No rush, and have no mercy, just as long as you keep me up in prizes. I feel like I should be doing better in this pool, but I seem to entertain the worst in me here.

Real's season? It is always their season! Any other results are abberations of money nature =)

From the start Rashford's future at Barcelona was questionable, but Hansi Flick remained convinced to loan him out. Hansi Flick even gave Rashford an ultimatum if he didn't perform to his best he would be given fewer playing opportunities. Indeed in the three matches Rashford has played for Barcelona ​​he hasn't contributed.

But in my opinion, it would be better for Barcelona to wait until January to decide whether to bring Rashford back to Manchester United. It's unfair to judge a player based on just three matches. Coaches must give players the opportunity to make a real contribution immediately, so their position in the squad isn't further threatened. Because judging players based on three matches is what frustrates many players, ultimately leading to early retirement. 

Favouring City over United in the weekend derby can't be guaranteed for me, it's going to be a tough game for both sides and I don't think United will be going into that derby looking weak for City. After watching United 3 games in the EPL this season it's obvious there has being so much improvement than what they were last season. The only difficulty they haven't yet solved is ability to be scoring goals that much when chances are created unlike City that has a top 9 like Erling Haaland that hardly miss goal chances.

I'm laughing at Rashford now. It seems every team is rejecting him. He wanted Barcelona, he got what he wanted, but he's a flop there. That's the reason Barcelona wanna return him back to the MU. His chance to play in Barcelona will never come as club is now welcoming him now.

His performance was so bad, and not worthy to be lined up in Barcelona's main squad. I think he can start to think to go to the Saudis or Turkish. No club is willing to sign him at this moment and paid his non sense salary. 

~
Убытки энергетиков
По данным на февраль этого года, «Россети» оценивали ущерб от незаконного майнинга в 1,3 млрд руб. Наибольшие потери были зафиксированы на Северном Кавказе (более 600 млн руб.), в Новосибирске (400 млн руб.) и Центральном регионе с Приволжьем (120 млн руб.).

про кавказ я давно говорю. да наверное можно обобщить на все южные регионы. менталитет. удивил новосиб. я его не особо помню в новостях, если честно. может прячутся хорошо, конечно.

"Вроде как история успеха", а вроде как верить в подобное, себя не уважать.~

There were games that really shocked me with their results, for example:

Lithuania 2 - 3 Netherlands

Honestly, I didn't expect the Netherlands to concede 2 goals in that game, because they weren't playing against a strong opponent; on the contrary, they were a very weak opponent. That was another game.

Turkey 0 - 6 Spain

How the hell did Turkey concede 6 goals? We are talking about a very important game, a World Cup qualifier, but they conceded 6 goals, they couldn't score at least 1 goal. How was that possible? Turkey was supposed to be the second strongest team in that group, but after that defeat, I see them with little chance of qualifying.

Uli Hoeneß on Nick Woltemade’s move to Newcastle: “What Newcastle are doing has nothing to do with football. It’s like Monopoly these days”

I don't think Real Madrid, Barcelona, ​​or Atletico Madrid will drop any points this week. All three teams will win their matches. While Atletico Madrid's match was a bit tough, I think they'll ultimately get the three points because they desperately need them. They played two very poor league matches. This is a chance to forget that.

Look even when Spain is the away team the bookies still give them odds of 1.54, as if Turkey can't beat them, yes it must be admitted that Spain is a strong team that is difficult to beat but that doesn't mean they never lose, I'm quite confident that Türkiye can rely on the advantage of playing at home to get one point or even possibly 3 points.

I’ve been thinking about this for a while whenever I check the lines in different sportsbooks. We all see odds move up and down before a game, but the real question is, are those numbers actually showing the true probability of the outcome, or are they just being adjusted so the bookmaker balances the action on both sides?

For example, if a team is priced at 1.90, does that really mean they have a 52.6% chance of winning? Or is it more about the book trying to spread money evenly so they lock in a profit no matter the result?

for odds converter, I'm using this i found in the internet https://www.aceodds.com/bet-calculator/odds-converter.html

I have bad news for PSG fans...

Two important names are absent for many weeks. They can still handle the Ligue 1 easily but the real problem is the Champions League for them.

The Atalanta (H) and Barcelona (A) games are likely to be a miss for both of them. Dembele is doubtful for even the third fixture then which is against Leverkusen (A).

Maybe another problematic start for PSG in league phase or not?

This is why Guardiola is maybe one of the greatest managers of our time. When they asked him if he might change his style of play, his response was simply  :

“Yeah, after 18 titles I will change my plan, after winning four Premier Leagues in a row I’m going to change the way I believe my football teams are going to play... NEVER, EVER WILL I CHANGE MY BELIEFS IN THE WAY WE ARE GOING TO PLAY!
But, if we regain up the pitch I want to attack quick, when the opponents high press man-to-man and we break the first press I want to attack quick, but after that I LOVE TO PASS THE BALL, A THOUSAND, MILLION BORING, BORING PASSES, I LOVE IT!”



I have to admit, I love this about him. I prefer attacking football way more than the tactical style of, for example, the Italians.

Recently, I'm in roll winning in roulette with a live dealer instead of machine based RNG games.

So I have to ask, specially for those roulette players here, which one do you prefer, a roulette game with a live dealer or a game that is base on machine and RNG? There is this kind of games wherein you are going to play against the machine in most provider of roulette like Evolution.

And what is the reason why you choose it? Do you think you have a better chance of winning against them with you strategy?

In a week, Atletico Madrid are going to face Villarreal home. Honestly it is one of the toughest fixtures in the season for them. Villarreal have started the season solid. Quite productive and strong in defense.  

As a reminder, both of their head-to-heads ended up with a draw last season. While Atletico Madrid are horrible now I wouldn't be surprised if they even lose. Double chance on Villarreal has 1.87 odds. I think it is worth trying.