As some have pointed out, Remixpoint is not the first company to pay its CEO in bitcoin, nor is Takashi Tashiro the first executive to receive a salary in bitcoin. Not to mention, they are too small a company to be able to create an effect or trend. Just like El Salvador adopted Bitcoin as legal currency, many expect it to create a huge ripple effect and lead other countries to follow suit. But as we all see, it doesn't create any breakthrough or effect. That's why I don't think this will have any important message, or effect.

To create a mass trend of using bitcoin for salary payment, we need world class companies and corporations like Apple, Nvidia to join this movement. Small and unbranded companies cannot do this.

RAINBOW PRINCESS HAS ARRIVED 👑✨

To celebrate the release, we’re giving away 25 FREE SPINS to try it out! 💫👸

Like, Follow & Repost to Enter. Ends in 24hrs! ⏰

Then you're not anymore talking about Bitcoin. You're practically referring to an altcoin, a fork from the Bitcoin network, the original network. But don't call it Bitcoin. You can call it Bitcoin sh*t or Bitcoin 10.0 or whatever.

That's no different from Bitcoin Gold, Bitcoin Cash, Bitcoin SV, and a dozen other Bitcoin copies. But, yeah, it may happen. The possibilities are endless. It may also happen that one day there's a consensus to discard Bitcoin and adopt a meme coin instead.

"when you win , make sure you win big"

The thing is that he was using VPN and it is clearly mentioned on the ToS that using VPN for restricted regions is prohibited.
So the user should have been aware of that before depositing such large sum of money on the site.
I wonder how people deposit such large amount on casino sites without reading their Terms and Conditions.
If BC.GAME is at mercy only then the user might get back his funds and otherwise they are pretty much gone.

My opinion is slightly more harsh than what's already written.
The problem is not the tokens, but the blockchains they 're built upon.
Stable coins are altcoins, so I dislike them immediately. I don't like any blockchain (Ethereum, Solana, BNB, HyperEVM etc).
The only blockchain I like is Bitcoin. (and Monero)

You have a good hint on this, and the more and pressing the demand for it, the more the value, which might later be causing the scarcity-induced price hike. It will be insane by then, provided the demand has become bitting at the time, and not what we still see now.

I tell you, if the total supply of Bitcoin is 50 million, the price will stand at the current level, that is what @Ambatman refuses to acknowledge. So, for now, it is not about the scarcity, Bitcoin is still readily available. The natural value attributed for being an asset itself has diven Bitcoin this far.

My experience with launchpool is bad.

I staked $5,000 for 5 days, I only get $10 worth of other coins.
Then the second time, I staked $5,000 for 4 days, I only get $0.5 worth of other coins.

I joined when launchpool is already widely known, probably the 4-5 months ago. Before that, it looks like launchpool was quite promising, but now it's no longer a good rewarding.

Having 10% Bitcoin holding is not that bad, at least for a beginner and you know, you can increase your holding as time goes on and how well you can tolerate the risk. Meeting up with family responsibility should always come first before investment. Don't be aggressive with investment and abandon your responsibility. What matters is getting started and you're already one step ahead.

Btw, your forum Rank doesn't matter, what matters is how you make use of the rank. In some cases, lower rank account make intelligent discussion than some other high rank users. There's always a chance to grow if you're willing to.

I never insinuated that it was a complicated thing at least not for most. Just saying that based on the experience that some gamblers have had or heard off from other gamblers about how a casino started suddenly demanding KYC after a huge win and they wanted to withdraw

some of these gamblers will prefer KYC at the initial stages before they can even make a deposit if possible rather than the later stages after their huge win.

Yeah a few years ago, I also assumed Bitcoin peaked, decided to sell it all and buy it back cheaper, I think it was when Bitcoin hit $2000 in 2017 or so. And guess what, it never returned to $2000, I think the lowest was $3500 during Covid or during that Nov 2018 crash.

You will never time the market correctly, you will sell way too early and miss a huge bull market like I did back in 2017. Its the same with stocks. Look at TSLA or NVDA, many assumed it would pullback and they rarely did. And those that sold missed out on huge huge gains.

They do allow it, and in fact they have a VPN-instruction page where they recommend VPN countries for you to use and some VPN they recommend you to use. https://betpanda.io/en/promo/vpn-instructions
Their moot is anonymous crypto casino so there's no surprise they would allow their players to use VPN and as they say, they value their players privacy.

However I think they might require you KYC if they suspect you to be fraud or doing something unusual. I think you can't voluntarily submit KYC as I double check it and there's no option where you can submit it.

Many people are certainly sharing your thoughts. Considering the BTC price has reached a new all-time high of $123,000, it's bound to cause a slight correction. Many people are looking to profit from investing in BTC, especially those who regularly trade or invest in short-term assets.

In my opinion, this depends on you personally. The decision is yours. If you sell BTC, there are two factors: first, you can sell your BTC and buy it back when the price is lower. This will be very profitable for you, as your BTC holdings will increase. Second, after you sell your BTC, there's a chance it will rise again, which will ultimately lead to regret and you won't be able to buy BTC at a lower price.

In my opinion, everything carries risks, and you should choose the one you prefer and do further research.

No - from my side because KYC at the beginning is a hassle.

Everything dies at some point. Even the universe probably will. As for Bitcoin, it's currently technologically relevant, but we honestly can't know right now for how long it's going to be this way.
There's also a certain limit on the price of Bitcoin at any given time. The global economy can be monetized, and Bitcoin cannot be worth more than all of the goods and services in the world. Of course, the global economy can grow, but it does so pretty slowly.
It's okay not to set a strict limit on how high the BTC price will reach, but there is a ceiling for that. Moreover, having a target in mind can be helpful to decide when one is actually ready to use/spend Bitcoin, and not just hodl it.

Bitcoin is not suitable for small businesses and small transactions due to fees. You might end up paying more fees than the actual amount you're supposed to pay for a particular transaction. And by the way, adoption is quite different from being used as a legal tender. One can exist without the other.

anyone can do that as long as you have nothing to hide and you trust the casino, making sure you give your documents to only reputable casinos, this will definitely make alot of sense solving all this KYC issue's.

Well, I have to add that reputable casinos will not confiscate your funds without any genuine issue, it is simply not sustainable and IMO, less profitable in the long run . A genuine rewarding casino can earn 100 times for than a dishonest casino.
Regarding handing out your KYC documents upfront at the time of registration, IMO, it is a very good idea, but there is no guarantee that pro-KYC casinos will not ask for additional documents. So all in all, if you are playing at reputable casinos and not cheating, you will enjoy a good experience.

Often we see people predict a Bitcoin price like $150K, or even we see $1M predictions. Let's say Bitcoin reached $1M; does it mean the Bitcoin game ended? Definitely not, but the wrong thing is limiting the Bitcoin price.

We have to remember, Bitcoin is just not an asset or stock; it's a decentralised cryptocurrency with a limited supply. But it was never limited by the price; as always, Bitcoin just created a new history by breaking ATH. When you are capping Bitcoin with a limit, you are putting a limit on something that is always meant to be limitless.

Although the probability that a random referral will suddenly turn out to be a major high roller and can easily reach the 15th rank on the Betfury site is extremely small, it's still there.
James Wynn is a great example of how a referral can be profitable for the person who invited him. By the way, while Wynn was gambling hard on Hyperliquid futures and lost more than $100 million, his referrer made a lot of money on that. If I'm not mistaken, he received more than $3 million.