Wrong. Fully custodial and centralized instant exchange. If you want, you can add no-account in that explanation.

Are you using AI for your posts or what/who writes these? CCECash and intermediaries have absolute custody and control of the funds. Users have zero control of the funds during the swap process.

CCECash, like all instant swap platforms, is completely centralized.

This exchange is centralized and can ask users to undergo KYC if they want to. Read their terms, it's all explained there. It's not based on my judgement. The terms explain how the KYC process works if it comes to that.

My statements are true. I don't need to use the exchange for my statements to be true. I will only use a centralized exchange that I believe I can trust. At this point, CCECash doesn't meet these conditions. 

If you calmed down and started thinking logically, it would be easier for you to understand what I am talking about. How do you think that easybit took your funds and have been holding them for 7 months? What made that possible? Custody made it possible. When you deposited money into easybit, they gained custody and absolute control of your money. If that wasn't the case, you could have made a transaction any day and moved your coins away from the exchange. But you can't do that, can you? What prevents you from doing it? The answer is again custody. More precisely, the lack of it. You don't hold the keys that would allow you to control your money. easybit does. You are now at their mercy and have to fulfill their requests if you want your money back. Are you starting to understand now?

That's why the custodial vs non-custodial argument is important. You can't claim to be non-custodial if you aren't and expect that people won't correct you. It gives the readers a false sense of security and control.
Any centralized exchange, be it easybit, FixedFloat, Binance, eXch or CCECash, can at any moment freeze your money. Whether or not they will do that is a different question. But they have the means to do it. If that wasn't the case, you wouldn't be waiting for 7 months for easybit to release your money, would you?

It is a no account exchange and that's fine. That's the standard way that instant exchanges operate. What I don't think is fine is claiming to be non-custodial and decentralized. CCE.Cash still claims that and it's written in their correspondence here with the community.

Can we stop beating around the bush please and call things the way they are. You went from claiming you are non custodial to calling yourself semi-custodial, and a temporary user-funds-holder. You are custodial. That's it. You and your intermediaries have custody of the coins until they get deposited into user wallets. The users don't have control of their money until the exchange is over. That's how a custodial service operates. It's based on trust. Trust that the custodian will do the right thing and exchange the funds and give up custody of them. 

I see no problem in an exchange being custodial as long as they are honest about it. You haven't been honest. You are neither decentralized nor non custodial and the question is how long are you going to claim that you are? You are new on the forum. Be honest with your potential customers to be able to build trust. Personally, I would never try a service that isn't telling me the truth. Everyone else can make up their own minds.

Additionally, if you were non custodial, you and your intermediaries wouldn't be able to freeze coins and request KYC. Your users could simply import their keys into a real non custodial wallet and forget about you and the KYC requirements. But they can't do that because they don't have custody of the coins. You have. 

CCE.Cash is not a no-KYC exchange. Please check my older posts in this thread and go through their T&Cs carefully. You could get your funds frozen and the exchange may ask you to undergo identity verification. You have the right to say no and demand your money to be returned to you. Depending on the case, they may or may not do that until you submit the documents they asked for. Only them and the third party they use will determine how "dirty" your crypto is and if you will get a refund or if the coins will be in their custody until you comply. That's not KYC-free, it's not non-custodial and it's not decentralized.

@CCE.Cash

It's just a hypothesis and a 'what if' question. The address I shared in my previous post is an actual address that the exchange generated for me where I should deposit my bitcoin if I wanted to do a swap. I am asking OP where would I get the keys to that address.

eXch has nothing to do with CCE.Cash or this discussion. I know why I am asking the questions I am asking. eXch didn't claim it was a non-custodial and decentralized exchange. CCE.Cash says it is. I am asking OP to explain how it works. If it's non-custodial, I am asking where the keys are to the deposit addresses. If it's decentralized, I am asking how to perform swaps when the website is offline and how to connect P2P to other market participants. According to OP, transactions are conducted directly between two parties. Meaning, I (the buyer) am connected directly to the seller. I want the OP to explain how that connection works if the CCE.Cash service is down? 

Don’t you think it’s ridiculous to give the private key of the deposit address? Has EXCH done this?
I am just a spectator, and I have also been defrauded by platforms that require KYC. I have posted about it in scam posts, you can go and have a look. I have no reason to help anyone or not, I just think your attack and difficulty are a bit bullshit, purely commenting and adding experience everywhere

Either you're part of the service team or you just want to spread nonsense. Although your writing style is very similar to OP's, I'll assume good intentions and invite you to re-read OP's comments, as he is an official representative of the platform and confirms that the service is decentralized and doesn't require KYC. I don't know how you compared it to Exch, but be assured that Exch didn't gain credibility overnight and don't attack community members who express their thoughts and honest opinions about the service. I also think it's better to help OP provide answers to community questions if you're convinced about the service rather than attacking those with ideas you don't like.

Excuse me, did this actually happen to you, or is it just a hypothesis?
If this actually happened, it's a serious matter, and the service must prevent such incidents from occurring, as this would quickly damage the site's reputation. If this is an example, I believe OP should clarify, since he claims the service is decentralized and the user has the access to obtain the secret key to the deposit address.

Unfortunately, OP continues to insist on not disclosing the domain name they've been using since 2018 and has refused to even provide a valid reason for doing so. At the very least, he should have refrained from claiming the service has been active since 2018 if he wanted to keep some details private.

Tell us this please. Let's say I want to exchange bitcoin for ether. I fill out the form on your website and I am given bc1qd28307q3p52zzcnu8lx7eg0lwkzwntq9flmcwh as the deposit address for my bitcoin. Can you tell me how do I find the private key or seed of this address if I need it?
Another question: Your exchange goes offline after I send you my bitcoin but before I receive my ether. How do I continue with the swap process with the website being offline to get my ether?

I encountered some problems. Yesterday, I exchanged bitcoin for eth through exch and sent it to my own uniswapAPP wallet. Then I exchanged eth and sent it to my own bitget exchange. But my account was frozen today and I can’t withdraw USDT. What should I do?

They claim that they recently emailed you with a request of specific information or documents needed from you. Did you send them the specified information?
Do you mind sharing the email they sent you here? Or perhaps a screenshot of it while blurring off any sensitive data?

This is important so we (forum members) know who is in the wrong and who is not.

Sorry for your loss. I hope you can get your money back. By reading the Terms of Use^[1], the only cases where they can keep your coins are cases of non-cooperation or suspicion that the coins are linked to illegal activities (funny, they say they're illegal yet plan to keep them).

Contact @Best_Change https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1073450 with these details, and perhaps they'll support your argument.

If you don't receive anything, I'll add negative trust.

[1]

This was their reply


What other addditional documentation do they need from you if you don't mind sharing?

I keep wondering why services won't just send back the funds if the user does not want to do KYC? it's like taking money to the supermarket but then when they are not sure where you got the money from, they keep the money to themselves until you give them youd ID and other documents.

There is a difference between what you think and what reality shows. We all, receiving Bitcoin one way or another from different sides, think that it is "hewn" from one clean piece. But today's reality is that the facts work against us. If you check on AML yourself and get clean results and low risk, then in this case it makes sense to prove something. While the cards are on their side, they certainly behave very impudently, since they are obliged to return what, in their opinion, does not pass the check and does not suit them. However, having checked the reviews of this exchanger, you are not the only one in their arbitrariness. Try contacting BestChange on this forum.

I believe this is one of their previous domains: usdtccecash.com. But that domain is also just under five months old, so I don't know exactly what they're referring to when they mention adapting to market changes and seemingly implying a longer history than that. If that's one of the "other links" they used before, it doesn't really give us much of a history to check.

That is so absurd. They need to improve on their way of handling issues. I don't think I would have been that patient like you were. In a meantime, please also respond to that very thread on Bestchange stating how you have never been helped since then. They promised a few days, but it's now about 4 months. BestChange should be able to pressurize them to act on your case

This is also their Inactive thread in this forum - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5468585.0
The opener of that thread might get tagged by me soon.

Are you trying to say after this reply by the Easybit admin back then in January, nothing has even been done to get back your money?


Also, it has got me wondering why it took you so long to create a scam accusation? I can also see that on that report in bestchange, you did not reply again after the promise they made all that time.