vs collateral, is actually seen in the numbers that israel done all it can to minimise collateral casualties compared to other urban warfare wars. he might wake up. and yep again the war related deaths of 70k currently are again hamas's health ministry stats.. even hamas admit the numbers they produce are co-mingled with troops and operational personnel and their families, so the number of true, uninvolved innocents is a low number mixed in with those wrapped up as intended targets

israel send warnings when hamas take over a new residential area for their military operations, israel warn the innocent population to disperse and evacuate, israel create safe zones and declare the area now occupied by hamas as a target zone. after giving time for innocents to evacuate.. but do hamas tell population to evacuate when hamas decide they like a new area as their base of operations.. nope

so many mistakes so many clarifications needed
Isreal never raided qatar. israel never even entered territory of qatar st start a war. nor hit qatar
legally and intentionally israel hit hamas sovereign territory. qatar have no jurisdiction over the land which the compound sits on. it held a hamas embassy thus not qatar land. qatars hands are tied as to what it can or cannot do on that land.

they were not innocent palestinians they were all part of the hamas envoy. a group of jihadi arabs governing gaxa but not to help palestinians, but instead to use palestinians to further a jihadi agenda sponsored by the tehran regime. the hamas negotiators had already declined any offers or suggestions made from israeli/us/qatar negotiators.

negotiations failed before the strike. and im sure hamas will find someone else to talk with the international groups once things get more worrying for hamas. infact once hamas are removed, an ACTUAL peaceful palestinian civilian political party will come to the negotiation table to be recognised as the temporary replacement government until elections are held.

once hamas are gone peacedeals can be met with a replacement political party wishing to govern gaza(aka philitinia aka proposed palestine) from a non military peaceful political group. where the rebuilding and peace can begin

allowing hamas to continue governing and continue practicing their military actions is not a path to peace nor recognition of gaza as palestine. removing and replacing hamas is

qatar also "normalised" relations with hamas.. the attack happened due to hamas
also worth noting.. the compound:embassy/hq/residence to which hamas hides within is not actually terriroty or jurisdiction of qatar.. hamas's own diplomatic and sovereign territory. not part of qatars jurisdiction

isreal did not actually strike "qatar".. it struck hamas territory and property which just so happens to be within qatar.. the intent was not to hit qatari's or declare war with qatar

..
as for "zionist settlement project"
zionism is the pursuit of settlement for jews.. im sorry to inform you but jews settled in the region along time ago.. the pursuit ended successfully along time ago. the zionist program is done and succeeded. making your use of the word obsolete

nope you got that wrong too, yoou are seemingly trying to dilute the term down to make the definitions thinly different

starting war due to disagreement is not genocide
starting war due to disagreement is not genocide even if other side does not surrender
killing each other over a disagreement is not genocide

intentionally wanting the entire race/nation exterminated IS genocide

israel want the removal of a terrorist group from governing a region of territory is war not genocide
hamas want death to all isreali's and americans is genocide not war

no country, including poland cant just shot anything. lets make up a country lets call it "dogwagtailistan" now lets say dogwagtailistan decided to airstrike a 'google street' aircraft or high altitude starlink satellite.. they need to justify the strike especially if its one countries attack on another countries property, the international courts would mediate/judge this

as for individual doing this.. well the height the drones can achieve i dont think it would be some 'individual' shooting it down with a handgun..
,, but when it comes to military actions they need to classify the attack via intel and such to justify the hit on a drone as a military concern. else it could be seen as a declaration of war instead of self defense

most idiots in this forum keep thinking war is just random attacks intent on killing anyone. they dont understand nor want to looking into military strategy, tactics and the rules of battle that determine if an incident is self defence, a military act, a intentful attack, and other such details like if there were any mitigating factors or intel to show how concerning the risk of the target can be.

by ignoring this. they want to exaggerate any and all  attacks as terrorist or genocide or other buzzwords.

update: the FBI have followed a figure of such description from the building to a wooded area off campus.. where he dumped his weapon. so they have reviewed and traced his exit off campus. they are now viewing other footage before the assassination to trace that path backwards and then they will be be looking at further ways to trace him off campus after the assassination. they have a picture of "a person of interest" but not identified the name yet. they have the gun, a footprint and a palm print and are forensically looking into those

the attack was not on or aimed for "qater" it was aimed for hamas..
heck even you admit to know that certain facilities have their own sovereign territory in other hosting countries, which separates them from the hosting country in way, diplomacy and such
as you say one such other example

i have commented on it, you have failed to look into it deeper. you just want spoonfeeds

also the US did not meet with hamas in qatar(face to face). the US did not invite hamas to come to the territory of qatar. hamas were already in qatar for other military coward reasons

hamas leaders operate long term from qatar but only operate in negotiations via phone meaning there is no need for them to be in qatar just to do negotiations
they could do negotiations in the same format from gaza. the only reason hamas were in qatar was they use it for their military operations and have been hiding there for a long period, unrelated to the negotiations

the only means and opportunity to take out these leaders is at their hiding place

if putin was permanently hiding in alaska for years, whilst giving orders on how to fight in ukraine. then the alaska building would and could become a worthwhile military target. much like how many countries hit us military bases, but dont exceed that intent, by not targetting random other sites.

this does not mean they are causing terrorism against the host nation if the only target is that of military interest

israel are at war with hamas. israels intended target is clear and transparent there is not brushing it off.

however some idiots want to exaggerate a targeted attack on a intended military target, into being a form of terrorism against qatar itself.
some idiots also want to pretend that the intended targets were not hit and instead only "palestinian citizens" were hit to try to escalate and exagerate

they need to learn what the word terrorism is. because not every attack is a form of terrorism.

answer:
your single image edit of the ring finger does not mean the entire scene was fake.. just the image you sourced..
many many many other source pictures and videos from multiple sources and multiple angled debunks your single image edit you sourced

the  'Gerbera' drones only have normal fuel load to do ~200m(300km) or... ~400m(600km) "with extra fuelbag"
now run the math.. see how far you get.. literally
definitely not russia -> east to west ukraine-> south to north poland to get to the baltic sea