First of all, it is a pleasure that you post in this forum, I follow you in the DASH forum and your contributions are of great interest, well-intentioned and always looking for improvements, imo. The point is that what is being raised is just another dissimulation about the corpse of the REAL DASH community that the Mnodes robbed and expelled from the project. Without real decentralization, anyway, I don't understand any improvement.

The model is not "a kind of centralization" ... it is centralization, absolute and outright ... in fact, DASH is more like future CBDCs than the libertarian cryptos that forged this space. Instead of being manipulated by politicians, it is done by another small group, nothing more ... but the model is identical: It will be the currency that 300 guys want. A global project in the hands of 2 or 300 people, infinitely less than any shareholder of a company. ... There are almost one million four hundred thousand addresses in DASH. The relationship is better not even considering it ... it would be ridiculous.

An endogamous solution of "voting for that elite" only wants to wash the face of a centralized project ... it does not seek honest synergies or decentralization. DASH was looking for that ... those who hijacked the project were not ... quite the opposite.

Now the DASH "community" can vote for their leaders ... is that it? An ally of a decentralized project does not seek the generosity or condescension of anyone. Seeks synergy and a respectful return to your participation. Generate a huge collective force outside of authority and take advantage of it, nothing more.

Well, for that, it wouldn't hurt to wash your face alone. I hope that the "market" pays for that commercial proposal as it deserves, that is, commercially.

By the way ... it is totally logical that the "outsiders" think that and more if they are supporters of crypto and know the movement / sector, etc ...... but personally, this is my fifth year in DASH and I think the same . And anyone would do it without DASH's fallacious "community" narrative. The DASH community is a couple of hundred people. What anyone understands by community in crypto, people integrated in the project, by investment, conceptual empathy, etc ... does not exist in DASH. They are CLIENTS of an elite that monopolizes the rights and benefits of it. Personally, I don't consider myself a foreigner ... or a "user" of DASH. In fact, I never configured my Mnodes for not collaborating in a hoax. Making money with direct lies, euphemisms or self-serving half-truths is not my thing, I have never done it and I never will ... especially because four too smart guys have come up with it and take on that role. DASH was my favorite project to compete against BTC, which is already impossible to do due to the centralization of DASH ... Anyway, I have made very good money with other projects, I do not need to assume fallacies, or deceive anyone for it. That is precisely why I am in crypto, to avoid the fantastic stories of smoke sellers who want to take advantage of others ... what I needed to get here to assume it.

People who watch Netflix at home are not "the Netflix community" ... that's cheap demagoguery to camouflage an unacceptable manipulation in the crypto world ... and more with "libertarian" statements about being your own bank, etc (For true ... Duffield already exposed it from the beginning with the "remunerated accounts" for micro-holders - Shared Mnodes - of DASH ... but the people all over the world who believed him lost their money and any right or capacity of integration in DASH ... and buying tokens for thousands of dollars). Even if you tried a "popular" poll on Netflix, the community would still not exist. Netflix users don't give a shit how they run that company, just like a telephony server or an electricity provider ... they are CUSTOMERS: They pay for a service, they want to receive it, period. But clients neither run Netflix nor support the work of its executives. The DASH elite choose this profile for those who need to be more modestly involved in the project ... but without integrating them. And they will receive the same ... at best.

Worst of all for DASH is that it will offer services that other projects do integrate into a collective and decentralized movement, without elitist manipulations. To begin with, these projects will respond respectfully, proportionally and in accordance with the purchasing power of each ally committed to the project based on their purchasing power and time of incorporation into the project ... which is absolutely logical and the DASH hijackers prevent all Costa, with the aggravating circumstance of having announced it to the whole world years ago, keeping their money and then marginalizing them. So those who want to get into crypto, join the "free money" revolution, without being controlled by 10,000 politicians or 300 too smart kids ... they will join another project that recognizes, respects, integrates and rewards them, even if their shipments take another minute. And they will commit to those projects like with their basketball or soccer team ... with devotion ... and with the added bonus as well as risking their money.

DASH will never have that. Those who kidnapped the jewel raised by its founder have chosen it that way. An endogamous approach intended to "enjoy" the generosity of an elite is not a collective or decentralized approach. That elite tries to mitigate the consequences of their deception cosmetically, because the appearance, in the context of the crypto revolution, is simply shameful and unacceptable ... but without giving up the benefits of the centralized project, of course.

In any case, the actual decentralization of the project is not an act of generosity, but of survival. The more atomized the governance, the less risk of control there is by large holders of tokens ... or groups of them. You will have to live with it ... indeed, I presume that in a voting niche where 4000 out of 5000 have not yet "shown the leg", the modest Mnodes will suffer the consequences.

 Personally, I will not suffer. Unfortunately, in DASH, like so many other people ... I'm just waiting for a good trade.

YUM, YUM ... 

Only exposure to BTC nullifies Nakamoto's Cannibalism.


YUM, YUM ...

Only exposure to BTC nullifies Nakamoto's Cannibalism.

Oops! Sorry ... I'm not a hijacker of the Dao and the thinking heads of DASH will be deliberating to guide the world with how a Store of value is defined.

Anyway ... you'll tell "... Eagerly waiting to be Enlightened ... and Educated ...!




(BTC will do it ANYWHERE ... you guys keep looting the DAO for "tips between friends" ... Perfect hit, bro!)     

P.S. on the contrary, it is the opportunity to regain ground lost in idiocy, lies, centralization, non-compliance or the entire sample of abuse and obscenity that you have allowed yourself ... and be the first to accept the inexcusable Standard of the boss. After the first ... will be crowds.
Más

It's possible. I always give the benefit of the doubt ... and Duffield's approach, coupled with his insistence on Shared Mnodes, was splendid.

About the thieves who corrupted it, there is no doubt. Fuck themselves ... well screwed.

Angry? LOL  

I'm enjoying, you don't know how much, how you yourselves, out of sheer corruption, have sunk your most valuable possession in shit. The bad thing is the damage you have done to others ... who, in addition, have prevented you from enjoying the wonderful project that seduced them years ago.

Everything bad that happens to the Mnodes is little and totally deserved.

BTC is (officially) an attempt to standardize global savings and compete with FOFOA's famous FreeGold that has been working perfectly since the mid-70s. But BTC is a fiat catalyst, nothing more: Real Wealth is already synthesized at the molecular and molecular level. indestructible ... for what it is insurmountable ... and less for a technological system, which is fragile by definition (not its approach, but its own structure, composition or format) .The volatility of BTC (actually, another system of drainage such as the one that the DAO hijackers want to carry out for particular benefit in DASH) limits it, moreover, as a Global Savings Standard and a cumulative and progressive Store of balue, but at least it is particularly usable while the party is still on, because the BTC leaks are, at the very least, interactive and decentralized. That's why BTC works ... because you can run that fiat catalyst at your convenience, whether you're a wall street millionaire shark or a humble bartender in Berlin. As a fiat catalyst, it works.

The underlying problem of DASH is that it does not respect the wealth that is devoted to its structure (and by extension, the individual ownership of that wealth). It is not a store of value because it is emptied for the benefit of a centralized elite. It is too gross a scam as the retards who wanted to kidnap her ... and have killed her. A pity, because Duffield's self-financing perfectly matched the speculatibo capital movements on it ... but hey, the fact is that it is already too late to rethink that, possibly.

You're a fucking scammer trying to dupe more victims.

Even if DASH receives wealth, she will drain it ... it is like a raft with 300 holes in the middle of the lake. It is an inexpensive perpetual drainage structure.

Don't pretend to be so great ... and keep fucking yourselves. It is little penalty for the thieves disaster you created.

With proportional returns and , ovbiously, rigths,  for ALL supporters, logical and normal view in a real decentralized collective project ... a currency in a position to operate TODAY a global payments network would have millions of commercial agents around all the world. They now reduce the model to looting a Ruined Treasure and begging for 4 coins to promote and expand DASH.

Only being a real moron like the guys in this band can you ignore it. Better 6% of shit than 3% of a real Treasure. Little more to say to that ... they already show themselves.

What revaluation do you assume for BTC during that 7x of the altcoins?

Thank you.

Well , then ... complain to RTaylor, not to me.  And do not look for cheat adaptations or disguises ... they are transparent and open approaches from the beginning ... no second readings.

Anyway... i also assume that you will not have a single DASH ... liable to be sanctioned by the SEC.

Don't be dramatic, man. Good design right from the start is a lot of headaches.

Have a good weekend. 

Ho,ho,ho...  ...No. A crypto with "independent" extensions...like the Cayman´s DIF.

If you think you're going to bang the most perfectly designed extractive machine in history bare-chested with the "intrinsic value" that a gang of retarded men can generate that get knifed for half a fucking penny, you're pretty screwed. Great evils, great remedies.

BTC was cannon fodder without Tether to face infinite fiat. The only mistake was to make up his speech. But you don't go to war loaded with roses, my friend. And DASH, without a system of reception, retention, accumulation and progressive increase of INALIENABLE wealth ... will not win even your beloved DogeCoin.

You see ... your thesis is worth doing pirouettes in the air ... do not complain about a lack of synergy and collective spirit. 

Even what is indicated in red I can read [/ b] [/ color] ... because I have exposed that ... you only try to link it to production, which is different. [/b]


"Miners do not create SCARCITY, even if you try this deceptive association of ideas with dissimulation. They are supposed to automatically transmit a production cost to the mined token (which is also not correct per se) ... because attention! It is only so if the token is UTIL, if it is in demand "

I'm trading BTC ... and maybe later break down your post (to hit that hard head that you don't want to open  ) ... although everything will lead to separating the factors that you try to associate in a set that does not exist.

The Reserves model that I propose DOES provide a transfer of real wealth. You're not stupid ... and you can't help but see it. And you can't help but see that without decentralizing DASH, the next victims are you, the MNodes, as vulnerable to a hyper-concentration model ... as everyone else.

As long as there are other means to produce a DEFAULT supply increase, that statement is not correct.

If the technological leap that CORE "sells us" is true, the marginalization of miners is not an attack on the DASH economy, but on its governance. It could represent an added value compared to the competition ... it could be.

I insist: The madness is not that the miners see their rewards diminished, that is at least debatable ... but that a cut in general expenses is oriented to private benefit and not to the general benefit of the project. That's the problem.

LOL  

What a phony you are!

I mentioned SCARCITY to you three times in a row in the quote before your perpetual juggling and sleight of hand with an association of ideas that is not real. Of course ... you missed it ... because it dismantles your fallacies (the same ones you are trying to slide now).

Miners do not create SCARCITY, even if you try this deceptive association of ideas with dissimulation. They are supposed to automatically transmit a production cost to the mined token (which is also not correct per se) ... because attention! It is only so if the token is UTIL, if it is in demand. If it doesn't, you repeat the Keynesian stupidity of creating wealth by digging a ditch ... and then increasing it by covering it. That is typical of intoxicants and / or retards like Krugman or you ... who start from an economic premise in which cryptos have "intrinsic wealth" (a statement that you overturn in the second line of your pseudo-economic sermon ... and the one that I didn't need to go through later) ... and that is a real clown. Shitting 20 times and wiping your ass as many DOES NOT CREATE WEALTH. Precisely because you invest effort / work / costs ... in tasks WITHOUT VALUE, which will not retain those costs in the monetary asset created.

If your token is not scarce, that is, if the market does not demand it to install it at that juncture, increasing the supply will make it more abundant and less valuable, whether the miners or their grandmothers do it. The production costs will be a direct problem for the producers ... and they will not be automatically transmitted to the currency created / making it an indirect problem of the Mnodes) ... precisely because it has no intrinsic value, since its value is diluted in a market who despises that asset and discovers a ridiculous price compared to your different forecasts (both incorrect and worthy of real idiots disappointed because their "rain dance" does not work).

The DASH token is not in short supply because neither the mining nor the "rich" that xkcd desperately awaits - as well as the centralized layer of parasites that wants its elitist profile to be enough to create scarcity and thus support and project the price of its asset - they replace an actor that, in your mindless greed, you have marginalized and eliminated ... and that already existed, just as it exists in BTC: The Micro-HOLDERS, who covered a totally necessary and inexcusable demand for that task. We return to the same thing: The goat that you fucked and slaughtered ... NO LONGER MOVES ITS PELVIS from her, once dead. Is it really that hard to understand, kids?

Only an action that does not admit your imposed idiocies will be able to reverse - except for eventual pumps - that descending situation and without solution. Meanwhile ... it's time to laugh at how you sink the value of your own wealth into shit. Without a fork to overrule such a herd of retards, there will be no logical reorientation to this nonsense.

And as new resources, such as the blocking of tokens for the reservation of names in the new platform ... they are not accompanied by any objective and authorized estimate of that demand - example: an external audit - ... you will continue betting the value of DASH to the lottery. The show is pitiful:

- A lobby wants to perpetuate its parasitism by proposing the improvements for the mainnet as necessary.
- Another, blocking them ... and waiting for an army of rich idiots to throw their capital into a suicidal price trend.
- A fool, try to fool the rest with kindergarten fallacies.

You are going to pay for the perpetual inbreeding of your successive attempts at monopoly, with blood. You have already done it miserably in the ass of others, with traps, like the scammers that you are ... now, the spanking in your asses is worthy of open-mouthed laughter.

Which is not little fun ... and, yes, authentic poetic justice. Meanwhile ... the REAL DASH community, outcast and scammed ... to lower their buy stops accompanying this museum-worthy moron harakiri, patiently.

Cross the feet on the porch table, with a cold beer ... and wait to see how the corpse of thieves passes in the street.  

Beyond sarcasm ... what's your theory on that?

The problem is the Shared Mnodes ... that crash was the real qualitative leap in the chain ... Greedy leap into the void that changed the entire DASH model. The best model to cause a network effect.

The miners' thing is just another overreach of the Mnodes on their centralized toy. Claiming that this causes the fall of a price that already broke shitty records from ATH, before being implemented, but not even suggested, is a cheap trick of a troll who wants to disguise his tax losses so that the situation that exacerbates them be changed ... but keeping the centralized corruption framework that destroys the project, nothing more. So it doesn't add shit, it's just the umpteenth twist of a sickly and destructively greedy vision in which this gang of morons is imprisoned.

The new Platform generates new returns, token locks, etc. ... new resources for the shortage of monetary assets. The problem is that the 200 corrupt DASH hijackers want to continue monopolizing the exploitation of the project: If they nullify the network effect, it simply won't work in a crypto revolution that envolves the world rigth now . However, if they decentralize it, if they share and open the project, the shortage will be enormous. And interestingly, with themselves as beneficiaries for their overwhelming disproportion in token ownership ... which makes their volunteer harakiri even more surprising and mindless    ...a real world record for nonsense . Such dysfunction only fits after the intellectual claustrophobia in which they have been installed for years since they "discovered" what they believed would be the philosopher's stone of their "perfect robbery": That neither is robbery ... far from it, perfect, only destructive garbage in the one that everyone loses.

The enrichment prospect must go through token revaluation ... it's that simple: Returns shouldn't be the basis of your greed ... it's stupid blindness. They want to catch success in crypto in front of 3000 projects that aspire to the same, but stupidly and stupidly renouncing a tailwind that those other 3000 projects dream about ... synergy that DASH already had and which it despised believing that a division among a few would compensate the equation.

And the answer couldn't be clearer: To hell and no brakes on a Mark Mason rollercoaster cart.

The key to DASH's projection is first in a shortage, shortage that can become unmeasured again ... and second - and Rtaylor is right in this - in generating OFF CHAIN ​​benefits that further expand the crypto ecosystem ... that transcend that crypto project to the real economy - The DIF is the key, Rtaylor knows it and its movements in that sense, creating an extension with the ability to channel funds for it, are positive - in the event that the fiscal move is correct before the regulator that conditions DASH's movements -.

The last quarterly call of 2019 finally exposed the implementation of Shared Mnodes ... let's give the benefit of the doubt and accept that it was not the umpteenth cosmetic attempt to deceptively attract followers. Mr. Taylor: Free yourself from this legion of unconscious subnormals who can't see beyond their noses and unleash the best project in the ranking with a Fork. You will fly to infinity and beyond and you will recapture your pompous speeches from 2017.

These idiots, if they were to marry Miss Universe, they would have her at home tied to the leg of the table and swelling her statuesque body with donuts and beer and her Madonna face with depressive dark circles. Not one more minute of care or hope for them.

Obviusly, theres nothing to claim, they are two different proyects and matters.

Obviously, a fork should build its own Reserves. That is Duffield's huge contribution to crypto: The possibility of financing the project by snatching the excuse of monetary emissions from the miners (RTaylor wanted to amplify it by stimulating general interest funds, which are those that contribute to the general reinforcement of the project ... and the Mnodes only increased their share, condemning the vocation of decentralization and collective enrichment, as in the case of the marginalized Shared Mnodes contemplated by Duffield).

Elitist parasitism in DASH stems from a part of its structure, conceived to administer the project management and its rules ... and which has falsely derived its role towards an orgy of private profit). Duffield conceived DASH as an economic structure controlled by its members ... but did not pay attention to the possible corruption of one of its parts, which, by blocking the enormous decentralization that a legion of micro-holders would bring, hijacked the project and its spirit of synergy. collective, which was what gave it absolutely limitless projection of expansion and adoption as consensus money, which is what these retardeds underestimated, believing that DASH's wealth was raining from the sky.

Amputating that collective projection that Duffield understood perfectly, they cut off the head of that insurmountable approach. Now these idiots are looking for that tailwind in "technological excellence", "user usability", "sale of monopoly rights" - the famous "rich" of @xkcd - and other pathetic attempts ... that of course, they will never match the tremendous power of the original approach of the project, because DASH does not attract support or to forward a twit ... as is logical and normal.

It is the price of turning a collaborator with whom to share ... into a client with whom to enrich yourself ... who obviously will not contribute their money for such stupidity. On the charts against BTC you have the most explicit graphical representation of how crypto receives that "conceptual fallacy". Literally, ignoring it, even being a supposed "improved BTC" (the biggest improvement of DASH over BTC was already expressed before any technological optimization ... and it was that DASH was a BTC self-controlled by its followers and also, distributing dividends. Simple tean not be understood by the elite who hijacked DASH gives a perfect measure of their neural capacity.

People who long to win back the consensus money that the global elite has stolen from their citizens are not looking to feed new parasites ... even if they change their suits. (Yep yep ... those narcissistic morons who publicly declare that "The Mnodes are like the Fed" ... and then laugh at the "vileness of their occurrence").

What is snatched by them is the first thing to retrieve a fork of DASH.

That is a perfectly valid resource, more in front of the influence of BTC on the rest of cryptos. In fact, it is the way the DIF is effectively safeguarding its available resources.

This is all so simple and obvious ... and your gratuitous sermons (and previously, the endorsement of your assertions with monosyllables that meant nothing) are so out of place, that I can't help but understand perfectly that your trolls and tax interest
  poorly concealed they preside over each of their posts.

Who can be surprised, in those terms, of the unfortunate disaster that this jewel has suffered.