Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 40 results by ptaylor78
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: 🔥 BC.Game - Casino & Sportsbook | Official sponsor of O'Higgins FC
by
ptaylor78
on 30/08/2025, 23:52:01 UTC
Hey @BC.GAME! Why won't your representative respond to the thread below? I have today red flagged both the BC.Game accounts.  Please resolve this matter that has dragged on for 72 days now.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5556232.0
I am just wondering, have you tried to send a private message to their support account in this forum - BC.Game Support?
The particular account you just tagged may not respond to you as the just seem to only post promotional information, however BC.Game Support tends to help users resolve issues or helps them to get answers.
Thanks for your reply. Do you mind telling me how to tag member accounts? Thanks.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: 🔥 BC.Game - Casino & Sportsbook | Official sponsor of O'Higgins FC
by
ptaylor78
on 30/08/2025, 21:18:04 UTC
🌍 Volunteers Needed!

BCGame is looking for players worldwide to help us test fiat deposits and improve new features. 🎮

All tests come with rewards — if you love gaming and crypto, this is made for you.

🔥 Fill out the sign-up form here: http://go.bcgame.ad/47hcFYG


Why won't your representative respond to this thread? I have today red flagged both the BC.Game accounts.  Please resolve this matter that has dragged on for 72 days now.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5556232.0


Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: BC.Game: The Most Dishonest Business Ever - $1500 Scam & Cover Up!
by
ptaylor78
on 30/08/2025, 19:53:05 UTC
After 72 days with the BC.Game complaint, Casino Guru has closed the case as “unresolved” because BC.Game refuses to cooperate or provide the replies and evidence needed for resolution. I have sent messages to Kubo and to leadership on CG’s Complaints Team, urging them to keep the complaint open while I also pursue avenues through Bitcointalk. Closing the complaint gives BC.Game exactly what they wanted all along: the complaint gets archived and they take only a minor hit to their CG Safety Index.

Case summary from the CG Mediator Kubo:
The player from Mexico filed a complaint against BC.Game Casino for a failure of their Responsible Gambling tools, specifically the daily loss limit, which did not activate as intended, resulting in significant losses of $1,661 USDC. Despite proactively enabling the limit and notifying support, he was allowed to place unrestricted bets, leading him to request a refund of 1,500 USDC for losses exceeding the set limit.

The Complaints Team acknowledged the complexity of the issue due to conflicting evidence from the casino regarding the activation date of the loss limits. However, after extensive communication and despite the player's substantial documentation, the casino's responses became infrequent, and the matter could not progress without their cooperation. Consequently, the complaint was closed as unresolved, with the potential for reopening if the casino decided to engage further.


CG's Message to Me:
Dear ptaylor78,

Unfortunately, we’ve reached a point where keeping your complaint open is no longer productive. Based on our previous experience with handling complaints involving BC.Game Casino, I had hoped we could make progress. However, despite receiving some additional details and evidence from the casino representative, they have not provided responses to my follow-up inquiries, which were essential for moving forward with our investigation.

As communication from the casino has ceased, I’m unable to offer you a suitable resolution without their cooperation.

For now, I must close this complaint as unresolved.

I completely understand this is not a satisfactory outcome. However, please note that unresolved complaints negatively impact the casino’s rating, which may encourage them to adopt a more cooperative approach in the future. Should the casino decide to respond, we will gladly reopen the complaint and you will be notified via email.

I’m truly sorry we could not provide a better resolution in this case.

Best Regards,
Kubo


---

So where does that leave us? For 72 days BC.Game evaded Casino Guru through stalling and dishonesty. They provided no public evidence and simply insisted that loss limits were activated on June 26 rather than June 19, despite substantial evidence to the contrary. Efforts will continue to have the CG complaint reopened, but the matter is now with @holydarkness in hopes of reaching a resolution. @holydarkness has handled the case since August 21 and has contacted BC.Game, but so far no cooperation has been secured and only requests from BC.Game for additional time to review. I remain hopeful we can get answers and reach the truth of the matter.
Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: BC.Game: The Most Dishonest Business Ever - $1500 Scam & Cover Up!
by
ptaylor78
on 30/08/2025, 14:33:48 UTC
@holydarkness thank you for your assistance up until this point.  please let me know what you need from me going forward and I will get it to you asap.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: 🔥 BC.Game - Casino & Sportsbook | Official sponsor of O'Higgins FC
by
ptaylor78
on 29/08/2025, 23:53:39 UTC
Keep an eye on this thread if you're truly interested in seeing how BC.Game treats its players.  You have been warned.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5556232.0
Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: BC.Game: Faulty Loss Limit Tools, Scammed Me Out of $1500, Outrageous Dishonesty
by
ptaylor78
on 29/08/2025, 23:25:41 UTC
The screenshots posted below are chat transcripts that remain in my BC.Game account right now. They show support agents confirming on June 19 that my loss limits were set. Yet BC.Game still insists nothing was set until June 26. Their own transcripts prove otherwise, and the longer they stall and push this June 26 lie, the clearer it becomes that they are refusing to deal honestly with the evidence.  I spent $30 in BTC just to get a Cooper Membership so I could post images. Much of this evidence is already on Casino Guru, but some of it is hidden, and I felt it needed to be visible here as well. What I am sharing is only a small sample of the evidence. There is much more. Also below is the screenshot from June 19 showing my loss limit was set at $60.















Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: BC.Game: Faulty Loss Limit Tools, Scammed Me Out of $1500, Outrageous Dishonesty
by
ptaylor78
on 29/08/2025, 23:14:23 UTC
The screenshots posted below are chat transcripts that remain in my BC.Game account right now. They show support agents confirming on June 19 that my loss limits were set. Yet BC.Game still insists nothing was set until June 26. Their own transcripts prove otherwise, and the longer they stall and push this June 26 lie, the clearer it becomes that they are refusing to deal honestly with the evidence.

Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: BC.Game: Faulty Loss Limit Tools, Scammed Me Out of $1500, Outrageous Dishonesty
by
ptaylor78
on 29/08/2025, 23:12:32 UTC
Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: BC.Game: Faulty Loss Limit Tools, Scammed Me Out of $1500, Outrageous Dishonesty
by
ptaylor78
on 29/08/2025, 23:10:19 UTC
Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: BC.Game: Faulty Loss Limit Tools, Scammed Me Out of $1500, Outrageous Dishonesty
by
ptaylor78
on 29/08/2025, 23:05:09 UTC
The screenshots below are chat transcripts that remain in my BC.Game account right now. They show agents confirming on June 19 that my loss limits were set. Yet BC.Game still insists nothing was set until June 26. Their own transcripts prove otherwise, and the longer they stall and push this June 26 lie, the clearer it becomes that they are refusing to deal honestly with the evidence.












Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: BC.Game: Faulty Loss Limit Tools, Scammed Me Out of $1500, Outrageous Dishonesty
by
ptaylor78
on 29/08/2025, 19:58:51 UTC
This is exactly why I gave them the benefit of doubt by letting them inquire and investigate for as long as they need and nudge every now and then: 1,500 USD worth of case. It is less than their weekly signature budget, I guess [I am not looking into their sig thread to check]. If they're at fault and try to cover it, they'll be more than happy to pay the quite likely low amount [if we may look from their perspective].

Their refusal to settle and choose to inquire to every departments involved indicates [at least for me] that they're seeking transparency instead of burying the case, that they want to know what exactly happened and why and how and when, and perhaps who.

So, maybe it'll in the best interest of every neutral overseers to sit patiently while I periodically nudge my contact until we get their side. One thing that I can assure you is that I am not leaving this case out of my eyes. I nudge my contact on daily basis [and today, it happened few minutes ago] to ask them if they've got their verdict and knows what happened.
It is not my intent to question your motives or sincerity, but I need to ask directly. You have seen the evidence in this case. How do you as a reasonable person reconcile the screenshots and contemporaneous evidence I submitted on June 19, including statements from three of BC.Game’s own support agents confirming my loss limit complaint, with BC.Game’s repeated position by email, on Trustpilot, and on Casino Guru that I did not set any limits until June 26, one week after I filed a complaint?

When you continue to grant BC.Game additional time and ignore their broken promises to provide explanations and verdicts, it appears to me that you are leaning toward their side instead of holding them accountable. You wrote that “if they are at fault and try to cover it, they will be more than happy to pay the quite likely low amount [from their perspective].” But they have not paid. Have you considered that they may not want to admit issues with their responsible gaming tools, for fear of opening the door to additional claims from other players or other regulatory problems?

Letting them "inquire and investigate for as long as they need" is such an odd position to take. As others have pointed out, we live in a technologically advanced world. By saying this you make it seem like BC.Game needs months to investigate some complex, year-long issue involving hundreds of players and multiple departments. That is not the case here. Loss limits were set on June 19. They were not enforced properly because their loss limit tool does not work in real time, even though they advertise that it does. Please stop making it seem like this is rocket science involving twelve departments within BC.Game.

You wrote that “their refusal to settle and choice to inquire to every department involved indicates [at least for me] that they are seeking transparency instead of burying the case, that they want to know what exactly happened and why and how and when, and perhaps who.” How can you say this sincerely when this complaint has stalled for 70 days, when they have lied about the date my loss limits were set, and when they have failed to even respond to you within the timeframes they themselves promised?

I cannot hide my disappointment. What began with you collecting my UID and story and enthusiastically saying you would nudge your contact to get to the bottom of what happened has now turned into encouraging everyone to be patient, give BC.Game as much time as they need, and for you to only “periodically” nudge them. Perhaps @yahoo62278 was not too far off when he joked that this case, which could honestly be resolved in a single day, would not be resolved until December 2027. Correct me if I am off base, but it appears you have shifted from being the neutral agent with contacts promising to expedite this case to becoming the new voice for BC.Game’s continued delays and stalling.

So again I ask, how do you reconcile their June 26 claim with the overwhelming evidence supporting June 19. And if we come to the reasonable conclusion that their June 26 claim is a blatant lie, then BC.Game has forfeited any presumption of honesty or good faith going forward.


Thank you for that colorful post.

If you ask how I "reconcile the screenshots and contemporaneous evidence you submitted on June 19,[...]" and so on, where I may add your above frustration into consideration, I'll answer that with "I prefer not to answer and will wait for BC to provide their piece". Because my honest opinion and action will involve a question that's been bugging me from the first time reading your narrative here and CG in full, that I refrained to ask, until I get a better picture, lest I only mudded the situation that otherwise can be cleared without me inquiring, with BC's narrative come at hand. By this point, with above clear frustation from you and your question of my neutrality, if I voiced that, safe to assume you'll irrevocably think I'm BC's agent. So... let's just wait for their piece, shall we?

About your disappointment, though, kindly enlighten us here what do you have in mind that I should do that you'll perceive as satisfactory, other-and-further than nudging and inquiring to my contact? Ring them? Fly to their HQ and inquire for a meeting? And to what outcome will it bring? They're still waiting for reports from the departments involved. Wouldn't that imply they're also waiting?

When they come with their findings and I find it odd or non-satisfactionary, I will inquire until things get very clear. That is my aim: to find the truest truth from this story.

And yes, you're off base.
By “colorful” perhaps you mean truthful and fact-based. CG has concerns about BC’s claims. I have concerns about BC’s claims. Players here have said that if BC lied about the loss limit date, they cannot be trusted. The only person saying otherwise is you, the one who said they could expedite faster than CG, who now says they  have issues with my complaint but do not want to introduce them. Instead, you prefer that evidence BC submits might make my complaint go away, rather than you presenting your own ideas. Thanks for your help.
holy's heart is in the right place but books take his eye off the ball and he looks at irrelevant information presented by books to cloud the issue. All that matters is whether BC.game ignored the loss limit that was requested.
I hope and would like to think so too, but when someone who promises to help and expedite refuses to concede on matters supported by significant evidence, disregards that BC.Game is stalling even with him just as they have with Casino Guru for 70 days, and then states that he has had issues with my complaint from the beginning but chooses to hold those concerns back in hopes that BC.Game’s information will be enough to defend my claim without raising his concerns, then I have to question impartiality.
Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: BC.Game: Faulty Loss Limit Tools, Scammed Me Out of $1500, Outrageous Dishonesty
by
ptaylor78
on 29/08/2025, 18:48:10 UTC
https://casino.guru/complaints/bc-game-casino-player-s-funds-are-lost-due-to-failed

The proof is above. The story by BC.game doesn't matter unless evidence shows that the OP fabricated the conversation that he had with support showing that a loss limit was in place.

Quote
Dear BC.Game Casino,

Thank you for your response.

However, I find it quite concerning that the player submitted his complaint on our platform as early as June 20, clearly indicating issues with the loss limit, and also provided multiple screenshots confirming that the limit had already been set at that time. Given that these screenshots were submitted directly within the complaint form, it seems highly unlikely they were taken after the fact.

Could you please clarify how it is possible that your internal records show the limit was only set on June 26? Any additional context or technical explanation would be appreciated.



Thank you for your cooperation.
I literally have screenshots taken with my phone of the on screen chat and the actual full text versions that you can download directly from BC.Game. The evidence from June 19 is literally still sitting in my account. The chats are still there. 
Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: BC.Game: Faulty Loss Limit Tools, Scammed Me Out of $1500, Outrageous Dishonesty
by
ptaylor78
on 29/08/2025, 18:33:53 UTC
This is exactly why I gave them the benefit of doubt by letting them inquire and investigate for as long as they need and nudge every now and then: 1,500 USD worth of case. It is less than their weekly signature budget, I guess [I am not looking into their sig thread to check]. If they're at fault and try to cover it, they'll be more than happy to pay the quite likely low amount [if we may look from their perspective].

Their refusal to settle and choose to inquire to every departments involved indicates [at least for me] that they're seeking transparency instead of burying the case, that they want to know what exactly happened and why and how and when, and perhaps who.

So, maybe it'll in the best interest of every neutral overseers to sit patiently while I periodically nudge my contact until we get their side. One thing that I can assure you is that I am not leaving this case out of my eyes. I nudge my contact on daily basis [and today, it happened few minutes ago] to ask them if they've got their verdict and knows what happened.
It is not my intent to question your motives or sincerity, but I need to ask directly. You have seen the evidence in this case. How do you as a reasonable person reconcile the screenshots and contemporaneous evidence I submitted on June 19, including statements from three of BC.Game’s own support agents confirming my loss limit complaint, with BC.Game’s repeated position by email, on Trustpilot, and on Casino Guru that I did not set any limits until June 26, one week after I filed a complaint?

When you continue to grant BC.Game additional time and ignore their broken promises to provide explanations and verdicts, it appears to me that you are leaning toward their side instead of holding them accountable. You wrote that “if they are at fault and try to cover it, they will be more than happy to pay the quite likely low amount [from their perspective].” But they have not paid. Have you considered that they may not want to admit issues with their responsible gaming tools, for fear of opening the door to additional claims from other players or other regulatory problems?

Letting them "inquire and investigate for as long as they need" is such an odd position to take. As others have pointed out, we live in a technologically advanced world. By saying this you make it seem like BC.Game needs months to investigate some complex, year-long issue involving hundreds of players and multiple departments. That is not the case here. Loss limits were set on June 19. They were not enforced properly because their loss limit tool does not work in real time, even though they advertise that it does. Please stop making it seem like this is rocket science involving twelve departments within BC.Game.

You wrote that “their refusal to settle and choice to inquire to every department involved indicates [at least for me] that they are seeking transparency instead of burying the case, that they want to know what exactly happened and why and how and when, and perhaps who.” How can you say this sincerely when this complaint has stalled for 70 days, when they have lied about the date my loss limits were set, and when they have failed to even respond to you within the timeframes they themselves promised?

I cannot hide my disappointment. What began with you collecting my UID and story and enthusiastically saying you would nudge your contact to get to the bottom of what happened has now turned into encouraging everyone to be patient, give BC.Game as much time as they need, and for you to only “periodically” nudge them. Perhaps @yahoo62278 was not too far off when he joked that this case, which could honestly be resolved in a single day, would not be resolved until December 2027. Correct me if I am off base, but it appears you have shifted from being the neutral agent with contacts promising to expedite this case to becoming the new voice for BC.Game’s continued delays and stalling.

So again I ask, how do you reconcile their June 26 claim with the overwhelming evidence supporting June 19. And if we come to the reasonable conclusion that their June 26 claim is a blatant lie, then BC.Game has forfeited any presumption of honesty or good faith going forward.


Thank you for that colorful post.

If you ask how I "reconcile the screenshots and contemporaneous evidence you submitted on June 19,[...]" and so on, where I may add your above frustration into consideration, I'll answer that with "I prefer not to answer and will wait for BC to provide their piece". Because my honest opinion and action will involve a question that's been bugging me from the first time reading your narrative here and CG in full, that I refrained to ask, until I get a better picture, lest I only mudded the situation that otherwise can be cleared without me inquiring, with BC's narrative come at hand. By this point, with above clear frustation from you and your question of my neutrality, if I voiced that, safe to assume you'll irrevocably think I'm BC's agent. So... let's just wait for their piece, shall we?

About your disappointment, though, kindly enlighten us here what do you have in mind that I should do that you'll perceive as satisfactory, other-and-further than nudging and inquiring to my contact? Ring them? Fly to their HQ and inquire for a meeting? And to what outcome will it bring? They're still waiting for reports from the departments involved. Wouldn't that imply they're also waiting?

When they come with their findings and I find it odd or non-satisfactionary, I will inquire until things get very clear. That is my aim: to find the truest truth from this story.

And yes, you're off base.
By “colorful” perhaps you mean truthful and fact-based. CG has concerns about BC’s claims. I have concerns about BC’s claims. The players here have stated that if BC lied about the loss limit date they can’t be trusted. It’s only you the individual who claimed you could expedite the matter faster than CG who is now claiming that you have issues with my complaint that are bugging you that you don’t want to introduce now because you prefer that evidence that BC submit make my complaint go away, instead of ideas you present. Thanks so much for your help here!
Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: BC.Game: Faulty Loss Limit Tools, Scammed Me Out of $1500, Outrageous Dishonesty
by
ptaylor78
on 29/08/2025, 17:15:24 UTC
This matter will now stall into a fourth calendar month as we reach September on Monday. BC.Game has already made a provably false statement about when my loss limits were set, yet continues to drag things out with no accountability. I am at a loss as to what anyone expects them to come back with after more so-called investigations and “second reconsiderations.”

And let’s not lose sight of the amount. This is only $1,500. A company generating millions in revenue every year has chosen to lie, stall, and ignore mediators rather than resolve a dispute over a sum that is nothing to them. I have given them every off-ramp: resolution by email, through Casino Guru, and again via @holydarkness, without requiring them to admit fault. They could have closed this long ago. Instead, they have shown us who they are.

Players should be warned. This is not just one account dispute. BC.Game is lying about something as important as responsible gaming tools. These are tools they promote on their website and are obligated to uphold under their supposed “licensing.” The fact that they would misrepresent or deny the operation of those tools shows how little regard they have for player protection. It is disappointing how this is playing out, but not surprising given their pattern.

My Casino Guru complaint can be found here: https://casino.guru/complaints/bc-game-casino-player-s-funds-are-lost-due-to-failed. Another player from Brazil with the same issue has also been ignored: https://casino.guru/complaints/bc-game-casino-player-s-loss-due-to-system-failure. Both remain unanswered while BC.Game responds to other Casino Guru complaints to keep their “Safety Index” at a misleading B+ (Good).

Meanwhile, outside of curated indexes, the reality is very different. On Trustpilot, BC.Game is rated “Bad” (1.5/5.0) with 61% of reviewers giving them 1 star, the lowest possible rating.

The strategy is clear. Stall until the customer gives up. I will not. I paused my next steps to allow @holydarkness time to contact his sources, but after another week of empty promises from BC.Game and a 30th straight day of ignoring the Casino Guru mediator’s third request, the picture is obvious. I recognize that @holydarkness has to remain unquestionably neutral to maintain his contacts with BC.Game, but neutrality must have limits when a company repeatedly shows bad faith.

Other players need to see BC.Game for what it is. If they can lie about responsible gaming and drag their feet over $1,500, they can lie about anything. Proceed with extreme caution.

This is exactly why I gave them the benefit of doubt by letting them inquire and investigate for as long as they need and nudge every now and then: 1,500 USD worth of case. It is less than their weekly signature budget, I guess [I am not looking into their sig thread to check]. If they're at fault and try to cover it, they'll be more than happy to pay the quite likely low amount [if we may look from their perspective].

Their refusal to settle and choose to inquire to every departments involved indicates [at least for me] that they're seeking transparency instead of burying the case, that they want to know what exactly happened and why and how and when, and perhaps who.

So, maybe it'll in the best interest of every neutral overseers to sit patiently while I periodically nudge my contact until we get their side. One thing that I can assure you is that I am not leaving this case out of my eyes. I nudge my contact on daily basis [and today, it happened few minutes ago] to ask them if they've got their verdict and knows what happened.
It is not my intent to question your motives or sincerity, but I need to ask directly. You have seen the evidence in this case. How do you as a reasonable person reconcile the screenshots and contemporaneous evidence I submitted on June 19, including statements from three of BC.Game’s own support agents confirming my loss limit complaint, with BC.Game’s repeated position by email, on Trustpilot, and on Casino Guru that I did not set any limits until June 26, one week after I filed a complaint?

When you continue to grant BC.Game additional time and ignore their broken promises to provide explanations and verdicts, it appears to me that you are leaning toward their side instead of holding them accountable. You wrote that “if they are at fault and try to cover it, they will be more than happy to pay the quite likely low amount [from their perspective].” But they have not paid.

So again I ask, how do you reconcile their June 26 claim with the overwhelming evidence supporting June 19. And if we come to the reasonable conclusion that their June 26 claim is a blatant lie, then BC.Game has forfeited any presumption of honesty or good faith going forward.
Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: BC.Game: Faulty Loss Limit Tools, Scammed Me Out of $1500, Outrageous Dishonesty
by
ptaylor78
on 29/08/2025, 16:39:45 UTC
I read the conversation and looked at the images at CG. Because BC.game lied about when they set the limit, it really doesn't matter what they say at this point. It can't be believed.
This matter has now stalled into a fourth month as we reach September on Monday. BC.Game has already made a provably false statement about when my loss limits were set, yet continues to drag things out with no accountability. I am at a loss as to what anyone expects them to come back with after more so-called investigations and “second reconsiderations.”

And let’s not lose sight of the amount. This is only $1,500. A company generating millions in revenue every year has chosen to lie, stall, and ignore mediators rather than resolve a dispute over a sum that is nothing to them. I have given them every off-ramp: resolution by email, through Casino Guru, and again via @holydarkness, without requiring them to admit fault. They could have closed this long ago. Instead, they have shown us who they are.

Players should be warned. This is not just one account dispute. BC.Game is lying about something as important as responsible gaming tools. These are tools they promote on their website and are obligated to uphold under their supposed “licensing.” The fact that they would misrepresent or deny the operation of those tools shows how little regard they have for player protection. It is disappointing how this is playing out, but not surprising given their pattern.
My Casino Guru complaint can be found here: BC.Game Casino player’s funds are lost due to failed loss limit. Another player from Brazil with the same issue has also been ignored: BC.Game Casino player’s loss due to system failure. Both remain unanswered while BC.Game responds to other Casino Guru complaints to keep their “Safety Index” at a misleading B+ (Good).

Meanwhile, outside of curated indexes, the reality is very different. On Trustpilot, BC.Game is rated “Bad” (1.5/5.0) with 61% of reviewers giving them 1 star, the lowest possible rating.
The strategy is clear. Stall until the customer gives up. I will not. I paused my next steps to allow @holydarkness time to contact his sources, but after another week of empty promises from BC.Game and a 30th straight day of ignoring the Casino Guru mediator’s third request, the picture is obvious.

Other players need to see BC.Game for what it is. If they can lie about responsible gaming and drag their feet over $1,500, they can lie about anything. Proceed with extreme caution.
Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: BC.Game: Faulty Loss Limit Tools, Scammed Me Out of $1500, Outrageous Dishonesty
by
ptaylor78
on 28/08/2025, 22:09:02 UTC
I read the conversation and looked at the images at CG. Because BC.game lied about when they set the limit, it really doesn't matter what they say at this point. It can't be believed.

New CG quote
Quote
Dear ptaylor78,

Please accept my sincere apologies for the recent lack of response on my end. I would like to provide you with an update regarding your case.

I have received additional evidence from the casino, specifically system records indicating that your limits were not set correctly on the date you mentioned. However, this conflicts with the fact that you submitted your complaint on the same or the following day (depending on the timezone) when the issue occurred. It also contradicts the evidence you provided, including screenshots and your correspondence with the casino’s customer support.

Because of these contradictions, the matter is more complex than it initially appeared and requires further assessment. I have already raised these discrepancies with the casino representative and asked for clarification, particularly regarding how a customer support agent could confirm that your loss limit was set when it was not recorded in the system.


Unfortunately, the casino’s response pace remains slow, and while I am actively pressing for answers, I cannot directly influence their speed. Please rest assured that I will continue to pursue this until we receive a clear and satisfactory explanation.
You can see the subtle shift in BC.Game’s position as they try to make their dishonesty easier to defend. Over 70 days their stance has gone from “no loss limits were set on June 19, only on June 26” to “system records indicate your limits were not set correctly on June 19.”

Also note that a player from Brazil submitted a complaint on July 21 with the same loss limit issue. BC.Game has ignored that case as well, despite multiple requests from the same CG mediator handling mine. Here is the link: https://casino.guru/complaints/bc-game-casino-player-s-loss-due-to-system-failure

@holydarkness has a track record of achieving results with BC.Game, which is why I was optimistic when the case was handed to him on August 21. Yet one week later the only feedback is “we need more time to review” or “we need more time for second considerations.” This has dragged on for more than 70 days. I even used BC.Game’s new “CEO Letterbox,” advertised as a direct channel to leadership, and received no response there either.
Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: BC.Game: Faulty Loss Limit Tools, Scammed Me Out of $1500, Outrageous Dishonesty
by
ptaylor78
on 28/08/2025, 17:25:13 UTC

 Is it not concerning

What I find concerning is the amount if time it takes to get replies. You posted this accusation August 21st and holydarkness starting getting in contact on the same day. We are now a week into this accusation and really not much further than we were a week ago. Someone asks a question, then we gotta wait for someone to get online and answer, and then again another question comes, and more wait time. It's comical honestly in this day and age. Almost like messenger services and telephones and faster communication of any sort never got invented. This case will be solved by December 2027 at this rate.

Obviously I know we will have answers faster possibly, but it does irritate me the amount of time it takes. @holydarkness no offense to you as you're doing a service to the community by using your time free of charge to help out, BC doesn't ever seem to be in a rush. I also realize that if you push too hard for answers, they may cease contact at all.

Need to find a faster way to communicate. Get the 2 parties online in the same message service and get to the bottom of things in a day vs 2 weeks.
I agree with you 100%. BC stalling is worrisome. This should have been a one day case. The OP has proof on June 19 that his loss limit was set. If BC has nothing to contradict the contact between the OP and CS, then the OP is right.
That’s the reality of online casinos if you don’t choose carefully. A casino can look at five pieces of evidence, including what its own employees said on June 19, and still deny it. Instead, they claim it happened on June 26 and refuse to refund or accept accountability. Their proof is “system records,” which they won’t provide to the player or post publicly.
Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: BC.Game: Faulty Loss Limit Tools, Scammed Me Out of $1500, Outrageous Dishonesty
by
ptaylor78
on 28/08/2025, 16:21:21 UTC

 Is it not concerning

What I find concerning is the amount if time it takes to get replies. You posted this accusation August 21st and holydarkness starting getting in contact on the same day. We are now a week into this accusation and really not much further than we were a week ago. Someone asks a question, then we gotta wait for someone to get online and answer, and then again another question comes, and more wait time. It's comical honestly in this day and age. Almost like messenger services and telephones and faster communication of any sort never got invented. This case will be solved by December 2027 at this rate.

Obviously I know we will have answers faster possibly, but it does irritate me the amount of time it takes. @holydarkness no offense to you as you're doing a service to the community by using your time free of charge to help out, BC doesn't ever seem to be in a rush. I also realize that if you push too hard for answers, they may cease contact at all.

Need to find a faster way to communicate. Get the 2 parties online in the same message service and get to the bottom of things in a day vs 2 weeks.
You make some really good points.  The bottom line is that BC.Game is not an honest and trustworthy business and we are just hoping that @holydarkness can use his contacts and influence to achieve a positive result in this instance.

June 19, 2025
BC.Game Support Agent Eone via chat - "I see that there was an escalation regarding your gambling limit that you have set."

July 30, 2025
BC.Game Casino Representative via Casino Guru complaint - "According to the user's account history, the user set up 2FA on June 19th, but the loss limits were set on June 26th. The user didn't have the balance they claimed on the day the loss limit was set. We have sent the proofs regarding this to Kubo as well."

In 2025 with all the technology available, the fact that it takes over 70 days with a Casino Guru complaint and then over a week with @holydarkness reaching out directly to higher ups within BC.Game, makes it's obvious what is happening.  However, hope is being held out that the proper result will be achieved in this instance.



Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: BC.Game: Faulty Loss Limit Tools, Scammed Me Out of $1500, Outrageous Dishonesty
by
ptaylor78
on 28/08/2025, 06:01:21 UTC
Well, I don't want to sell myself high, but the second reconsideration might an attempt from my contact to overrule a decision made by risk division, or perhaps to simply ask the case to retried and re-discussed after the team handling your matter gave their verdict and ready with their explanation.

Or perhaps simply they mean they need to double check all the facts.
I trust you have reviewed what I have posted here and the evidence already on CG. My account is not just a version of events, it is indisputable and supported by contemporaneous evidence submitted the day of the incident. BC.Game, in contrast, has produced “system records” that appeared only two months after my complaint was filed. Their own chat transcripts from June 19 directly contradict those records, yet they continue to put forward narratives that are provably false.

This is not a close call or a matter of interpretation. BC.Game promised players loss limit tools that take effect immediately. On June 19, those tools failed. I have used the identical interface on Shuffle Casino where the limits work in real time as advertised. BC.Game’s did not. After weeks of silence, they shifted their story to claim no limits were set until June 26, a position neither I nor Casino Guru accepted given the obvious evidence to the contrary

That is why I am concerned. A transparent, honest casino would not need repeated reconsiderations of a straightforward refund request. Yet 70 days later, BC.Game continues to stall while ignoring this complaint and freely responding to others on CG. This is not how a trustworthy casino conducts itself.

I understand you have helped many players with BC.Game issues, but so far I have only heard theories about what might be happening on their side rather than what they have actually said, what evidence they have to support their position, and their explanation for why their position is contradicted by a large amount of evidence.
Yes, I have reviewed your case on CG and understand the narrative told from your side. But the puzzle will still be incomplete without narrative from BC's, of which become more crucial as we need the truest version that my contact can hopefully dig by inquiring inter-department and crosschecking everything, something that perhaps BC's live support can't provide, and thus give a wrong sets of puzzle that made us unable to get a complete picture.

Though I can understand your frustration from being hung with uncertainty, I hope you can have a bit more patience while my contact tried to get us the story from their side, this time with the correct side of puzzle from their side, so we can combine that with yours and we can see the real picture.

This situation underscores the importance of choosing online casinos with care. You have reviewed and acknowledged my narrative, which is supported by extensive evidence. You are right that we also need BC.Game’s version to complete the puzzle. They have already given theirs: a claim that I did not set loss limits on June 19, only on June 26.

I sense even you doubt that claim. Your reference to your contact seeking the “truest version” of events and the need for second reconsiderations suggests as much. Is it not concerning that BC.Game’s position is widely seen as untrue or, at best, a misunderstanding not supported by their own records?

Is it unreasonable to expect that when issues arise, casinos provide the honest and accurate version of events from all levels of the company rather than forcing players through disputes lasting more than two months? I will be patient, as you have asked, but this ordeal highlights why honesty and good faith should be non-negotiable when selecting an online casino. Or should some level of dishonesty and “shadiness” be expected from all online casinos, with the only real difference being that some are much less so than others?
Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: BC.Game: Faulty Loss Limit Tools, Scammed Me Out of $1500, Outrageous Dishonesty
by
ptaylor78
on 27/08/2025, 17:56:05 UTC
Oh, sorry if I made a wrong impression that they didn't respond to me up to this second. As per my previous post, I am already in touch with them and we're alredy talking about your case. I should've got a verdict for yours by two days ago, by Monday, however, as per my last nudge yesterday, they asked me more time for second reconsideration.
I don’t wish to micromanage how you handle the process, but from my side this has already been 70 days of stalling and contradictory statements from BC.Game, so transparency is key. If they’ve now asked you for additional time on a “second reconsideration,” I would love to understand what exactly they are reconsidering and why.

Well, I don't want to sell myself high, but the second reconsideration might an attempt from my contact to overrule a decision made by risk division, or perhaps to simply ask the case to retried and re-discussed after the team handling your matter gave their verdict and ready with their explanation.

Or perhaps simply they mean they need to double check all the facts.
I trust you have reviewed what I have posted here and the evidence already on CG. My account is not just a version of events, it is indisputable and supported by contemporaneous evidence submitted the day of the incident. BC.Game, in contrast, has produced “system records” that appeared only two months after my complaint was filed. Their own chat transcripts from June 19 directly contradict those records, yet they continue to put forward narratives that are provably false.

This is not a close call or a matter of interpretation. BC.Game promised players loss limit tools that take effect immediately. On June 19, those tools failed. I have used the identical interface on Shuffle Casino where the limits work in real time as advertised. BC.Game’s did not. After weeks of silence, they shifted their story to claim no limits were set until June 26, a position neither I nor Casino Guru accepted given the obvious evidence to the contrary.

That is why I am concerned. A transparent, honest casino would not need repeated reconsiderations of a straightforward refund request. Yet 70 days later, BC.Game continues to stall while ignoring this complaint and freely responding to others on CG. This is not how a trustworthy casino conducts itself.