Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 3,170 results by evoorhees
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: Shapeshift giving away $10 dollars?
by
evoorhees
on 10/09/2019, 02:00:07 UTC

It is a very funny promotion.

KeepKey ( price is $79.00 )

source: https://keepkey.myshopify.com/products/keepkey-the-simple-bitcoin-hardware-wallet

Trezor ( price is $65 )

source: https://trezor.io

People will need to have funds to trade

People will have to go through KYC which means handing over passport, income statements and proof of residence (In my country passport price is $60)

just to earn $10? I don't know if their marketing department believes this to be a good thing, but in my opinion I don't see it as a good thing.

  • The goal of the promotion wasn't to get someone to buy a whole new hardware wallet, it was for those who already have one
  • If you do want a KeepKey, you can use code "genesisfox" on Shopify to get 50% off (add coupon in the checkout process). https://keepkey.myshopify.com/
  • You don't need passport, income statements, or proof of residence.  For US you need only name, phone number, last four of social, and address. For non-US you need that plus a scan of your driver license or passport.

Enjoy! Try it at beta.shapeshift.com
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: Shapeshift giving away $10 dollars?
by
evoorhees
on 10/09/2019, 01:53:34 UTC
ShapeShift doesn't service US customers anymore, so I won't be taking advantage of the promotion.  I bought a Keepkey not too long ago and didn't realize the wallet was linked to ShapeShift--that seems ridiculous to me that a hardware wallet should be dependent on an exchange.


CEO here...  We definitely do service US customers.  Your KeepKey can be used in multiple ways:  we recommend you try it with the new beta.shapeshift.com platform, but you can also use it with the original KeepKey chrome client.  Would love to know what you think!

The platform UI...
Post
Topic
Board Services
Re: Bitcoin 100 has run its course. This is the rebate thread.
by
evoorhees
on 24/10/2016, 23:31:58 UTC
Hey Phinnaeus Gage,

Blast from the past! Smiley  I haven't been here on the forum in forever, and I've abandoned /r/bitcoin as well, so now I'm like a Bitcoiner without a home... an orphan lost at sea.

But that's okay, I get to see most of the good ones at conferences/events still. Hopefully you and I can perhaps meet some day.

Thank you for putting together the Bitcoin 100, and for winding it down in such a professional manner. You can send anything of mine to:  1HRLDNg1jZrHqeYQudiePjhTk68XHsuaYB

See you at the moon, my friend.
Post
Topic
Board Service Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ShapeShift.io - Instant Coin Exchange - No Account Needed
by
evoorhees
on 17/12/2015, 19:21:53 UTC
I use your service to convert my altcoins to bitcoins but I am not happy with your high exchange fees
There are no fees, only spread...

...or am I wrong?

You're correct, it is a matter of spread, not fees. Users get exactly the exchange rate shown on the site. To get better rates, you should always put in a "Specific Amount".  Since many of these coin markets are thin/illiquid, there is friction in converting between them, and some people incorrectly believe it is a ShapeShift "fee."  We've struggled with how to communicate this effectively to users.
Post
Topic
Board Project Development
Re: Python script to autotrade between wallets and shapeshift
by
evoorhees
on 30/11/2015, 15:49:34 UTC
Awesome!  If we can help in any way, please let us know. You can reach me directly at erik at shapeshift dot io
Post
Topic
Board Service Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: ShapeShift.io - Instant Coin Exchange - No Account Needed
by
evoorhees
on 24/11/2015, 00:59:53 UTC
Hi, i think shapeshift have a problem handling txid with more than one transaction, it is a problem to people who uses web wallets or faucets doing batch payment
example= if two people send money shapeshift using the same txid  only one exchange will be done

, there are some official statement about it or some way to fix it?


thanks


Correct - TXs only work when one output per tx is a ShapeShift order. If two or more outputs are two different ShapeShift orders, it will not work. We may change this in the future but for now that's how it operates.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: FeedZeBirds UPDATE Feb 9, 2013
by
evoorhees
on 14/01/2015, 00:14:16 UTC
The website was live and operational - how do you think that happened without "conducting business?"

I recall using FeedZeBirds to create a campaign and fund it. There were technical difficulties and the ads were never tweeted or even displayed on the site. I contacted support multiple times for either a refund or a new campaign. My emails remain unanswered. Is that what you meant by "live and operational?"

I'm sorry you had that experience, it must have been after the site went down. I am probably to blame for that. It was working quite well for a number of months, and there were hundreds of tweets sent (each unique tweet being a customer), with thousands of retweets and hundreds of thousands of people reached by the ads: https://twitter.com/FeedZeBirds

By the way... if anyone would like to rebuild the service (using the name or not), I'd be happy to see it live again. I think with a team that executes better than we did, it could be a success.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: FeedZeBirds UPDATE Feb 9, 2013
by
evoorhees
on 13/01/2015, 23:38:11 UTC
First, investors don't get "paid back" when a business fails. I didn't take on debt from the investors with an interest rate and repayment terms.  

Yet, we have NO records that this business actually conducted business (no bills, receipts, invoices, etc.).


The website was live and operational - how do you think that happened without "conducting business?"
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: FeedZeBirds UPDATE Feb 9, 2013
by
evoorhees
on 13/01/2015, 22:23:02 UTC
It is always the exact same story with EV, blame everyone but himself. I cringe every time he presents himself as a figurehead for bitcoin considering his trademark lack of character and selfishness.

Even in his little 'sorry you're screwed' message, he slips in that he accepted BTC and is sorry he can't payback the USD. BTC should payback bitcoin, you psychopath.


Calm down kingcrimson. I'm absolutely to blame for the failure of FZB, and for the poor communication after it fell apart.

Now, "BTC should payback bitcoin," you say. First, investors don't get "paid back" when a business fails. I didn't take on debt from the investors with an interest rate and repayment terms. I took on investment in return for shares of equity. Second, it's absurd to say "BTC should payback bitcoin" unless there is some specific clause in an agreement specifying such.  When you invest or contribute property to something, there is a value of that transaction, called consideration. It would be same if you used dollars or gold or wheat. This concept is not new, and whenever business deals are done, the value of the consideration provided is how restitution or damages are calculated.

You will not find a single example in business case law where a debtor (and this wasn't even a debt situation, as described above) was required to pay back "in kind" instead of based on the value of the consideration, unless an explicit clause in some agreement stipulated that was to be done.

And something tells me that if the bitcoin price had fallen, and Bitcoin was $0.01 each now, that if I paid back the bitcoins to the investors, you would be here railing on me for not paying back the "real value", the USD value, of the investment.

Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: FeedZeBirds
by
evoorhees
on 13/01/2015, 22:09:00 UTC
"Flying private planes with convicted money-launderers".... wow.  Reality: friend has a prop plane, offered to fly Charlie and me to San Francisco from Phoenix after a payment conference. I chose to take that free transportation instead of paying $400 for a commercial ticket.  

I'm sorry I can't provide receipts for the spending of $15,000 raised... it didn't get very far. A couple months dev work, six months of web hosting, and a few grand on advertising. It got spent, the business wasn't earning significant revenue, we closed it down. And then the SEC took $15,000 more from me.  So investors are out $15k net, I'm out $15k net, and SEC is up $15k net. Again, I'd be happy to work with the SEC to transfer the $15k they got back to those who should get it - the shareholders.  That option was not permitted.

No receipts for the web hosting? Not even emails? A few grand on advertising? Where exactly did you advertise?

I understand you're frustrated with the SEC. I've dealt with them too. But the fact that you WERE fined $15k for this, even though you've retained one of the most prominent attorneys in the space, leads me to believe that you aren't disclosing everything.


It was very foolish of me not to keep receipts/emails of that stuff for obvious reasons. Those complaints against me are legitimate and I don't have a good excuse for it.  

Advertising was done on OperationFabulous, A-Ads, and I think CoinURL. A few grand will get you a month of heavy advertising in those channels... it's really not much.

When you say "you WERE fined $15k for this," it's important to define what "this" is. I was fined for failure to register the securities with the SEC. It was not a fine for fraud of any kind, nor were there accusations of fraud from the SEC. I didn't get permission from them to do what I did, and so they took money from me and made life hell for a while.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: FeedZeBirds
by
evoorhees
on 13/01/2015, 19:53:51 UTC

I'm not sure what I can do at this point to satisfy any of the understandable bad blood that has happened regarding FeedZeBirds. The list of shareholders I received a while back was incomplete to a fault, only covering about 1/4th of the shares sold. A number of people who contacted me claiming to be shareholders were not even shown on the list. I have no idea why it was so messed up or how GLBSE didn't have proper records. There is thus no way to figure out who actually was a shareholder. If someone has a verifiable list, please send to me.

There is no good news here. I am sorry that FZB failed, both as a business and an asset. I wish that the SEC would give the $15,000 they took from me back to the shareholders of FZB, but they, like myself, can't figure out who they are, and the SEC wouldn't do that even if they could (you know, because they care about shareholders).  I am also very sorry for my inability to even provide updates on this topic over the past couple years. Everyone has been in the dark, the whole situation sucks, and the only party who benefited from any of this is the SEC.

I have a few lessons I would love to share with the community regarding crypto-equities after my experience with SatoshiDICE and FZB, but again, because of threats from the SEC, I can't.

Keep innovating and building. I'm sorry I let you guys down on this one.


Perhaps you can show shareholders some receipts or a blockchain trail concerning the FeedZeBirds project......flying private planes with convicted money-launderers looks very suspect when you claim that all the funds went to "build,run, and market" the site. Especially when the photo was taken just days after the GLBSE went offline.


"Flying private planes with convicted money-launderers".... wow.  Reality: friend has a prop plane, offered to fly Charlie and me to San Francisco from Phoenix after a payment conference. I chose to take that free transportation instead of paying $400 for a commercial ticket. 

I'm sorry I can't provide receipts for the spending of $15,000 raised... it didn't get very far. A couple months dev work, six months of web hosting, and a few grand on advertising. It got spent, the business wasn't earning significant revenue, we closed it down. And then the SEC took $15,000 more from me.  So investors are out $15k net, I'm out $15k net, and SEC is up $15k net. Again, I'd be happy to work with the SEC to transfer the $15k they got back to those who should get it - the shareholders.  That option was not permitted.







Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: FeedZeBirds
by
evoorhees
on 13/01/2015, 18:49:50 UTC
Hello thread - wanted to post this here and address a few things. Recently mentioned by someone on Reddit:

Quote
Hey Erik, before you pump out another one of these 2,600 word diatribes calling out someone for accusing bitcoin of being a scam, why don't you stop by your thread on bitcointalk and address your former FeedZeBirds shareholders, where you raised 2,452 BTC (illegally), did essentially nothing, promised a (partial) refund, and then disappeared:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=82866.msg1741669#msg1741669
While it's great that someone wants to stand up and defend bitcoin from these kind of attacks, when the person doing the defending himself is accused of scamming it just makes you and the rest of us look dumb.

A fair criticism I suppose, my response:

Quote
[–]evoorhees The money raised for FeedZeBirds totaled about $15,000 (and yes, it was converted to USD back then because there were costs to build, run, and market the site). The business failed, and GLBSE fell apart, so there was no way to know who the shareholders were. SEC commandeered $15,000 from me... I would've preferred to give that $15k back to the shareholders of FZB (if they could be found, which they can't), but the SEC didn't give me that option, and while I was struggling with the SEC I was advised not to discuss anything publicly, thus the lack of updates, which I apologize for. If anyone would like to start a campaign to get the money back from the SEC, I'd love to signup. Edit: feel free to read the SEC settlement as well: http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2014/33-9592.pdf

I'm not sure what I can do at this point to satisfy any of the understandable bad blood that has happened regarding FeedZeBirds. The list of shareholders I received a while back was incomplete to a fault, only covering about 1/4th of the shares sold. A number of people who contacted me claiming to be shareholders were not even shown on the list. I have no idea why it was so messed up or how GLBSE didn't have proper records. There is thus no way to figure out who actually was a shareholder. If someone has a verifiable list, please send to me.

There is no good news here. I am sorry that FZB failed, both as a business and an asset. I wish that the SEC would give the $15,000 they took from me back to the shareholders of FZB, but they, like myself, can't figure out who they are, and the SEC wouldn't do that even if they could (you know, because they care about shareholders).  I am also very sorry for my inability to even provide updates on this topic over the past couple years. Everyone has been in the dark, the whole situation sucks, and the only party who benefited from any of this is the SEC.

I have a few lessons I would love to share with the community regarding crypto-equities after my experience with SatoshiDICE and FZB, but again, because of threats from the SEC, I can't.

Keep innovating and building. I'm sorry I let you guys down on this one.


Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: FeedZeBirds UPDATE Feb 9, 2013
by
evoorhees
on 29/11/2013, 23:30:34 UTC
I have not forgotten about FZB.  A new site has been built (it is already working). I was not thrilled with the aesthetic design, however, so I am searching for a front-end designer to make it prettier. I also need to find someone to run the site. Regarding shares and ownership, I am in talks with a certain platform to explore listing (new shares wouldn't be sold, but anyone who had shares originally would then have a liquid market to cash out if they wished, etc.)

I am sorry that the project has been in the dark so long. I don't have good excuses or reasons for this other than that I'm overstretched, so again, I apologies for the delays - it is not fair to the original buyers and this is my responsibility to resolve. And resolve it I will.  If any of you know of good candidates for either front-end design work or for actual operations and marketing once it launches, please PM me (or ping me on skype: evoorhees)

Thank you

 
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin Omega Scholarship
by
evoorhees
on 29/11/2013, 15:20:01 UTC
I'd like to contribute. Please mark me down for 1 BTC for now.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: SatoshiDICE Tribute - Fast and Fierce Social Dice Gaming
by
evoorhees
on 31/10/2013, 16:16:12 UTC
Congrats on the launch guys  Smiley
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Is anyone worried how fast BTC is climbing in price?
by
evoorhees
on 21/10/2013, 22:35:26 UTC

But long term this rally is unsupported by anything "real".   I'd love for this rally to be occurring on the heels of the announcement of new bitcoin technologies or some larger retailers or Paypal implementation, etc.

http://www.coindesk.com/chinese-internet-giant-baidu-starts-accepting-bitcoin/
Post
Topic
Board Legal
Re: Good news regarding Bitcoin and VAT in Sweden
by
evoorhees
on 21/10/2013, 21:40:03 UTC
Great work Smiley
Post
Topic
Board Wallet software
Re: How to build a Hive app (introducing the Hive app API)
by
evoorhees
on 18/10/2013, 14:19:12 UTC
Great job mate!
Post
Topic
Board Meetups
Re: [Montreal] Bitcoin Embassy's second official meetup. September 21st 2013
by
evoorhees
on 23/09/2013, 17:06:48 UTC
Awesome! Kinda wish I lived in Montreal! Smiley
Post
Topic
Board Goods
Re: Anonymous reloadable EUR/USD/GBP VISA cards with own bank account
by
evoorhees
on 22/09/2013, 21:31:00 UTC
Hello,

About a week ago I ordered one of these USD cards via BIPS. I received it today, but everything is in Polish and I have no idea how to activate or fund it Smiley  I went to the bank's website, but again, no idea what to do and I don't want to screw something up.

How do I find the bank account information of the card? (routing and account numbers, etc)