Maybe they meant to say that this is the first ever Bitcoin course at this university, not worldwide? Even in this case it is a bit too strongly worded in this case too given the prevalence of these courses elsewhere as Potato Chips said. 

You get it. God and other reasons are just excuses for their selfishness and greed. There is no love involved except narcissistic delusions. If one is very poor, then one should not have children.

At this point a stable population would be much better than growing and of course than a shrinking one. Population does not need to indefinitely grow, and there is nothing wrong with short periods of shrinking either.

Then short it or you are just full of shit. Show us your open short positions. 

The problem of today's world is that stupid and poor people are having kids, and educated wealthy people are not. It is a consequence of the welfare state, no welfare or aid should be given to these uneducated parasites.

Of course it should. The only reason why many children are suffering is because their parents didn't consider their or the wider economical perspective before having them. Most people in undeveloped places should have never had children, prove me wrong.

Are you kidding? If you are serious, you are an idiot.

Bitcoin has survived all kinds of crises. There has been crisis after crisis since it has been created. Everything short of WW3 and complete economic collapse. If you believe this is true, then take out a loan using everything you own as collateral and short it with 100x. If you won't, then you are just being an idiot with threads like this.  

Absolutely fucking wrong. There is no need for any game to use blockchain technology, especially not an MMORPG. This is the trick that you have been sold by shitcoin creators.

While this does sound promising, I would like to see the contents of this course first. It really depends on who is teaching it and why.

It should, but I don't think the powers at hand will allow that to happen at least not yet.

I didn't read anywhere that it will be only used for payments, but that payments will me one of the main uses. Where did you see that?

Almost all other stablecoins are junk or extremely risky.

I would not take his word for it, these people are not very committed to anything other than making money. They will say and do whatever it takes to earn them money, they change their public opinions all the time.

This sentence does not make sense.

This is not good for anyone. I don't want to use another network when I need to use USDT or USDC. I wonder what is the real reason behind this.

Of course it will, a lot of the TVL comes from these tokens. If they withdraw them from the other chains, the TVL will go down.

It can, this possibility always exist but it is very unlikely. Why would it? Why does the world need Axie Infinity? It doesn't.

Yeah you are right, I missed that. I didn't expect that to be the case because most spam is in Bitcoin sections. I removed those posts and made my submission down to only 2 posts. Thank you.

Round 1:

1. Re: Will there be an asset more scarce than Bitcoin in the future?
Description: Short analysis of scarcity of top 20 coins on coingecko.
Category: Opinion
Board: Bitcoin Discussion

2. Re: Receiving BTC through wallet pear to pear can put you into problem.
Category: Opinion
Board: Bitcoin Discussion

3. Re: What's Happened to Litecoin and Monero? Are They Still Worth Investing
Category: Opinion
Board: Altcoin Discussion

4. Re: How to survive an altcoin bear market [strategies from veterans]
Category: Opinion
Board: Altcoin Discussion

5. Re: How to survive an altcoin bear market [strategies from veterans]
Category: Opinion
Board: Altcoin Discussion

The risk of this is minor. It exists but it happens very rarely compared to the number of successful transactions. There are many things you can do depending on how unsafe you feel:
1. Use AML tools. Some are free others cost money. You can analyze the coin you received before making a transfer, or you can ask to analyze the coin before the P2P transactions.
2. Decentralized mixing like JoinMarket. Without even knowing if the coins are problematic, you can send them into mixing and hope you get good ones.

In reality you will not be labeled as a criminal as long as you have proof that this comes from some transactions. You may lose the coins for a very long time or forever though. Of course, the same would happen if you received money on your bank account from a very suspicious or dangerous source.

If you are doubting real-world applications, then it is clear to me that you don't understand Bitcoin. Bitcoin's existence itself is the biggest killer real-world application.

You are confusing the location of the problem. This is not a problem of Bitcoin, it is a problem of society. Bitcoin is the best tool that we have ever had, expecting it to fix society is just crazy thinking.

I agree with Litecoin's assessment although it is less relevant now. Why would is use Litecoin when I can use Lightning Network on Bitcoin? Much faster, cheaper and safer.

For this you are making a mistake. All of the reasons you have provided are reason for which one should buy Monero, and not reasons against. It can also be seen as factors that suppress market performance but it is not working that well.

Monero always has demand because of its unique and strong features, it does not need artificial utility.

Do you maybe know where this community is the most active? I don't see much of them on this forum here?

That right there is the primary reason why things are not done against these kind of things. Corruption. If the people in charge were not corrupt, there is no way that they would not want to rule on these things. Who would not want to protect their own kids from such manipulations and dangers? Only a monster..

No. There is only 1 reason why these projects include the word AI, it is to generate hype on an otherwise pretty useless project. TAO for example stands no chance compared to its centralized counterparts. The AI agents you mention? Remember how much hype it generated for a few months and how everyone would be using them? All lies, now it is completely dead. Nobody cares about it anymore, which confirms it had no utility from the beginning.

Realistically you don't need the safest setup of wallet. Let's be honest, you don't have enough money to need this. If you really wanted to go all in, you create something ridiculous like a multisig wallet that mixes several hardware wallets and airgapped laptops. Using this to ever make a transaction would be very annoying. Backing all of it up would be a nightmare and the chance of losing some of the backups is very high. Stick to simple suggestions of prior users such as using commercial hardware wallet.

They are a terrible kind of people. Does one really need to jump off of building and break your bones to learn that it is dangerous?  I agree with you, many of these kinds can't be persuaded and even having them as your friends is bad unless you are on a similarly low level.