I ALREADY PROVED YOUR CLAIM THAT THIS SORT OF LINKING IS POSSIBLE TO BE A LIE:
So you are just going to stick to the "Here is one good example, please don't look at the blockchain evidence of all the flawed ones" approach? All caps doesn't make it any less of a stupid argument, you know.
I already proved you are lying when you said WabiSabi coinjoins were critically flawed, remember? You never provided any examples of flaws whatsoever in WabiSabi coinjoins:
For you then to provide a single example which works well does absolutely nothing to address the fact in many cases Wasabi coinjoins are critically flawed. As per my previous analogy, a car manufacturer showing a new model which works well does not excuse previous models which have randomly burst in to flames. This is an incredibly simple concept, so I can only assume you are trolling by continuing to deliberately misunderstand it.
Go on, tell me how Wasabi coinjoins are "critically flawed". Don't hold back, I want to know what's wrong with them.
Again, I'm going to remind everyone that this is a malicious lie: You cannot surveil Wasabi Wallet users, they are made completely private due to Tor and client side block filters.
Again, I'm going to remind everyone that if you use Wasabi, you are literally paying for the privilege of having a blockchain analysis company stick their noses in to your UTXOs.
UTXOs created by
ANY wallet are publicly visible to anyone with a copy of the blockchain,
any blockchain analysis company can see a UTXO exists and view its history no matter what wallet you use.