Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 145 results by BitcoinHoarder
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: [DISCUSSION] What will happen to the "lost" bitcoins?
by
BitcoinHoarder
on 29/10/2024, 17:28:07 UTC
⭐ Merited by d5000 (1)
Given enough time, lost coins will be reclaimed by technology that is able to claim them.  Of course when the time comes non-lost coins will not be vulnerable to the same technology that claims lost coins.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Were you close to throwing in the towel on bitcoin?
by
BitcoinHoarder
on 29/10/2024, 17:24:11 UTC
Throwing in the towel is a product of how many bitcoin cycles you have been a part of.

Propensity to throw in the towel:

0 cycles: High propensity, desperate to "catch up" and no understanding of hodling
1 cycle: Medium propensity, you remember getting a 3x return, somewhat fearful that history won't repeat itself
2 cycle: Low propensity, you have seen an order of magnitude expansion of your wealth, good things can happen
3+ cycle: No propensity, you have seen it all, bitcoin don't care how you feel, life is good
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Merits 2 from 1 user
Re: ELECTRUM BITCOIN RECOVER WALLET
by
BitcoinHoarder
on 09/09/2024, 00:38:29 UTC
⭐ Merited by hugeblack (2)
Why not just make a couple hundred of them yourself?
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: CVE-2014-0160 is putting bitcoin sites at risk
by
BitcoinHoarder
on 09/04/2014, 15:48:28 UTC
That has got to be bug of the century... if not ever.

Implies that for 2 years since code was released anyone running a server using openssl 1.0.1 (upto 1.0.1f inclusive) an attacker could silently (i.e. no logging or trail) download the ssl private key off the server. And then if they could intercept any ssl traffic between server and client they could then decrypt that data (again silently leaving no trace). And could have been doing that for 2 years.

Or have I got the wrong end of the stick here?

This implies that every users need to change every password on every site that was using 1.0.1?

Refs:
https://heartbleed.com/
http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=96db9023b881d7cd9f379b0c154650d6c108e9a3;hp=0d7717fc9c83dafab8153cbd5e2180e6e04cc802
http://security.stackexchange.com/questions/55076/what-should-a-website-operator-do-about-the-heartbleed-openssl-exploit


You are correct, and there are many other ways to exploit the server memory.  For example, it has been shown (and I tested it on my own servers) that you can dump the HTTP headers (no trace left!) and extract session IDs.  You can then trivially use that session id to masquerade as a logged in user.  It's REALLY easy.
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Stuck trying to import my key
by
BitcoinHoarder
on 18/02/2014, 16:57:13 UTC
I don't know why you would have a space before bitcoind but that is irrelevant because you are getting the error.

My bet is that the privkey is bad, otherwise it would work.
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: Satoshi Dice -- Statistical Analysis
by
BitcoinHoarder
on 09/03/2013, 20:50:45 UTC
All bets * (1-.981).  That is roughly how much the house is expected to rake.

Think of SatoshiDice as a laundrer, it returns you 98% (roughly) of your money over time.  Now some people play wierdly trying to "beat the numbers" and they might actually lose 100% of their money.  That sweetens Satoshi's profits.  But as Dooglus has shown, pretty much it's just laundering and taking a 1.9% fee.
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: Satoshi Dice -- Statistical Analysis
by
BitcoinHoarder
on 25/02/2013, 04:10:05 UTC

Just wow!  Bet $0.60, win $38,400.

I hope he won that $38,400 before he had already bet that much in losses  Wink
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Bitcoin API with callback function?
by
BitcoinHoarder
on 15/01/2013, 12:41:44 UTC
If you are developing several applications for bitcoin I highly recommend you learn the bitcoind API.  It does a lot and works really well.  Why would you want to avoid having a local server?  If you post here you will get help very fast.

I will even get you started with this script that sends money in Python:

Code:
from jsonrpc import ServiceProxy

amount = 0.5050
sendToAddress = "1putanaddressheretosendto"

access = ServiceProxy("http://username:password@127.0.0.1:8332")
balance = access.getinfo()["balance"]
print "BALANCE: " + str(balance)
transaction_id = access.sendtoaddress(sendToAddress, amount)
print "TRANSACTION ID: " + transaction_id

How easy is that?  Super easy!
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: y4x.com: BTC awarded on first block that has a bid
by
BitcoinHoarder
on 19/12/2012, 19:18:15 UTC
change the system. Make the Bids 1/10 of the initionbet. So it makes more sens to outbit others Smiley

I already offer a 0.01 initial bid.  You are saying people want to bid lower than that?
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: y4x.com: BTC awarded on first block that has a bid
by
BitcoinHoarder
on 19/12/2012, 12:59:58 UTC
The game has run it's course, thank you to everyone who played, I had a great time writing the scripts to work with bitcoind and the blockchain. 
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: y4x.com: BTC awarded on first block that has a bid
by
BitcoinHoarder
on 12/12/2012, 19:59:09 UTC
Have you changed the starting algoritm? A couple of times the game has started just when I randomly go to the page. Or am I just being lucky?

Hmm.. anyway you woud not need to start the game, if there are no players ;-) You could delay the start until someone refreshes the page.

Exactly correct, I do not send the initial bid until the reveal address is seen by a player.  So imagine the database is configured to start a game at 12:00:00 PM.  12:00:00 PM may come but if the address has not been revealed to anyone then the initial bid is not sent and the game therefore can not prematurely end.  I put this in place so that games wouldn't be started by the initial bid and then ended without anyone ever seeing the address.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: y4x.com: BTC awarded on first block that has a bid
by
BitcoinHoarder
on 12/12/2012, 19:56:46 UTC
Looks like you can win, even if you send your bid a lot later than the initial bid; see round #535:

 http://blockchain.info/address/1Y4nWizG5ebNgUqHyHhbknE1gc2vnReXV

initial bid was made 2012-12-12 17:15:08, the winning bid (me :-) was at 2012-12-12 17:43:42, ie almost an half hour later.

Hmm.. however, I would guess you get better chances, if you bid asap after initial bid. But the difference might be smaller than one would think.

Correct, you can win ANYTIME you have the highest bid in the first block.  Blocks do take a long time, it's not that hard to get 30 minutes or an hour (although it is less common) between blocks.  In your case the initial bid was sent immediately and your bid 30 minutes later both made it into block # 211953.  That's just exactly the game.  The initial bid might be sent and ten seconds later it is in a block or it might drag on and on and on.  You never know.

If you send immediately then you have the maximum chance of getting included with the initial bid but you also have the maximum chance of being outbid.  So, again, that's the game.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: y4x.com: BTC awarded on first block that has a bid
by
BitcoinHoarder
on 12/12/2012, 00:34:03 UTC
I think players see an opponent as a threat more than an opportunity. So if there is someone already made a bid, people tend not to make a bigger bid because they are afraid of losing money. How would they see it more as an opportunity to earn even more, which it actually is? ;-)

Hmm, I think you are right...  Maybe I need to put more time between the pots so that each feel scarcer...  I don't know, I think you have a good point.  If someone has already bid, what is my incentive to bid, I know that someone with initiative is already betting.  If I bet I'm probably just going to get outbid.  Going to have to think about that...
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: y4x.com: BTC awarded on first block that has a bid
by
BitcoinHoarder
on 11/12/2012, 22:21:40 UTC
Okay, I think I have some pretty bad luck - sent 0.100001 btc with proper fees, didn't get in the block which came after 5 minutes... And plus the "initial block didn't get in" happened to me too Tongue



What do you mean "initial block didn't get in"?  You mean initial bid?
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: y4x.com: BTC awarded on first block that has a bid
by
BitcoinHoarder
on 11/12/2012, 22:18:15 UTC
Oh man ...

i did send 0.101 BTC to 1Y4wvaZXLNkSfYC4RCL9ZK4gvSYYFZovD ...
my Transaction got included in the Block, but not the Startingbet!!!

That System is bad Sad

Maybe, last bet in the block afterto the block with the initionalbet should be the winner!?!

Same thing happened to me :

http://blockchain.info/address/1Y4gqnxNJP5UK27EhKoc24AvJQtpKMEnY

This time, the initial bid *did not* have a fee, and it got included 3 blocks later!

Of course, the system tells the rules, so this is a known risk to the player. However, it makes the playing less attractive. I would also prefer a slight change to the rules; the winning bet should be searched from the block where the intial bed is *and* earlier blocks.

But of course, this is my opinion (and ThePok's ?), but  the host defines the rules...

Edit: hmm.. I think I actually won, but I only won back my bet, without the initial bed. And minus fees, of course :-D

Edit2: Here is the transaction where the win came to my wallet, if you are interested:
http://blockchain.info/tx-index/36240968/2487f45d1b3c369b1f493dbe35f00ab0224887f52fe6595ee409cda7a1ed997e


Argh, I just updated my bitcoind and I lost the paytxfee value, so indeed I was not attaching a fee to the initial bids.  This is fixed.  I have sent you the missing .10 that you should have had for the bid and I sent you an additional .25 for reporting the bug.  Thanks.

I am not an advocate of ensuring the initial bid is included for three reasons: 1) It is rare.  Excluding this issue where I wasn't sending a fee, the initial bid almost always get the first block.  2) The player is only losing a potential win, they get their initial bid back.  So yes, you don't get the initial bid but "no harm done".  3) This game is not about winning the initial bid, it's about winning the pot.  If there were more than 1 player on the pot then 99% of the payout will come from the bidding.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: Casinobit - no house edge, 100% payout
by
BitcoinHoarder
on 11/12/2012, 19:22:32 UTC
... to discuss ciphers with 16 year old teenagers that play Minecraft.

It is clear how much competition and dirty promoting exist on these forums since I was met with sticks and stones.

You are lost my friend.  You might see other operators as competitors but that's really not how we see ourselves when speaking to you about issues.  We all want to see Bitcoin succeed and crap websites don't help the community image.  So we just try to help, no one told you to go away.  If we wanted you to go away we wouldn't have said anything and your site would have taken the inevitable plunge to obscurity because your site really is garbage design and won't appeal to people.  Remember most people owning bitcoins are fairly technical and can smell crap from a country mile away.  We don't engage you to have a buddy to talk ciphers to.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: y4x.com: BTC awarded on first block that has a bid
by
BitcoinHoarder
on 11/12/2012, 19:15:20 UTC

Maybe initial bets 0.01, 0.02,0.04, 0.08 etc so people can try martingale ;-)

This is different in that you can win many multiples of your bet (not just 1x like black/red on roulette) if you get in late enough to get the whole pot.  You can only martingale if nobody else is playing against you.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: y4x.com: BTC awarded on first block that has a bid
by
BitcoinHoarder
on 10/12/2012, 22:24:29 UTC
Maybe you could have a less frequent, bigger stakes game? 0.5 BTC every 4 hours or so.

For sure, I like the idea of bigger stakes.  So far I am keeping larger stakes for events... like I am going to have a big stakes for New Years Day.  That reminds me, I should add the New Years stake.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: y4x.com: BTC awarded on first block that has a bid
by
BitcoinHoarder
on 10/12/2012, 21:52:03 UTC
I payed Fee, and one Minit later comes the Block, still didnt get in Sad

That Game makes no fun this way Sad

Its not realy about who bids last Sad

Yes, iam crying loud as a Baby Sad

But you need Happy users, Happy users play again, even if they lose, but in a fair way Wink

http://blockchain.info/address/1Y4TGvLDohNfNkVMKCzt6DJ1G7HEhccdy

You placed your bid 12 minutes after the address was revealed and you are not happy?  That's pretty risky, people who win just place their bid immediately and then pay close attention to whether anyone is trying to outbid them.

In form of an update I added a small amount 0.001 for those who don't want to commit a lot of BTC and I staggered the start time.  So 0.001 starts 1 minute between, 0.01 is 2 minutes, 0.05 is 5 minutes and 0.1 is ten minutes.

Enjoy!
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: y4x.com: BTC awarded on first block that has a bid
by
BitcoinHoarder
on 10/12/2012, 00:44:07 UTC
Sounds like the miner didn't have your tx... or he discriminates against high fees Cheesy

My tx had a lot of small inputs - which is why the default client decided to include 3 times the usual fee I guess.

The miner may have decided it's better to include 3 small transactions rather than my 1 big one.

It just happened again by the way.  This time both transactions had the same minimum fee, but only the initial bet got into the block:
  http://blockchain.info/address/1Y4jkMHYjG8M9GeTgCZvkmsQLdwP9Q9me

In this case my transaction was smaller than the first bet, since it only had one input.

How many nodes are you connected to with your sending client?  Blockchain.info is very easy to get broadcast to because they have 2500+ connections with their custom implementation.  You need more connections to increase your chances to get to miners maybe?