Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 357 results by Bluedrem
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: Test Cricket Prediction and Discussion Thread [self - mod]
by
Bluedrem
on 09/09/2025, 06:03:30 UTC
South Africa A vs New Zealand A, 1st Unofficial Test match New Zealand A team scored 607 runs in 128.5 overs for the loss of 7 wickets in the 1st Innings. 1st Innings New Zealand A scored a good score. I don't think South Africa A team can perform well in this match. We will have to see how well South Africa A team can perform in this match. We will have to watch the match till the end of the game. South Africa A team has now come out to bat.
South Africa A team had already come out to bat in the first innings and they finished the second day on 137 runs for the loss of three wickets. Currently Jordan Hermann is at the crease on 45 runs and Jason Smith is on 15 runs and they will come out to bat on the third day. I think South Africa A team can bat well on the third day but this match is most likely to be a draw. For that they need a big partnership. On the other hand, if the bowlers of New Zealand A team can bowl well and dismiss the South African batsmen in the first two sessions of the third day, then New Zealand team will have a great chance to win this match. Still in this match South Africa A team is behind by 470 runs so it can be said that New Zealand will remain unbeaten in this match if there is a big incident and if South Africa A team can bat well, the match will be a draw.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: Reason to return to gambling after quitting
by
Bluedrem
on 08/09/2025, 18:21:11 UTC
I saw a post about someone returning to gambling after quitting for some time, maybe a year or more. But my concern is not more on the return to gambling, rather it is on the very question I am about to ask that requires your opinions if really we want to solve the problem of gambling and addiction into it

What could be the reason for his return and what can be done to manage such situation?
I have seen two types of people in gambling. For example -
1. Those who are financially independent: Such people mainly enter gambling for entertainment. Gradually they become addicted to gambling. Their financial condition gradually gets worse, they understand this but they cannot do it.
2. Those who gamble to change their luck: These are usually not financially independent. They always face financial problems, they cannot earn enough money for them, so they gamble with whatever they earn to change their luck thinking that if they can win a jackpot, then their luck will change. But in reality, very few people can change their luck from here, most of them fail here.
As you said, if someone quits gambling once after being addicted to gambling and returns to gambling after a long time, what could be the reason for this. In this case, from the above analysis, my answer would be that either he has returned to gambling for entertainment or he is currently in a financial strait, so he is looking to enter gambling again to change his luck.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: How many hours do you play in slots?
by
Bluedrem
on 08/09/2025, 16:44:36 UTC
That's true, staking low allows you to have more opportunities to play and eliminates the pressure of huge losses. I have seen people lose huge amounts of money just trying to chase quick wins with huge stakes, it rarely ends well. Point of gambling should be fun and control, not a risk of risking all at once. Winning big is always possible, but key is your patience and knowing when to stop.


When a person starts making small profits by betting on small bets, greed arises in his mind and he thinks that since he is winning, he should bet a big amount and if he wins the bet, he will be able to win a lot of money at once. From this thinking, a person starts from small to big bets and in most cases it is seen that if he loses the money he has bet on, then he faces big problems. To be honest, gambling is a matter where it is very difficult to control himself. If a person can control himself while gambling, then he can actually earn a good amount of money even while gambling.
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Buy the DIP, and HODL!
by
Bluedrem
on 08/09/2025, 15:32:08 UTC
Talking about this your statement here, I don't necessarily think that you must be solid financially before you can start investing in Bitcoin, once you have a discretionary income that will enable you to invest in Bitcoin consistently, you are good to go, along the line you can be working on your finances to make it more stable and reliable, but waiting to build a solid foundation financially first before starting is another way to delay your Bitcoin investment journey.
Quote
If a person does not have a discretionary income, he will never be financially strong. A person is financially prosperous only when he has a discretionary income. Because then he can do anything to gain financial security in the future by using that income. He can become more financially independent by creating an emergency fund with the money from that discretionary income, creating different funds to meet his financial needs in retirement, and investing in different fields, etc.
If I talk about investing in Bitcoin separately, then this too will help him meet his future economic deficit, i.e. to eliminate the financial problems when he does not have an income. If he invests in Bitcoin now, then he will get the maximum advantage in eliminating financial problems later. As you meant, if someone is not financially stable, i.e. if someone does not have an emergency fund along with discretionary income, then he will not be able to prolong his investment. That is absolutely correct. To prolong investment, we need to invest with all the money that we could have managed our life even if we did not have it in our life. That is why investors are advised to invest in Bitcoin using the DCA method using discretionary income, because in this case, the investor is using money that he could have spent his life without.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: T20 and T20I cricket prediction and discussion
by
Bluedrem
on 08/09/2025, 11:55:19 UTC
Yeah, I was also expecting a competitive match between Pakistan and Afghanistan in the final. But the result was completely opposite. Afghanistan batsmen couldn't stand in front of the bowling of Mohammad Nawaz. He has destroyed the batting line-up of Afghanistan alone. The match would have been a little competitive if the batsmen of Afghanistan had shown some responsibility. The target wasn't anything big, but they lost by a big margin.
Afghanistan is not a weak team at all in T20s. Especially their bowling line-up is great. They have the ability to fight with any team around the world in T20s. In that context, when Pakistan was bowled out for 141 runs in yesterday's match, I thought the match would be great. Although Afghanistan's batting line-up is a little weaker than the bowling line-up, the match could have been great since there were not many runs. But Afghanistan's batting failure and Mohammad Nawaz's hat-trick and five wickets put Afghanistan on the backfoot. Yes, the biggest contribution behind Pakistan's victory in yesterday's match was bowler Mohammad Nawaz. Afghanistan went on the backfoot a lot due to the wickets of Darwish Rasooli, Azmatullah Omarzai in the last two balls of the fifth over and Ibrahim Zadran in the first ball of the seventh over. As a result, they were all out for just 66 runs.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: 🏏 2025 ACC ASIA CUP🏏 9 Sep - 28 Sep 🏏
by
Bluedrem
on 08/09/2025, 11:19:10 UTC
Before the start of the Asia Cup match, many cricket analysts are saying that Bangladesh is likely to be eliminated from Group B in the group stage match. Seeing their opinions, I personally analyzed a little. Although Afghanistan is ahead in the ranking and current performance, I think there will be a tough fight between Bangladesh and Sri Lanka to reach the second stage. If we look at the latest matches, we can see that Sri Lanka is currently struggling well in T20. Although they are winning the matches, their performance is not up to par. This can be understood if we look at the recent matches in Zimbabwe.
On the other hand, Bangladesh is currently having a good time in T20. Some emerging young players have joined them who are performing quite well. And recently, Bangladesh's winning rate is also higher than Sri Lanka. In the previous Asia Cup matches in the T20 format, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh have faced each other twice and each team has won once. So I think Bangladesh is more likely to win in the group stage along with Sri Lanka. Let's see what happens.

And OP has to be specially thanked for organizing such an event in view of the Asia Cup. Here, the general audience, apart from the cricket board, will make predictions about which team will win using their own analysis. Which is the best opportunity to showcase their internal cricket analytical talent. I hope OP will create that opportunity for me too.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Everything you wanted to know about Bitcoin Strategic Reserve
by
Bluedrem
on 08/09/2025, 05:13:27 UTC


METAPLANET has just announced the purchase of 136 Bitcoins. They spent $15.2 million to buy these 136 BTC.
Their Bitcoin holdings have now increased to 20136.
_____________________________________________________________________
Source:    Metaplanet Inc Disclosure
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: T20 and T20I cricket prediction and discussion
by
Bluedrem
on 08/09/2025, 04:06:45 UTC
Afghanistan is a strong T20 side and everyone was expecting a good competition in the final but things went just one sided. Afghanistan bowlers did good work to restrict Pakistan to 141 but when Afghanistan came out to bat there batting collapsed due to Muhammad Nawaz bowling. Nawaz got 5 wickets and gave away just 19 runs in his 4 overs. The whole Afghanistan team got out on 66 runs beacuse none of there batsmen was able to stay on pitch and score runs.
The target of 142 runs for Afghanistan in the T20 was not a big collection at all. They bowled fairly well and restricted Pakistan to a reasonable one run. But the Afghan batsmen could not bat well at all. As a result, they were all out for 66 runs in 15.5 overs. Pakistan bowled brilliantly in every over. No one gave more than five runs per over, and Mohammad Nawaz took an important 5 wickets. Also, Sufiyan Muqeem, Abrar Ahmed took two wickets each.
We all expected the final match to be great because Afghanistan is not a small team in T20 and they had enough capacity to fight with Pakistan, but the match did not gather momentum due to the batting failure of the Afghans.
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Buy Buy Buy or Sell Sell Sell?
by
Bluedrem
on 08/09/2025, 03:58:39 UTC
Those who dream of getting more from shitcoin or meme coin in a short time and getting rich very quickly instead of Bitcoin are also destroyed very quickly. Here I actually do not understand one thing, why people dream of investing in shitcoin or meme coin instead of Bitcoin where Bitcoin is now benefiting people more. I believe that there are many people who really want to get rich very quickly like gambling by being overly greedy to increase their capital very quickly, but in fact at the end of the day they lose everything, but still people are not aware. Every person should have their own judgment analysis. When every person can understand and can put away greed and from the day people keep Bitcoin in their long-term plan, people will be able to protect themselves and will be successful in investing.
Yes, they will invest in meme coins and lose their capital, later they will justify that no crypto currency is good. But they will not say that they invested in the wrong place due to which they lost their capital. Most of the time it is seen that all investors compare meme coins with Bitcoin but they do not want to understand that Bitcoin and meme coins are not the same thing. How reasonable is it to compare the coin that is called digital gold and is thought to be a reliable medium of exchange in the future economy with various inconsistent and fraudulent points in the market? In fact, they do not understand this simple thing. They think that I will invest now and in the morning I will wake up and see that the invested money has increased several times. Which is never possible. Because the profit from investing in Bitcoin is not like winning a jackpot that if he goes and wins many money at once. Bitcoin is a long-term investment structure that needs to be maintained and later on, one has to expect profit from it.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: ODI cricket and general cricketing discussion [self - mod]
by
Bluedrem
on 07/09/2025, 17:17:36 UTC
It was unimaginable that South africa would face such a humiliating defeat. South Africa lost by 342 runs. I have  never seen a South African team lose by such a big margin before. And this is probably the biggest  defeat in the history of South Africa. The South African players were able to score only 72 runs. Although  they won the series, the team batted terribly in the last match.
Rashid and Archer's bowling attack left no South african batsman at the crease for long. Archer broke the South African top order and Rashid broke the lower order.
England's victory in today's match is the biggest victory in men's ODI cricket. Today England defeated South Africa by a huge margin of 342 runs.
Due to which India's biggest victory in an ODI match was a victory of 317 runs which broke the record and took the place in today's match. Today, England lost the toss and opted to bat and scored 50 and then 414 runs in the end. In response, South Africa came out to bat in the second innings and scored just 72 runs in 20.5 overs. Along with the England batsmen, bowler Jofra Archer bowled brilliantly and took four wickets. Adil Rashid also took 3 wickets and Brydon Carse took 2 wickets. Corbin Bosch can score a maximum of 20 runs for South Africa. England's victory in today's match is the biggest victory in ODI history.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: ODI cricket and general cricketing discussion [self - mod]
by
Bluedrem
on 07/09/2025, 15:56:00 UTC
Oh boy! Poms are taking South Africa to cleaners, first with the bat and now with the ball.

Proteas' might have some excuses because they did rest few players but dont think it justify this kind of hammering. Poms are literally killing it today.


South Africa have already lost 6 wickets, with Jofra Archer taking six wickets alone. The match is going to be one of the best ODI matches in England. First, there was a great batting, which resulted in a mountain of 414 runs on the scoreboard. The great batting of Jamie Smith, Root, Jacob Bethell, Jos Buttler seemed to have a saddle on them.
When South Africa came to bat in the second innings, they faced a mountain of runs equal to the Himalayas at the beginning, resulting in the fall of the wicket with the second ball of the second innings. And so far, the South African batsmen have not been able to stand in front of Jofra Archer's fireball. Today, it can be said with an oath that South Africa is going to lose the match.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: If you were a sports journalist...
by
Bluedrem
on 07/09/2025, 15:44:25 UTC
The sports industry does not only consist of athletes and managers. There are also the reporters or journalists. They are the ones who go to watch live sports and report trackside or from the studio. They follow the season and the athletes. They are the ones who build a narrative and share it to the public. It got me thinking whether they do sports betting or not and uses whatever inside information they have. Or do they spread something just to bet something different? If you were a sports journalist, would you enjoy betting on the sports you report on?
Sports have become so popular among people because of journalists. Not all people have the opportunity to watch the games while they are on the field or busy people cannot always keep track of the live games, but later when they have time, they get various types of news about sports by just glancing at the television news or the newspaper pages. In this way, journalists play a leading role in popularizing sports. Without journalists, sports might have been confined to a certain limit, a handful of people would have been aware of sports, most people would not have known anything about it, as a result, there would not have been so much popularity or excitement among people about sports. Therefore, journalists are closely associated with the popularity of sports and sports.
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Buy Buy Buy or Sell Sell Sell?
by
Bluedrem
on 07/09/2025, 11:30:56 UTC
This thread is not about shitcoins or to ponder over which shitcoin might be less shitty.  You should try to stay on topic.  Bitcoin and shitcoins are different things, even though many shitcoins try to present themselves as being similar to bitcoin or better than bitcoin in some kind of way in order to get people to buy those inferior products.
Where is Bitcoin and where is Sheetcoin 😃
Bitcoin is like the Tulsi plant (Ocimum sanctum) which, if taken care of, will be of great use to us in the future. Just as the Tulsi plant is useful to us for future protection, Bitcoin is useful for our financial security. That is, Bitcoin keeps our assets safe.
On the other hand, Sheetcoin is like the Castor Bean (Ricinus communis) which can harm us at any time if we have it. That is, no matter how much money we deposit in Sheetcoin, it is at the highest risk. Speaking from real experience, I initially invested several times in some Sheetcoins due to the temptation of abnormal price increases, but they could not give me anything but disappointment. Just as gambling puts our money at risk, I feel that Sheetcoin puts our money at risk no less than that.
Bitcoin is thousands of times better than other cryptocurrencies. While Bitcoin is currently considered to be much better than gold, comparing Bitcoin to other coins is also foolish. There are still many people who do not understand this simple fact.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: MicroStrategy Buys $250M in Bitcoin, Calling the Crypto ‘Superior to Cash’
by
Bluedrem
on 07/09/2025, 07:43:22 UTC
Poor performances?

It may be a poor return for what was expected, but a security that was launched on July 29 for $90, which in just over a month, with little volatility as it is August, is trading at almost $98, I would not call a poor return. That return within the markets it is trying to compete with, such as coupon-paying bonds or stable companies that pay dividends, is huge, massive.

What I think Saylor wants to do is accelerate the arrival of the price at $100 because from there on, everything that goes up will be sold in STRC ATMs to replace MSTR ATMs.

Exactly.
I mean poor performance is the fact that it didn’t reach 100, as this would be considered a “neutral” level that wouldn’t impact on the life cycle of the stock.
This quarter the performance wasn’t good, so Strategy raised their Dividend Yield target, that’s it.
Today is September 7, 2025. Looking at the picture below, we can see that Micro Studies raised $19.2 billion in funds in the first 8 months of 2025. Where $11.5B is Common Equity
and $7.8B is Fixed Income, i.e. a total of $19.2B.

Where the bulk of the Fixed Income $7.8B, i.e. $2.52B, came from STRC. And when STRC launched in the market, its price was $90 but it is currently trading at $98. That is, the price has increased by about 9% in a month, which is not negligible at all. Yes, we might have expected better performance from STRC, as you said, $100, but it has not yet touched this price. For which we might call it bad performance. But in reality, it is not bad performance at all. I think Michael Saylor is working on this and he probably wants it to hit $100 because as Free Market Capitalist said, if it goes above $100, STRC can be sold off and used in place of MSTR ATMs, STRC ATMs. I think that will allow the company to raise funds to buy more.


Picture Source:    Strategy Twitter post
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Buy the DIP, and HODL!
by
Bluedrem
on 07/09/2025, 07:00:30 UTC
the amount of discretionary income you decide to use to invest depends on how aggressively you want to buy bitcoin and after investing you can always put what's left from your discretionary income into your emergency funds, this is because an emergency fund isn't a part of your daily, weekly or monthly necessity
It is completely wrong for a person to keep the remaining money in an emergency fund after investing. Because an emergency fund is a necessary fund that should be considered as the last part of a person's basic needs, it is necessary to keep money in an emergency fund before investing from the discretionary income that a person generates after fulfilling his basic needs. Otherwise, if a person goes directly to investing, then there is a risk that his Bitcoin investment will not be long-term because when that investor needs money for an emergency, he may have to sell his Bitcoins to collect the required money. But if your discretionary income is rich enough, then you can invest in Bitcoin after storing money in an emergency fund and later, when a fairly healthy amount of money is accumulated in the emergency fund, you can reduce the supply of money in the emergency fund and start investing aggressively in Bitcoin. For example, if you have just started earning and you do not have an emergency fund and if it is possible to extract your discretionary income from your current income, then if your discretionary income is $ 1000 per month, then you can initially put 20% of your income in the emergency fund. You can invest in other areas including Bitcoin with the remaining money. After a few months of this, when you have a sufficient amount of money in your emergency fund, if you want, you can stop providing money to the emergency fund and later you can invest 100% of your discretionary income in other areas including Bitcoin.
But remember that to make an investment long-term, you need to have a healthy emergency fund, otherwise you may need to sell your invested Bitcoins for an emergency. So just as we need to save for the future (invest in Bitcoin), it is also important to have an emergency fund to make our savings long-term.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: How often do you use Bet Builder?
by
Bluedrem
on 07/09/2025, 01:57:40 UTC
I want to know your opinion and experience with Bet Builder.

Which combinations work best most often?
Do you see any advantages compared to single bet or parlay?

In my opinion, it is best to use Bet Builder in matches between a favorite and an underdog, where it is easier to determine the winner, and where there is a higher likelihood of many goals being scored, or overall dominance by one of the teams.


I usually combine the winner market with the total, and sometimes I add yellow cards or corners. What do you usually choose, and how often do you use Bet Builder?
Bet Builder is most suitable when the win or loss of a match is almost certain. When a match has a favorite team against another weak team, it is almost certain who is going to win. Then Bet Builder is used to put together the logical markets for this match.
Most of the time, the winner and goal markets are not selected in Bet Builder. Cards and corners are added when the style of play of the two teams supports them. Because when a big team matches with an underdog team, there is no guarantee that the players will always get cards and corners. But if the style of play supports them, adding them increases the stamina of the bet.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: T20 and T20I cricket prediction and discussion
by
Bluedrem
on 07/09/2025, 00:43:46 UTC
Zimbabwe has won a T20 match after a long time. Even though the series is levelled, the chances of Zimbabwe winning last match is very low. Sri Lanka still is favourite for last match provided they don't play bad cricket. It was a big surprise to know that Sri Lanka got out in just 18 overs after scoring there second lowest total in T20I. Seven of Sri Lanka batsmen were not able to make it to double figure today and that's why Sri Lanka failed to give a fighting total. If Zimbabwe can keep giving performances like that then surely they will qualify for T20 world cup some day.
The match will be a very memorable match for Zimbabwe. But if you analyze the match, you will see that the Zimbabwean batsmen are also as unsuccessful as the Sri Lankan batsmen in today's match because after batting for just 80 runs, Zimbabwe had to bat for about 15 overs and five of their batsmen got out. Yes, the bowlers bowled brilliantly that applies to both teams. When Sri Lanka came to bat in the first innings, Raza and Brad Evans took three wickets each among the Zimbabwean bowlers. On that day, eight of the Sri Lankan batsmen could not touch the double-digit house in terms of runs, out of which 3 batsmen could score 0 runs and 2 batsmen could only score 1 run. Kamil Mishara could score 20 runs in 20 balls for the team. So it can be said that the Sri Lankan batting lineup was completely unsuccessful on that day.
Although the Zimbabwean bowlers bowled brilliantly today, I would not say that the batsmen batted well because they had to bat for 14.2 overs to chase this small target and they lost 5 wickets. No batsman could bat significantly at the desired strike rate for the team. In the third innings, Dushmantha Chameera took three wickets for Sri Lanka. I would say that the bowlers completely dominated this match. I think if Sri Lanka could have scored a few more runs, they could have won this match.
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Buy the DIP, and HODL!
by
Bluedrem
on 30/08/2025, 17:06:50 UTC
One big mistake a lot of people make is thinking Bitcoin is some get rich quick ticket, when in reality it is the complete opposite. Patience is literally the whole game here. If someone can not stomach holding for years, then they will likely get shakes out during the dips and end up regretting it later. Bitcoin rewards those who think long term, not those who panic or chase short term flips.

I also like that you mentioned the over accumulation point, because that is really how you build real wealth in this space, keep stacking, keep holding, and let time do the heavy lifting.. Ten years might sound like forever, but looking back, people who held even just half that time are already living proof of what patience can do..
You are right. When investing in Bitcoin, you have to invest with a long-term plan. If you have a plan, keep investing and I will sell Bitcoin when I need it. If you have such a mentality, then it would be best for you not to invest in Bitcoin because Bitcoin is an asset that is very volatile in nature. It often reduces its value a lot. When the value decreases, if you need money, if you sell Bitcoin, you have the possibility of losing money. In terms of investment, I will share with you an incident from the early 2000s. When my younger brother was born, my father separated some money from his income and started saving it in the bank every month. I asked them what was the reason for doing so? Their answer was that when your sister grows up, she will need this money. Later, when my sister was 26, my father set up a business with that saved money. Then I was able to explain that my father had also saved the capital of the business I am currently doing in this way.
That was the generation before the Bitcoin generation. Now fathers can plan for the future of their children and save in Bitcoin. This will be very effective because saving for your child is a long-term plan and if you want to invest in Bitcoin, you also have to invest through a long-term plan.
So if a father has a fundamental consideration, then he can invest in Bitcoin to build his child's future.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: Is Bitcoin Gambling a big opportunity or a big trap?
by
Bluedrem
on 30/08/2025, 15:24:06 UTC
Recently I've been noticing how bitcoin gambling sites are becoming increasingly popular among young people as these days you don't have to walk into a betting shop again or visit any casino games centres before you can gamble, now you can just get everything served to you on your smartphone while you're sitting at home and since the introduction of crytocurrency including bitcoin into gambling, it has even gone further to make gambling faster, easier sweeter and more enjoyable to many young people.

Now with these crypto based gambling sites you have easy access to playing gambling games and bets, borderless transactions through wallets and also get instant payouts as well as you don't have to pass through many traditional verifications or ID checks.

But as good as these new developments may sound, we have already started witnessing its side effects around increasing financial loss among the young ones since the process has been made easier than ever, growimg number of young gamblers becoming more attached and more addicted to gambling as they could do everything at home and more importantly making it more difficult for proper regulations among government institutions.

The big question for me now is, do we consider bitcoin gambling sites a big opportunity for the people or a big trap that will leave many young people addicted and financially broke?
Bitcoin has nothing to do with gambling. You may have meant that Bitcoin can currently be used to play casino games on various casino sites. Yes, it is true that you can play casino games with Bitcoin. But if you look, you will see that apart from Bitcoin, there are other digital currencies as well as fiat currency transactions for playing casino games. I do not think Bitcoin is responsible for the expansion of casinos. When a gambler has Bitcoin, he may be gambling with that Bitcoin. On the other hand, those who do not have Bitcoin may be gambling with other currencies. Yes, we can say that after the modernization of technology, people no longer have to go to casino centers, they can play casino games from home, this may be a reason for the expansion of gambling.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: T20 and T20I cricket prediction and discussion
by
Bluedrem
on 30/08/2025, 15:17:00 UTC
This match  is not very interesting. Because the Netherlands batsmen have scored only 138 runs in 20 overs, which reduces the strength and effort of the match. Bangladesh hard work and effort can be victorious for them because the Netherlands batsmen have played weakly and they will lose this match easily. For the Bangladesh batsmen, this is an easy victory, which their batsmen have to achieve by playing well and not being careless, due to which Bangladesh hard work will become strong for them. Bangladesh batsmen have scored 100 runs in 10 overs and they are very close to victory because they need 38 runs to win the match which they will play well and get. The Netherlands bowlers also cannot play well, due to which their chances of victory should increase.
Bangladesh has already won the match. Although Netherlands is a relatively weak team compared to Bangladesh, Netherlands still has a winning record against Bangladesh. I will give more credit to the bowlers than the batsmen for the victory in today's match. Taskin bowled brilliantly and took four wickets for 28 runs in four overs. Due to the excellent bowling of the bowlers, the Netherlands set a low score for Bangladesh, which gave the Bangladesh batsmen an opportunity to bat without pressure. Liton Das was the brightest among the Bangladesh batsmen today, he scored 54 runs in 29 balls in this match. Besides, Saif Hasan scored 36 runs in 19 balls. As a result, Bangladesh team scored 138 runs for the loss of two wickets in 13.3 overs and Bangladesh won by 8 wickets.
Bangladesh took a 1-0 lead in the three-match T20 series. The second T20 match between Bangladesh and Netherlands will be held on September 1.