1. We are not interested in the profitability of the casino!
Expect the same standard for casinos. They also don't care about your profits.

. Perhaps you missed the term, 'from casino's perspective' in my post.
No it's "expect the same standard for scam casinos". No retail books operate this way and the large majority of crypto sites don't either.
This has never been an industry standard to just not payout under the guise of valuebetting or arb betting, NEVER.
Keep dying on the hill with the 10 or so scam casinos that have rules against winners in their ToS, really cool side to take here.
if the casino refuses to adhere to fair play, its rating will be at the level of 3 out of 5 with perfect work.
Give them any rating in your own mind, who cares? But your argument is BS if you think you can convince someone with these overly generalized hypothetical scenarios.
The casinos should care, betpanda for example has a terrible rating outside of trustpilot where they have a 3.5/5, which would be a 1.5 if they didn't spam fake positive reviews.
Their casinoguru, askgamblers and general reputation is destroyed. If you google "betpanda" hundreds of scam accusations instantly popup.
This is obviously going to hurt their reputation and will eventually be their complete downfall when they lose potential valuable customers from not paying out small amount of winnings.
So yes, THEY probably should care.
BUT you are confusing the concepts of the future tense and the past!
What this BS, correct retrospective actions are justified in almost every field: stock exchange regulators confiscating funds obtained by illegal trade, bookies doing the same for cheaters, etc. Come on, don't pretend to be so naive and don't argue just for the sake of argument.
Future and past, lol, really!!
This isn't the same at all, once again proving you're just really stupid and have no idea what you're talking about.
The correct comparison would be people betting on a fixed betting match and the bookies retrospectively voiding the bets after learning this, which is completely acceptable.
Betting some +ev lines where the bookies are just not pricing correctly is not the same.
And also try to answer the question, how can I documentarily confirm that my bets are not arbitrage? because I don't know the answer to this question and this is another fact that this rule can be applied to any player as unproven.
Lol, you are presenting like there are thousands of arbitrage betting opportunities every hour

. As I said earlier and no wonder you have not paid attention, arbitrage opportunities are super rare and certainly, you need at least two casinos to exploit the +odds difference. You can easily show that it is not possible to do arbitrage by simple math. If there is a possibility of arbitrage you have to show your bet history from both casinos (hoping that you are not doing that.). Ofcourse, You can create a hypothetical situation (which I am sure you will do

) whre it will be impossible to prove that you were not doing arbitrage betting, to which I have to say, bad luck man. It is like being in the wrong spot at wrong time

Again, let me restate that no reputable casino is built on robbing players.
Yes in fact there is thousands of arbitrage betting opporutunities every hour, they are not super rare and it is just simple math.
Once again proving you are just yapping in this thread without knowing anything, please go watch a simple video to educate yourself.
Again let me restate that you're a moron, 97% of sites do not steal funds, the small percentage that do deserve to be flamed and criticized.